Is the declining birthrate somehow related to female education and overall empowerment of women in general?
>>536310566Birth control/SSRI's/bad economy/no affordable housing/chuds
>>536310566Yes. But for both women AND men. Having children is an activity that's too easily replaced now with countless distractions.Return to the 60s. Let the neurological catastrophe burn off 7 billion.Let the survivors rebuild.
>>536310566I think it was just the internet making women think they are all 10s so they're all waiting for millionaire prince chad while occassionally fucking drug dealer chadlite. Women empowerment and rights are a joke that only lasts as long as men play along, but the birthrates themselves is just internet making them think they have options. Women cant handle optioms or making choices. They cant even decide what to eat for dinner.
>>536310566>memeflag>MUH BIRF RATEES A HURRRR DUHHHRRRRR
>>536310566There's probably two dozen reasons that you'd probably have to pay me money to name and describe, because it would be so much work. Bottom line is most of us know what they are. And if you are 40 years old now and haven't had a minimum of 2.3 kids then you are out of the gene pool in the following decades anyway.>>536310747>muh internetRetarded take. You do realise women had stopped putting out and settling down with a single partner long before internet started being a thing? Internet dating sites are a factor, but that's just a catalyst for foid behaviour and simps.
>women can earn a wage now>women do better than men in employment these days>having a family means sacrificing that>lose money and financial freedom>if you want to maintain your lifestyle, need a man who earns a lot>there aren't many of them and not all are attractive It turns out having abundant resources is preferable to a family for women
>>536310566not just that but the decline of humanity and society is related to women joining the corporate work force. Instead of raising children and maintaining a household they are busy doing soul crushing labor that mostly benefits some rich asshole they barely know. People UNDERSTATE the consequences of encouraging women to work rather than raise families.
>>536310798
>>536310610>>536310670>>536310707>>536310747>>536310798>>536311352This is an israeli/indian "memeflag spam thread with a "spoonfeed me" rhetorical question that's been answered since the 1960s
>>536310566Cute
Birthrate is still a better topic to discuss than /uhg/ or Trump being an increasingly demented retard, even if this is a spam thread.Not even going to give a (You).
>>536311571rhetorical question that's been answered since the 1960sLol
I think it's unfair to frame it at the woman's fault. that's like blaming a kid with down syndrome when you put him in a kitchen and tell him to cook whatever he wants. men lost control of women for many reasons. antimasculine narratives, plummeting testosterone, loss of cultural framework to build on. we let go of the leash
>>536311524>>536311571The ONLY problem facing civilization right now that matters.>nooooo stop talking about female rights being the extinction of life in the universe, it doesn't matter.No. Fuck off cuckold.
>>536310566Women going to the university or jewish daycare facility are malfunctioning. There's only one way to fix them.
>>536310566
>>536311902Judge them or not, natural selection doesn't like dysgenic traits.
>>536310566Yes!Basically!Futurist responsible for charting Progress (feminists are members of this group) are basically Bath-shit naive stupid individuals not able see possible extinction level event impact of their decisions .Later they just run around in panic and try cover their responsibility for destruction!Currently we are at least 20 years past the point where anything could be saved and only way out of this mess is just and only invention of artificial WOMB!But that also will either lead to extinction of Female Population simply from the fact that there will not be reason why to create Females in first place .x)See?x)It is better not ask this questions!!!x)Any more Questions?x)
"Somehow" Yes, and it's just a small part of the entire puzzle. It goes for both men and women. As people get more educated, they put off things that can get in the way of education and career. Then, when they're set to have kids, they're educated enough to weigh quality versus quantity. Two working parents only have so much time and money to spend on raising children into intelligent, sociable, mature adults who can thrive in society. So you get a lot of couples with one or two kids, which doesn't end up replacing the couple when averaged out.And that's JUST education, not bringing up the economy, the displeasure with the state of the world, two separate cultures between men and women in countries like America, lack of effective financial help that isn't just tossing more money at the person with no guidance, awful work hours with little-to-no time off, anxiety over legal ramifications if the relationship goes downhill, etc. Truth is, flipping replacement rates is a ton of work in a wide swath of areas. Education is a small blip.
>>536310670Stop discriminating against the chuds.
>>536310566We must save them
>>536313186Yeah...You Know....AI images not going save anyone !
