Why is Hitler the only person in history to lose a war and then be held responsible for the events unfolding after said loss?Doesn't losing a war by definition mean agency goes to the winner?
>>535669683Because he was trying to prevent the events that he knew would unfold if he didn't at least try, and he gave everyone copious amounts of warning. History has proven that he was right, and that the Germans were the good guys.
>>535670059>the nazis were actually the good guysGrow up.
>>535670216shalom
>>535669683>Why is Hitler the only pe—Napoloeon>inb4 but nobody cares about nappa anymoreyeah. and naturally nobody will care about hitler either, it is a natural process. it's only the evangelical-israel wing of the anglosphere that keeps trying to slow down this process
>>535669683The argument is basically that the war destabilized Europe and the greater white race. Starting the war and winning would have been the best possible outcome, yes. But the war never having started would have been a better outcome than starting the war and failing.
>>535670277Why are you greeting me in Hebrew? I thought your kind weren't liked around here.
>>535670960What're you talking about? >>535671289Uhhh so why did the "white race" go to war with the "white race"? Makes no sense. Just admit jews controlled America and England before WWII.
