[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


The West should have kept the USSR alive as competition. Western societies were at their peak when they still had to compete. When it collapsed in the 90s, Western elites became extremely complacent and arrogant, sending vital industry to China and letting their populations become weak and impotent. This is also why they push for AI so hard, because they are hoping it will compensate for the destruction and mongrelization of the West. Almost everyone who had the experience of pre-90s society would prefer that kind of world to the one we have now.
>>
>>535680050
nixon created the yellow peril menace in the 70s


the USSR spawned the shit skin menace
without the USSR china/India/africa/LATAM would have starved to extinction
>>
>>535680191
imagine believing this. the industrial complex was left by western colonizers, populations would've exploded regardless of the USSR. If anything the USSR stopped them from "developing" even more by over throwing the colonizers. You're a mindbroken boomer. USSR was based
>>
>>535680050
Rockefeller was planning to cull whites 100years ago, then in the 60s, his birth control pill and china trade became reality

by Y2K a full pivot to china/india/latam etc has been achieved and they opened up the borders in 2001
>>
>>535680050
What even makes you think they competed in an economic sense?
The competition was purely one of genociding commies and financing proxy regimes for no real gain except more dead commies.
The reason the West declined is because nobody gave a shit about running a sustainable business model, and as you may have noticed: even today nobody does.
Why? Because the economy is a larp to begin with.
The only thing this entire affair actually is about is concentrating wealth in the pockets of the elite.
>>
>>535680279
no retard

india/chinks/Africa starved to death? major famines n shieet

ussr fed those monkeys, gave them tech, hospitals to spawn the vermin into the billions

fuck the ussr
>>
>>535680381
I get it, but if China becomes the global hegemon, they will likely spread communist ideals abroad. Will Western elites be allowed to survive in such a scenario? Where will they hide, on their yachts?
>>
>>535680050
I don’t really give a damn.
>>
>>535680461
Rent free commie housing you say?
>>
File: Geg.png (374 KB, 728x702)
374 KB PNG
>>535680050
>if you kill your enemies, they win !
Honestly, Khrushev should have nuked you
>>
File: 1762636006721683.jpg (35 KB, 356x355)
35 KB JPG
USSR fell if u don't accept that commie u will never learn and adapt. Communism died with Lenin in russia, Stalin propt it up for a while but once the elites got their hold they dismantled it and pillaged it for profit
>>
>>535680461
They had to let the average people think they had some sort of stake in the economy. They allowed workers' rights and good wages. They didn't start sending all of the wealth to the top until they knew the USSR was done for.
>>
>>535680510
chinks are the hegemon
US appeases them since Y2K
hence open borders and white genocide

>Will Western elites be allowed to survive in such a scenario? Where will they hide, on their yachts?

the wall street yids thought china is a cool obedient nerd that cant into nazism like ebil yt

but china has been pushing anti-yid stuff for decades and it only became apparent to wall street Yids during the latest shoah, and they know they already lost to China

hence kushner and trump sucking chink microdick
>>
>>535680713
This is a gross misinterpretation of what op is saying. The mouse utopia experiment would be a better one.
Basically, with no competition and with abundance society declines as people become complacent.
>>
File: 1768045595952633.jpg (34 KB, 517x800)
34 KB JPG
>>535680050
>Western elites became extremely complacent and arrogant, sending vital industry to China
But isn't this a good thing?
China needed this industrialisation more than you did, and you still kept a mostly decent life.
>>
>>535680814
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. What are those dumb niggers on wall street thinking? If China installs a puppet government, they will have their organs harvested and dumped in a pig farm.
>>
File: IMG_7643.png (1.4 MB, 1920x1080)
1.4 MB PNG
>>535680713
I just sprayed my welfare neet room with a biocide agent. Is the migger infestation dead yet?
>>
File: xi3.jpg (2.21 MB, 2775x1860)
2.21 MB JPG
>>535680050
China is the current USSR.
>>
>>535680797
https://youtu.be/E7ezaai3E2Y


>>535680279
https://youtu.be/PDT8g7UruMc
>>
>>535680922
It was a good thing if you were a rich asshole. Not good for everyone else. An entire stretch of America is now permanently known as the Rust Belt.
>>
>>535680050
The decline started long before the USSR fell, it started in the 1960s once jewish elites relaxed and became certain the Germans weren't going to rise up a third time.
>>
>>535680797
The collapse of the Soviet Union ruined everything

Hear me out.

Communism was basically the best thing to happen to the (Capitalist) West.

By isolating Eastern Europe, Yugoslavia, China, India and Latin America economically, Communism kept billions of cheap labor and goods out of the West.

Competition between the two systems (Capitalism vs Communism) meant that the elites in capitalist countries had to prove to their population that they’re better off than under Communism. This insured accessible education and housing, stable wage growth, lots of benefits and appeasement for simple workers.

After the Soviet Union was dismantled, neoliberal capitalism was let loose. Capital became global and now countries have to compete for it by lowering wages and labor standards.

Globalism is the direct result of the collapse of Communism. Notice how globalization basically began as soon as the Iron Curtail fell. The elites no longer had to pretend they cared about the will of the population, since the sole competitor to global dominance was defeated.

Communism wasa blessing for those who lived in Capitalist nation during its reign
>>
>>535681142
I agree 100%.
>>
>>535680279
you belong in an oven
>>
>>535681080
>>535680927

plot twist: those yids were agents of USSR

in the end their long term startegy is ending up like Epstein

tldr yiddish high IQ is greatly exaggerated. t
>>
>>535680927
historically, these greatest strategists always end up like Trotsky or Epstein

on a geopolitical level the game is over and they created the Chinese Frankenstein golem who destroyed their little fantasy
>>
>>535680690
Actually they tend to own the unit, but yeah.

>>535680473
It's kinda comical when you consider that, at least technically, in communism workers actually have a stake in it.
Now I wouldn't go so far as to claim this actually worked, but it's still worth a thought.
>>
>>535682617
Whoops I meant to quote
>>535680797
>>
>>535681142

it was even more profitable for us because America would shower you with money and privileged market access if you were bordering with the enemy.
We used to be more relevant before 1989/91 and remember there were two Germany.
We used to have a giant communist party too and strong welfare policies.
>>
>>535680050

on the other hand, the US (and France, UK) system successfully challenged giant threats in the span of 200 years.
I mean, America won against itself during the civil war, IWW, IIWW (National Socialist Germany and imperial Japan), Cold War against USSR and the Warsaw Pact, now it's China.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.