>implying you need more than daylight wb>implying you need more than 24mp>implying you need more than fine jpg>implying you need more than light dro and a picture profile>implying you need more than a kit zoom with default corrections enabled
>>4539186Looks too yellow
>>4539186Is this fujiworms
>>4539186Does it look all pixelated to you too?
>>4539187for you>>4539188no thats grass, touch some>>4539189>Error: Maximum file size allowed is 5 MB
>>4539190>sooc thread with pic not soocNice
>>4539186Your picture looks like an ugly color film mixed with a midrange digital camera. There's something off about the colors. It's in a sort of uncanny valley for film sim digital.Not really a look that I love and the picture leaves something to be desired.
>>4539186I am indifferent to your picture. Your thesis, though, has some merit, especially for the amateurs that comprise the majority of users here. We are not professionals who must deliver images with certain outcomes to clients in exchange for an agreed fee: we are amateurs. I hope to God in heaven above we see more digishit threads and more activity from people who are just taking photos, the best photos they can, with what they have, for the sake of it. Who are any of us trying to please?
>>4539192Sorry I didn't take on potato.>>4539196These are my best photos.
>>4539186Some real phone shit going on with the right edge treesWhy spend hundreds if not thousands on camera gear just to get mogged by a 5dIII from a good will auction because the user shot raw
is using a polariser cheating?
>>4539204Why would it be cheating?
>>4539203Why would anyone else's camera "mog" me?>>4539210It didn't come in the rabal box?
>>4539204hideous bokeh
>>4539218It's not really a boke lense
>>4539186I shoot black and white probably 80-90% of the time these days, and these days i'm happy with the SOOC jpg probably 8 times out of 10, the other two, it's a light dodge and burn that I would have done in the dark room anyway.
>Implying you need to calibrate your screen
>>4539346More people should be taking the 10 minutes to set their camera up before shooting, rather than the hours to unfuck the results after.How is this for hi iso?
>>4539350You're getting really intense false colors.It isn't about fixing it in post. It's about fine tuning what you got after making a good exposure. There's a fujispammer guy that shoots jpeg soocs and posts them in /rpt/ that took these tree + fog pictures. His in camera setting made the fog look so incredibly terrible. His screen was probably too small to notice just how bad they looked or he simply didn't care. If he shot raw he would have had nice images after a couple minutes of fine tuning, but they are all shit forever.
>>4539350Looks fuckedCant imagine using mommy with a camera facebook-friendly mode after paying hundreds to thousands for a 14 bit 24 million pixel sensor the size of an iphones entire camera hump
>>4539186>ITT: jpg shooters discover RAW + JPG>ITT: RAW shooters discover RAW + JPG
>>4539350I would be pissed if a 10 year old nikon DSLR produced images this bad
>>4539351>that took these tree + fog pictures. His in camera setting made the fog look so incredibly terrible.Don't insult me. The photos I share here might be uninspired photos of nothing but they are always correctly exposed, sharp and well framed. You're just angry because my camera is not fool frame and yet it has great image quality and that doesn't fit your agenda.Have a picture of a twig.
>>4539366the tragedy of the gearfag
>>4539351>If he shot raw he would have had nice images>>4539366I always shoot JPEG + RAW but almost never feel any need to edit my photos. This is what good cameras do. They produce great pictures without extra hassle.
>>4539364>>4539356>>4539352>>4539351Ok, fun's over.Real "sooc"s too follow.>processed with default settings in sony imaging edgeThey're all A7r4 with a canon 40mm stm and old CPL in full retard green box auto, but raw only as I only had a couple of cards.>f/10, 1/160, iso100
>>4539372except this one which was AV mode, light picture profile, -1.2ev comp>f/8, 1/80, iso400
>>4539372No matter what you post and say there will always be an asshole with a cum glazed 5DMKII telling you that your images are shit because xyz. Don't bother.Nice detail but dear lord those colors. I'm so glad I didn't get a Sony camera.
