would it be possible to create some sort of yelp-like website for judges? like so we can see every time they release violent criminals? the amount of bad guys that keep doing bad shit is too fucking high. i feel like if judges were publicly shamed, this would change things.
>>536065440bump>coalfacts for judgesI'm okay with this
oy vey that is stochastic terrorism
>>536065440>would it be possible to create some sort of yelp-like website for judges?I can't think of a better way to put a big target on your back.
>>536065492based but good fucking luck
>>536065440damn the odyssey looks great. cool costumes.
>>536065440Wouldn't it be easier to make lists with corrupt judges and pay professionals to kill them?
>>536065440What's to stop tens of thousands of reviews saying shit like>Ay yo dis judge dun treated me unfair just cuz I's a nigga, 0 starsKeep in mind that this sort of nonsense is exactly what happened with Yelp
>>536065440Seems like it would all just be negative ratings, but I like the idea.
For how "autistic" /pol/ claims to be, there are a distinct lack of lists.
>>536065618Kek
>>536065683>>Ay yo dis judge dun treated me unfair just cuz I's a nigga, 0 stars>Keep in mind that this sort of nonsense is exactly what happened with Yelpfair point, but i guess that if a criminal was released they wouldn't be going online to complain about judges.
>>536065501Stop saying a lot of judges are jews. That's anti-semitic
>>536065501>oy vey that is stochastic terrorismi know you're memeing, but it's literally no worse than leaving a yelp review at your local chipotle.
>>536065830I have to say that your guess is ludicrously naive, plus if this might actually have electoral effects then there's even more reason not just to leave real reviews but also to spam with fake reviews, which again was and presumably still is a problem with Yelp
>>536065767Its all mental.The glowies need us to write it down for them.
>>536065657>Wouldn't it be easier to make lists with corrupt judges and pay professionals to kill them?not looking to kill anyone. just create a space that holds judges accountable. like the ones that are constantly releasing career criminals.
repeat offense is high because once we see that the concentration camps are full of black people, we NEVER help the whites do any thing ever again. We wait for you all to go extinct.
>>536065440you can get detailed statistics on judges in most states, broken down by types of case, types of defendants, conviction rates and more. same for prosecutors. usually you just pay a fee to state's judicial statistics authority. you wouldn't be the first person to make an organization dedicated to identifying outliers. in states that elect judges, campaigners on both sides do exactly what you're describing.
>>536065991vishnu, shiva, brahma, indra, ghanesh and hanuman tongue my balls in submission
>>536065440It sure is and it would almost certainly help the situation. Though we both know it wouldn't be for being publicly shamed. And while it would be noble work there's also this to consider >>536065515 because it's a 2 way street.
>>536065910>I have to say that your guess is ludicrously naive, plus if this might actually have electoral effects then there's even more reason not just to leave real reviews but also to spam with fake reviews, which again was and presumably still is a problem with Yelpso criminals are sophisticated enough to bot a judge because they put them in jail for too long? is that what you're saying? or that victims would bot the judge because the judge let a criminal out on the streets?
>>536065440This sketch was retarded and made no fucking sense and everyone on imgur at the time swore they were fucking brilliant. This would've been right around the time the Jews were pushing their "world's sexiest military" with Jews in their lowest bidder IDF fatigues and our old M4s
>>536065440I'm pretty sure you already have access to everything a judge does in courtIf you don't want to search through it yourself you could probably use AI and then double check everythingThen you could just start posting on social media or a blog or some shit
>>536065440host the website anonymously, or at least off continent. This shit is the kind of needed, virtuous work that'd get you killed.
>>536066148Criminals can be far more sophisticated than cops when there's an incentive. Why do you think that despite a decades-long War on Drugs we've got an opioid crisis? Speaking of drugs, in Mexico many people are just straight up assassinated if they might prove too much of a problem for criminals. You think leaving a Yelp review is harder than that?
