[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_1117.png (163 KB, 512x342)
163 KB PNG
NYS budget calls for Glock ban…
Oh say can you see…

>Among the thousands of pages of legislation that comprises the 2026-27 New York budget is a law that bans the sale of pistols that can be converted into automatic weapons.

>The legislation, often referred to as the “Glock ban” has been signed by Gov. Kathy Hochul. The language included in the budget bill is similar to S.3559, legislation that was reintroduced in the Senate in 2025 by Sen. Zellnor Myrie, D-New York City. Pistol converters are known as “Glock Switches” because the design of Glock pistols – and other pistols that replicate those designs – makes them uniquely susceptible to this type of illegal conversion. Myrie wrote in his legislative justification that the ban on new sales of Glock pistols would be lifted if the gun manufacturer changes its design so its pistols can’t be converted so easily.
https://www.post-journal.com/news/top-stories/2026/05/glock-ban-included-in-state-budget/
>>
>>536016013
You'll regret this
>>
>>536016013

This country is completely fake on every level
>>
California did the exact same thing a while back. Glock redesigned their new series of pistols to be compliant.
>>
>>536016013
if certain people kill people why not ban those people from NYS?
what's the point of crippling everyone of their right to bear arms because of a small group of criminals?
>>
>>536016357
I decided to actually check:
I was more right than I thought; the text in the California law and in the New York law is almost exactly the same regarding the "cruciform trigger bar" that Glock got rid of on their latest redesign.
>>
>>536016357
Still undetectable by airports' metal detectors! A weapon of war doesn't belong in a polite society! Think of the children of the streets! Don't you care about the children, you monster!
>>
>>536016013
Nothing burger
>>
File: israeli plus sign.png (234 KB, 1080x680)
234 KB PNG
>>536016870
BTW it just occurred to me that politicians wanting to ban a cruciform thing seems like something many anons on this board would be very interested in
>>
>>536016357
>California did the exact same thing a while back. Glock redesigned their new series of pistols to be compliant.
>>536016870
>that Glock got rid of on their latest redesign.
Doesn't matter, people on the internet found a different design to make a Glock Switch to work the day after release.
>>
>>536016013
>woman infringes
what you gonna do goy, comply?
>>
>>536016180
makes you want to fucking kill people don’t it?
the subversion is british.
>>
>>536017102
I heard about the new switch too but it does matter legally because both laws exempt, using exactly the same wording, pistols "lacking a cruciform trigger bar".
>>
>>536016153
It's virtually impossible to buy guns in shit holes like NY anyways. This is all theater.
>>
>>536016437
Honestly I think it comes down to a lack of theory of mind for Democrats. Most of them are mentally unstable and feel if they had access to guns they would kill themselves and others in a vulnerable emotional state. They don't understand that most people would never consider using a gun for something other than hunting and self-defense
>>
>>536016013
Legacy models will be grandfathered in if you know who your father is.
So...



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.