[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Elon Musk just said what nobody in Washington wants to hear.

- The government is basically unfixable.

- Americans are useless unproductive degenerates who must be replaced by data centers ASAP

- If AI and robots dont solve our national debt. We are toast.

https://x.com/CryptoTice_/status/2060285026009219474

This way Musk for the first time said that the only hope are AI and robots, not Amerimutt brown biomass that is probably only a huge drain on resources, thats why mRNA vaccines are the future xD
>>
What you said and what the tweet said don't really match up
>>
>>536017684
This part about useless Amerimutts was my personal addition as the only possible logical consequence of Musks words xD
>>
>>536017440
Vaxx zombies will be culled.

Beast system will be enforced on the survivors.
>>
>>536017440
There are four options:
1 It is completely made up.
2 Low birth rates, which work over a century or two. AI time scale is in months to years though.
3 The deathly hardships and desperation that AI bros inflict on the sane people. Works over years and decades though.
4 Some evil plan for a doomsday event.

You be the judge.
>>
File: 1777365017758121.jpg (253 KB, 719x1278)
253 KB JPG
>>536017792
They were already murdered along with their offspring, only in a delayed mode, if we exclude all these millions that dropped dead so far xD
>>
>>536018131
Low birth rates don't affect the nationalities that have bloated the human population from 4 to 8 billion in a couple of fucking decades.
It's the other three.
>>
File: 4897534957348957.jpg (1.21 MB, 2852x3143)
1.21 MB JPG
>>536017440
>>536017762
this is the population drop elon is talking about because he is the one who orchestrated it with DOGE
>>
>>536018188
you sound retarded
>>
>>536018131
Probably 4.
Covid was the first half of le Kabuki dookie play
Whatever they have planned for 2030 will most likely be le Shyamalan twist
The final act will be starving/using AI to hunt down the survivors
>>
File: 1732203551446987.jpg (420 KB, 1311x2048)
420 KB JPG
Grimes, the mother of three of Elon Musks children, in a recent interview for Time:

"Luckily there is a massive population drop coming so the AI replacing humans wont be a problem"

https://x.com/Vision4theBlind/status/2010056211622957538
>>
>>536018404
retard
>>
>>536018362
>>536018430

You sound like a genius xD
>>
>>536018470
no i just look at his actions and understand that the "elmo in saudi arabi" line was lie presented to you to make genocide more appealing
>>
Kind of sad that her entire existence and fame is now dependent on Musk
>>
>>536018529
Dude. If Musk says that government is unfixable and the only hope are AI and robots, otherwise Amerimuttland goes bankrupt, he indirectly suggests that Amerimutt biomass is fkn useless drain on resources fully responsible for this bankruptcy. He says nothing about low taxes, strong families, rich middle class, yadda-yadda. He says the only hope is AI and robots. Can you decifer logical consequences of such statement or not? xD
>>
>>536018696
well someone has to pick the fruit and that shit used to be for brown slaves
>>
>>536018696
Of course the American biomass is useless, overall, its entire focus is babysitting third worlders at this point. It's effectively a global daycare.
>>
>>536018788
>>536018794
You are the useless biomass xD
>>
At least Elon Musk's baby momma is dropping some truth for us plebs. So nice of her!
>>
File: The west has fallen.jpg (80 KB, 999x1024)
80 KB JPG
>It's over!
Source: Some random Jeet on Twitter.
>>
>>536018844
I can't wait for Russia to roll over you again xD
>>
>>536018844
cutting off nato from america will have a similar effect on europe. thats one is harder to do because your leaders really dont want to die
>>
>>536017440
>I think-
Let me stop you early and save some breath
>>
THE SUN CAN JUST REVAPORIZE
THE RESIDUAL ENTROPIC DISEASE
THAT IS RESURGING ITS VIRUS
SYNDICATE WITHIN THIS
BIODOME/DIEHOLD
>>
>>536018932
You're already de facto cut off lol. You're a liability that can't even take care of Iran.
>>
>>536018929
>>536018932
I dont fkn care about West, NATO, Bolanda etc. I talk about serious matters, not bullshit. All these organisations are currently disintegrating xD
>>
Everyone will know who killed the world. There will not be a warm welcome for the bunker dwellers.
>>
>>536017440
Boomer die off will see the west transform for better or worse
>>
File: =-==-=.png (2.15 MB, 2499x2494)
2.15 MB PNG
ELONIGGER IS
SUCH A BOTCHED
DICK BIGOT

