>>536278477No/thread
It would definitely spice up politics
>>536278477Yes.They should also be carefully regulated, with rigorous strictures regarding who, when, and why someone may participate in a duel to the death.All other situations would thus require nonlethal, and any social faux pas of challenging the ineligible to lethal duel should be punished by public whipping.
>>536279004oh shut the fuck up ,just let people duel to death if they want to.the only rule should be that there's other guys hecking it so we can be sure it's not a murder.
>>536278850>It would definitely spice up politicsIndeed
>>536279004Cringe>>536279107Based
>>536279107Even in medieval France I couldn't duel to the death without permission of the king. So, proposition this >>536279004 proposal sounds reasonable.
>>536278477Yes, but heavily regulated with all the disclaimers and paper signing. I also think it should be legal only in special government buildings, and also publicly streamed.
>>536278477They are illegal because in practice it just gave jews a pass to openly "murder" their suicidally stupid opponents at their opponents' insistence.As it turns out racial superiority does not translate into superiority at arms.
>>536278609>No>/threadYou're the living proof how german spirit has fallen.
>>536278477Yes but only for shitskins
>>536279162I don't think you understand how prevalent public whipping would be.It would be fucking hilarious.And yes, "take this outside" means whipping time.
Make yu-gi-oh real life now
Yes
>>536279272Fuck no. Matters of honor are not for public spectacle. Instead of filming it, they should be carried out inside of insulated black boxes with a single testimony.
>>536279004I can get behind thisBoth parties must be of sound mind and acting of their own volitionHave some kind of legal form both parties must signMust have third party observers, possibly even recorded to make sure there's no dishonorable shenanigansAny third party who might interfere with the proceedings would be subject to criminal chargesIf one party surrenders that's it, he is forfeit the challenge and faces some civic penalty for wasting everyone's timeThere would need to be other rules I'm not thinking of I'm sure, but I think dueling could work in the modern era
>>536279318>Did we have this thread yesterday already? - check>Wants to revive dueling but doesn't dare to show flag? - check>Argument uses shaming based on national pride? - checkI wonder who could be behind this post.
>>536279318Also mutilating your face is cucked.
>>536280387Stuff like children of minority, ongoing feuds, etc etc.
>>5362784771968Based times
>>536278477They did it the right way in the past where only nobles and semi-nobles who constantly got into retarded catfights were allowed and by that decimating their own numbers
>>536278477yes if both parties agree and bystanders are protected from harm, it's a legitimate way to solve a dispute.
>>536280667maybe he should've practiced his shootin' rather than have his head in a maths book all the time?
>>536278477>>536278609Hmm, let me think . . . No.
>>536278477yes but only in a highly ritualized and publicly televised manner.
Obviously yes
>>536282122Ritualized warfare is completely different, and should be legal. There should be various different games where it's physical combat between two champions (roid and natty categories) or a duel of gundams where the technology of both sides comes into play.
Imagine all the money and engagement Trump would be raking in right now if he were prepping a UFC fighter to go take on Iran's top heavyweight boxer for all the uranium. Imagine the pay-per-view. Imagine the hype, the legends born. Ritualized warfare will be the sign that civilization is able to control itself, no more wars of the rich on the poor.
how about dueling is legal, but only for people with a net worth above $5M and their money is collateral, if they die it goes to sick kids or something
TEST YOUR MIGHT
Duels would be a daily occurrence in nigger cities.
>>536278477If both people consent, I have no issue with duels
>>536278477Yes.
>>536284047anon . . .
>>536280386Too easy to abuse if done in such secret
