anyone with an IQ below 120 shouldn't be allowed voting rights.the vote of a sub 100 IQ voter and a 120+ IQ vote should not carry the same weight.discuss.
>oh so sorry goyim but some of your answers indicate that you're an antisemtite which automatically places you in the 10th percentile>so no voting for you, also no guns and you're now on a watchlist
>>536429101This but White men write the test.
this + kill all virgin and/or criminal men and we're good
>>536429362>oh yeah don't worry about that a (((white))) man definitely wrote this and scored it
>>536428829There shouldn't be any voting at all. Any domain which requires merit and competence shouldn't base decisions based on consensus via voting. Voting is good when you want to decide whether you want to eat at goyschlop restraunt #1 or goyschlop restraunt #2, but when there's actual stakes which requires competence voting is the most retarded way to come to a decision. Decisions need to be made by whomever is the sovereign, a father is the sovereign of his family, so his say is final. He may takes suggestions or listen to input but ultimately he decides. Such is the way society should work. Of course, in order for this to work you can't have massive centralized bureaucracies either. Instead "states" should be treated more like businesses, which they kind of are, and whomever has "ownership" over a business is the sovereign who makes decisions, and he is responsible for the people under him, and people under him for the people under them, and so on, a pyramid hierarchy. He rules over x land and if you don't like it you can find a different king in y land, much like how if you don't like an employer you find another one. Either that or you rise through the ranks, or make your own business. Yes, this is similar to feudalism, which is how natural order structures society, instead of the abomination we call nation-states and liberal democracies.
>>536429919restaurant*
>>536428829How would a weighted voting by IQ look like?As any study been done on it?
>>536428829Own land and be white. This should be easy if you have a high iq
>>536428829>voting should only be done by people that are good at rotating basic shapes, and counting>if you cant tell what shape is next in the series, you dont know politics
>>536428829>116-144 are all merely "above average"145+ IQ is 0.135% of the population, and 160+ is 0.00317%. Subdividing it this way is extemely hair splitting, and arguably kind of meaningless, since the difference between those two is determined by answering like 1 or 2 more out of 200+ questions correctly. This smells like it was composed by someone with a fetishistic fixation on "elite human capital"
>>536428829wrong101+ is above average120-135 is high to very high140 is very, very high (2% pop)150-160 does enter supah smart territory180 hovers above mortals like an alien (bobby fischer, newton)
>>536429739Put in laws that specifically classify jews as hostile non-whites
>>536428829Guess that disqualifies you op.
>>536428829>votingMake democracy a capital punishment crime and install a dictatorship. Problem solved.
>>536428829this is retarded simply because who is going to make the test and verify it too much points of failureif this was a test, you just failed
>>536428829I'd prefer a net tax payer requirement. This is all assuming voting is real.
>>536428829IQ doesn't seem to make people better at life.
>>53642882985 is mentally retarded, but they reclassified it because most blacks score at 85. They literally changed the definition of retardation because it was rayciss to black people.
>>536429403>let's create a population full of sexual degenerates and prostitutes except everyone must participatemutt goyim is insane
>>536428829Ok, but if that was the case only democrats would win elections from now on.
OP wants it to be IQ and not land ownership because he is a worthless rentoid.>but I'm smart!If you were smart you'd have the funds for a house. Being able to regurgitate textbook information doesnt make you smart.
>>536428829IQ measurement system is trash and the better measure system has not been implemented.
>>536428829>votingDoesn't matter when the elections are stolen by Socialists/Democrats/RINOs
>>536428829WhiteMaleLand ownerColonial heritage
There was a study involving my great grandfather and his great grandfather into how genius was possibly an hereditary trait. I lucked out at 136 when tested but I believe my cousin would sit somewhere within the 140+ range. He wears tweed jackets even when it's really, really hot outside though, so I'm open to the possibility he's simply autistic. If voting was restricted to those with an IQ above 120, I believe more people would own a monkey as a pet. It's just a guy feeling.
>>536435525To clarify: I mean monkey as I'm the animal - not a euphemism for Negros.
>>536434970both are worthless since jews and boomers are hoarding all the wealth, should be an antisemitism test and those who prove to be antisemites will pass it and be allowed to vote
>>536431003The image is probably AI generated and neural nets are almost definitionally incapable of thinking of numbers as having real fixed values. Every number they use is an estimation/approximation.
>>536428829would you be in favor of this if you failed the test?
>>536436080https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c56t7upa8Bk
>>536436511For monkey time is really important, for the universe it isnt.
>>536436854And in a monkey system, monkey will always remain.
>>536436900
>>536428829How will /pol/ vote then
>>536428829Mandatory radiation suits required for voting.
>>536436964Left wing economic politics and a stricter asylum/immigration laws in germany.
