being a socialist means being unafraid to say that this is wrong
>>536089038>4 out of the 8 of them are jewsFor being 0.2% of world's population jews are weirdly over-presented.
>>536089038You don't have to a socialist to be against oligarchy.
>>536089038>being a socialist means being unafraid to say that this is wrongWhat's wrong about it? Will Communist Jesus descend from the great gulag in the sky and demand that you combat on wealth inequality or you will go to Capitalist Hell? No one cares, nor should they. You want the world to change, but the rest of us don't want it to. The human species was born into absolute poverty... we were nothing more than naked animals. All wealth is literally made. It is fabricated from what you find around you. Go make some.
>>536089038Being a socialist means having no idea what the word wealth means in this measurement
>>536089038>>536089129And notice how the RothschiIds and the other dynastic banking families who've been gaining infinite money on debt since the 1700s are mysteriously nowhere to be seen
>>536089038Bottom 50% of the human population barely have any self-awareness
>>536089038Socialists are retarded weak men that need the state to take care of them. The reason you are poor is because you offer nothing of value to society.
>>536089499That's because these charts don't track families. The Rothschilds have well over 2 trillion in assets and properties between their primary family members, but it's spread out so they can try to act like they're not as big of a deal. But we know better.
>>536089038THEY WORKED HARD
>>536089038Yes, put them in camps. Work will make them free.
I don't care about taxing them because they are guilty of treason and should have their assets seized, be placed in camps and forced to work to earn their freedom.
>>536089038>they left out the 2 google ceos, both worth ~+250billionfunny innit? what a shitty pic
>>536089038CAPITALISM IS THE BEST
>>536089038I think poor people shouldn't exist/should stop breeding.
>>536089499>>536092088The truly wealthy are smart (and rich) enough to never let their names be known or spoken about publicly.
>>536089038If I had to pick one half to cull...
>>536089038> out of date image - where is Elon
>>536089038Elon Musk belongs to the poorest 50%?
>>536089129They're just smart
>>536089129
>>536089038Lol not even one Rothschild.
>>536089038In a communist government about 10 people control everything so whats the difference?
Photo isnt true anyway. The world has around 500 trillions in hard assets, likely another 500 trillion in financial assets (like stocks). The billionaires in the pic have like 1% of global assets.Most global assets by sheer value are real estate. Like cities, all the apartments, houses, towers, shopping malls, in every city in China and elsewhere.Followed by the value of the electric grid, all the power plants. For instance China has 4000 gigawatts of electric capacity, at a cost of 3 dollars per watt, thats 12 trillion dollars only on the chinese grid. The global grid is worth 30 trillion dollars, thats worth 100 times Jeff Bezos net worth.
>>536093001>The truly wealthy are smart (and rich) enough to never let their names be known or spoken about publicly.yes the richest people in the world are people you've never heard of, because any newspaper editor that mentions them will have his family killed.
>>536089038Wow, I never looked at it like that before. We should just nationalize the top 10 largest corporations and give a couple shares of each of those corporations to every third world mud-hutter. Some shitskin who is too stupid to plant a seed or even dig a hole to shit in totally deserves to own Amazon, Microsoft, and Berkshire Hathaway!
>>536093264But the point is we should just divvy all that up so that pic related get their fair share.
>>536093250nor a single king (assets in the tens of trillions) or royal family
>>536093264If you did that it would make people look even poorer.
>>536089038>no Elon muskJesus how old is this fucking slop?Kys