Why were anti-vaxxers upset that the covid vaccine wasn't harmful? Isn't that a good thing?
Bait used to be believable
Oh, but it is harmful.
>>535968577I'm upset that it was uselessthe harm is a given, literally every drug kills someone every now and then even if it's just an allergy so an ineffective drug is always worse than nothing
>>535968663evidence?
>>535968577postan in a troll thread!
>>535968771>I have no absolutely knowledge on this issue whatsoevertry leading the thread with that next time instead of lying about the vaccine not being harmful
>>535969086>i refuse to provide evidence for my claims when askedthis is why no one takes anti-vaxxers seriously you expect people to believe you just because you said something
No one is upsetBut please, just take your booster If you’re not up to day on boosters (number 12 now), then you’re an antivaxxer
>>535968577No, it's a bad thing. I'm upset because I wanted the vaccine to be harmful so it would maim/kill the liberals who took it.
>>535969169>>i refuse to provide evidence for my claims when askedwe know, OPit turned out you were just lying when you said "the covid vaccine wasn't harmful"now apologize to everyone here for wasting their time
>>535968577Is this gas lighting or a strawman?
>>535968577>wasn't harmful
>>535968655After Trump killed USAID the shills got really fucking stupid and lazy.
>>5359685772 more weeks until red deer vaxxie die off
>>535969822WhyNotBoth.png
>>535969947he’s defending the trump vaccine
>>535968577Pro tio unless you were aged 50 or above every single vaccine had a higher rate of serious complications than the Wuhan flu did.
>>535968577You couldn't cartch the covid anymore so at the least it worked. At the least.
>>535969822strictly, gaslighting is convincing someone they are insane in some way.colloquially, gaslighting is any kind of trick based on dishonesty, so all fallacies presented as valid and good faith arguments are gaslighting.it's a simple loaded question, an informal fallacy where the speaker bakes a false premise into the question that you have to accept whether you answer yes or no.>do you still beat your wife?
>>535968577You mean the anti.vaxxers who were pro-vaxxers before the fake pandemic.As if they have any clue about vaccines anyways. Beside they are mosly only anti-covidvax.
>>535968577don't care if it's harmful or noti'm just not gonna take it at all, you boot licker
