publish non sense mathematical proofs right into math-magazines, which means it has rights to publish, a non mathematician regular person cant just go and create a user account into math-magazine and publish whatever, it goes through rudimentary peer review at first.Turns out AI stuff gets through peer-review process and someone at univerisites gives an online account to AI so technology is not stopping AI from publishing.>It is still nonsense but apparent only to people who are high enough on mathPlausifiable proof:https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/mathematicians-warn-of-ai-threats-to-profession-as-industry-encroaches/The Leiden Declaration, which has already drawn hundreds of signatories, warns that recent AI developments are threatening "characteristic values" of mathematical research, "often in ways that disproportionately affect students and early-career mathematicians, and hence the long term future."First, it points out how AI models can "produce plausible but unreliable (or even incorrect) arguments which are difficult to distinguish from correct mathematical proofs." Such developments put reviewers under increasing pressure and are "jeopardizing our ability to implement traditional standards for the correctness, transparency, and independent verifiability of proof," the declaration warns.Second, the declaration highlights how "models trained on published works frequently return outputs that do not properly cite the human works they synthesize," while also pointing out that many current AI models were trained on data obtained through "exploiting licenses and access arrangements" or "simply violating copyright protections."Third, the declaration describes how the use of AI "may become incentivized for its own sake, disrupting our mechanisms for hiring, funding and recognition" while leaving out researchers who lack access or are "unwilling to use technologies controlled by organizations whose values they do not share."
that's one of mine
>>536311651I liked it
>>536311807so why are you concerned about ai in math? mathematicians are smart, they won't let it get as bad as the normie retards who go into delusional spirals & give themselves schizophrenia
>>536311651Wrong. It's mine.
>>536311895https://chatgpt.com/share/6a1fd64f-2f08-83ea-821b-13d17b465b7a
>>536311412I drink coffee but can stop at any moment. I don't understand how people cant go a single day of their lives without that stuff. I had a trip to Vietnam where I drank coffee everyday (i wanted to try all their concoctions and when I returned here I went back to drinking it only when I got less than 6 hours of sleep (not common for me). >t. gone about 9 days without coffee
>>536311412if you're gonna make a comic, at least make it interesting
>>536311412Next time run your text through an ai and ask it to make it not sound so ESL
>>536311412>>It is still nonsense but apparent only to people who are high enough on mathit's not only true about math, it's true for everything. But most people are too dumb to even understand that they could be this dumb
>>536311861There's already a big fucking replication crisis in science, AI spamming nonsense proofs that take hours of work to even verify as nonsense will just make it worse
>another thread of retards proudly posting their dogshit sloppa "OC"When did 85 IQ browns take over /pol/?
>>536312314u jelly? sounds like u jelly
>>536312314>all butthurt>can't even articulate a single thought worth processing into a picturehere's one for you
>>536312308arxiv.org is already spammed w/ nonsense proofs. mathematicians are not losing any sleep over it so i don't get why you think it's a problem
>>536312368he jelly as fuck
>>536312385>>536312410Praise AI, praise Israel!
>>536312097yiff in hell you gay ass furfaggot nigger.You are a freak who secretly wants to fuck animals and can't even be honest with yourself and others about that. Absolutely disgusting.
>>536312436>when humans use AI to make fun of KIKES>that means they support israelpathetic as usual
>>536312453>nuuu don't smash the face of my nigger-jew diety>but in a fake comic-book world where the people are bears instead of humansso when you see animals in a cartoon like bugs bunny, the first thing you think of is molesting them?
we all know AI is for smut
>>536311861>mathematicians are smartthey are not simply a brain, or made of pure energy floating around thinking about complex concepts, they are humans, they'll try to get as much as they can from life doing as little as possible. If AI means more publications, they will use that. They will write research paper with that, their thesis too.Most scientists are making a career in academics because they can't figure out what they could do that really produces value
>>536312576i can tell you haven't studied math. i went to grad school for math, your understanding is that of a retard so you should post less & lurk more before making a bigger fool of yourself
>>536311412The site obviously cant tell apart if the submitter or their work is AI or done by AI. If anyone can publish schizobabble in a math magazine, the problem isn't AI, it's that the magazine is fucking garbage and has no standards.
>>536312368>>536312385>>536312410Jelly of what? Of you posting sloppa? What a retarded nonsensical response, as expected from slop brained mutts.
>>536312809>this guy>tries to make an AI image>comes out like this
>>536311861Everything ive seen thats been generated by AI (Im a maths phd student) has been clearly worthless at a glance. They probably made this statement because they dont want to sift through mountains of AI slop when refereeing a paper is hard enough. Maths papers are usually badly written as well.
>>536313061>sift through mountains of AI slopah so you HAVE dabbled in the Aiif you aren't a retard you can make prompts that produce some pretty funny shit
>>536311412I wanna fuck coffee addict chan
>>536313061>wah goy>you haven't properly buried the clay urn containing the charred remains of your firstborn child you sacrificed to moloch!>that means your AI outputs will be SHITsays YOU, and your colored wife apparently, LOL
