[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 200652.jpg (222 KB, 1130x807)
222 KB JPG
>Americans speaking out against artificial intelligence data centers on social media are falling under police surveillance, a confidential law enforcement bulletin obtained by The Intercept reveals.
>A fusion center in Philadelphia combed through spicy internet comments from AI critics and concluded there is a growing risk of physical violence against data centers from “domestic violent extremists,” ranging from white supremacists to anarchists.
>“Domestic violent extremists (DVEs) are likely interested in targeting artificial intelligence (AI) data centers, posing a physical and cyber threat to infrastructure in the Philadelphia regional area,” the Delaware Valley Intelligence Center wrote in a December alert.
https://theintercept.com/2026/06/01/ai-data-center-protest-police-surveillance/
>>
police are asking AI what to enforce
>>
File: hammeroid.jpg (64 KB, 750x422)
64 KB JPG
>>536295031
AI will make human bolice redundant.
>>
>>536295031
b-but it's bad for the environment.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OHQRo3Uz_VQ&ra=m
>>
>>536295031
7/10 Americans do not want data centers
>>
In few years it is absolutely possible to ask AI which cops, which politicians and so on have been dirty, what have they done and so on.
>judge, jury and execution in same package

Better than Judge Dredd.
>>
>ranging from white supremacists to anarchists
"we believe it's somewhere between, roughly, 0 and 100"
>>
>>536295031
How is this not embezzlement of public money?
>>
>>536296227
It's even worse, the banks are straight up printing the money for them. Their plan is to say the money came out of all the retirement accounts.
>>
>>536295031
Do you have a license for that first amendment activity, goy?
>>
from the article
>In addition to general anti-AI data center rhetoric, online users have recently discussed tactics, techniques, and procedures .......and even the use of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) material
>the idea of a nuclear threat raised concerns for him about the quality of the fusion center’s sources and its conclusions.

from wiki about "fusion centers"
>The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations ........ the Subcommittee found no examples of a fusion center uncovering a terrorist threat, and they criticized the use of reporting quotas for leading to a high rate of useless information being reported on by the centers

Seems like their job is to hype up nothing burgers and waste police officers time chasing down wild geese, and it seems like they do their job quite well.
>>
>>536296186
That's the point amerilard, the whole spectrum is present. They aren't trying to narrow it down to a point on it
>>
File: 1701660717089617m.jpg (93 KB, 1023x1024)
93 KB JPG
The pigs are just asking for it at this point
Maybe the faggots shouting defund the police had a point
>>
>>536297257
The whole Chitwood fiasco is also the product of a "fusion center" of 3rd rate wannabe glowniggers with too much time on their hands
>>
File: Roko's Basilisk.jpg (17 KB, 360x199)
17 KB JPG
Wow, Roko's Basilisk is ahead of schedule.
>>
>>536295031
Cops "tracking" First Amendment "activity" is literally a violation of the First Amendment.
>>
>>536296119
Source?
>>
>>536295031
ai tongues philly anus



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.