[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now open. Apply here!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1779536406290.png (274 KB, 598x861)
274 KB PNG
Why is darkskin seen as ugly? Is it because of colonialism or because of biology?
>>
>>536184390
Preferences for light skin go back way before colonialism. The simple answer is that it simply looks worse. There’s really not much else to it. Indians and negroids are often considered the ugliest races because of their shit colored skin (though their facial features don’t help either.)
>>
>>536184390
I had to turn up the light on my phone to even see anything but ink spots there.
>>
File: s.jpg (86 KB, 1200x1068)
86 KB JPG
It's not dark skin specifically that is unattractive.

It's the overall set of traits that identify you as an abo, indian or nigger.
>>
File: Fuck Niggers Pepe.gif (285 KB, 850x850)
285 KB GIF
>>536184390
Because its not attractive
Its black
Void of color
Lacking in essence
Or brown
Color of shit and dirt. No redeeming features on eaither. No real quality. Just burnt by the fucking sun
>>
i dont think that art is very good
>>
File: jug.jpg (931 KB, 2706x1875)
931 KB JPG
>>536184390
>>
>>536184390
>Why is darkskin seen as ugly?
It's a thirdie thing. Being pale as a corpse is ugly and being the color of burnt shit is also ugly. One should get a healthy tan and that's it.
>>
even the drawing is so dark skinned you can barely see the expressions.
Why the fuck are blacks so sensitive over real facts all the fucking time
>>
>>536184634
Dark skin indeed makes emotions hard to read. It's why blacks speak 'with their body' via body language, that's where their emotions come out.
When they get angry, it's not enough to pull a face. They have to beat their chest and shake the trees around them.

You now understand that fundamentally black people can never be civilized. They are literally human animals.
>>
>>536184632
>Being pale as a corpse is ugly
fuck off we're full
>>
>>536184390
because its more like mud and poop retard. do you even have instincts?
>>
>>536184559
picrel is still ugly as shit
>>
>>536184390
I hate Hindus.
>>
File: Ugly Hindu woman poo.mp4 (1 MB, 480x852)
1 MB
1 MB MP4
>>536184784
>>536184764
>>536184716
>>536184684
>>536184634
>>
>>536184862
your memeflag makes me not your friend nigger.
>>
>>536184390
I'm going to say, it is primarily colonization, not just european colonization but even more ancient than that.

The thing is light skin correlates with cold climates, which selects for forward-thinking and forward planning, which inevitably results in wealth/technology/superiority.

So after a certain point every interaction between a light skin and dark skinned person felt one-sided such that the light skin person was generally from a superior society.

This is true in ancient china/asia. It's true in ancient india before the British, and after the British as well. It's true in south east asia, hell it's even true in north africa. The Sahara and Congo environments prevented population for most of human history, thus sub-Saharan africans were largely isolated and left to develop on their own like the Australian aboriginals.

The only case it's not true is when swarthy levants and Mediterraneans marched into northern europe with legions, and conquered the dirty pale cave apes humans living there, but even in that case both sides were largely pale skinned compared to say a sub-Saharan african.
>>
>>536184390
Poop is brown. It is difficult to determine how much of a poopjeet is covered in feces without sniffing him first, which nobody on earth wants to do.
Hope this helps.
>>
i hate panjeets
>>
>>536185035
Doesn't track, that's like saying people have brown hair, therefore they have poop hair, therefore it's bad.
But clearly no one cares about brown hair. It can't be the poop association.
>>
>>536184390
>Why is darkskin seen as ugly?
Because people that have it are ugly.
>>
>>536184390
>huh? I don't get it
Imagine, if you would, having indicators of beauty other than skin tone.
I know you can't, you being a faceblind retard and all(thanks for contributing your genetic diseases to your former overlords, btw), but it turns out that actual humans can still spot beauty regardless of skin tone.
>>
>>536184390
Non whites have been conditioned over the centuries to see light skin as preferable. It gives off the image that you are rich so you don't have to work in the sun. Even in your caste system, Brahmins tend to have light skin,.
>>
>>536184991
>memeflag couldn't help but denigrate his most hated foe
Outlying settlements and agrarian communities are not "cave dwelling," and the Gauls were a peer civilization that held Rome at the border.
Take your fucking seethe with you through a noose portal, faggot.
>>
>>536185122
>even in your caste system
All jeets in india are dalit.
NO EXCEPTIONS.
THEY REMAIN BECAUSE THEY ARE DALIT. THE REST FUCKING FLED FOR THE SAME REASONS THEY WANT TO NOW.
>>
File: jeet pantone 448c.jpg (152 KB, 1336x1000)
152 KB JPG
>>536184390
It's not just white people who think your skin looks like poop.
>>
File: upload.png (155 KB, 554x360)
155 KB PNG
>>536185072
A lot of it is also just cultural association; as in We like the pale goth look, because subconsciously we associate it with a modern young woman with high fertility, a specific taste in music, a specific accent and likes and dislikes.

