Worry not white people!Your savior is here!https://youtu.be/xcdJ7-h3aDk?si=HQxUCJ2KVa9lbLBB
ugly bitch
>>535941260We like white women, but we don't agree with having female leaders. Women belong in the home.
>>535941492JEW KIKE
>>535941517You can't stop a girl boss from savin shit
>>535941260Bump
>>535941260Is that an AI animation of a 90s photo? And the sasquatch posters lol.I don't think people think much about Sydney Sweeny on the right. Some of the stuff she's done is highly depraved but the extent to which she herself is knowingly complicit is ambiguous. If you know anyone that works in movies and tv, or anyone that at least hangs out with or has dated celebrity types, you'll know that a lot of it is genuine and organic and many are just normal, kinda shy people that don't necessarily have much understanding of what's going on politically. Many have genuine problems and may not have many real friends etc.>(for males:)The Conservative Right and Radical Right have different concerns on the matter. Conservatives believe sexuality is learned, and a temptation to suppress and don't really seem to have an alternative to arranged marriage as dutiful obligation. The Radical Right by contrast are attracted to women and like big boobs. They have practical time/place concerns as it can be a safety hazard. They assume young women will try to be attractive and assume young men will try to impress them. Whites, as a dual selection consensual race, as opposed to forced reproduction races, will get both annoyed at big boobs for distracting them while also complaining about political attacks on big boobs. Sydney enjoying her boobs and having a sense of humour registers her as less annoying than aggressive feminist types who complain about big boobs while also showing off their boobs making them more of an mirror opposite of conservative, which registers as MORE annoying for the Radical Right.
>>535941517Female leadership has proven to be extremely violent and dangerous. They are also extremely impressionable and will change direction radically in ways that men simply don't. A lot of long time right wing nationalist types will probably know a bunch of examples of women changing direction so radically that they actually feel quite tame/moderate in comparison. Women's speed of life/mind (for a lack of a better term) operates far faster than men's to the point it seems incomprehensibly whimsical compared to their own. By their late 20s girls will have had serious relationships, completed advanced education, will have worked multiple part time jobs and careers, will have travelled all around the world and spent a lot of time socialising and read a bunch of books, and will be managing all kinds of debit and credit cards, will have had several cars and gone through a whole host of cell phones while keeping up with all things fashion. They won't necessarily know what the polish corridor's significance was, but, when one knows, they all seem to know.Guys will spend large sections of life getting to points that same-aged girls have whizzed past years before them. That slow life mode however means guys have a lot of detailed information despite being less well travelled. >Women belong in the home.Is this even true though? The decisive factor in child rearing seems to be... male presence. Our youth have been raised by women at home and at school and women are far out performing men by several metrics. They also seem to have vastly better success at getting work and seem to enjoy work more than men. Women are also the major movers of the economy, they buy and spend more. Men often fixate on money only to provide women with money to spend or to fund projects. Otherwise guys are content with very little compared to women. A room with a punchbag and a computer and mattress covers most men's basics.Are men the true home makers?
>>535941260
>>535941260you just know the milk tastes like bourbon barrel aged honey nectar
>>535942422SHES A HERO FOR WHITE IDENTITY WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOTWHAY THE FUK HAVE YOU DONE FOR THE WHITE RACE!?
>>535943344And is that suppose to be bad!?
>>535941260what happened to her face?
>>535941715That strategy, again?
>>535941492>>535941517>>535941687>>535941715>>535942285>>535942422These are reposted spam threads
>>535941687>>535941517>>535941492>>535943401>>535943390>>535943372
>>535941260isn't she too young for presidency
