Anonymous (ID: qUMW+fBe)
Another Trump Q proof 05/28/26(Thu)23:54:09 No.536001715

File: 2539728943172381792843327(...).png (1.3 MB, 1895x547)

1.3 MB PNG

Another Trump Q proof Anonymous (ID: qUMW+fBe) 05/28/26(Thu)23:54:09 No.536001715

The standard deviation on this, isn't reasonable.. it just isn't.. in other words, what you're looking at is a statistical impossibility.. do you really want to know what the odds were?.. of this anon being right about the 8 and the 9? seriously. what were the anon's odds of that? do you know? if you do, then you might be getting that uncomfortable type feeling, when you observe phenomena that violates the terms of statistical variance.. Let's look at how this anon does it.. it's a type of SYN-ACK, if you believe in those kinds of things..
1.) The first Truth social message at 7:32amPST show not just your 8 and 9, but all 3 100s. See the 3 100% in the picture? It's the SYN. But you didn't know that.
2.) At 9:03:00am PST the anon posts an image of Pelosi in North Korea. This is the ACK. It's 3:00, or 300. The anon needed to hit double zero to do that. And he did
3.) Exactly 5 minutes later at 09:08:00, the anon reposts the first message. Now he has his double zero delta marker. He's rolled the :00 twice on this site. Read that again. He's got the 9 and the 8 and the double zeros, twice.
4.) Later that same evening, a Trump truth post at 8:54pm PST contains.. get this, an 8 and a 9. This is a complete fucking statistical impossibility, for this anon to have achieved.
5.) In the first reply to this post, we'll put the Q drop containing the result for 9x9 and you'll see it's about North Korea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfelvI_ikf4