I bring you possibly the most politically correct email ever written. I wanna give a speech at council meeting. Sent this to council person for feedback. Text is same as email except grammar. Only just sent for feedback, meeting is next month so written as such.>Start with the government is going to die in about 10-20 years while trying to make that relevant to a council meeting. >So I can explain things like politics and politicians being a complete heist operation, whole government being a scam.>To a small army of councillors, bunch of other literal whos. Thought it might be challenging. >Define politicians and politics as I thought a politician would if they were truthful. >Looks good, but that's not the whole spedometer, redline it by sorta mentioning aliens. Seems to not be a debuff. >Problem is, I think this is 100% serious. The result seems to be that it may force anyone in government to accept the one thing that no human being possibly can: The responsibility for ruining everything. Like a catalyst to make them accept responsibility. This can't be good. These guys have my address, they're the council. I'm gonna call the cops tomorrow and tell them that the council might be pissed off with me. I turn to /pol/ for wisdom. 1/
I didnt even finish explaining government death either. Have to finish. The timeframe is tied to AI having a cost effective humanlike (in function) body. Government cant survive because not enough people to steal from. AI is based upon our thoughts and problem solving. The shit school curriculum will allow it to keep up with us easily and the body is on its way. Could probably turn the email into a political weapon at the council level. Need a second opinion as council not replied yet. Whats the lady gonna say you reckon. Does it need more council words. Surely theres a fed here that can help. ??????????????Is OP a bundle of sticks or nah? And what will a bunch of thieves do to me? Don't have a lot. What does government do besides steal? Do they pay tax?
>>535838094Schizo thread
Nah, wont happen
I ain't reading all that I'm happy for you though or sorry that happened
im not going to read its too complicated
tl;dr
>https://youtu.be/FcMvic6UoBg>https://youtu.be/oHXIfFJcNpgget back to it
2 weeks amirite?
>>535838199100%, at face value
>>535838369What else are you going to read on here hahahaha
>>535838428Most notable thing was the ironclad understanding that governments specifically exist in order to make us trash everything. I don't think this was previously understood.
Try one of these paragraphs then.Defining politicians and politics accurately as a politician could understand them.
>>535838094I want to read it but its triggering my skitzo filter. Answer in 3 sentences or greentext
godspeed, OP
>>535838094
>>535839887Whatever you do read, most of it will become your understanding. Though, there's some council specific stuff. >>535839518
>>535838094Elw/e bro hope u get the high score good luck with all that
>>535838194> The timeframe is tied to AI having a cost effective humanlike (in function) body.Yeah no, won't happen. Back to the drawing board.
>>535840365It's a dense speech, visually daunting
>>535840541You have to think about this logically. The world is really starting to bite the bullet. What do you expect the ruling class to hide behind? One step after that, they have a chance to act with impunity worldwide, it's probably the only thing they haven't done yet.
I read the first part, but the second part appears just to continue with the low IQ rambling so yeah I'm not reading that
>>535840867I do think logically. Humans are too incompetent to build something like that. In fact, "AI" is pretty much destroying it's own database where it can learn from. The data is being corrupted as i write this.Sorry, but you know very little. Have a consolation prize.
>>535838094I just skipped over it and nothing which was landed on had really had any substance. To the intelligent listener the premise of whichever argument you're presenting has to be able to stand on it's own legs and here you're wrapping it up in this blackpill wrapping in an attempt to sell it's validityWhat you've got here is basically a verbal clickbait thumbnail used to mechanistically bait the listener in but then by the time they realize you're full of shit they've already let you start talking, and you're mostly going to have to end up preying on that in order to get your point across, where you'll eventually get laughed off stage or politely tolerated and hushed along until the next speaker automatically becomes 100x more interesting because it's not you and everyone forgets what the fuck you said anyways except for the part where everyone laughed, if you even managed to get that farI would pass on this one, OP. People either notice this kind of thing or they don't
>>535838094This is a picture of me sending an email to my local government.
>>535841104We call them the ruling class because they have a lot of our stuff. We allocate resources to solve problems. It doesn't matter what the rest of humanity wants due to politics. Politics is specifically used by the ruling class to make sheer numbers irrelevant. You know this. Even by that metric alone, they'd be interested in throwing resources at advanced tech, so they don't have to come up with more and more clever ways to divide people. Sadly, the power trip of being able to act with impunity is what's guiding them to come on podcasts and talk about a future with AI where we don't have to work. If you look at the world, it's basically a bunch of normal people and then the ruling class messing with basically everyone. A future where you don't have to work is exactly against everything they seem to want to happen. So, explain to me why they're selling a future of AI abundance, if they are the ones always messing with people? They're only buying time to get there. If it's within reach, which you know that it is, the trajectory is clear. They'll throw resources at it and they have infinite resources, they're the ruling class.
