the fatigue. it never ends.>stein>brought to you by heebshttps://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20260527-estevanico-the-african-explorer-who-crossed-north-america
One of three possibilities:>it wasn't a nigger>he accomplished something Europeans did decades prior>it's completely fabricated
>BBClol
>>536012243>it's completely fabricatedprobably this one
>>536012195Hahahahaha. Nobody cares what the BBC says
>>536012291A Moroccan is not an African, they weren't black, and he has a Spanish name. It becomes so tedious
Now I know where the term "coon" cam from when referring to black men. as well as "Key stealers"
>>536012243probably all three
>>536012195>>536012243>>536012282>>536012356you idiots don't realize that this means we can now legally call them colonizers
>>536012195>estevanicothe story of estevanico is well documented. but niggers like to wewuz all the time. when they say african, it was of course a moor from spain
>>536012359He wasn't black. It wasn't until some time in the 1700s Morocco integrated the Sudan into its Sultanate. Prior to its attempted invasion of Spain. The same Sultan.So what we have is an assumed Moor? One that has taken a Spanish name.The Moors weren't Black. That goes back thousands of years to the Egyptian civil war. Upper and lower. There are loose and I mean very loose descriptions of nubians, blacks throughout our Empires but for the most part they were excluded since the pharoahs. Islam slave traded of course. But not to the point of documenting exploration based on modern revisionism. The title is quite contrary and erroneous.Why hasn't it used the black who attempted to discover the North Pole?Sick of this bullshit.
>>536012195>story about a "great explorer">it's about EstebanicoThis is probably written by the same people who say "Emperor Julius Caesar".
>>536012246Mutt’s Law
>>536012243It's none of the aboveIt's the Spanish bringing a slave (or freedman) with them on an expedition and him being one of the few survivors when the whole thing ended in disaster
