It's been three days in June, and corporations have not updated their profile picture.
>>536325728*Tap tap tap tap tap*
>>536325728Trump was elected. He hates gays. Also you lost, tranny.
>>536325728Corpos do whatever to sell anything. Pride is a new religious movement that isnt as popular anymore and has less followers
WHAT THE FUCK GOOGLEFAG LOVERS
my german corp switched to faggot colors
>>536326051Goymoney always follows insane religious ideological things every generation its not surprising
>>536325728People are tired of sodomites I guess.
>>536325728Trump ended usaid
Thank china russian and middle east. Euro and yank market is smaller and loses money pushing pedo gay shit on everyone. Hopefully west can go back to being normal forever.
>>536326316People don't decide these things. Our owners have changed strategies.
>>536325728The cockchopping fad had to end eventually.
>>536325728>literally signed by the President and Vice President of the United States, check the QR code>makes employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation legal in Michigan again by invalidating Rouch World, LLC v. Department of Civil Rights (2022), Michigan Supreme Court Docket Number: 162482 and restoring Barbour v. Department of Social Services, 198 Mich.App. 183 (1993), and not even Justice Gorsuch and/or Barrett can save it>"No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."– U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 3.Why did President Trump and Vice President JD Vance sign this bill of attainder and send it to someone living in Saginaw ("Saganaw", EFTA02449573, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02449573.pdf) via mail? Didn't any of the "legal geniuses" at the White House tell Trump this was a bad idea?https://www.courts.michigan.gov/courts/supreme-court/prior-terms-case-information/case-information/2021-2022-march-case-information/162482-rouch-world,-llc-v-department-of-civil-rights/https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/barbour-v-department-of-889141079>"In an illuminating opinion which gave the historical background of the constitutional prohibition against bills of attainder, this Court invalidated ... a bill of attainder .... On the same day the Cummins case was decided, the Court, in Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 333, also held invalid on the same grounds an Act of Congress .... Neither of these cases has ever been overruled. They stand for the proposition that legislative acts, no matter what their form, that apply either to named individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict punishment on them without a judicial trial are bills of attainder prohibited by the Constitution. Adherence to this principle requires invalidation of [Rouch World]. We do adhere to it."-United States v. Lovett, 328 U.S. 303, 315-316 (1946).
>>536325728costs too much ram to change
>>536328098>"We do not, and need not, take a position on Justice VIVIANO’s assertion that the but-for causation standard requires some proof of intent to discriminate. ... This is the first step..."— Rouch World, 510 Mich. at 422-423 n.17. (Majority Opinion)See https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02650228.pdf, at EFTA_R1_01890480 ("First Step Freedom, LLC")>"For years, the MCRC tried unsuccessfully to get the Legislature to amend the ELCRA to include sexual orientation as a protected class. These efforts apparently exhausted the MCRC, and, in 2018, it elected to end-run the Legislature by declaring in Interpretive Statement 2018-1 that the ELCRA has always prohibited sexual-orientation discrimination (as well as gender-identity discrimination). ... In this way, the MCRC invaded both the law-making power exclusively assigned to the Legislature and the judicial power to interpret law exclusively assigned to Michigan’s courts."—Rouch World, LLC v. Dep’t of Civil Rights, 510 Mich. 398, 430 n.4; 987 N.W.2d 501, 517 n.4 (2022) (Zahra, J., dissenting).>"But the majority opinion’s holding that the ELCRA has always prohibited sexual-orientation discrimination amounts to an exercise of legislative, not judicial, power."— Id. at 433.>"The Court tries to convince readers that it is merely enforcing the terms of the statute, but that is preposterous. Even as understood today, the concept of discrimination because of 'sex' is different from discrimination because of 'sexual orientation' or 'gender identity.' And in 1964, when Title VII was enacted, that understanding was thoroughly settled. Therefore, there is only one word for what the Court has done today: legislation."— Bostock v. Clayton Co., 590 U.S. ___; 140 S Ct 1731, 1754; 207 L Ed 2d 218 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting).
>>536325728They are done with the gay shit
>>536325728The woke religion peaked and is no longer useful to elites. Now they switched to slopulism to contain the RW.
>>536328098Saginaw is so bad when my crackhead cousin got kidnapped by niggers and held against her will when she called the cops they laughed said she deserved it for hanging out with niggers in that part of the town and hanged up the phone
>>536325728Wdym? Poland strong
>>536328098>"Our constitutional system vests the 'legislative Powers' in Congress, not the Judiciary. Art. I, §1. ...when this Court usurps the role of [the Legislature], as it does today, the public understandably becomes confused about who the policymakers really are in our system of separated powers, and inevitably becomes cynical about the oft-repeated aspiration that judges base their decisions on law rather than on personal preference."— Bostock, 140 S Ct at 1836 (Kavanaugh, J., dissenting), as quoted in Rouch World (Zahra, J., dissenting).Under the framework of United States v. Lovett, a bill of attainder is defined as a legislative act, "no matter what [its] form," that applies to "easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict punishment on them without a judicial trial".By rewriting the ELCRA from the bench:The Court executed a legislative act.They targeted easily ascertainable members of a group—specifically traditional, independent business owners (like Rouch World, LLC) whose open, public commitments to their values are thoroughly documented and easily flagged under standard operational codes.They inflicted punishment without a true judicial trial by using Footnote 17 to strip away the requirement of animus.Because the majority ruled that an individual's intent is automatically fulfilled by a mechanical "but-for" toggle, a standard trial exploring actual malice is bypassed. The business is automatically processed, found liable, and handed over to the administrative state's enforcement and mandated counseling pipelines.Happy Pride Month! Thanks Donald J. Trump and J.D. Vance! Ivy League (see, porngoonleak) legal geniuses! They're going to make the super elite pay like hell!
>>536325823Came here to see this. Thanks!
>>536325823Which sign is that?
>>536328717I have nothing to say back to the mean and insensitive words you posted because it sounds awful, but maybe you'll enjoy this comic I've been working on. Here's a preview! Nyaa!
>>536329271the "military wants you to think "the good goys won" so you'll be more eager to go die for the homeland" sign
>>536328717(Made using publicly available information that any reasonable and informed citizen should keep abreast of, available at https://www.justice.gov/epstein)
>>536329645
>>536329680
>>536329715
>>536325923what do you mean, bessent is as literally gay as it gets and he's the mouthpiece for trump now
>>536325823ah yes, wokeness is totally dead
