[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Europe used to never mutilate genitals - until Queen victoria reigned.

In Victorian england they mutilated both girls and boys. Circumcision spread and they performed Clitoridectomies for pseudo-scientific reasons.
Isn't that kinda interesting that Europe for thousand of years didn't perform genital mutilation - until a woman took power? Could it be that the jews are the way they are because they are matriarchal? Because the similarities are striking. Say: that both made up pseudo-scientific claims to justify mutilating children. Both had hypocritical sexual morality (which is women in a nutshell).
Women claim they'd be better off if a woman ruled. But when they did, they performed pseudo-scientific Clitoridectomies.
>>
>>536273791
Can you prove they mutilated little girls and not just boys?
>>
File: FGM_VictorianEngland.png (777 KB, 1032x1232)
777 KB PNG
>>536273912
They mostly mutilated boys (and that became widespread during Queen victorias reign).
But they also performed female genital mutilation in victorian england (named after queen victoria).
>>
File: AiOnIt.png (154 KB, 800x1132)
154 KB PNG
>>536273912
Here's an Ai on how widespread FGM and MGM became during Queen Victorias reign.

FGM was overall rather rare - but it still happened in Victorian England. I think it's funny that genital mutilation went from nearly non-existent to somewhat widespread while a woman ruled.

Overall genital mutilation wasn't a thing in Europe ere that.
>>
>>536274540
Depends if she had a hand in this nonsense or it was just a bunch of Jewish physicians going rampant.
>>
>>536274710
Then it's still interesting that happened while a woman reigned for 63 years and not 2000 years before in europe nor the UK, isn't it?

Like whatever the jews do - they certainly did it the last 2000 years. They certainly did it in all of europe and not just victorian england (literally named after their queen).
Maybe women are more susceptible to a matriarchal religion. Less appalled by male genital mutilation and all that.
>>
>>536274902
Any books on this subject or do you just use AI? Wikipedia is really lackluster. Yeah women are cunts tho.
>>
>>536273791
>Could it be that the jews are the way they are because they are matriarchal? Because the similarities are striking. Say: that both made up pseudo-scientific claims to justify mutilating children. Both had hypocritical sexual morality (which is women in a nutshell).
finally someone else also figured it out.
MGTOW is right about women.
>>
File: 1732032002884385.png (1.03 MB, 858x1196)
1.03 MB PNG
>>536273791
anyone who thinks its okay to perform an elective amputation of a healthy organ without that persons consent or anesthesia and then shove that open wound into a dirty diaper is a complete idiot and deserves to be taken out and skinned alive
>>
Also Egyptians and early Jews did not perform a complete amputation of the foreskin which is barbaric nonsense. Egyptians probably performed a dorsal slit while the Jews only cut the tip of the foreskin which let you with total or almost total coverage while flaccid.
Egyptian girls weren't as lucky they got circumcised too while boys only got a slit, looks like it was the best time to have a dick. A small price to pay for having women that aren't massive sluts.
>>
>>536273791
why was this bitch so ugly? weren't aristocrats supposed to be ubermensch
>>
>>536274710
She called out women for what they were, the last few years of her reign they were receiving voting rights across the empire. Proving authority correct is innate female behaviour
With her being used for that movement the sadistic genital mutilations would not surprise me in the slightest
>>
>>536273791
Was not lover of victorias muslim or jeet?
>>
>>536273791
Based
>>
>>536275672
Is the dorsel slit called the banjo string in English?
>>
>>536275067
Just google and Ai. I just asked AI if genital mutilation was ever common in Europe and it told me that it wasn't. For thousands of years Europeans resisted genital mutilation and other forms of mutilation (the Chinese mutilated feet, Africans prolonged necks etc.).

The Europeans are sorta unique in that regard along with the Japanese. Mutilation is common in many places.
It's a bit odd it began spreading in Victorian England (named after Victoria) yet not in mainland Europe, isn't it?
>>
File: 1775649781651748.jpg (1.07 MB, 1033x2290)
1.07 MB JPG
that's a man
>>
>>536278644
Yeah but it has spread even harder in the US and they had male presidents. It's definitely Jewish nonsense Anglos and kikes are interconnected.
>>
>>536279818
>>
>>536279273
no that's just how women look without makeup.
>>
>>536274151
>FGM
Why does everything need to be an abbreviation nowadays ?
>>
>>536279273
She's just old at that picture.
>>
>>536282792
Kikes manipulate language to cloud the meaning of words in historical books and to soften the impact of the definition of crimes they are guilty of. Pedophiles become MAP, niggers become people of color, coronavirus become covid, department of war becomes dept of defense (although now war is back on the menu)
>>
>>536283047
That's sorta how they justify genital mutilation too.
Saying it's hygiene - or "gender affirming healthcare".
>>
>>536273791
>Europe
Just anglos
>kile victoria
Disraeli primeminister
Whoa! why den dun dem shircumsishionzz



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.