[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1683596548389392.png (413 KB, 671x837)
413 KB PNG
Why could no one produce irrefutable proof that burgers walked on the moon to the russian spess boss?
>>
File: long ahh bird.jpg (740 KB, 1154x1698)
740 KB JPG
>>
>>535690379
love on first sight
>>
File: 1719958460359468.jpg (166 KB, 679x1043)
166 KB JPG
at*
>>
Everyone could, he just didn't want to see any.
>>
File: 1736455756183073.png (265 KB, 667x430)
265 KB PNG
>>535691084
right...
>forensic statement analyst after analysing neil armstong interview
>>
File: 1760908806689972.jpg (717 KB, 1280x848)
717 KB JPG
You can literally see the flag and rover from earth
>>
>>535691713
you can put rovers and flags on every planet, doesn't mean humans were there
>>
File: 1716196198685678.jpg (455 KB, 634x2012)
455 KB JPG
>>535691713
in 2002 ESA tried to use the VLT-I to look at the landing sites

it has an angular resolution capable of distinguishing the headlights of a car parked on the moon

what followed was deafening silence
>>
File: 1731880946809227.png (85 KB, 848x730)
85 KB PNG
>>535691806
>>
What would you accept as irrefutable proof? Because no matter what proofs you are given you would just make up some excuse for not accepting it.

Answer that question.
>>
>>535691855
there is no proof of humans walking on the moon
and there is no proof of humans not walking on the moon

but there is proof that today it is too technologically difficult to repeat the landing of humans on the moon, or as they say:
>unnecessary
>>
it appears the moon landing was technologically possible only during Cold-War secrecy and control over public information.

a repeat of the moon landing in the age of social media and OSINT became technologically impossible and unnecessary
>>
>>535691806
So, what they did see?
Where are photos?
>>
>>535691855
they couldn't produce irrefutable proof in over 50 years

this >>535691806 would have been irrefutable proof that at least something is there and anyone on earth could potentially verify it themselves
>>
>>535692010
deafening silence

the website simply states now that it's not possible to use it to look at the landing sites without giving reasons why
>>
Russia is desperate.
>>
File: howfarMoonis.jpg (942 KB, 4500x1656)
942 KB JPG
>>535692079
The reason is that they were forbidden to look at it.
>>
>>535690276
ussr was going often and went to venus the closest plant to earth, if i was loosing the space race i would start buying talent and ideas until i got something i could hang my hat on.
>>
>>535691898
>>535692047
The whole planet was watching. How is that not proofs? It would be impossible to fake something like that without anyone of the billions watching noticing.
>>
File: 1646964434658.jpg (2.07 MB, 5100x3333)
2.07 MB JPG
>>535692223
soviets sent the first animal into orbit and lied for ~50 years about her cause of death

the only humans who have beaten her altitude since then were the miraculous apollo missions and now artemis

not even polaris dawn went higher than laika
>>
>>535692361
von braun realized we can't go beyond a certain point and chose pslams 19:1 as his epitaph
>>
File: 1718550933509052.jpg (157 KB, 1024x828)
157 KB JPG
>>535692326
are you serious? how is a tv program proof of anything?

soviets fooled NASA with their zond-5 mission
>>
>>535692361
Wait are you saying Artemis is fake?
>>
>>535692512
>tv program
Or being able to follow the whole thing visually, by radar, by radio, you name it. Do you not understand that 99.99% of the population is more intelligent than you and would not be fooled by low quality fakes? Something like the Moon landing is impossible to fake. The observations and observers are endless. Every single one of them would somehow need to be faked. Thousands of people would need to be involved in such a massive operation.
>>
>>535692645
the manned mission, yes
they can send empty vessels and simply relay signals from earth

soviets did it with zond-5 and NASA fell for it
>>
>>535690276
They should do it now, we have 8k cameras so we can zoom on any speck of dust.
>>
>>535691350
here's the analysis
starts at about 4 minutes
https://odysee.com/Analysing-The-Astronauts-Part-1:c
>>
File: het.jpg (172 KB, 683x1010)
172 KB JPG
You guys didn't look at the new UFO disclosure drops, did you?

www.war.gov/UFO

>That Gemini audio recording..
>>
>>535692700
Why haven't you blown the whistle then? You would become a worldwide hero. Somehow you have amassed solid evidence that no one else has, and you did it all without leaving the basement.
>>
>>535692652
>>
File: QuadLaser-cutout.png (18 KB, 300x225)
18 KB PNG
>>535690653
it was the laser
>>
>>535692652
>99.99% of the population is more intelligent than you and would not be fooled by low quality fakes
That's quite an optimistic claim, to say the least
>>
>>535692733
this should be known to anyone who looked into the moon hoax

people still choose to believe the lies
just like 9/11
>>
>>535692645
MM is saying that and after looking closer he is probably not wrong.
>>
So we faked the moon landing once on live television with the world watching

We then went back 5 more times
And just doubled down filming it by hitting golf balls on the moon and driving around in a dune buggy on the fucking moon on live television but the space boss expresses doubts and says there is no proof of it
>>
>>535692740
>first recorded space trolling
>>
File: 1495372147999.jpg (32 KB, 370x375)
32 KB JPG
>>535692904
the golf balls were a wink to freemasons

pic related is a masonic emblem
>two balls and a cane
>two ball cane -> tubal cain, the password of a master mason
>>
File: 1729170971819871.png (1.61 MB, 2026x1101)
1.61 MB PNG
>>535693000
masons also claimed 'masonic territorial jurisdiction' on the moon, which is illegal due to the outer space treaty of 1967

tha lack of legal action shows that it was merely symbolic and they never went there
>>
>>535690276
Theres no proof that russians were ever in space to begin with.
>>
>>535693126
Theres no proof that Finns were or are on Earth to begin with.
>>
File: 1478810567852.jpg (1013 KB, 935x1045)
1013 KB JPG
>>535693000
and if you're familiar with the craft freemasons practice you would understand that it was an alchemical operation

turning lead into gold and the unity of sun and moon

saturn stands for lead in alchemy
5 is the quintessence
the rocket goes through stages of purification leaving the purfied apollo capsule
apollo the sun deity goes on a journey to unite with the moon
even the lander was wrapped in golden mylar foil
>>
File: 1591630795760.jpg (2.61 MB, 3024x4032)
2.61 MB JPG
>>535693225
from albert pikes morals and dogma
>>
>>535692733
>>535692652
>>535692326
>rampantly defends nasa and the US govt
>finland
hello thread jew
>>
File: 1728060644347357.png (65 KB, 762x835)
65 KB PNG
van allen's explorer 1 geiger counter reading

it went into raditation so strong it completely jammed the geiger counter

von braun talking about this unexpected discovery
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcVgCO8mRJo
>>
>>535692930
this is really fascinating
thanks for posting
>>
>>535694439
You are welcome. You are Pole or just poleflag?
>>
File: 1760944072198427.jpg (9 KB, 177x284)
9 KB JPG
>>535692437
The new international version changed it. The word firmament was removed from the text.
>>
>>535694715
german polish mutt
my great grandfather was in the wehrmacht and received an iron cross
my grandfather was a polish partisan
if they had killed each other i wouldn't be here lol
>>
>>535692930
what?
What about the vitamins?

