[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now open. Apply here!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1769444331854.jpg (38 KB, 735x376)
38 KB JPG
The second amendment was written for 1700s muskets, not ar-15 assault rifle weapons of war
>>
File: 80.jpg (88 KB, 1063x1067)
88 KB JPG
>>536137280
In that case, the first amendment does not apply to modern communication devices.
>>
File: 2nd-Amendment.jpg (197 KB, 800x500)
197 KB JPG
>>536137280
>A "well-regulated" militia
The 2nd Amendment explicitly calls for stringent gun control laws
>>
> Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment. We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.
>>
File: 2A explained.jpg (1.06 MB, 3012x1728)
1.06 MB JPG
>>
File: all of them.jpg (57 KB, 472x621)
57 KB JPG
>>536137538
and this too
>>
>>536137280
But muskets were the weapons of war back then
>>
>>536137280
Yes, which is why the assault weapons ban should be repealed. They gave the citizenry the right to own the firearm of a standard infantryman back then so they should be permitted to own the same today
>>
>>536137280
yeah and other fundamental rights were written before global telecommunications and shit like 50,000,000 FLOCK cameras watching your every movement and the existence of the police state

we should be allowed to have nuclear weapons with the way cops behave in america
>>
>>536137280
Do zogbots still use muskets to enforce tyranny?
>>
>>536137280
Define "assault rifle".
>>
Sad fact is that ZOG will just use drones to put down any armed uprising against it, whether that uprising is from the right or the left (whatever those terms mean now).
>>
>>536137280
The second amendment was written for governments with 1700s muskets.
That governments now are an even greater threat to the security of a free state makes the second amendment MORE relevant.
>>
>>536139184
a rifle you use to assault
its in the name
>>
File: Burr-Hamilton.jpg (145 KB, 800x532)
145 KB JPG
>>536137280
The Constitution was written by an agent of the Rothschilds.
>>
>>536137429
Hell yeah, governments should stringently have zero guns in its control, so that the people may acquire and maintain well-regulation in arms.
>>
>>536140845
the well-regulated militia was supposed to serve the government. it was essentially a way of safeguarding states rights while also ensuring there would be a fighting force against Indians, spaniards, British, etc (since no standing army at the time).
>>
File: 1648167885944.jpg (54 KB, 550x550)
54 KB JPG
>>536137280
>muskets
which were standard issues at the time
>ar-15
are todays standard issue
>>
>>536141340
>the well-regulated militia was supposed to serve the government
If the government had a convincing enough call that the militia supported it, sure.
Regardless of whether the government could obtain the support of the militia, the government interfering with the militia becoming well-regulated is a violation of the second amendment.
>>
It was legal to own cannons back then, too. Still is in some states. Your argument is stupid.
>>
>>536137280
Fun fact no military uses semi automatic rifles for war unless they're specifically marksman rifles.
So the AR 15 is basically a scary looking toy, not a weapon of war.
>>
File: IMG_4613.jpg (225 KB, 1170x751)
225 KB JPG
>>536137280
I’ll give up my AR 15 when you get your ugly shitskin ass out of my fucking country.
>>
>>536137280
the constitution was written for white people. it doesn't work when non-whites are involved.
>>
>>536137429
And yet they got rid of militias in the 90s too. Strange.
>>
>>536137367
>fpbp
Based bill of rights knowing leaf. Hope you have a great day, fren
>>536137429
Well regulated meant functioning properly, well-disciplined, and adequately trained for combat you stupid bitch
>>536140934
The “A” in “AR” stands for Armalite, dummy
>>
File: 1774313088769746.gif (65 KB, 220x165)
65 KB GIF
Don't make me buy another gun out of spite, OP
I already bought three in the span of a month
>>
I like tater tots. They are super underrated and much better than french fries.
>>
File: GRI-5aPaoAAP7mq.jpg (51 KB, 540x540)
51 KB JPG
>>536137280
If you believe that, then protect yourself and your family and your home with a 1700s musket.
>>
>>536137280
The First and Second Amendments were written before the 13-15th Amendments, so do not apply to Niggers.
>"well-regulated" = no chimpouts



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.