>>536066054>you can get detailed statistics on judges in most states, broken down by types of case, types of defendants, conviction rates and more. same for prosecutors. usually you just pay a fee to state's judicial statistics authority. you wouldn't be the first person to make an organization dedicated to identifying outliers. in states that elect judges, campaigners on both sides do exactly what you're describing.so there's already a database that combines judges in every state?
Do elected judges have personal PACs like Congress members do. If so, what organizations contribute to their PACs, their family members PACs, their business associates, donors. Even if not elected name their personal PACs. It's all public disclosure. Perhaps you could sue for a forensic audit of these PACs. At the very least it could be highlighted and posted who's pouring what into whose PACs and how does that correlate to the violent repeat offender releases among other things. It's not altruistic. It's money. It is always money.
>>536066255you know you can make a nonprofit like the heritage foundation and publish a judicial scorecard and not be so damn paranoid?no american judge will shut it down unless it's called "thesesumbitcheshaveitcomingifyouknowwhatimean dot org"
>>536065959And how would you hold them accountable? You think they'll stop being corrupt and will stop protecting criminals because some faggots wrote them angry negative reviews on some retarded platform?You don't have to kill ALL of them. Make a tier list according to the number of criminals they let go. Some don't deserve death, just have their children kidnapped and raped on livestream then release them.
>>536066281no, the states don't all keep the same data or in the same format.don't forget, they're applying different laws, so you're better off comparing a state's judges to his peers in that state.
>>536065440If public Shame were of importance, current SCOTUS and administration would have bailed out long ago.
>>536066460This guy gets it.
>>536065440Yes they need accountability, there should be public investigations on any judge letting violent criminals off easy.Judges and lawyers should also share the punishment if criminals reoffend on bail, or early release.
>>536066279>Criminals can be far more sophisticated than cops when there's an incentive. Why do you think that despite a decades-long War on Drugs we've got an opioid crisis?>Speaking of drugs, in Mexico many people are just straight up assassinated if they might prove too much of a problem for criminals. You think leaving a Yelp review is harder than that?hypothetical>cartel kills my brother >judge lets the killer gowho do you think would be more passionate about rating the judge? my family or the cartel? if anything the cartel would want to stay silent because their boy got released.
>>536066279>we've got an opioid crisis?cause doctors...
>>536065683instead of comments it could simply be a curated list of the high profile crimes which got them nominated to the list
>>536066580It hardly matters who's more passionate; what matters is who's more underhanded, which of course will always be criminals. There are countless Yelp reviews with very passionate real reviews and many more times impassionate spam reviews.
>>536065440Feds already keep a database on every judge. Because every time a seat on the SCOTUS opens up, the sitting president wants to make sure his pick doesn't go off the reservation
>>536066654they don't need to be high profile cases. the main problem is repeat offenders that keep getting released on probation.
>>536066802Yes, it could be possible to create a Database Judge/ Case #/ Crime/ Bail/ Ruling from the Bench. Obviously Jury Ruling should not apply. the issue is what lifeless moron will be in change to keep the database up to date?
>>536066748>There are countless Yelp reviews with very passionate real reviews and many more times impassionate spam reviews.i suppose the judges themselves could spam the site with positive reviews. sites like yelp are generally correct though because they have a method for siphoning out the trash reviews.
>>536066886>the issue is what lifeless moron will be in change to keep the database up to date?the database would mostly be handled by the users and other people dedicated to the cause. think /pol/ mods. they're out here deleting shit constantly.
>>536066992>sites like yelp are generally correctNo they're not. I'm sorry to again use the word naive but nobody who knows how easy it is to manipulate people with these sites has any faith in them.
>>536067160>No they're not. I'm sorry to again use the word naive but nobody who knows how easy it is to manipulate people with these sites has any faith in them.so you think a judge would be able to hire an IT team to manipulate their ratings? you don't think that would all be public record?