We don't for instance expect a goth chick to smell like curry, fart and bob her head when she talks with an absurd accent. This 'subconscious' expectation I think forms a large part of attraction as it's kind of baked into our experience of the world. Similarly when we see an indian guy we expect unhealthy, smelly, rude, with unhygienic with a horrible accent, and self-centered demeanor; and this get's baked into our judgement of people, the same way we think the goth girl is attractive, we think the indian man is ugly.

That said, there are heaps of disgusting ratty smelling goth chicks that you regret ever talking to the moment you smell their breath;
and there's plenty of well spoken polite in-shape Indian men that most girls fall for given exposure to.
>>
>>536185183
>memefag still going
You like the pale look because you're a fucking corpse chasing kike.
Shut the fuck up, vampire troon.
>>
IT'S NOT JUST THE COLOUR, IT'S THE SHAPES AND OTHER GENETIC TRAITS THAT ARE UNDESIREABLE YOU FUCKING RETARDS
>>
>>536185215
Remember that jewish faceblindness came from somewhere.
>>
Dark skin isn't inherently ugly; it just has that reputation because it usually accompanies disgusting facial features on dark skinned people.
>>
>>536185134
How are the gauls a peer civilization, we're talking about Rome here. Empires and organisation. The colosseum.

The successor to Greece.

The inventor of roads and aqueducts and modern engineering.

The progenitor of all romance languages.

Who were the gauls? Tribes men living in wooden/mud huts if that in the forests and mountains?

Their armies were essentially raider bands with stone weapons paid with what they could pillage,

Rome had modern legions paid via gold from a centralized government taxing citizens.


They didn't even have an alphabet, borrowing from fragments of greek that reached them.


Face it, the Gauls were no more than the native americans were to the Spanish; Or the Aboriginals were to the British in Australia; A backward local set of barbaric uncivilized tribes with pasty pale skin, and horrific hygiene.

To say otherwise, basically puts you in line with the idiot pajeets that claim 'hinduism knew the truth thousands of years before science!'
>>
File: the_assitecht.jpg (208 KB, 1024x1024)
208 KB JPG
>>536184390
>Why is darkskin seen as ugly?
1. It hides features and homogenises darkies as such; creating an uncanny valley effect that humans recoil from, because the species discerns one another according to their facial features.

2. Dark skin is an aberration of sunlight exposure, and is not natural as such. No one "evolves black" -- the melanin is a protection mechanism for a species that is not meant to be exposed to excessive amounts of radioactive sunlight. Indeed, as turdies flood Goldilocks zones, their melanin production will decrease. Also, melanin blocks the light absorption that is vital for health (vitamin D, serotonin etc.).

3. Dark skin (excessive melanin production) also comes packaged with black follicles, black eyes, facial feature malformation (protruding glabella, splayed nostrils etc.) -- i. e., it's not just the skin that is homogenised by melanin.

4. Darkies are synonymous with arrested development, as a direct affect of being in hotter climates wherein the the brain does not function as efficiently as in temperate zones. Moreover, because hotter climates presuppose nomadism (moving with seasons / fauna), thinkers who require being ensconced for them to emerge, are less likely to appear. That is why the "5,000" years of scatolojeet 'culture' has spawned a daemonology of idiotic gods and a 'country' that makes most the worst rubbish dumps look livable.