I NEED TO KNOW
>>
yeah moonism and 9/11 are in this strange limbo where just about anyone who spends a cursory 30 minutes investigating either story will leave with more questions than answers, an agreed upon silent "yeah well it didnt go LIKE THEY SAY but it still HAPPENED" whispers thru a normies mind, but the little questions still float in the back of mind. Why during the Vietnam War and never again? What was E team doin, or the rooftop dancers or those lucky workers who called out that morning? Oh well. more news to watch I think basketball is on
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Myf7oH0n9g&
>>
>>535694878
>they were the same man
>>
>>535692904
Even nasa admits the golf ball shit was fake iirc.
>>
File: 1731882502260230.png (42 KB, 1239x697)
42 KB PNG
>>
None of the scientists or engineers who were responsible for putting man on the moon could get a job in a government lab today. You need to be female, LGBT, disabled, diverse person of color, etc to get a job like this. It is defacto illegal to hire white men for a job like that, employer has to waive tax credits to do it. Why do you think every tech company is do desperate for H1B immigration? Its the only way to get anything actually done in 2026.
>>
>>535695200
>newly restored copies of the original broadcast look even better
That's a straight up lie. The original tapes contained high definition video recordings which have never been broadcast.
The footage that was broadcast on tv was created by a tv crew pointing a camera at a monitor at NASA. They're camrips.
>>
File: 1675335105027073.png (263 KB, 762x547)
263 KB PNG
>>535695313
>the simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission
>the only people seeing the full picture
were the very senior individuals in possession of the full picture
>>
>>535690653
>Be Buzz Aldrin
>Not doing 'you had to be there's
>>
>>535694305
And here comes the Van Allen belt meme. Can you show your math where you show how radiation the astronauts would receive inside the capsule?
>>
>>535690276
It's obvious they were the whiny bitched pushing for the moon landing being fake, too.

You lost the space race, tranny.
>>
File: 1660870991902104.png (88 KB, 867x374)
88 KB PNG
>>535695590
the capsule had window panes made of quartz and aluminasilicate, which are essentially holes in terms of shielding, so they would get the full dose

when a geiger counter gets jammed it means there are too many counts per minute for it to register, meaning massive radiation

no one has beaten laika's altitude and she died fairly quickly

on earth we get radiation damage from the sun's UV- rays and were shielded by the atmosphere
>>
>>535695913
I said show your math. Do you understand what that means? Show the data and models you used and the radiation figures you calculated and compare them to known fatal radiation doses.
>>
>>535695959
the canary in the coalmine didn't survive and no one has surpassed her

that's the math i trust
>>
>>535695913
>made of quartz and aluminasilicate
made of silica and aluminasilicate
>>
>>535696022
What is laika get shot by alien ray guns? There may be space ATF on Earth orbit.
>>
>>535696022
You can't do elementary school level math? Or high school level physics? Why do you bring up the Van Allen belt when you cannot show if its radiation is strong enough to matter. In fact it sounds like you don't even know what the Van Allen belt is. Why is it so hard for you to answer with a solid number that can be verified though well known models?
>>
>>535696108
because i don't have the numbers
i would have to send my own geiger counter because data coming out of NASA post moon landing is worthless
>>
>>535696108
Models made up on wrong assumption and data?
>>
File: 11b.png (396 KB, 1206x765)
396 KB PNG
>>535696108
Van allen himself did the math and concluded the belts were impassable for humans. NASA claims that manned flights "went around" the belts which is an argument I don't find particularly convincing. It's not really possible to fully avoid them.

At any rate I don't like arguments that can't be proven either way I prefer demonstable facts.
>>
File: 1738341714814249.jpg (1.16 MB, 2418x1419)
1.16 MB JPG
>>
>>535690276
Why did they never question it in the 70s when they had some credibility left?
>>
>>535690276
>russians are retards
Im shocked!
>>
>>535696603
USSR leadership was already compromised in 70' and they were playing bad cop/good cop game with USA anyway. Also grain deals.
>>
>>535696498
the trajectory of apollo 14 even went right through the inner belt

there's no mention of the belt in the communications of the missions

and when asked in an interview, apollo astronaut alan bean doesn't even recall whether they went far enough out to encounter it or not (which is true since they never went past low earth orbit)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHfsHYg7Yoo

longer version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCF5BWm9bak
>>
>>535696651
Why did China not question it after they returned their own Regolith last year?
>>
>>535690653
>moon landing
This nigger made millions of money and attention lying. He battled drugs/ etc because he’s made a living off of a lie
>>
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tQ8xEoxHkMJjU104eG6scXlKmq9Baui3?usp=sharing

youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY
>>
File: water in space ns3.webm (2.95 MB, 460x818)
2.95 MB
2.95 MB WEBM
>>535696673
of course they didn't left the Earth
there are dragons outside that would eat them
>>535696749
China is at it too obviously
>>
>>535696749
>asking questions we cannot know but only speculate
>>
File: Dzhanibekov Effect2.webm (1.76 MB, 854x480)
1.76 MB
1.76 MB WEBM
>>
>>535697027
so that's why we don't have rotating artificial gravity spess stations yet
>>
>>535695913
>when a geiger counter gets jammed it means there are too many counts per minute for it to register, meaning massive radiation
It means it's above what that particular model can measure. Not good, not bad.
>>
>>535697084
>>
>>535697140
sure, but the lack of manned missions outside of low earth orbit speaks volumes
>>
>>535695343
> The original tapes contained high definition video
Calling it high definition is a stretch. The original video would have looked better sure, but it was not high definition. It had a resolution of 320 lines at 10 fps.
>>
>>535697540
The point is the original "high definition" tapes have never been broadcast or seen by the public. All existing apollo footage, excluding the handheld film cameras is camripped from a monitor and far lower quality than the footage nasa had.
Why nasa withheld the higher quality footage from the public and now claims it all went missing in the 2000s can only be speculated but it's extremely suspicious.
>>
>>535697734
NASA never have it in first place
>>
>>535697796
I don't think any serious skeptic doubts the existence of the original video tapes. The question is whether they contained real or staged events.
>>
>>535697935
yes, NASA never had them
>>
>>535697935
my guess is the deleted footage contained artifacts that revealed it was prerecorded on film
>>
>>535690653
They didn't tell the astronauts until right before the rocket launch that it was all just a big shit show and that they'd better keep playing along if they didn't want to be considered “lost in space.” You could see it very clearly in the press interviews with the astronauts. They believed it themselves the whole time. Until just before the launch. In all their interviews, they were totally enthusiastic and full of heroism. But in their last press interview, they sit there like thieves with sacks full of loot, trying to keep a low profile.
>>
>>535695435
>>Not doing 'you had to be there's
Too cliche to be fair
>>
>>535698052
the real crew died on the way
>>
File: C39uY.jpg.gif (738 KB, 320x240)
738 KB GIF
We had "real time" conversations with the astronauts, but my 5g phone only has one bar at my house, using tech that far exceeds anything on that lunar lander.
>>
File: apollo16.jpg (460 KB, 2405x889)
460 KB JPG
Nasa got a little sloppy towards the end

>>535698244
I don't doubt radio conversations could have taken place if the astronauts were actually there. The issue with the conversations is they messed up a few times and responded too quickly, a physical impossibility if the conversations really occurred as stated.
>>
>>535698244
You can do that with analog signals. That's the difference. Digital can potentially offer much higher quality but it's buffered and has to be processed before you can get the message. If the bits are too scrambled to be interpreted by the receiver, you get nothing. With analog, you get a continuous signal that simply degrades until the content is incomprehensible from background radiation.
>>
>>535691713
any proof it was planted when the mutt niggers claim they did ?
>>
Why cant we have space travel? Actual space travel? Instead we get jew peadophiles raping eating and kidnapping children for satanic rituals, we burn dinosaurs to get propulsion and boil water to get power
>>
File: IMG_7828.jpg (57 KB, 800x522)
57 KB JPG
>>535695913
Radiation is not a fluid, it’s not going to flood in and fill the interior through a tiny window. It also takes time to soak up a lethal dosage. If they had just parked in the Van Allen belts they’d probably get cancer…. Good thing their mission was to go to the moon, not hang out in the radiation belt. They transited the belt at about 25,000 mph, so their total exposure time was very low.

Obsessing over the Van Allen belts is like saying this image is fake because the fire would cool him to death.
>>
>>535697440
They sent people to the ISS and they ended up floating in poopy air. Who the fuck wants to go to the moon when they have trouble getting into LEO properly. Literally have good ships lying around but some DEI hire from whatever too big to fail company is getting the contract.
>>
>>535698497
I asked locals and they told me that landings never were manned
>>
>>535692904
NASA is very sloppy, trump and the astronauts were having a conversation with no relay delay. trump finished talking and some nigger immediately continued the conversation.

sloppy.
>>
Funny how not a single moon hoax believer has ever presented even the most basic proof. It's all "these shadows look weird" and "the Van Allen belt, no I don't know what that is but it totally would have killed them". Why is it so hard to provide just one piece of evidence? You're the same as election 2020 hoax believers. You have literally zero evidence but because you made believing in a lie your entire identity you can't be shown any logic or evidence since you will deny them all like cultist sheeple.
>>
>>535698518
You vill put ze atoms in increasingly strenuous situation to boil ze vater and you vill like it, goyim
>>
>>535698497
The issue I have with any picture showing rover tracks is this: There are many hasselblad photos taken from the surface where the rovor tracks are not visible and appollo believers explain thsi away saying that's just how rover tracks are, as the rover drives along it covers it's tracks up with dust.
So rover tracks are simultaneously invisible at close range and visible from orbit.
>>
>>535698518
Because the US would rather buy votes with welfare than do anything actually cool, the Russians are too stupid to boil water properly (read: Chernobyl), and the Chinese only know how to steal technology so if we don’t make it, they can’t either.
>>
>>535698630
The Moon was covered by forest long time ago, astronauts brought back fossilised wood from it. Trust Science(TM) .
>>
>>535698688
idk, some niggers told me to buy a commercial telescope and check the flag as proof of the moon landing from 80 years ago... im like nigger that's not proof you landed on the moon 80 years ago.
idk, nasa is retarded, but the nasa fans are even worse... fucking midwitts.
>>
>>535692135
They reason they were forbidden to look at it is that it's fake. The official international space agencies all have top down pictures of the site at different levels of quality, but they may well all be controlled by freemasons.
>>
>>535698518
We do have space travel but it is tremendously expensive and we are still a long way from having technology to make it profitable and easy.
>>
>>535698518
you cant, we dont have power sources.
we havent advanced an inch in batteries.
a steam engine technology can only do so much.

the notion of endless evolution is retarded, and past performance are not indicative of future.
you're naive.
>>
>>535698808
even if that were possible flags only last a few months in space as evidenced by the soviet flag on the MIR space station.
>>
>>535698518
We don't burn dinosaurs. That's retarded. We burn compressed plants and algae. And water is the single most efficient medium of energy exchange we have for turning thermal energy into kinetic energy.
>>
>>535698889
Its risky, time consuming, can be done only alongside currents and by sail.
>>
>>535698731
>type which country has the most advanced nuclear tech
>china & russia
>no mention of the usa
even your own ai creation agrees haha
>>
File: how it really was.gif (1.06 MB, 600x374)
1.06 MB GIF
>>535698938
>We don't burn dinosaurs. That's retarded.
True. All dinos were ejected into space when comet hit Earth. They landed on different Saturn and Jupiter moons and filled them with hydrocarbons.
>>
>>535698630
I believed when i was young, but now i cant pretend i believe
Its not that i need evidence, its that im so indifferent to the whole ordeal that i dont give a fuck who says what, it seems a lil sus as americans say, thats enough for me
Its also depressing and demoralising to not believe anymore
And from any logical standpoint, people should go up there and get the ore, build habitats and mine shit
>>535698660
And thats not all, chinese want fusion reactors, i have no idea what it is albut it sounds revolutionary and sciency hecking chungus bazinga
I just hope that fusion reactors arent another fancier way to boil water...
>>
>>535692326
At most a few hundred, something easily done with the huge amounts of Jews and freemasons available in the US. Only project management and the staff responsible for executing the final steps need to be in on it. TV quality was nonexistent in the 50s, as was viewers' technical underStanding of motion picture manipulation and filming techniques.