>>535840651Copy paste it here, it sucks dick to read it off the images, schizo-fren
>>535841182Haha farout I thought this was an AI post, finally read it. It's a full on review! but it's irrelevant because you didn't read it. A review of something you didn't read.
>>535841672I posted a little image somewhere up. I'd just be spamming the thread t
>>535840978It has to be relevant to council, it's a council speech. there's heaps of filler at the start so that I can actually explain things that aren't bridges and laneways. Fair point though. Thanks
>>535838094You're not going to present in front of anybody. You sound like a schizophrenic who didn't pass high school
>>535843040How the fuck did you get sound
>>535838094Get-Off-Muh-Porch...(((Those))) Council-Positions are certainly hand-selected ZOG-Pimps.Forget about (((Elections))) - Ha-Ha-HaYou get what ZOG decides.
>>535843496>You get what ZOG decides.Yeahhhhh its looking to be that way at the moment
YOUR SON IS NOT TAKING HIS MEDICATIONS. I SUSPECT HE ALSO SHIT HIS PANTS TODAY.
You assume the majority of people are significantly more inteligent than they actually are. Not only can most people not think of a way to improve the education system at age 20, about half of graduates cannot even comprehend what the education system is from a wholistic perspective outside of the microcosm of their classes at their school.
>>535838094This will get tons of "likes" on Facebook, boomer.
I'll summarise one paragraph. I probably should have just ran little things by /pol/ instead of expecting them to have time to read a whole speech. >Defining politiciansA politicians job is to steal as much as possible and get away with it. >Putting different types of theft on a scale with explanations. >Bottom of scale: tax loopholes/theft of livelihood Tax loopholes are them making sure their friends don't have to pay what we pay. Bottom of the scale, indirectly stealing your livelihoods. >Top of the scale: Indirectly stealing your lives/WarWar is the most profitable way to generate income. Central banks offer stability through interest, the interest becomes the inflation, staving off hyperinflation. This allows the government to issue more currency without tearing apart the economy, when you're bringing wheelbarrows for bread, et cetera. Now that they have the ability to resist hyperinflation, how can a government justify spending the most amount of money quicker? War. When it has to defend itself. >The scale of theft now has a top (war) and bottom (tax loopholes). Next would be to pick something between those points: Stealing your future through having a shit school curriculum that basically any adult could improve upon. First of all, the teachers are not to blame. If you all think back to your time in school, after you left and worked your first job for 2 years, could you at around 20 years old design a school curriculum that better prepares children for the real world than what you got, with no real knowledge of the education system? Anyone sane of mind could. You learned more after school in those 2 functioning years than those 11-13 years in school. And those 13 years in school didn't even prepare you for those 2 functioning years. Just like that, piece by piece the future was stolen. >If we all picked our own 3, combined them, you'd chase politicians to the ends of the earth. I'd love to just walk into the council tee off but can't.
>>535844367You're taking the piss surely. In terms of real world preparation, school has almost nil. It's like starting from scratch at age 18, with the ability to write and count to a decent level and nothing else. Actually, that's exactly what it is. Almost anyone could improve the real world value of the current school curriculum. Incredible thought went into wasting as much time as possible while making it look useful. I hope the teachers don't blame themselves ever, they were amazing, the only good part of it. College/university is fine but they should make a massive effort to pipeline jobs. It's before those stages that is extremely inefficient and lines kids up for economic slaughter and nothing more than the bare minimum to be employable. In like 11-13 years. Oh, and you can write poems, and probably use letters as numbers.
>>535844367>Not only can most people not think of a way to improve the education system at age 20They're not thinking then. You could just teach then rent and mortgages through maths instead of looking a fucking triangles, for example. Maths could be entirely based on financial literacy. I could probably spend days just constantly writing out improvements off the top of my head. For fuck sakes it would be like finding water in the ocean. Sand at the beach, grass in a field. Anyone who's had a job 2 years would be able to improve it, there's no way they wouldn't be able to.
