[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: florida.jpg (99 KB, 1200x630)
99 KB JPG
I have ancestors who were indigenous Floridians. I am a true Floridian. I also have black ancestors that I am very proud of. This doesn't mean I can't hold your views such as small government, free markets, strong borders, etc... I just want to be respected as an individual not lumped into a group. I feel the right-wing needs more people like me in the movement.
>>
>>535974177
I'm racist as fuck and I wouldn't exclude you. I believe the AVERAGE brownoid is a worthless piece of shit, not that all of them are.
>>
>look at me guys, i cant think for myself! please accept me!

you're just cooning to a collective and trying to fit somewhere instead of exercising your true individuality and agency. many such browns
>>
>>535974564
That's fair enough.

>>535974928
You literally are an NPC with zero critical thought, you've never once thought for yourself, you're a slave.
>>
>>535974177
>small government
In other words, ceding state power to other political factions who are actually willing to use it...
>free markets
and outsourcing whatever is left to private corporations to the point where they can use their economic leverage to bully you into writing policy for their lobbyist muscle.
>strong borders
Redundancy. You either have *a* border or you don't. There's no such thing as "strong" or "weak" borders. People either cross if and when they feel like it (because you don't have a border) or if and when you allow them (because you DO have a border).

Drop the 'we' shit, kid. You have to be 18 to post here. Come back when you're past your egalitarian libertarian phase.
>>
>>535975718
>In other words, ceding state power to other political factions who are actually willing to use it...

No, ceding power to the individuals, each individual can govern their own affairs as they see fit and interact with others in a voluntary manner.

>and outsourcing whatever is left to private corporations to the point where they can use their economic leverage to bully you into writing policy for their lobbyist muscle.

Literally a child's view on things. This is how I thought when I was 14 years old.
>>
>>535975864
>No, ceding power to the individuals, each individual can govern their own affairs as they see fit and interact with others in a voluntary manner.
Libertarian idealism that looks fantastic on paper and has never worked.

Power vacuums are always filled by ambitious men who are more willing to use force than you. If you put 100 people on a desert island and say "nobody is in charge", I guarantee you within a week one guy will find a really big stick and starting beating other men into submission while simultaneously selling them on a plot to rape and seize the women as warbrides.

>Literally a child's view on things. This is how I thought when I was 14 years old.
You refuted nothing. Ad hominem. I at least explained why you were wrong before insulting you.
>>
>>535976167
>Libertarian idealism that looks fantastic on paper and has never worked.

It only worked 100% of the time it's been tried

>Power vacuums are always filled by ambitious men who are more willing to use force than you. If you put 100 people on a desert island and say "nobody is in charge", I guarantee you within a week one guy will find a really big stick and starting beating other men into submission while simultaneously selling them on a plot to rape and seize the women as warbrides.

That's why you establish a Federal Police force, court system, and punitive system to deal with those who break the law

This isn't complicated.
>>
Don't let these people get to you.

Limited government is the answer.

Being a US Citizen under the Constitution is the answer.

Racial fanatics are sick commies and need to be ignored.
>>
>>535976294
>It only worked 100% of the time it's been tried
I'm guessing you didn't give a real world example of an actual country where this worked because you don't have one.

>ceding power to the individuals, each individual can govern their own affairs as they see fit and interact with others in a voluntary manner.
>establish a Federal Police force, court system, and punitive system to deal with those who break the law
Pick one.
>>
>>535974177
>I just want to be respected as an individual not lumped into a group.
Over target. Without personal freedom and the freedom of the individual, there will be no freedom. Black or most likely brown based on what you said, but you're alright man
>>
>>535974177
>Im a black Seminole
Big doubt
>>
>>535976476
United States, 1870 to 1905, rapid industrialization, rapid standard of living increase. They weren't perfectly libertarian but they were as close to it as I can imagine

>Pick one.
They're not mutually exclusive.I have more freedom as an individual because i have a police force to protect my property from violent thugs.
>>
>>535976623
Yes the industrialists gobbling up all the land for free was liberalism
>>
>>535976678
Totally bro
>>
>>535976775
And then selling the farmland to the displaced farmers from industry and then having them pay whatever you wanted to ship their produce

Vgh
>>
>>535974564
>the AVERAGE brownoid
The AVERAGE whiteoid is not exactly a prime example either.
>>
>>535976294
>>>535975864

name one time it has been tried, you retard
>>
>>535979497
Literally your country Netherlands during the 30 year war, you created the first stock market and broke down guilds to let the free market revive your economy, it's what founded the East India Company... fucking MORON
>>
>>535974177
Your the faggot manlet who hit my truck?
>>
>>535977129
They dont try to rape people (usually)
>>
>>535979553

>describes mercantilism and state intervention

lol retard
>>
>>535974177
It's quite simple.
The left pushes a settler v. indigenous angle for their narratives.


