Why do different search engines return such different results? Here are the first results for a query I made on Google and Yandex: "R. F. Kuang breasts" where there is a clear difference between the images. Google does not show the image on the right even when going to the furthest possible page of results. This trend of censorship will continue until the people rise up.
Google
>>535871388Indians are invading your country adn this is all you can think about?
Yandex
Hi-res for the first image (Yandex result)
Hi-res for the second image (Google result)
Apparently someone (a woman) wrote an article about this author and took an image from another article about her, and censored it. I think I will reach out to her and tell her that censoring the woman's free expression of her body infringes upon her autonomy and is anti-feminist. But the question remains: why does Google not show the nippley one?
>>535871471>>535871498This is bizarre. It's not just the nipples that are censored but the shadow from the necklace is removed, as well as shadowing around the lips and nose. Which is the original image? The skin tone is also subtly changed.
>>535871471>>535871498KEK
I sent a message to the woman who originally censored the image. She writes a lot about feminism and other dogshit, so hopefully my concerns will resonate with her.
>>535871877For your reference, please compare:https://www.elle.com/culture/books/a64900222/r-f-kuang-katabasis-next-fantasy-book-interview-2025/https://www.interviewmagazine.com/literature/r-f-kuang-on-plagiarism-and-the-pitfalls-of-identity-politics
>>535871388Yea but i went to yandex, turned the safe search off anf search woman nude and not a single nude woman showed up
>>535871388White supremacist board where white men spend their time discussing about searching for Asian women breasts on the Internet Kek
>>535871388>>535871413Just stop using google, stop using youtube, stop using facebook, stop using twitter, stop using <insert every other fully globohomo controlled shit>
>>535871933nigger cope
>>535871933Honestly, I can't think of a better way to spend my evening than berating feminists online about their hypocrisy. And if it's concerning the Asian breast, that's even better. Coors Banquet in my hand. Free the nipple!
>>535871434GOOGLE MUST SHOW PROPER TITS YOU BENCHOD
>>535871413>>535871437I always use Yandex when I know google is gunna get censored or jewed. So anything related to piracy.
>>535871388Now do all the sensitive searches for the geopolitical “West” (ZOG). Holocaust, Epstein files, aliens, UFOs, remote viewing. It's all heavily censored by Google, a company with very close ties to the Pentagon, Mossad and the CIA. Wei whatever the fuck it's called, the search engine from China, also does not censor it. But Russia and China censor some other things sensible to them. Governments are all like this, a cesspool of secrecy and deception.
>>535871933Keep seething, jeet.
you can't even reverse search non-famous anymore. sometimes the person is famous and the search still won't work.
>>535871388So which one is the edit? It could be either one.
>>535872094Go ahead and create hapa mutts to own the feminists.
If you search the image content, the nipple version is accessible via Google
>>535872349The nipple one appeared in an earlier article, so I assume that one.
Apparently Bing is still based enough to show what I want
>>535871388if i cant find something on google, i 90% find in on yandexturns out western regimes censored what i wanted
>>535871388With Anon's like this, the world would have ended already.
>>535871388why did you need to make 2 threads.
>>535872586I didn't make the other one
Why doesn’t Google like women’s nipples?
>>535871877>>535871918Absolutely mega based, booba no matter how big or small were made to be loved and appreciated.
big breasted women are oppressed and discriminated against
>>535871471>Hi-resNice
>>535871471>>535871498Both of these are generated images. If you do ELA on them they are not real photos and they are not the usual fakes. The only errors are on thr background, her necklace and her outline. Meaning those are 3 objects almost seamlessly blended.I would post a picture but jannies tongue my anus and TKD TND
>>535871933What does it mean to be supremacist? Few people here would accept your claim as thier own. To be chosen by god and have a soul, while everyone else is soulless cattle, is my definition of supremacy.
>>535871388If they're not all on the same team, why does Yandex return the same bullshit as google? At one point they were totally different, and if anything they've gotten worse. Why is globohomo in every search engine and making them suck?
>>535871933We are working on something
>>535872914Sexo
i'm not sure whether Google still omits the actual 4chan homepage, but for many years it did. if you searched "4chan" you'd get the Wikipedia page on top and some critical pieces from researchers and MSM
>>535871388yandex pic is from pininterest google is from feminist magazine elle
the west has fallen
>>535875684The pintrest image is the same image as all the other ones they list under different resolutions. The pinterest one is just the lowest res. The article from 2023 I posted features the nipples.
Oh no not my heckin nasty gook bitch’s nipple outlines! Gtfo fish head lover
>>535871933and?
>>535871877bless you jack
>>535876960Ugh but Asian girls are to cute and impregnable. Can't relate.
>>535871388Kagi shows both
>>535871388yandex is more betterde-google yourself NOW
>>535871471>>535871498>>535871877So the mystery is solved? Google brings up the article about her with the edited pic (since google images aren't just images, but site links with the images in it), while Yandex brings up the original raw photo
>>535871933that is correct, assdeepfeel free to light yourself on fire
>>535879167No, both link to separate articles. One chooses to show the article with the censored image, the other the article with the original.
>>535878569>KagiBased
>>535879373and? that's entirely up to who made the article, and censorship rules on the site. They probably thought it was too lewd and did a quick photoshop job. Who fucking cares
>>535871933Wow a white woman visits this board.This is rare.
>>535879496What kind of goy simp posts this? I want my nips! No problem with that. I guess you already got neutered.
>>535871471HER NIPS ARE PROTRUDING!!!! COVER THAT SHIT UP.
what if the original had NO nipples, but A.I. erased them?
My brothers, I’m old enough to remember when you could find an ocean of images of white women fucking dogs on google’s image search by just typing “woman fucking dog.”I mean, so many of them that I just concluded that most women have sex with their dogs.
>>535879964>I mean, so many of them that I just concluded that most women have sex with their dogs.It's rover.
>>535872421This bitch has swallowed White man cum before. More than once.
>>53587143499% of your entire race just participated in the largest psy op in human history ever, masking, vaxxing, scanning qr codes, showing vaxpasses, kept indoors in front of screens, in a display of human domestication never seen before that would make ancient emperors and dictators even blush and youre thinking about indiansRent freeNo refunds
>I’ve really enjoyed Alexandra Chang’s Days of Distraction, which features a Chinese American woman in her mid twenties navigating a relationship with her white boyfriend while he’s applying to PhD programs.>I recently went through the PhD application cycle with my own white boyfriend, so so many of their conversations and the little details about what they were stressing over (checking GradCafe! oh my GOD!) rang so true.what did she mean by this?
>>535871388People still use google?
>>535871388Google has been turning into complete shit lately, got especially worse after AI integration.
>>535871434>stop asking questions goy
>>535877664I rove you
>>535873686good question
>>535880262I don't know if it's just me trying to find more and more obscure knowledge but I can barely find anything with google. Bing/duckduckgo are even worse somehow, and yandex finds mostly Russian stuff
>>535872914I want to run women over with a truck
>>535871877Kek these threads are why I still come back to this place
So i've seen people praise yandex and duckduckgo as these uncensored havens for special information that google and the normie engines will suppress. In that case why have i over the years kept finding better more accurate results on google? Bing was terrible in comparison and so was yandex and duckduckgo. I also found more recommendations in total.