The most damning proof of fabrication is the slow-mo movement of the astronauts. No one moves that slowly without air resistance escept geriatrics. My guess is it was filmed underwater, with weighted down diving suits.
>>
>>535698948
Classic dry humor, this is a rare white brit
>>
>>535698999
He is stuck in the 50s america, its peak
Idk what was invented since then, everything is just faster and more convenient but not new
>>
I know these russians you have to stroke their ego
praise them tell everyone how glorious russia is. give them a bribe and that pancake will go on record and say americans landed 10 times on the moon
>>
>>535698999
>russia and China have superior nuclear technology
Okay. Describe it.
>fusion
It’s been 5 years away for the past 70 years.
>>
>ctrl-F "flat"
>zero results
I've never seen this happen before.

>>535698630
How do you like NASA fucking up the filming location in an official Apollo video here >>535698405
>>
>>535692904
They were just having a good time tricking everyone and rubbing it in their faces.
>>
File: wtaf.png (36 KB, 1106x686)
36 KB PNG
>>535698630
>You're the same as election 2020 hoax believers. You have literally zero evidence
ok retard!
>>
>>535690276
We put giant mirrors on the moon while we were there. You can still see them with a telescope and bounce lasers off of them today
>>
>>535699255
Even the most head-up-ass retard *here* can't persist in delusions that Earth differs from every other round celestial body. The world is growing and healing.
>>
>>535699052
It was a joke but its also truth.
Space travel is risky, slow, only possible alongside plasma currents and using solar sail
>>
>>535696603
They were faking stuff too. Why expose the Americans when u can make both countries look far and above anyone else with a bit of lies and cinema. Same thing with nukes.
>>
>>535699395
The reflectors have always been a poor argument and the mythbusters should be ashamed for perpetuating it.
1) The presence of a reflector is not evidence of a manned landing eg: the soviets put reflectors on the moon.
2) The lunar laser ranging experiment dates back to the late 50's. Lasers were successfully bounced off the moon and measured long before apollo.
>>
>>535690276
Russians are more pathetic than ever.
>>
>>535699555
>1) The presence of a reflector is not evidence of a manned landing eg: the soviets put reflectors on the moon.
The Soviets did a manned mission but the aliens got them on the way back
>>
Google’s own AI says that US moon landing photos/videos are fake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxXi3LwkF8w
>>
>>535691855
Hard to say and you're probably right, but that's what happens when one constantly lies all the time. Eventually, people simply lose trust and even when you might be telling the truth this time, people just won't believe you anymore. Everything is called into question.
>>
Personally I don't believe mutts are smart enough to go to the moon
>>
>>535699555
There's video, audio, rocks brought back, items left behind which you can still see, what's it going to take? Don't you think the Soviets would've denied it in 1969 if it were a hoax?
>>
>>535699695
So you can't possibly be convinced. No need to engage with you then
>>
>>535699523
That is incorrect. Never mind, you are unaware of basic physics.
I'd hoped you were euphemistically drawing allegory between how sailing the seas was once dangerous and slow, and now is done with floating nuclear reactors with regularity and efficiency. I see you're not real bright, yet, but you can pick up a book on how space works. Several, in fact, and at random, they will likely agree with one another and NOT the nonsense you just posted lmao
>>
>>535699883
>>535699883
>I see you're not real bright,
I see you are real dark matter. Scientists are looking for you and can't find you but here you are. I bet you are also really massive.
Noble prize secured.
>>
>>535699823
If you highlight my posts I've already covered why the video, audio and alleged items left behind are not satisfactory proof. There are just too many issues with them.
>>
>>535698630
Yeah we don't have access to NASA archives, do we? We don't have the ability travel to the moon and check, do we? Fucktard. The preponderance of evidence strongly points toward a hoax.
>>
File: 1733257866351854.jpg (88 KB, 680x552)
88 KB JPG
>>535699823
man, that russian space dude must have never heard of those!
>>
>>535699948
https://www.masterbooks.com/intro-to-astrophysics-digital-single

This should work for you, bud.
>>
File: 1766275682848752.jpg (587 KB, 581x1085)
587 KB JPG
>>535690276
>>
>>535700079
All fake and gay. Just like you.
>>
>>535690276
>space boss
Poolitzer worthy journalism
>>
File: 1422483129822.jpg (14 KB, 352x270)
14 KB JPG
>>535698630
there is so much content pointing towards a hoax you can fill hourlong documentaries with it

if it were real that wouldn't be the case

pic related is the lemon gus grissom hung on the lander after concluding it will never go to the moon

he was supposed to be the first man on the moon and died in a tragic accident
>>
File: 1659608608433212.webm (331 KB, 480x355)
331 KB
331 KB WEBM
myth busters did a show "debunking" moon hoax claims

they replicated the jump salute but slowed the footage down at the wrong rate so it wouldn't line up, effectively debunking the claim

turns out if you slow it down at the correct rate it lines up perfectly
>>
>>535691713
wow those pixels are so large and clear
>>
>>535700314
the safety inspector thomas barron who wrote a whistle blower report died in another accident
>>
File: nasa 2.png (288 KB, 730x620)
288 KB PNG
>>535700413
must be fake, NASA would not lie to us
>>
https://www.infinityexplorers.com/nasa-missions-and-their-masonic-connections/
>>
Didn’t Martin Scorsese direct it? They later suicided him
>>
NASA's logo is the same as the masonic square and compass.
>>
>>535699026
If a few hundred people were involved in making a moon landing hoax why has not a single one stepped forward? Where are the clips of the supposed movie studios? What about all the faked broadcasts? If you believe that a few hundred people could be involved in a massive conspiracy to fool the world when everyone is watching closely, and not a single one ever leaked anything, then you truly are a hopeless schizo.
>>
File: 1724361178546645.jpg (54 KB, 800x628)
54 KB JPG
>>
>>535700935
all died in accidents
>>
>>535690276
>Why could no one produce irrefutable proof that burgers walked on the moon to the russian spess boss?
because we didn't. it was Stanley Kubrick made-for-TV propaganda
>>
File: 1648575748642.png (1.28 MB, 1080x1106)
1.28 MB PNG
>>535700935
why would they come forward when they want to hoax to be successful?
>>
>>535696749
Xi is buddies with Putin and Schwab looks up to him. You think he's a real Chinese patriot without sinister world destruction plans? Under his watch millions of Chinese left without a trace, villages are completely empty, and people in the cities are completely clueless where they went. Covid came from China, while the vaccine came from Israel. Take a wild fucking guess why China isn't calling the bluff.
>>
>>535701095
This would work if a photographer lined hijself up in a way that would replicate the moon picture. From this viewpoint there are very stark differences.
>>
>>535701008
It's an interesting picture but it's not proof of anyting. Kubrick and clarke worked together on the 2001 space odyssey novel and book combo in the mid-to-late 60's. Also clarke wasn't just an author he's largely credited with the invention of communications satellites.
>>
>>535700314
You say there are hours of evidence and can't produce even a single one. Let's try once again to see if a moon landing schizo cultist can actually answer a specific question:

