Simply point out their entirely different definition of "racist", and respond by identifying that they are just antiWhite. If they insist that is not the deifntiion, then peg them down to a definition. I guaruntee they will refuse to give an actual definition, and merely accuse your insistance as being "racist". To which you hammer home that they are just antiWhite, and then assert that Whites have a right to exist as a distinct race.It will expose them in the eyes of others, and THAT is worth it.
>>536058380I guess I'm double racist.
>>536058380Race + ismRace is subspeciesism is belief systemThe belief that humans have subspecies, simple as. Racism is reality.
All praise and glory goes to Lord Jesus Christ! ALELLUIA!
>>536058380Will never be able to verbally convince a nonwhite subhuman that they need to go away voluntary.Nonwhite trash feels it is their right to have unfettered access to Whites. They'll fight for that right and jews will arm them.
It do be like that
>>536058544But they will simply argue "race doesn't exist" when it suits their agenda, and then argue "race matters are important" when it suits their agenda.You can not win by arguing facts (dialectic), you win by pure emotional response (rhetoric)...because that is how most people go through their lives. By arguing such facts you cede their definition has power to the emotional. It's why imagery works so well.
>>536058380>>536058544based
>>536058380Everyone knows the term racism is just a psyop for whites and a newspeak label. The correct term is bigotry or if you hate niggers and are American the correct term is segregationist because that's what they stamped on Johnny Rebel records back before newspeak
POWERFUL RESPONSE: "You're just another antiWhite."When they scoff at the notion, simply cut them off and demand they answer the following question: "Do you believe Whites should exist as a distinct race, and have self determination? Yes or No"If "no", then repeat "See...you're just another antiWhite."If "yes", then point out that you just want Whites to have a corner of the world where Whites can live and have self determination...that you wish no harm upon nonWhites, but that nonWhites seam to be incapable of letting Whites be.
>>536058380Have you ever considered breeding instead of crying on 4chimps?
>>536058544>>536058380Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) invented the word.
>>536058380Why waste your time arguing with them at all?
>>536058380Whites also have the right to have supremacy in the countries they built.
>>536059084I disagree that "everyone knows", and even if that were the case...there is tremendous value in openly stating it for the benefit of others to hear/see they are not alone. Confidence is commanding as a true virtue in the face of frauds.
>>536059167I have many children. I have also done my duty removing Niggers from the world. Don't be so hypocritical typing out on my thread, Schlomo.
>>536059171He didnt invent the word, it was just never used because it would imply you practice, teach, or are a supporter of "race" as structure. It made no sense and anyone who acknowledges that race exists would be a racist.
>>536059224It's not agreeing with them...it's forcing their hand, for the benefit of others that may be witnessing the event.
>>536059246That would be the self determination part.
>>536058380>babby Anon discovers words mean whatever the speaker wants them to mean to fit their worldview.
>>536059617>wawwa Anon discovers people don't hear what is being spoken and lose power because of it
>>536059407ok, my bad
good threadsome notesi was debated MANY times by obvous anti white poc, that "racism is systemic opression of race", and that "i hate whity but cant be racist, cos im not society/goverment"then that poc get into denial when i bring "south africa govs kicked all whites from country so its racism, by your definition"then, you expose them as anti white retard bigot (double standards what racism wven is)so, some folks permamenly belive that "racism is only for white people" and then we have controversial definition ofhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_racismbtw reverse racism dont exist, definition in op, or any "logic based definition" are actually truebtw "racism is opression" was pushed by usa university, and that definition existed in internet everywhere, including on main wikipedia page for racism.luckily, some media finally were forced to change that definition to more valid one..
