[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: el-mapa-fisico-de-cuba.png (222 KB, 1300x900)
222 KB PNG
The Euro(cuck)pean mind cannot and will not ever understand Latin America.
All their analysis and predictions are built on the idea that inhabitants of a country will drop their differences when an invasion happens because of an inherent loyalty to each other built on a shared background.
This makes sense in their context and history, but this is not true at all in Latin America. A race mixed, raceless, young so-called society devoid of any real struggle (at least on the level that european nations have gone through).
People on these lands WILL sell each other for personal gain at the first opportunity. Our countries are only held together because the ordinary people are just lazy and incapable of waging war.
The upcoming invasion of Cuba by the US will be a success, and yet again, eurocucks will all act shocked and dumbfounded when their prediction didn't work, and the citizens of Cuba welcome Americans as liberators.
>>
>>535959538

You make it seem like America wouldn't be liberating them. They're not selling out their country by siding with the US because their country no longer exists, it died in 1959. Nations do not exist in a communist regime, even a larping one like Cuba.
>>
Zero reason for America to get involved. Asking for trouble.
>>
>>535959689
>>535959784
Missing the point.
Whenever something related to LATAM and the US pops out, it is euros that go around parroting shit like
>HURR DURR THERE WILL BE RESISTANCE
>HURR DURR A NEW VIETNAM, IRAQ
>HURR DURR MUH SLEEPERS CELLS
>>
This is why any "pan ethnic" movement is bullshit, and why BRICS is double bullshit.
>>
>>535959899

Europe died in 1945. They're an abandoned museum housing what's left of the west's culture, swarmed with vermin, a consequence of its dilapidation.
>>
Why do latam people on this board call you guys peruANO
>>
File: IMG_9532.png (174 KB, 478x404)
174 KB PNG
>>535959689
You have to go back
>>
>>535959538
>start war with Iran to distract from Epstein files >losing war against Iran >start war with Cuba to distract from failing war with Iran
>>
>>535960465
Because it is funny
>>
File: P1010506-1.jpg (397 KB, 613x1000)
397 KB JPG
>>535959538
>The Euro(cuck)pean mind cannot and will not ever understand Latin America.

fucking columbian sitting in a full train and talks how he just stabbed a female cuz she is a bitch and that he is on a run to Poland now. 5 people who speak Spanish and arrested that freak at next station. some Latinos are inbred retarded to the level of potato..
>>
>>535960763
what does it mean though
>>
>>535959538
cuba is another gaza
mutts will have feed 10 million niggers more
>>
>>535960899
Ano = anus
Because ass is the peak of comedy
>>
>>535959538
>devoid of any real struggle (at least on the level that european nations have gone through).
That's not true. Natives killed each other all the time, you just did not write about it so have developed a communal memory of it. Even if you want to bitch that you are a mestizo, you have half euro struggle and half injun one. Stand proud, you are stong.
>>
>>535961046
kek thanks ano
>>
>>535961053
>Natives killed each other all the time
Not even close, at not at the level to develop a real military culture.
Keep in mind that here, the priests were the one holding the power.
>>
>>535961208
You gotta clarify what you mean by "military culture" because the Incas certainly had one. Mesoamerica was too, if you want to count it. Very cut and dry.
>>
>>535961407
>Mesoamerica was too, if you want to count
Anon...those were religious rituals, not military practices.
>>
>>535959538

Austrian flag with a turd stain in the middle.

What a joke.
>>
>>535961465
>the flower wars were not military practices because of religious tones
What a dumb thing to say, so i guess the crusades were not either.
>>
>>535961590
Both are in conflict with each other.
The flower wars wanted to CAPTURE as many people as they could to sacrifice for their gods.
A real military doctrine focuses on being efficient at KILLING in the battlefield
>>
>>535961713
>A real military doctrine focuses on being efficient at KILLING in the battlefield
Not at all, a real military doctrine focuses on winning, and everything else is an orbiting accessory. Maximum killing might be one of the ways a doctrine might pursue this but it has historically not always been the case. In any case, not all aztec warfare was flower wars. They also fought wars for expansion, tribute, rebellion suppression, and territorial control.To say it was all a religious practice is baptizing any military action as such, not really a serious argument.
>>
>>535961993
>Not at all, a real military doctrine focuses on winning, and everything else is an orbiting accessory.
By being efficient.
You cannot be efficient when your leaders (priests and godking) demand that you go out of your way and capture people ALIVE.
That fact alone hindered their military development forever
>>
>>535962177
And they had to kill the opposing force so they could get the easier to capture alive non combatants. You think they were careful not to kill enemies that threw arrows and spears at them? They wouldn't have built an empire if they were so inept.
>>
>>535959538
OK, glowie
>>
>>535962378
>capture alive non combatants
They wanted living combatants
>>
>>535962527
Not a glowie
>>
>>535962534
>They wanted living combatants
Not exclusively, and again, that's mostly Flower Wars, not every aztec campaign. In any case, how does the maximum killing doctrine pan out right now for the US of A? That strait is still closed last I checked.
>>
>>535959538
It may also have something to do with the fact that the cuban government has been historically unpopular with its people and are the reason why cubans keep fleeing to Florida.
>>
if Cuba got annexed would it be a safer tropical vacation spot or would it be as bad as Puerto Rico in terms of crime.
>>
>>535963505
Depends if there is a mass exodus from Haiti or not. It's a hell of a lot easier to reach Cuba than Puerto Rico.

Keep in mind that blacks already shit up Puerto Rico to begin with.
>>
>>535959538
Based USA destroying browns everwhere and saving the latin and white races.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.