Name the one single most solid piece of evidence you think best proves the Moon landing was a hoax. Literally just one. Pick one, no gish galloping. Schizos always fail to understand the meaning of the words "one" and "specific' whether they are sperging out about the Moon landing or election fraud or vaccines.
>>
>>535700791
You should email Scorsese and let him know he's dead, maybe he'll stop making movies
>>
>>535701036
Do you have a list of names? Going to need a few hundred.
>>535701095
Why would anyone want such a hoax to be successful? And you seriously think not a single person would mistakenly leak information?
>>
>>535701405
The most solid piece of evdence is this: NASA is masonic.
>>
>>535701405
read the thread
for example >>535691806 >>535692708

forensic statement analysis is a scientific method of deception detection

you can take this as evidence to court
>>
>>535701405
it's easy to talk shit when you ignore people showing you evidence. You didn't respond to nasa fucking up the filming locations on apollo 16.
>>
>>535701484
you're dealing with freemasons
the moon hoax was not just a hoax but an alchemical operation, see >>535693225
>>
>>535692437
Thank you for sharing this anon
>>535694752
and this
>>
>>535701662
Before he became a leader at NASA werner von braun actually published a book saying it's economically impossible to build a moon rocket.
>>
>>535701635
they also claimed jursidction on the moon >>535693066
this is from their website tranqulity lodge 2000
>>
>>535701519
Are you mentally handicapped or why can you not answer the question? You can't even count to one?
>>
>>535702023
Are you mentally handicapped or why can you not answer the question? You can't even count to one?
>>
>>535701550
How did they fuck up? Be specific. Very specific. Tell everyone in detail why whatever you are using as claim would be evidence that it was all faked.
>>
File: 1763620343015059.png (285 KB, 443x693)
285 KB PNG
>>535702023
have a moon rock bro
from the deep forests on the moon
>>
>>535702085
You claim you want evidence but you're too fucking lazy to even go to the two timestamps in the picture?
https://youtu.be/SgYrj5zJAKQ?si=6yLG2EwLu91faQmN&t=844
https://youtu.be/SgYrj5zJAKQ?si=9T8neka2jkivyVMJ&t=1026
Those 2 timestamps are 2 different days in 2 different locations yet the location is identical. It's an official vintage nasa production on an official nasa channel.
>>
File: sun dog ns.webm (2.78 MB, 480x360)
2.78 MB
2.78 MB WEBM
>>535702218
ANON, calm down.
The rock may still be from the Moon. Its from the time when Moon was green and full of trees, or from the time when Earth Life tree reached the moon or from times when Solar system was in disaster mode and there was material transfer between various planet. Heck, it could be dropped on the Moon by some tourists long time ago.
>>
>>535701087
Oh it was Stanley Kubrick? I thought Martin Scorsese… Didn’t they suicide him for this?

>>535701095
This. They all became famous for it, they’d never let that go
>>
>>535701470
My bad it was Kubrick
>>
File: IMG_1313.jpg (1.34 MB, 2340x2360)
1.34 MB JPG
Where was this photo taken?
>>
>>535702413
Why is it literally impossible for you to understand the meaning of the words "one" and "specific"? Nobody is going to watch your 4 hour schizo videos. You were asked a very simple question. You didn't answer. Explain in your own words. What are we supposed to be looking at here and why is it evidence the Moon landing was a hoax? In your own words, not "watch my schizo rant on youtube".
>>
>>535690441
Make it more obvious all the anti moon shit is Russians and Chinks
>>
>>535703374
Okay so you were lying fuck off retard.
>>
>>535690276
Can't they just fly up there and see for them self if the remains are still there?
>>
>>535703441
So you were lying. You can't even write down why whatever you posted is supposed to prove it was all a hoax.
>>
File: D-dYrjnWsAE0Ug7.png (91 KB, 680x414)
91 KB PNG
>>535690276
proofs?
>>
>>535703726
sure, let me just start my space cesna
>>535703776
I was there when landing supposedly happened. It didn't happened.
>>
>>535703726
Actually no. The USA declared the landing sites as historical locations that can't be visited or even flown over below a certain altitude.
>>
>>535703776
shit tier troll
1/10 made me reply
>>
>>535700791
>>535696782
>>
Moon hoaxers getting very angry as they realize they have nothing but virgin sperging.
>>
>>535693224
Theres no proof theres any white people left in UK.
>>
>>535705087
That is true. I didn't see any for long time.
>>
>>535695067
Show it then.
>>
File: golf.jpg (109 KB, 1200x630)
109 KB JPG
>>535705227
Searching has been complicated by a professional golfer stating that he doesn't believe in apollo recently. Now that I think about it, I don't think it was nasa themselves who admitted it was all bullshit but shephard admitting in his autobiography that the still images of the golf shot are fake. Which was kind of obvious really with the comically large golf ball.
>>
>>535705760
Are you going to post any solid evidence with links that are not youtube schizo ramblings or not?
>>
File: Average Geologist .png (2.91 MB, 1198x1024)
2.91 MB PNG
>>535700413
>gravity on moon is 1/6th the gravity on earth
>1 meter jump 65 kg on earth.
>E = mgh
>65*9.81*1=65*1.64*X
>637.7/106.3 = X = ~ 6 meters

6 meter vertical.

The guy jumps 1-2 feet on earth, should be 6-12 feet on the moon.

Never seemed real. So light on the moon that human motor control wouldn't be readily capable of precision movement.
>>
File: forbes.png (448 KB, 1134x904)
448 KB PNG
>>535705925
If you're fucking retarded enough to think this famous picture with a comically oversized golf ball, cited as being from NASA here on forbes is real then I don't know what to tell you.
>>
>>535701405

See
>>535706319
Hour long documentaries are just slop, you don't need them. The reality is simple.