5. Black is the absence of all light in the spectrum; it represents cold, evil, and lifelessness. Humans naturally equate black with negativity, and this inflects their perception of darker skin. Even within darkie groups, there are subsets of colour -- mutt niggers consider anyone who is "darker than a brown, paper bag", a "nigger"; Naples is Italy's "ghetto". In Asia, skin bleaching is a multi-billion-dollar industry (even blacks skin-bleach). In Brazil, the darkies are "macaco"... and so on. Aversion to darkness is the counterpart to the attraction to light.
>>
>>536184390
Did Europeans actually impose their own beauty standards into other races?
>>
I can barely see the fucking drawing. At least add highlights or rim lighting to define the shape holy FUCK DO NIGGERS NOT UNDERSTAND BASIC ART. A FUCKING 13 YEAR OLD ON DEVIANTART COULD FIGURE THIS OUT
>>
>>536184390
Because it is ugly, humans are beings of light, we repel darkness and evil.
It is NOT possible to live together and coexist in peace.
Savages must go.
>>
>>536185067
Poop can clearly be seen in brown hair by its difference in texture, unless the hair is extremely curly and afrolike.
>>
>>536185392
>citation needed
>>
File: fuckwebp.png (1.13 MB, 693x669)
1.13 MB PNG
"The only difference between us is our skin color."
>>
>>536184390
Dark skin is fine. It's the disgusting genetic deformities that make people gag at the sight of the average nigger
>>
File: IMG_8080.png (1.63 MB, 853x1280)
1.63 MB PNG
>>536184390
Did someone say dark bc skim?
This is now a Danica collins thread.
>>
File: joggers--SELFIE (4).jpg (140 KB, 1024x1024)
140 KB JPG
>>536184559
>It's not dark skin specifically that is unattractive.
Correct; but, the melanin does not exclusively affect skin colour. That's why blacks, jeets, even Arabs looks so inbred -- both because of literal inbreeding, and the effect of melanin. Nords do not look like Slavs, nor the latter like Normans -- this is because lighter skin accentuates the distinctions between races; whereas, darker skin hides physiognomical traits.

Body builders "bronze" to try and increase the shadowing their musculature creates -- including black bodybuilders (i. e., that bronze to look lighter). This demonstrates how colour changes the look of a individuals; and when it comes to the face in particular, there is no getting around the fact that darker skin homogenises; in turn, creates and uncanny valley repulsion in people. I'd go as far as to say that one of the reasons why turdies are so violent, is that when they pop off, they don't discern foes as fellow [insert turdie demonym]; rather, as indistinct enemies who they can butcher like zombies... That is, their colour dehumanises them by default.
>>
>>536184390
>why is brown homogenous sludge less aesthetic than lighter colors + blue and green.
Gee, idk.
>>
>>536184390
Both but since most of this thread lean into the former, I will quickly talk about the latter:
Everything dark/brown is usually associated with bad stuff in the wild, those colors are often indicative of dirtiness, food that are not safe to eat, feces, gangrene, etc
And thanks to that, human instinctively know that brown/dark = bad and those who ignore these millenia-old warnings from nature almost always end up paying a toll.
>>
>>536185593
Ugly as fuck but still an improvement. If it straightened its hair and got a nose job it would start looking vaguely human.
>>
File: african lady.png (2.21 MB, 1200x1200)
2.21 MB PNG
Don't like dark skins? Send them my way.
African wimmin >>>
>>
File: 1696631074140680.jpg (136 KB, 1024x1024)
136 KB JPG
>>536185435
If they did, it got lost in translation...

>imagine that sausage skin painted onto a high fructose niggress
>>
I mean you’re literally the color of waste while we are the color of life. It’s why nothing sticks when people try to make fun of white peoples skin color. Pig skin? Cum skin? What’s next? Fresh snow? Cherry blossom?
>>
File: 1770000581516875.jpg (695 KB, 750x1240)
695 KB JPG
>>536185450
>I can barely see the fucking drawing.

See here:
>>536185392
>>
File: zll.jpg (136 KB, 681x1073)
136 KB JPG
It was never about the pigmentation,
>>
File: GdWP1ewaoAEFYoj.jpg (376 KB, 1920x1080)
376 KB JPG
>>536184390
lmao
>>
>>536184390
For SIMILAR GENETICS estrogen tends to make skin color lighter, while testosterone tends to make skin color darker. To a lesser extent this also applies to hair.
So for normal heterosexual people of SIMILAR GENETICS lighter colored women are more attractive, while darker colored men are more attractive.

