[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: evopsych.png (879 KB, 1740x1862)
879 KB PNG
>https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2026.10020
>>
>>536056117
I don't think that means what you think it means
>>
>>536056117
Here's the archive:
https://archive.is/dn4ve
>>
>>536056850

What does it mean then? By bluepilled standards, this content is pretty based.
>>
File: filename.png (322 KB, 834x1115)
322 KB PNG
>>
Solo parenting (with brothers and sisters/family to be fair) is the female natural state. You can observe this in matriarchies. The children doesn’t increase much though. Women having more than about 2-3 kids typically requires a more patriarchal structure.
>>
>>536057028
Thank god AI is going to revert most of this
>>
File: IMG_7986.png (1.93 MB, 2130x2842)
1.93 MB PNG
>>536057275
Women bitch about “the patriarchy” like it’s some grand conspiracy, but the reason patriarchies exist is because women-led societies select themselves out of existence due to low birth rates, poor leadership, and unmotivated men who aren’t interested in providing for or defending their societies.
>>
File: filename.png (100 KB, 863x1009)
100 KB PNG
>>536057707
wdym?
who is feeding the AI its instructions?
>>
>>536056850
Sounds like they're just justifying cooking up means for single mothers to have an easier life at the expense of men and then making half asses measures for men themselves. This is very dystopian
>>
>>536057028
>>536056117
>discriminating against men illegally makes them not comply with our system of discrimination and they're getting violent and radical
>so the solution is to discriminate harder
>surely we don't have our names and addresses attached to this paper
Academics were purged in every totalitarian regime for a reason.
>>
>>536056948
the content is 'based' in the sense that it reveals the problem, but says the solution is to make the problem worse and hope men eventually comply rather than killing all of them.

It reminds me of reading a new yorker article about how "nick fuentes fears women" and the entire thing was online influencers like tate and fuentes talking about how islam was right, simps should be slaughtered and women should be in chains.

These people think if they call you names, you'll stop wanting to beat them until they can't speak or stand anymore.
>>
>>536056117
Multiple apparitions by Jesus and Mary have warned about these Satanic attacks on family
>>
>>536056117
The thing designed by kikes to destroy white people and western civilization destroyed white people and western civilization? I don't believe it.
>>
Yes, industrialize reproduction, that is totally a good idea and not unnatural to the point where you will be punished for it one way or the other. I don't feel angry or happy about this. I obviously want to destroy these peoples' agenda, but there's no emotional need for it. The cool thing about nature is that everything pretty much gets what it deserves eventually. Do leftists deserve to get hanged and have their heads bashed in or exlode into confetti? Who knows.
>>
>>536057275
It leads to unstable societies with unstable futures prone to collapse.
>>
Article states the obvious is a nice way. They offer a few suggestions, with the goal to bridge the gap between the desired number of children women want with what they actually do. It's kind of funny that they admit some of their solutions don't actually work in Norway, and basically say that undesirable men should just be hopeful of future reproductive technologies (that they likely won't have access to) while the government should trial providing for women enough so that they can be a single mother. It's concerning that they conclude that efforts should be focused on giving more resources to women in hopes that they'll meet a desirable fertility rate. Kind of grim desu.
>>
>>536056117
Another fine display of the low IQ of /pol.
>>
File: 1606525616887.jpg (71 KB, 1024x958)
71 KB JPG
>>536058118

>the content is 'based' in the sense that it reveals the problem, but says the solution is to make the problem worse

Yeah. Well, I'll take this as a win. Just 5 to 10 years ago, this would've been unheard of in science.
>>
Weird I see no mention of what happens, historically speaking, when ever larger numbers of men face dwindling prospects in life.
>>
the article's conclusion is what OP put in the subject but the pages he posted don't fit it at all
>>
File: 1771142485959536.jpg (43 KB, 406x312)
43 KB JPG
>>536059925
> historically
The times have changed and men changed with them.
There will be no revolution, no civil wars, no unrest even. Remember covid?
I have never met a real man in my whole life. r-selected cowards, all of them.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.