Claims do not match evidence.
>>
>>535706413
Can you explain without angry schizo sperging? Pretend for a moment your IQ is above 80.
>>
File: totally real bro.jpg (55 KB, 650x433)
55 KB JPG
>>535706531
It's pretty straightforward. Are you retarded enough to think that image is real or not?
>>
>>535705925
Behold
>>535702754
Scrub all mention of the moon-landing scrub the footage scrub the documentation if you want to prove it happened.

Truth fears not investigation.
>>
>>535690276
you mean other than the giant rocket and thousands of engineers and scientists who would need to be hushed over a fake moon landing?
>>
File: 1749578731482.png (243 KB, 800x1022)
243 KB PNG
>>535696498
>>
>>535706838
I dunno what you're on about but that photo is a picture of the lunar lander from Apollo 17 taken rather far away from jt easily accessible online
>>
>>535690276
Who needs proof when generations of star whores and spacecux have been payoped to defend nasa to the grave deapite never seeing any proof themselves. You dont even need boomers for this anymore...just rewrite the internet
>>
>>535706978
see
>>535695407

how many people working on the manhattan project knew they were building a nuclear bomb?
>>
>>535700935
You don't know the first thing about schizophrenia. You're just a golem for the Jews with holes in your brain. You don't even realise that hundreds of people can work together on a thing sharing the same motive, the same motviation, the same fake loyalty. We have MILLIONS of Jews and Masons in the US. We had many more masons in those days. It s an effortless undertaking to stage a conspiracy even with thousands of people involved because of this massive manpower pool. And then there are the type of retards who categorically deny the possibility of any conspiracy because "muh 1000 leak0rz", and would easily fill the gaps in any scheme being none the wiser because they just don't even bother to look at any discrepancies.

tl;dr your brain is swiss cheese
>>
File: 1672710486779500.webm (824 KB, 720x404)
824 KB
824 KB WEBM
>first time in deadly alien environment
>jump around like retards
you can tell they had no sense of danger since they weren't on the moon
>>
>>535706836
What is that image?
When/where was it taken, what context?
What criteria should one use to determine if it's real or not?
>>
File: 1680628383396518.webm (1.19 MB, 640x360)
1.19 MB
1.19 MB WEBM
>>
>>535706531
I hope you're a bot because if not you're the most insufferable type of person. Acting smart, being condescending while spouting demands and bringing absolutely nothing worthwhile to the discussion.
>>
Explain the reasoning for doing Apollo 13 if it was fake you dullards
>>
>>535711424
How exactly are you supposed to talk to people whose IQ is below 80 who do not know to make the simplest logical arguments?
>>
>>535711611
I think your first step should be going here: https://www.reddit.com/
>>
>>535698052
The press conference after the mission is jarringly bad. They are totally subdued and incoherent. The shame they felt was palpable. Apollo 13 being the "accident" one was also pretty funny. Nice cohencidence on the numbering. What gets me a bit is how they were audacious enough to fake six landings. I guess they had budget to use up so might as well funnel more of that into film productions.
>>
>>535691713
>You can literally see the flag and rover from earth
You literally can't fucktard. And not with the Hubble or JWST either. That picture is not supposed to be from Earth. And objects on the moon will never be proof of men having been to the moon.
>>
File: 1481925435063.jpg (129 KB, 1377x779)
129 KB JPG
>>535712423
The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.

Joseph Goebbels
>>
>>535700181
You're making a claim, so the burden of proof is on you, sweaty

This post >>535711110is a reasonable question, whether in good faith or not. Yet, its unanswered and >>535711424 is already defensive. Flerf/fake space fans are almost as bad as fake nuke niggers. Disingenuous and unwilling to perform their own experiments, despite being so empirically driven. Sorry cucks, the 2 RLGNs I spent 3 years with still had to be adjusted for the curve of the earth over long journeys. I'll sell you one, if you want to test it yourself :)
>>
There could be a city on the moon with round trip tickets for $5000 and people would still claim the moon landing was fake.
>>
>>535691713
The ratio of sizes in this picture is completely absurd. Those must have been giants on the moon, kek. Just look how small and blurry the mountains and valleys around the supposed rover tracks look. Amazing.
>>
File: dingdingding dong.jpg (81 KB, 1440x1080)
81 KB JPG
>>535712727
>There could be a city on the moon with round trip tickets for $5000 and people would still claim the moon landing was fake.
That's not people, its jealous hidden chinks
>>
>>535690276
flat earth firmament christfags deserve the rope
>>
>>535690653
What bothered Buzz the most wasn't the lying, he always knew that was part of the job description. A job he was being paid very well to do.
What bothered Buzz was the realization that he was chosen for the job over all the others for not just his ability to lie, but his willingness to do so. That thought shook him to his core.
>>
>>535703858
>sure, let me just start my space cesna
If you truly was a superpower you would!

>>535703878
kek i can't really tell if trolling or not
>>
>>535714355
>flat earth firmament christfags deserve the rope
There's none itt. Is just jealous chinks you dumb faggot. Christians wouldn't post subversive anti Western shit every day.
>>
>>535714969
>redneck baptist taliban fucks wouldn't post subversive anti western shit.
Did you remember to tithe 50% of your income to your megachurch?
>>
>>535714518
What was he lying about?
>>
File: von-Braun-moonship.gif (79 KB, 228x359)
79 KB GIF
>>535690276
>Why could no one produce irrefutable proof that burgers walked on the moon
NASA does not allow other missions to get in line of sight of their precious landing sites: https://www.space.com/nasa-lunar-landing-policy-analysis-apollo-protect

For historical preservation, of course.
>>
>>535691855
irrefutable proof would be us being able to go the moon any time we wanted by now. we supposedly landed on the moon in the 60s and at the exponential rate technology grows we should have had shuttles taking niggers on spirit-galactic vacations to the moon by the 90s. instead we get nothing but bags of excuses as to why we can only go around the moon in 2026 for "practice."
>>
>>535712589
I've seen happier men at a funeral. They should have picked 3 niggers for the job. There'd have been hootin and hollering without any care in the world
>>
>>535712612
>the 2 RLGNs
so now we're just making up acronyms to appear knowledgeable, cool
>>
>>535716535
You can just search what those are on the internet you're using to talk to me. What does it stand for?
>>
>>535716927
Some soundcloud artist apparently
>>
File: chuds.jpg (90 KB, 1109x1080)
90 KB JPG
>>535715231
>Thread minders mad
>Anti Christs
See. It's soulless bugs not Christians
>>
>>535698052
they were probably told that there would be a real launch very soon, just as soon as this space race business was put to bed. Must have been a terrible burden and mental strain to come to terms with.
>>
>>535714969
Imagine thinking anyone actually gives a shit about the alleged moon landings from almost 60 years ago. You could educate yourself on the topic and see that there are serious gaps in the story. Or just go on believing. It completely doesn't matter either way.

