Your face when you realize women will be easily replaced by a sex robots considering men's standards on sex dolls.
>>535555633>women will be easily replaced by a sex robotsOnce they make robots with a "womb" chamber than can incubate a baby to birth, then yes, they will completely replace women. no more bitching, nagging, griping, hissyfitsno more alimony and rigged court systemsno more cheating or whoring aroundno more STDsetc.
>>535555633Yes, women are fucked. https://youtu.be/OAzncbNovJcFleshlights/tengas/onaholes for now
^^
I was putting foam in a BJJ dummy and had to sort of straddle it from behind and got a chubby lol
I just need one that can clean itself after the deed while I take a nap.
>>535555842https://static1.e6ai.net/data/sample/3d/6e/3d6e0bc92a4537fad6430e62dc07c2df_alt.mp4https://static1.e6ai.net/data/sample/cd/51/cd51dba613239511e048b3ee0bf6d91a_alt.mp4https://static1.e6ai.net/data/sample/b1/d9/b1d9dacc6f074a3056463bb343d1ab0d_alt.mp4https://static1.e6ai.net/data/sample/c9/e8/c9e8e16863f7d47d6ef69e6704270e16_alt.mp4
>>535555747Why is the ultraviolet light blue?
>>535555633That is against our organs.
>>535555633
>>535555932>Why is the ultraviolet light blue?Lamp coatings or specialized glass (like Wood's glass) may fluoresce under UV exposure, emitting visible blue/violet light.
>>535555924
>>535556184Retard
Which is more likely to happen? Sex robots or artificial wombs?
>>535555633Women will try to ban sex robots before that can happen. Which stance will the Jews take on this?
>>535556241Too profitable to ban
>>535556268An army of divorce attorneys disagree.
>>535556330Robots industry > divorce industry
Kinds funny when you think how women have had sex robots since the 1880, lmfao.
>>535555829>Yes, women are fucked. Not after we get the sexbots.
>>535556517=)
>>535556241>Women will try to ban sex robots before that can happen.Yep.
>>535556241>where do jews standWrong question. Jews are matriarchal. The real question is are there enough jewcels to break through.That being said, if a country bans sexbots, men will just move.>>535555747>making a complex and expensive machine more complex and expensive for no reasonWomb doesn't need to be in the bot. Just go to a central ectogenesis facility. And surrogacy already exists.
Need sex robots
>>535556882>Just go to a central ectogenesis facility.Would you trust them to not fuck with the fetus? Seriously? They'd make it gay with parasites. You want the bot under your supervision.
>>535557689The same reason you trust your 110lb terminator sexbot to not kill you in your sleep or fuck with the baby. I have a feeling that has sexbots is going to be a lot less jewish than the current one.