>>536067348A lot of judges probably would be able to do that, and it wouldn't be public record, but that's not really my point. Judges manipulating you would be the least of my concerns.
>>536067609>Judges manipulating you would be the least of my concernsmmmmmmkay. so what would be your main concern about a yelp-like site where judges are called out for releasing criminals?
>>536067790Didn't I make that clear already? If you're not a total retard then you can guess if you've been paying any attention to anything I've been saying.
>>536067863explain it to me because i'm literally retarded.why can't there be a website where judges are rated? because the judges will just bot the site with positive reviews?
>>536065440Yes, you COULD do that.But you'd have the police up your ass and sheriffs and all kinds of stupid bullshit, and when you get to court? No attorney would take you as a client, you'd get a public defender who would tell you to your face they hate you and you're going to get screwed, and you'd spend the rest of your life in prison.So what I'm saying is do it from a non-extradition country first. You thought cops were a gang? JUDGES are a fucking gang.
>>536068014cause "rate is subjective"and anyone can make bots account to raise or lower said "Judgements" Like, you fucking stupid??
>>536068166>and anyone can make bots account to raise or lower said "Judgements"> Like, you fucking stupid??bots are a problem on every fucking website. so nobody should make a website anymore because of bots? doesn't make sense.
>>536068392What tacos are good is not even close to "Judges" and lets not even talk about having the resources to track you and sue you for libel and defamation cause Judges ARE PUBLIC SERVANTS.
>>536066281you should the percentages on immigration judges. They lefty judges who ignore the laws, logic, and truth are very easy to spot. They all have rates in the 90%s. Letting everyone in.
>>536068509>What tacos are good is not even close to "Judges" and lets not even talk about having the resources to track you and sue you for libel and defamation cause Judges ARE PUBLIC SERVANTS.so negative comments on chipotle are ok but negative comments on trump are bad because he's a public servant?
>>536068696What said acts as a Ranking Board for Politicians?
>>536065440They'd throw you in GITMO.
>>536065830It could be their family
>>536067099>think /pol/ mods. they're out here deleting shit constantly.what are you talking about retard? they dont delete shit unless it's a wrongthink that's somehow too threatening or novel for ZOG to toleratethey only sometimes react to mass-reports to give an illusion they do something
>>536068806>What said acts as a Ranking Board for Politicians?you write like a retard, but fucking everything. polymarket and every news outlet.
>>536068916New Outlet have Polls, Those are not leader board Pollymarket is gambling they are not "Leave a review of X or Y politician"
>>536068879>It could be their familythe criminal's family? why would the criminal's family complain about a judge releasing their family member?
>>536066460>>536066486almost as if it's not about public shaming but making an assassination hitlist to offload taking down a judge you dont like to some other sucker
>>536069179OP here and i never had a thought about killing anyone. your mind is corrupted for even having such a thought. meme flaggot.
judges in america have very little power they only choose between scripted sentences that have very tight marginsif you're upset with the sentence you should be more mad at the system that compels them to give those sentencesbut in that case you're pretty much just picking a fight with the state itself
>>536065440yes, and i think this is the next big thing. if nobody does it in a year or two then ill do it myself. the biggest weakness of our system is out of control judges who "interpret" the law to mean whatever they want (citizens united) and judges who refuse to prosecute criminals. if the supreme court upholds the recent anti-semitism laws then we will start destabilizing as a country. better to have a non-violent way to get rid of traitorous judges.
>>536065440>just speedballing here not really
>>536066422does it feel good to vent? because we have to take every possible non-violent step before resorting to violence. that's what gives the violence legitimacy. as long as we have a way of getting rid of bad judges (permanently banning them from any public office too), then we can stay within our consitutional system. anarchy is gay.