Calling anyone questioning this a chink or russian is disingenuous though. The moon noticing industry is almost 100% home grown and seems to be something only White on the spectrum people are interested in.

For anyone actually interested, this documentary is the most comprehensive trove of evidence I've seen for fakery.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpuKu3F0BvY
The photo analysis by professional photographers in the end is pretty irrefutable.

The USSR's official stance at the time was that they didn't think going to the moon was technically feasible with 60s technology and would not be pursuing it. But they accepted the story as real because did not want to rock the boat due to plans for collaboration on the ISS and food aid deals with the US.

In 2026, demoralizing a few nerds with "le moon was fake" would not make any sense as a shilling tactic because it's so niche. Russians and Chinks demoralize the West by shilling narratives like the collapse of the West, "you're owned by the kikes," you will be a minority in your own country, China numba won, everything said in /pig/, incel shit, etc. Moon stuff in 2026 barely qualifies as political imo, more like alt history.
>>
>>535711110
>>535712612
Reverse image search answers all those questions. Good luck finding the original input images for the admitted composite. I haven't been able to. Not that this on its own is proof of anything though.
>>
>>535690276
You mean like the parabolic reflectors they left up there that anyone can use to fire a laser and have it bonce back to you?
>>
>>535716089
>>535717803
So... no answer apart from angry incel sperging?
>>
>>535691855
Irrefutable proof to a Russian is a thorough beating, until he begs for mercy and then a bit more.
>>
>>535690276
so... hes no longer russian?
>>
>>535717897
that system of reflection
a) relies on receiving back a few photons of light, which the moon itself could do
b) does not prove the 1969 landings were real
>>
>>535691084
>everyone could

Can you show me some evidence right now?
Reminder, the evidence should prove men walked on the moons.
>>
>>535718005
Lol, lmao, failed 4th grade geometry
>>
File: Fsy5WZcaMAAMUH-.png (2 KB, 277x271)
2 KB PNG
>>535718020
>>
>>535691713
Actually you literally can not according to NASA.

Are you accusing NASA of lying?
>>
>>535690276
Stop shitting up /p/, degenerate piece of shit
Funny how you drop the trip here
>>
>>535718063
nope, I've been around long enough to see these shitty arguments. Look it up. The way you put it, one would assume a solid laser beam would be returned, but that is FAR from the case.
>>
>>535718111
>YOU CAN’T JUST ASK FOR EVIDENCE OF A CLAIM MUST BECAUSE THE CLAIM IS THAT EVIDENCE EXISTS
wew. Lunatics on television watch.
>>
>>535691713
>You can literally see the flag and rover from earth
that picture wasn't taken from earth you retard.
>>
File: images.png (8 KB, 288x175)
8 KB PNG
>>535718158
>>
535717212
Week bate
>>
>>535718209
blah de blah de bleepbleep bloop
fuck off and look it up, shit, ask shartGPT if you want to.
>>
>>535717803
We're having a conversation, sort of. You *cannot* be taken seriously if your response to present corroborating evidence is
>google it.
And then, to pussy out and say it's not proof of anything though!!!
Flerf/space-is-fake fags are such limp wristed empiricists. True empiricists can't buy canned soup, because there's no way to know it isn't poison.
>>
File: EESUmDLXsAMzfvC.jpg (34 KB, 580x426)
34 KB JPG
>>535718474
>>
>>535715936
that's just NASA asking partner companies and countries to respect the areas
China or Russia could easily say "fuck you" and land there too
It'd be a great attack on American domestic and foreign policy if they did show up to those sites and nothing was there
I'd suggest they do so
>>
>>535690276
Poles are so retarded
Gets me everytime
Sad we didnt holocaust their whole fucking country
>>
>>535718209
>>535718266
I did it for you
>The footprint of a standard laser beamed from Earth onto the Moon is typically between 1 and 7 kilometres (0.6 to 4.3 miles) wide by the time it reaches the lunar surface.

>The laser retroreflectors left on the Moon by the Apollo astronauts are quite small—ranging from the size of a briefcase to a small coffee table

>As the reflected light travels the 2 light minutes back to Earth, it diverges into a cone that is roughly 15 square km wide by the time it arrives
>>
Bump.
The best thread on pol right now.
>80 shit , spam and slide threads
>>
>>535719393
good fucking job NASA put that reflective coffee table out, otherwise it would never work eh? Pure bollocks
>>
>>535700830
NASA in Hebrew means to deceive
>>
>>535690276
>Why could no one produce irrefutable proof that burgers walked on the moon
Because nobody has been to the moon.
>>
>>535690276
already knew it. any other news?
>>
>>535692437
>Firmament
To the trash with your zealotry
>>
>>535690276
My foundational pillars in politics atm:
>manned moon landings never happened and man can never cross the van Allen belts
>nuclear weapons do not exist and all evidence from footage is fake
>israel assassinated Kennedy not because of fake nukes but because he was going to end support and let the Arabs fuck them
>israel committed 9/11 to go to war in Afghanistan for their poppy fields and Iraq to destroy it as a regional threat
>covid 19 was a hoax and Covid vaccines never worked plus they were designed to decrease goy lifespans to avoid the very real issue of $200 trillion unfunded liabilities for retirement