HIS GFs of his "OFFSPRING" SHOULD JUST
CASTRATE HIM FOR BEING A (ECO)TERRORIST/GENOCIDAL PERPETUATING BIGOTED FUCK
>>
Quickly, more Indians!
>>
>>536019030
>>536019031
yeah but we need to burn the entire thing and make it official. the best way is to constantly attack you since your so arrogant but your leaders are actual seem to catch on. thats why they keep forgiving us with some shittalking involved
>>
File: 1779666879541935m.jpg (63 KB, 689x1024)
63 KB JPG
>>536019096
Boomer will live for another 100 years. It's the spic and jeet who gonna die first
>>
Thinking about it, given this "leak" and Ashley St. Clair's "leak", I'm really starting to think Musk just intentionally seeds this shit, and is playing with these unstable women.
>>
>>536018131
5 dysgenic collapse of civilisation.
In the past, dumb people were exterminated by harsh Darwinian selection pressures. Now we have healthcare for infants of all class of families, welfare, regular food supply etc. We need eugenics to counteract these systemic nesting patterns.
Eugenics doesnโ€™t require extermination, but Iโ€™m not feeling charitable.

FYI leftism is ontologically evil and innovates the most dysgenic cultural practices imaginable. Essentially the will of Satan.
>>
File: IMG_7974.jpg (1.89 MB, 1504x990)
1.89 MB JPG
Noooooo, 1997 was supposed to be the end of history! How could this be??
>>
>>536017440
No one is breeding.
Stop thinking this is some mustache twirling villain stroking a white cat in a high backed chair and realize that men are so fucking sick of women being unholy cunts that they refuse to fuck them.
That's what is meant. Not that the ayylmaos are going to nuke the frogs gay with black helicopters in Israel.
>>
File: 1779892055966949.png (248 KB, 1474x1136)
248 KB PNG
>>536017440
I wonder sometimes, is he fucking retarded? You cannot ever pay down the debt, by design. You cannot "just stop being lazy, bro" your way out of this system. He has to know this, and knowing that he knows this and continues to say this retarded shit, changes everything about what that guy truly is.
>>
>>536019650
It is about injecting 70% of the Amerimutt livestock with DARPA bioweapon in form of modRNA/LNP and AAV genetic platforms that are now accumulating mutations in your bodys software effectively reducing your lifespan and lifespan of your potential offspring (if your sperm wasnt already so fucked up by these gene therapies that you cant have any). Nukes were already dropped on useless eaters in 2020/2022. Elites dont need to do much anymore, just cosmetic culling in the meantime xD
>>
>>536017440
>But this time for real though
>>
>>536017440
One guy wrote about it in 1992. Too bad you have to be Elons Roastie to get attention
>>
>>536019650
OP is a Jew that's why he spams these "killer vaccine" slide threads even though everyone quit believing in that garbage years ago. Search the archive for XD if you don't believe me
>>
>>536019959
Thats the truth, tho. Useless eaters expire prematurely everyday mostly because of these 2021/2022 modRNA/AAV injections deliberately contaminated with DNA residuals and nuclear promoters/enhancers. Sad but true xD Do you expect me to lie? Nobody pays me for spreading lies. If somebody paid me very well, maybe i would say that everythings fine.
>>
File: IMG_7976.jpg (487 KB, 1639x553)
487 KB JPG
>>536019478
Thatโ€™s the second commandment.
>>
>>536019592
lol they painted over this shit.
>>
>>536020345
Dude, you dont need any "guidestones" to know such basic things. General scientific consensus for today is a claim the global population must be reduced from current 8 bln to 0.5 bln ASAP

The 2024 study (Dasgupta et al.) proposes an optimal global population of lower bracket 0.5 billion based on a rigorous economic model balancing population size, per capita consumption, and Earths regenerative capacity for natural resources.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10986754/

Rees (2023): In "The Human Ecology of Overshoot: Why a Major 'Population Correction' Is Inevitable," William E. Rees argues for an inevitable reduction to below current levels (implying under 1 billion in severe overshoot scenarios) due to humanity's ecological footprint exceeding Earth's biocapacity by 1.7 times.

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/3/32

A companion paper, "The Human Eco-Predicament: Overshoot and the Population Conundrum" (also 2023), reinforces this by modeling overshoot dynamics, suggesting reductions to levels compatible with pre-industrial biocapacity (potentially 0.5โ€“1 billion) to avoid collapse

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365402435_The_human_eco-predicament_Overshoot_and_the_population_conundrum

Van den Bergh and Rietveld: A meta-analysis of 94 population limit studies yields a lower bound of 0.65 billion under current technology, assuming strict sustainability and minimal consumption

https://www.niussp.org/environment-and-development/can-earth-support-4-billion-people-sustainably-and-well/

... and many-many more xD
>>
>>536020696
Ehrlich (2018): Paul R. Ehrlich, in discussions on population ethics and sustainability (e.g., referenced in 2023 analyses), estimates an optimum population of under 1 billion to ensure moderate standards while preserving biodiversity and resources

https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/a-brief-on-overpopulation-why-it-matters-and-what-you-can-do-about-it/