Of course, interacting with people who are NOT OF SIMILAR GENETICS throws a monkey wrench into the whole thing. My theory is that "mud sharks" are too stupid to do even the most basic of secondary checks for weather a sex partner is suitable of making children with.
Unlike "Aryans" on /pol/ I don't think of it as "wasting a white womb", but rather, a totally defective white womb objectively showing the world just how worthless it is.
>>
>>536184559
>plastic chink whore
great example there retard
>>
>>536184390
They themselves consider it ugly, did so before colonialism ever came around.
>>
File: future_face.jpg (196 KB, 1033x1024)
196 KB JPG
>>536185711
Jungle fever should always remain a fetish; never life's calling.
>>
File: 1780268585453469.webm (2.16 MB, 640x360)
2.16 MB
2.16 MB WEBM
>>536184623
The mighty Jaganath shall never be sated.
>>
>>536184390
It's not about skin color, sir.
On the contrary, black skin hides the atrociousness of their facial features.
>>
File: 1740151368312378.jpg (175 KB, 1080x1350)
175 KB JPG
>>536185804
You're likely right. Lots of sad mulattoes out there wishing they were monoracial. Some people think that patriarchy prevents deracination, even in mixed persons.
>>
>>536184390
take your gypsies back.
>>
>>536184390
i dont hate black people. if anything i wanna help their women breed right by breeding white.

>inb4 "you're bring the white race down"

nope, its called uplifiting and in the long run will benifit everyone
>>
>>536185183
>We don't for instance expect a goth chick to smell like curry, fart and bob her head when she talks with an absurd accent
Have you been to England, bruv?
>>
>>536184390
It just is.
>>
File: Opindia-Images-6-1.jpg (98 KB, 696x398)
98 KB JPG
>>536185183
>We like the pale goth look, because subconsciously we associate it with a modern young woman with high fertility, a specific taste in music, a specific accent and likes and dislikes.
No we like goth girls because they're hot and exclusively white, you don't need to dig any deeper memeflag shitjeet.
>there's plenty of well spoken polite in-shape Indian men
Hahahaha
>that most girls fall for given exposure to.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Nobody is lining up for pic related.
>>
>>536184847
Why?
>>
File: 1764070957470569.jpg (66 KB, 680x571)
66 KB JPG
>>536186119
Look fat, mutt women on average have the same height and weight as a fucking Blastoise but go on with your cope.
>>
>>536184390
Less contrast in the face.

>>536184559
Notice how this "attractive" woman is using totally white eyeshadow for contrast?

Light skin naturally shows more contrast. This is why it's more beautiful. Our brains are wired to see contrast in a face as attractive.
>>
>>536184390
African shaniqwas aren't this thin. They wish they were, though.
>>
>>536184862
that kind of resentment goes so deep. there's no telling what kind of evil she's capable to wrought.

ugly girls are way uglier on the inside. don't fall for the 'book by its cover' crap!
when they sing that song about - you should date an ugly girl - they're talking about a 6, not a 4
the idea is gratitude, not handing a demon the opportunity to destroy you.
this woman would Khalesi an entire city and probably dreams about it.
>>
Because everybody poops Rajeed and you look like you're made out of shit.
God did this on purpose because he knew the future would be full of animals like you.
>>
File: 1774692684625623.mp4 (2.06 MB, 320x568)
2.06 MB
2.06 MB MP4
>>536184862
in fact I think that's probably why they were invited. to Kali the country with their resentful hatred
and white women, pretending to be kind and moral will patronizingly open the gate and duck out of the way.
>I loooove tikki masala! oh my gawwd!
(I'm only a 7 not a 10 don't eat me! I have hate too let's team up)
>>
>>536184390
Nappy hair and huge lips are far worse, since they are significant indications of Bantus, while dark skin can for instance be South Indians, who are infinitely better than Bantus. Though nappy hair and huge lips are easier to change, hide, mask or conceal somehow than darker skin.