These are my pillars of politics.
>>
>>535714218
They are really really good at hiding their accountability behind others and not having their real intentions read. A guy in a pro Russia greek forum larped as Russian but digging through posts found he was really pro China.
>>
>>535720039
all that this tip of the iceberg normie-core
next week you will be posting big revelations about freemasons or adrenochrome
>>
>>535691713
Why would burgers lie, goy?
>>
>>535720184
Normies think the cia killed Kennedy and bush did 9/11. It was Israel. Most normies never heard of the dancing Israelis until 2 years ago.
>>
File: 1769105986241296.png (45 KB, 1112x975)
45 KB PNG
>>535720039
they used low yield tactical nukes in ukraine/russia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lb1TAMTZv8

pause it at the right moment and you see the bright as day flash at distance of 4km

the crazy part is no one believes it's a nuke
>>
>>535692134
Not as desperate as Jews
>>
>>535720371
check out TikTok, between all the brainrot advertisements, the JQ is ubiquitous
>>
>>535720381
Nukes don’t exist, a 5 kilogram warhead cannot vaporize everything in a 2-5km radius from impact, it’s all fake Jewish mysticism to put fear in goy hearts.
>>
>>535720463
Right now it is, it was not kosher before the plandemic. Everything I wrote down I’ve known since I was 16 15 years ago
>>
The only reason that NASA's attempt at the moon in 1969 wasn't considered a joke wask because of the fucking legendary vision of Werner Von Braun, poached from nazi Germany,

So the real moral of the story is hold onto your dreams and work for them no matter what.
>>
>>535692645
Wait are you saying the USS Maine, Gulf of Tonkin incident, Iraqi WMD & Iranian nukes are fake??
>>
>>535692652
>Thousands of people would need to be involved in such a massive operation.
Compartmentalization. I am so glad you took the vaccine.
>>
File: 1774691422600468.png (301 KB, 1280x720)
301 KB PNG
>>535720481
that's a 2-4 kiloton detonation from an nuclear artillery shell
you can't pack that much tnt into an ordinary artillery shell

at first they said they destroyed a bunch of grad launchers in a successful attack but when the footage was leaked they changed the story to hitting a chemical plant
>>
>>535720769
Nah probably a mini foabs, video is edited, spliced or doctored. Nukes are fake.
>>
>>535692708
Interesting video. I wouldn’t put too much weight on it, but it is definitely worth noticing.

I also like that the recommended videos included multiple parts of this Christian Identity podcast exposing Judaism
https://odysee.com/@TheNarrowRoad:8/RHVS---Willie-Martin-The-True-Origin-of-the-jews-Part-1-(-12th-January,-2026-)---1hr2m:9
Going to start this series today and see how it goes.

No one ever talks about the moon hoax ——> Christian anti-semite pipeline.
>>
>>535720749
They sold a bullshit lie and flogged a load of contracts, then when the shit started hitting the fan they had to pull the plug. The space race nearly bankrupted the U.S, of course in the early stages it was a tremendous boon to the economy, but there we have it.
>>
>>535691350
Based Richard hall appreciator
>>
>>535690653
Anon, I actually met Buzz Aldrin when I was a kid, because I grew up in Florida so this shit happens to us Crackers.
Anyhow, I was still pretty damn young, maybe 10 or so? He was speaking to me and a small group of other kids, my mom was there, I think we were at MOSI. This wasn't a scheduled thing, he was just there, bumped into us outside and started talking to us. He was cheerful, maybe had a beer or two in him looking back, but again Florida so who didn't?
HE DID NOT TALK ABOUT THE MOON LANDING AT ALL!
What he talked about was consciousness. He spoke about how immediately when he left the sphere of influence of the Earth, his consciousness changed. It wasn't some "Oh wow I'm looking down at earth, these feelz" BS, he made it sound like a concrete effect of being outside of the earth's fields (gravity, electromagnetism, I don't know this was almost thirty years ago but my 'tism powers grant me an incredible memory, I replay it to the best that my mind could store the data.) of influence. He said it as if it were a liberation and made it clear that this was the single most important piece of information he could share with us....
That's pretty much it, then he walked off kind of abruptly and we went to get food or something.

My take on him was that I liked the guy. He was friendly, intelligent, entertaining to listen to, and taught me to appreciate the effect of location and circumstance on consciousness when I was still a kid. He, in that moment, seemed entirely genuine and honest.
He did not speak of the moon landing though. Not one word. Take that for what you want.
>>
>>535690276
It was real in my mind
>>
>>535692904
Imagine carrying all that extra weight for a stupid stunt. Imagine a "dune buggy" that folds into a suitcase, but they don't sell the technology commercially. Imagine putting yourself at risk for these stupid unneccesary stunts.
>>
>>535701008
Arthur C. Clarke was a good lad
>>
>>535721097
The moon buggy had a battery that had not been tested and was not rated for temperatures found on the moon
>>
>>535721030
thanks for sharing your story

here's buzz talking to an 8yo girl and he slips out that they didn't go there (to the moon)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_54aXGPXSk
>>
>>535721270
dunno man, I think he was just fucking with her. He acknowledge that he thought it was a sinister question before he said that
>>
>>535721270
the video is edited btw to make it come off worse
>>
>>535721030
Did they psyopped him into a demonic fallacy?
>>
>>535721075
This probably. In Acherus necromancy in ancient greece the conditions were soundproof rooms and darkness, and the initiate slowly progressed towards sound deprivation and gradually payoped. In fact humans get psyopped by fallen spirits and think they see or hear stuff that isnt real. 4chan/x has many imaginary stuff that is actually demonic deceptions. "it was real in my mind" stuff.
>>
File: eglin.h2pysy4nzrxg1-1.png (253 KB, 1528x1102)
253 KB PNG
>>535699255
>2026
>non-Masons still don't grasp the concept of a massively astroturfed Internet
>>
>>535692652
that fuck mongol retard
>>
>>535691713
>I can see the moon from my house
>>
>>535722459
President back then? Hussein Obama, a socialist shill working towards socialisms (and reddits) magnus opus, the world socialist governance
>>
>>535690276
Space Boss? Is that an official title in Russia?
>>
>>535690276
Russians have always been buttmad at getting outrageously mogged by superior American tech.
>no proof stealth bombers exist
~Russia
>>
>>535701312
>It's an interesting picture but it's not proof of anything.
Typed without a trace of irony
>>
>>535724015
People standing together actually is not proof of anything beyond association.
>>
>>535701405
Freemasonry has the structure of an intelligence network that is transnational & intergenerational, with filtering & compartmentalizing "initiations" and penalty-of-death secrecy oaths.

>inb4 they are a men's BBQ club to get away from their wives, that has their symbols on money & govt buildings & police badges & false flags, most successful BBQ club ever
>>
File: 1632992550826.jpg (160 KB, 599x594)
160 KB JPG
>>535725091
the profane know!
>>
>>535706531
Ad hominem is the sign of desperation
>>
>>535708970
>how many people working on the manhattan project knew they were building a nuclear bomb?
Somebody would have talked!!
>>
>>535721127
>defending a gay pedophile
Typical britbong.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.