Why do so many nuAmericans with no blood relation to the War of Northern Aggression absolutely seethe at Southerners who honor their ancestry and heritage? I've seen LITERAL pajeets on twitter trying to dunk on various Confederate generals/leaders. It would be hilarious truly if it wasn't so goddamn baffling. The same people who hate the US, suck the US of 1861-1865 off like a hoe needing to make rent. Dylan Roof, is where you can chart back this hatred of the past, completely destroying reconciliation. Course most of them never heard of Emmanuel, the dude who shot up a White church in Tennessee as 'revenge'.
the south will rise again fr fr
>>536151715Hell yeah waffle man. Now ask FN to lower their damn price on the SCAR.
>>536150623>whybecause import shit become shit>thats why
>>536152753Melting pot is ahistorical shite.
>>536150623Even foreigners now what pathetic mongrels you retarded faggots are. Literally destroyed the country so you could keep your precious niggers and never work in the sun. Only a truly worthless people would be so nostalgic for a war they lost 150 years ago that they make it their entire culture.
>>536150623i like how southerners act so fucking high and mighty like they were doing america a favor killing their fellow white man to defend their right to enslave their precious niggers.
>>536150623>seething niggerlover STILL buttblasted the niggerlovers got btfo in the civil war that they started>>536153014>>536153043trvkes. imagine claiming to be the champions of white people when your entire "culture" is just importing niggers. southern niggerlovers wanted to turn the entire country into brazil 2
>>536153269Personally I think changing the constitution for niggers makes you more of a nigger lover than keeping them as agriculture equipment.
>>536152841>whyhere is another then gripey boy kek
>>536153667only reason there's niggers at all is because your niggerlover ancestors NEEDED to import infinity niggers for some reason
the northerners won and the southerners lost. meanwhile america for the past century has lost every major war they got into. including vietnam, korea, iraq, iran, etc
>>536153269>>536153043>>536153014Republicans of the 1860s created the country we have now, congrats.
>>536150623You lost, klanny
>>536153775yeah all of that happened because some greedy kike politicians in the south wanted to keep their free nigger slave labor. they brainwashed a lot of southern yokels into thinking it was about states rights.
Wanna know how I can tell this board has been infected with plebbitors?They're all anti Confederacy and like to pretend the war was over slavery.
>>536153990You lost
>>536153990how was it not? our leaders nowadays have no problem at all replacing us with third world street shitters so they can make an extra buck.do you really think the plantation owners that ruled the south were worried about anything other than their bottom line?
>>536153775>>536153961To make a long story short. Lincoln is saying that he violated the Constitution for the “greater good.”“I did understand however, that my oath to preserve the constitution to the best of my ability, imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government-that nation-of which that constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the constitution? By general law life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful, by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the constitution, through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground.”~ Abraham Lincoln to Albert G. Hodges, April 4, 1864, Collected Works, vol. 7, p. 281.
The South wanted to peacefully just go their own way but the North decided to commit an act of war by not ending the illegal occupation of (((federal))) troops on sovereign Southern lands. All the North had to do was go home, but instead they chose to spark the most costly war in American history, kill hundreds of thousands of white men, and force blacks into neighborhoods all over the country
>>536150623Honor their ancestry and heritage of being short-term traitorous losers?
When discussing the The War For Southern Independence, the South wasn’t trying to take over the federal government, hence why it was not a “civil war,” but had left a compact union agreement that they felt they were free from because the other parties had broken contract with them. However, when discussing this war, modern historians, in an effort try to force the moral implications of slavery (and generally a leftist agenda) as if it was the “reason” for the war. And before the booger eaters start crying about the original seven seceding states listing slavery as a major factor, ask yourself this…1. Was slavery legal? 2. Was slave property in the Territories constitutional?3. Was slavery a state or federal authority? 4. Is domestic terrorism constitutional?
>>536151798There are vastly better weapons out there. Why are civilians such faggots?
>>536154395>loyal to your home state before the war>loyal to your state during the warAt no point did their loyalties ever change, so its factually incorrect to call them traitors and frankly only a kike would demand you have loyalty to the (((federal))) government instead of your own people
>>536153723>There were ZERO slaves in the NorthA bold claim Cotton.