This collaborative paper by environmental analysts states that a sustainable human population - one enjoying a very modest, equitable middle-class standard of living while retaining biodiversity and minimizing climate adversities - is estimated at 2 billion in lower bracket.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969722042644

Lianos and Pseiridis (2016, frequently cited in 2020-2025 reviews): Using an ecological footprint-biocapacity ratio (L=1 for sustainability) and targeting European-level per capita welfare ($11,000โ€“16,000), they estimate an optimum of 3.1 billion. This is referenced in recent overviews (Overpopulation Project analyses up to 2025) as a benchmark for maintaining relatively comfortable living standards without rapid depletion of natural resources.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282242775_Sustainable_Welfare_and_Optimum_Population_Size

Bradshaw et al. (2024) โ€“ "Net Benefit of Smaller Human Populations to Environmental Integrity and Individual Health and Wellbeing" (published in Frontiers in Public Health). The study implies 2-3.5 billion as a sustainable carrying capacity for decent standards within planetary boundaries.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10949988/

Thats science. Only the "covid vaccinated" think all of this is a "conspiracy theory" (a term created and popularized by CIA btw).

Useless farters are always the least informed xD
>>
File: IMG_7977.jpg (1.84 MB, 1766x900)
1.84 MB JPG
>>536021537
Sure, Iโ€™m just addressing that anons point about dysgenic collapse.
Itโ€™s another matter that has concerned the elite for some time.
>>
>>536021537
Pimentel et al. (cited in 2022-2024 reviews): This biophysical analysis, updated in recent sustainability debates (e.g., IUSSP and MDPI), calculates Earths carrying capacity at 2 billion with Western-level consumption or 3-4 billion at much lower levels, advocating rapid reductions of global population

https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/Crist2022.pdf

Ward et al. (2023) โ€“ "Demographic Delusions: World Population Growth Is Exceeding Most Projections"

The study recommends restoring forced family planning to achieve below-replacement fertility (max 1.2), enabling decline to 2 billion.

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/3/34

Washington and Kopnina (2022) โ€“ "Discussing the Silence and Denial around Population Growth and Its Environmental Impact" (published in World via MDPI)

It estimates sustainable populations at 2-3 billion under equitable consumption, or lower (e.g., 1.2 billion using the SNQ model prioritizing 'Nature Needs Half' for biodiversity).

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/3/4/1009

de Regil (2024) โ€“ "No sustainable paradigm is attainable without gradual population reduction"

It estimates sustainable levels at 2 billion with drastic production/consumption changes, warning that even frugal living for billions is untenable long-term due to finite resources

https://overpopulation-project.com/no-sustainable-paradigm-is-attainable-without-gradual-population-reduction/
>>
>>536021753
Fletcher et al. (2024) - "Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future" (published in PNAS Nexus)

The study argues for urgent reductions to avoid tipping points. Most optimal sustainable population is modeled at 0.5 billion

https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/4/pgae106/7638480

Cohen (2024) - "Can Earth support 4 billion people sustainably and well?" (published via N-IUSSP). Framing an IUSSP debate, this review of carrying capacity estimates argues that sustainable populations at reasonable living standards may be much below 4 billion. Meta-analyses show lowers like 0.65 billion under strict tech/ecological limits. Advocates "fewer forks" (fertility reductions).

https://www.niussp.org/environment-and-development/can-earth-support-4-billion-people-sustainably-and-well/

Feldstein (2023) โ€“ "Population Decline Will Change the World for the Better" (published in Scientific American)

Postulates radical global reduction of fertility rates, shrinking populations to cut emissions and resource depletion levels.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/population-decline-will-change-the-world-for-the-better/

Kompas et al. (2024-2025, referenced in Overpopulation Project reviews): Modeling global impacts of heat/water stress on food production projects severe insecurity increases under high-growth scenarios, reinforcing that reductions to 2 billion (via fertility policies) are needed for food security and planetary boundaries, as overshoot exacerbates malnutrition and ecosystem strain.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-65274-z
>>
File: pobrane.jpg (183 KB, 335x2097)
183 KB JPG
>>536021825
Meanwhile pic-rel "COVID-vaccinated" biomass of animal IQ doesnt believe that such studies even exist. A life of useless farter spending printed fiat on limited and mostly depleted non-renewable resources is priceless, after all. Especially now when even commercial LLMs are more intelligent than 99% of humanity.

These pic-rel individuals think that "COVID vaccination" was so coerced so they lived 100 years in full health xD
>>
>>536017440
wild projection from some fag who cant make a marriage last to save his life whose kids and ex wives hate him and all think he's a huge fag dork retard
>>
>>536023380
Your food supply has been poisoned for decades along with your water and air. The amount of abuse metered out to the average person globally has resulted in a TFR collapse. It will only take a few generations to wipe out a majority of us. Energy and food famines are about to pop off and those were engineered intentionally.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.