Also, are you one of the Jews that pretend to love Indians in some public contexts, and seek the enslavement and genocide of Indians in covert deed?
>>
File: 1712692186723603.jpg (102 KB, 966x1134)
102 KB JPG
Yes im an oil driller, an obsidian miner, a black sand collector. My COCK does not discriminate. Black women were literally hand crafted for white men. BTW sex with black women is amazing.
>>
>>536185168
it's the tinge of green that makes it so unsettling. a red brown is expected and almost warm, it has heart like a mahogany or an earthen color. but green brown? holy hell. why is it green
>>
>>536184390
Idk why its just repulsive. Must be nature. Thinking about purple nipples, black/purple pussies yuck. Thinking about some nice pink nipples makes everyone happy, even nasty niggers know this.
>>
File: looksmatch plapjak.jpg (264 KB, 771x692)
264 KB JPG
>>536187483
>6
So, a 300lb plapper? Don't forget: the average woman is a 12/10 and treated that way in comparison to the average man.
>>
>>536187735
You are what you eat. In jeets' case, it's cow dung.
>>
>>536184390
Skin, skin, skin... that's all you care about.
Not about your culture, not about how you carry yourself, not about how you look overall, not about your presentation, not about way you act... it's a skin that you have problem with.

I call everybody a nigger who acts like one. Doesn't matter if it's white,chinked or black if you go and act like retard out of jungle i'll call you a nigger 1000 times a day.
>>
>>536185751
Correct. They try to reduce to that because the reality is literally much much uglier for them
>>
File: niggresses envy.jpg (698 KB, 1045x2274)
698 KB JPG
>>536184390
Why are you brown subhumans so jealous of our european clean skin?
>>
>>536184390
first, dark skin is ugly because it hides facial features:
- no clear contrast with hair, eyebrows, moustache, or beard
- bone structure, jaw muscles, etc. appear less defined
second, most cultures associate darkness and lightness with bad and good respectively
third, black skin has been associated with the content of black character
>>
>>536184596

At least she tried to make the drawing cute instead of certain abominations that look like they came out of a World War II pamphlet.
>>
>>536184390
Because it is. Beuty standards are globally the same and now with things like egg donations, surrogacy pregnancies and designer kids everyone chooses the exact same arc type for their child. Niggers wear wigs because they know their hair fucking sucks. Every woman on the planet uses the same whitening creams for the exact same reason. Nobody likes jeets etc. Best looking black women are like 1/16th black and look good because they look like white women with a color swap.
>>
File: 1657493832990.jpg (122 KB, 659x876)
122 KB JPG
>>536188041
True but Sub-Saharan hair has always been off-putting to me
>>
>>536188900
Their faces are worse. Niggers pass well as trannies because their women already look like the men.
>>
>>536184390
>Dark skin seen as ugly
>Western culture is obsessed with tanning (tanning is a billion dollar business)
>>
>>536184390
Pale skin also looks bad if you're a man, that's why germanic and slavic snowbunnies like Meds #dasright
>>
>>536184862
honestly bros i feel bad for her, she's not even ugly
>>
>>536187675
Poo and free mason are related.
>>
>>536185382
The barbarians drove back the Romans with their axes and their forest pigs, get btfo'd lel
>>
>>536189389
She looks like a fucking abbo lmao
>>
>>536184390
ugly.
>>
>>536185382
>Who were the gauls? Tribes men living in wooden/mud huts if that in the forests and mountains?
>stone weapons paid with what they could pillage,
... you do realize the "traditional" Roman war gear was copy-pasted from the Gauls, after they utterly ass-raped Rome in -390?
Gauls literally taught Romans how to make weapons and armors that don't suck ass. Seriously, the Etruscan war gear they used before that was lmao-tier.
Even after that, Gaul's metallurgy and goldsmithing was prize in the Empire, with some legions having to put hard restriction on who could use non-standard weapons because otherwise everyone was dumping their standard issue gladius to get a Gaul blade instead (which in turn made it a symbol of status to be allowed to have one).
>>
File: NICE WIG BY THE WAY.jpg (762 KB, 2108x2744)
762 KB JPG
>>
>>536184390
because it is ugly
>>
>>536184862
Obessing over things you can't change is low IQ stuff. Jeeta are infinitely low IQ which is why they are hard stuck at rank and caste.
>>
>>536184390
I love black women.
...
Indians are just ugly on the inside and out.
>>
>>536188041
You would have to have basic self awareness for that.
>>
>>536184390
Dark skin is ugly because dark colors are ugly. Well at least on skin for some reason.
>>
File: disgusting.jpg (17 KB, 240x320)
17 KB JPG
>>536190016
>I love black women.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.