>>536154395Name one Confederate convicted of treason.Go on.Just one.You can't, redcoat.
>>536150623Because dying for another man's slave is peak goy cattle behavior. Which the south is known for.Even today they're the evangelicals who will always vote for more money to israel.
>>536154745>Mindraped historically illiterate speds will look you dead in the eye and lie, saying Southern men were fighting for some other dudes slaves.>Not the fact a nearly quarter foreign army sent by the federal government to burn, rape, and destroy them was goosestepping in their backyard>No. No it was over SLAVES.Northern and midwestern antislavery supporters preached what they were unwilling to do themselves. The antislavery supporters said nothing about where the freed slaves would go and to the citizens of the Midwest, this was a crucial point. Republicans emphasized that northern worries about a Negro inflow and racial adjustment were groundless because the freedmen were going to remain in the South. According to this idea, slavery was a national sin and disgrace, but the problems of freedom and race were to be worked out in the South. Following a familiar pattern, antislavery politicians and editors of every rank and persuasion cried that emancipation would stop the flow of colored immigrants from the South; that it was bondage rather than freedom that was driving them into the North. Free the slaves, they said, and a warm climate, a sentimental attachment to their native land, and northern race prejudice, would induce them to stay on Southern soil. (Milwaukee Sentinel, December 11, 1861, June 28, 1862; Illinois State Journal (Springfield), April 22, 1862; Congressional Globe, 37 Congress, 2 Session, pp. 332, 2243, and Appendix, pp. 212, 327)
>>536154889Sherman was only burning in the later stages of the war. Early on the north was on the back leg. it was the confederates marching through northern territory.So your silly motivation argument doesn't hold up. Most southerners didn't deal with anything except a blockade in the early stages, yet they still signed up to defend richfag plantation owners. And then they bought the same drivel later on in history that you're selling.
>>536154989>it was the confederates marching through northern territory.Hah. How many battles took place in the North? Gettysburg?Unless your counting states like KY where originally they wanted to be Switzerland and proclaimed neutrality, which big Ape Lincoln did not like.Southerners proudly joined the growing army to defend their homes from Tyrant Lincoln's army. His lust for tariff money so high that he gladly murdered hundreds of thousands of people.Sherman ran like a little bitch from Nathan Bedford Forrest. Begging the federal government to bankrupt itself if it meant stopping the wizard of the saddle.Sherman was only good for fighting women and kids, and disorganized feather injuns.Weak, coward. Pathetic man. You'd all be better off putting men like Chamberlain on a high pedestal instead of that baby back bitch.>In 1864, the Union army carried victories, but there was no evidence that the South was weakening. The Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of Tennessee were still intact. Sherman’s war on non-combatants was an admission that the Union armies could not win based on the battlefield.
A lot of it comes from the Renaming Commission and that retired general Ty Seidule activist going around promoting total bs - including lying about his ancestry in the Civil War. His ancestry is Italian and German and none of his forefathers were in America until after the war (he had a female ancestor in America at the time). Before that mob of Obama acolytes started going after the South demanding a second Reconstruction it wasn't even an issue.Brion McClanahan.on Youtube is well worth watching as he counters this Obama era bullshit.
>>536154644The ones that fought a war against the United States in an attempt to take land owned by the US government and create a rival, obviously hostile nation out of it. The Confederate States only lasted 4 years, you'd think (((someone))) who's "proud" of it would know anything about it.
>>536155690>Brion McClanahanAye he is.>>536155798Still waiting for you to name a single Confederate brought forth on charges of treason, convicted of treason, and then executed for treason, redcoat. Bet you're a post Ellis Island 'American' too.
>>536155798Also.A simple, honest, straight to the point reason the South could not leave the Union. "The Southern Confederacy will not employ our ships or buy our goods. What is our shipping without it? Literally nothing. . . It is very clear that the South gains by this process, and we lose, No, we MUST NOT LET the South go.”~ Union Democrat, Manchester, NH, Feb. 19, 1861Big Ape Lincoln wanted that TAX money motherfucker and by god he was gonna get it. Didn't matter how many people had to die and suffer.