>>536069570>yes, and i think this is the next big thing. if nobody does it in a year or two then ill do it myself. the biggest weakness of our system is out of control judges who "interpret" the law to mean whatever they want (citizens united) and judges who refuse to prosecute criminals. if the supreme court upholds the recent anti-semitism laws then we will start destabilizing as a country. better to have a non-violent way to get rid of traitorous judges.i'm just an accountant, so the only 'coding' i do is in excel. pretty sure i could get grok to do everything over the course of a few days though. like with maps where you could toggle between local, state and federal judges.
>>536068806this website, which is heavily botted yet still useful.
>>536069869show me hte leaderboard.
>>536066460the point isn't public shame, it's drawing attention to the fact that these judges are unelected and unaccountable. we use particularly bad judges as a rallying cry to push politicians to make it easier to remove bad judges from office. it all starts with spreading knowledge about who the bad apples are.
>>536069570badjudges.org is available for only $10/yr. i can buy it unless you think there is a better name
>>536065440>oy fucking vey the goyim are uppity lately!
>>536069936>badjudges.orgYou are gonna get sued.
>>536065683Mandatory hand + timestamp pic before you're allowed to post reviews?
>>536069968>You are gonna get sued.by who and why? i wouldn't be providing the inputs. just a platform for people to report judges that consistently release criminals. and what's the difference if i were to make a site called badpoliticians.org?
>>536069895if you want something like a leaderboard, then this one is pretty good.https://www.trackaipac.com/congress
>>536069936That's biased, obviously you'd want to promote good judges that consistently but people away. Something like judgetrak.com would be more neutral.
>>536070221yea maybe judgetrack is better. thinking about it. i was literally about to buy the badjudge domain. shit's only $10 so maybe i'll just get both unless someone has a better domain idea.
>>536070043>by who and why?a Judge. Defamation.
>>536069759>>536069936i've only been coding for the past 8 months, so i'd expect someone else here could do a much better job than than me in a short time. i think i agree with the other anon that badjudges.org sounds biased.just asking gemini about it and (1) state and local judges are vulnerable to voters, so political campaigns against bad ones are definitely on the table. (2) in the case of federal judges, a bad decision COULD be grounds for impeachment, but only if a majority of the House and 2/3 of the Senate agrees. also it's never happened before just for a bad decision, but the way is open and there's a first time for everything.
>>536070415>a Judge. Defamation.so if someone makes a post on X 'defaming' a judge, does the judge sue elon musk?
>>536070346just buy it. you can always have badjudge redirect to judgetrack, but if someone notices an anti-judge trend and buys it just to to scalp, you'll have to pay thousands if you want it later.
>>536070442i've been programming for ten years nowi cba to organise such an effort, but if you goys want to start, then i will help outyou should probably set up an irc to organise, but i could regrettably join a discord group or server
>>536070543>>536070570ok, i'll just buy both domains
>>536070543i would put forward something like judgewatch, but i don't think it has the same ring to it
>>536070570yeah i just had to look up what an irc is so discord would probably be best kek.
>>536070688i think judgewatch sounds good
>>536070871irc is the proper and oldschool way to organise such thingsdiscord is a sloppy temporary solution
tf>badjudge.org taken>judgewatch.org taken>judgetrack.org is the only one availableliterally the first two were available 30 minutes ago. all for $10 a pop. now the first two are at $99. there has to be some bot that buys up domain searches.
>>536071174it's more likely being done by someone watching this conversation. i've bought domains before and searches didn't cause bots to buy it.
>>536071174dare i say, there is judge.watch>boy buying up domain searchesthat or there is someone in this thread
okay i made a discord server. i can't post the link but it ends in q5M8JC32
>>536071349just ask chatgpt how to turn q5M8JC32 into a discord invite link.
>>536065440That would be taken down quicker than the coalfax site. Would need to be on the darknet.
>>536066371Just like being a Boing whistleblower, there is absolutely no danger at all.
>>536072145because leftist stochastic terrorists are protected by judgesor pardonedI don't see groups like heritage backing down, fortunately
>>536065440Good idea bump