If you identify with the indigenous and not the settlers, you're on the wrong team. Non-Whites are always inherently going to be untrustworthy because the path of least resistance for them will always be to sympathize with the indigenous against the settlers
>>
>>535979779
It was a domestic free market, which was far closer to it than previously where you had state sanctioned guilds and monopolies. It took longer before the ideas were applied on an international scale.

America was very libertarian in the 1870s to 1910s even though we had tariffs, you're a retard.
>>
>>535979918

you're wrong about the netherlands and you're wrong about america retard

the US in the 1870s to 1910s was pro-business, protectionist and in the phase of a developmental state. you cant just exempt tariffs either as some minor exception retard because they were central tools of US economic policy and literally used to both rasie federal revenue and protect domestic producers from foreign competition. the state was also actively involved in itnervening in the market by then like building railraods and shit. the pacific railway act gave federal subsidies in land and loans to support the railroad constrtuction and the morill act used federal land grants for public colleges + national archives showing 10 million acres involved in grants from expropriated tribal lands (your ppl btw retard XD) so america was basically stalinist btw

banking was also not laissez-faire, not even remotely. national banking acts of 1863 and 1864 blew ur lbiertarian retard dream to smithereens by creating a federal banking framework ,banking regulation, national currency system and the immigration and labor markets were also state controlled. 1870s and 1910s implemented the interstate commerce act of 1887, created the ICC, made railroads the first industry to federal reg, food and drugs acts, and other progressive era regulatory statutes.
>>
>>535980375
>was stalinist btw

Holy fuck a literal retard.
>>
>>535981558
>lets cling onto the obvious bait so i dont have to address any other points

so predictable
>>
>>535981954
I never claimed the U.S was an ANCAP state, my point is that it was far more Libertarian than it was before (due to slavery) or after (due to the Roosevelt revolution and Teddy's regulations), as well as the Federal Reserve which began to take a more proactive role in interest rate policy compared to the previous central banks.

The U.S was very lazzie faire compared to today, these were small regulations (not that i approve), and although they were protectionist, the U.S itself acted as a giant common market within, and it was big enough that the effects of the tariffs were partly mitigated. Government spending as a % of GDP was very very low, tariffs and excise taxes were the only significant taxes and made up less than 5% of GDP, and there was almost no regulation on finance or labor or industry activity.
>>
File: 1773965072988749.jpg (282 KB, 1200x864)
282 KB JPG
>>535974177
I agree. The right needs more niggers like you out front to remove all pretense they give a shit about the white working class. Fuck niggers
>>
>>535982274
You help the white working class the same way you help anybody.

Shrink the size of government, tight monetary policy, low tax, deregulation
>>
>>535974177
Fuck off kike
>>
File: 1776562029798876.png (921 KB, 859x657)
921 KB PNG
>>535982373
Sure thing Ronald McRagan
>>
>>535982992
Ah yes, because restructuring the economy is so bad,
>>
>>535982098
Liberalism and slavery are not mutually exclusive. You're thinking socialism
>>
>>535974177
>small government, free markets, strong borders, etc... I just want to be respected

Lol it's surreal that people still seriously say this stupid, propagandistic shit in 2026 when megacorporations and banks have colonized the planet. Anyone pretending they're gonna help institute any of that shit is just saying it because they know you're a stupid cornfed negroid trying to vicariously capture that ooga booga strongman feeling and you'll fall for it sincerely.
>>
>>535983541
>say this stupid, propagandistic shit in 2026 when megacorporations and banks have colonized the plane

Imagine being so dumb you unironically fall for this schizo propaganda aimed at stupid people.

No corporations aren't "colonizing" anything, banks aren't evil, they're allocators of capital. You're a child who thinks anything big is scary and you're dumb enough that conspiracy people were able to take advantage of you.

The left used you for an experiment, and you fell for it.
>>
>>535983858
You are a banker Jew aren't you, lol
>>
File: download (27).png (86 KB, 828x959)
86 KB PNG
>>535974177
>im proud of being a nigger mutt, but i think you should be more socially cohesive because i said so
cool story nigger. get your fucking niggers face out of our white movies though.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.