"Series finale is dead chimp on the pavement and you monkeys rioting when I walk free. Stay tuned."
>>536430236they chimpin out
Yeah he’s fucked
>>536430289lol no he's actually not you fucking nigger, stay tuned
>>536430236You're always wrong about this shit. You're wrong now too.
>>536430338You can go ahead and stick a fork in him.
>>536430236what was this message in reply to?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V36lKr0zFI
>>536430236chud the fed is totally gonna go to jail and definitely isn't gonna get let off resulting in a totally new and definitely not shilled blm equivalent movement just in time for midterms
Good, no one cares about this literal DL faggot. It's obviously a pyop. Guys with mustaches like that love to suck cock.
>>536430236Oh well. He wouldn't be in jail if he had stayed home smoking a bowl and wasn't being a fuckhead. He acted like a nigger and is getting treated like one.
>>536430236Wheres the gofundme?For him to get raped
What Nigger?I don't think they released its rap-sheet?
>>536430236The nigger didn't die, retard. Also the nigger instigated the fight.
>>536430236Sounds comfy.
>>536430236wait they let him cook in prison? how does that even work?
Regardless of whether whether chud goes to jail for life or is free tomorrow, blacks are still winning the race war. And I guarantee that every single day another white man either gets killed maimed or has his life ruined because the blacks and the other races which work night and day to deprive us of our own country.
>>536430236Poo shill.
turned into Bubbas personal Braphog
>>536431070He posted that about a week before the shooting.
>>536431138Chud is 6 2 and built.
AI answerif it was truly self defense hes not going to jail, i dont care either way
>>536431233>is 6 2 and builtbuilt 4 BBC
>>536430236No he won't This is exactly what will happen >delay for almost 2 years>attempted murder will probably be dropped after his defense files countless motions>sentenced to time served for felony reckless endangerment, banned from owning a gun, long probation>sued for all money raisedwe won't see him until 2028
even if you think that proves intent, you have to prove he started the physical fight outside the courthouse for the murder charge to stick and the absolutely tip-top best the prosecution can say in the affidavit is that chud took a 'bladed' stance
>>536431479Wasn't he driving around starting fights with people and calling them niggers and shit?
>chimps out and goes to jail>aryan brptherhood comes to protect him>they still give him the rape n' gape as payment for protection
Chud the prisoner
>>536431392>looks like a literal ancient luwian-arameanlelalways knew he was a KIKE
>>536431532interestingly, among the foundational concepts of American jurisprudence is the idea that people are to be tried for their actions, not their words. had mr chud the retard been on a stream and approached mr fox to call him a nigger, and had mr fox responded with force, i think the attempted murder charge would absolutely stick. i do believe you could convince twelve people who vote and don't weasel out of jury duty that chud set out to go full Morrowind on a nigga and failed. nobody wants Morrowind rules.but that isn't what happened. mr fox went well out of his way to approach chud as he was leaving court. so the question of who started the physical altercation becomes the important factor, because the judge isn't going to want to rule on whether chud the retard can go around saying nigger or whether mr fox has the right to turn the courthouse into a PvP zone over it to decide whether this was attempted murder or just complete stupidityhe's going to rule on who started the fight outside the courthouse. the reckless endangerment charge is actually going to be the interesting charge, because i suspect will be trying to prove that his actions prior to the fiasco outside the courthouse constitutes a reckless pattern of behavior that renders him singularly culpable for the altercation and thus the endangerment. but I think they'll have to demonstrate that chud's online antics are the sole influenceand we both know nigger twitter has been offering cash and clout for a hit on that stupid fuck, so that may mean mr fox's internet history gets handed over in discovery, and if he ever looked at any of that shit, the charge might dissolve because the defense will argue he was out for gain
>>536432196>among the foundational concepts of American jurisprudence is the idea that people are to be tried for their actions, not their wordsOkay, but driving around and calling people niggers is an action, right? It's not persecuting him for the content of his speech but rather using the context of his actions to derive intent. If you're rolling around cities calling people niggers while carrying a gun and constantly announcing your desire to do violence towards those people... that's gotta be salient in some way, right?
>>536432272The justification of violence for words led here not vice versa dipshit.
>>536432272>calling you meant names>is the same as punching your facein the mind of retard shabbos-goyim and the leftists nigger-jews leading them around by their nose rings, sure
>>536430236>quotation marksGo back faggot
>>536430744>smoke weed and stay home there goyTake it easy hersh
>>536432758>>536432807These are two of the most exceptionally low quality posts I've seen in over twenty years of posting on 4chan. The first is totally incomprehensible due to a failure of basic literacy. The second packs so many buzzwords so tightly together that reading it feels like stepping in dogshit. Bravo.
>>536433373>These are two of the most exceptionally low quality posts I've seen>gets all butthurt and can't offer a rebuttalwow, I'd say this was the most pathetic jewish post I'VE seen in 20 years of using 4chanbut jews answer questions like this here every day
>>536432272that, anon, has no bearing on the interaction outside the courthouse. further, i do not argue that the state can prove intent on the basis of his prior statements. the problem for the state is that intent is not the only requirement for an attempted murder charge. the state also has to prove that chud started the actual physical altercation. this can be done in one of two ways.1) prove that he started the fistfight. this is the only genuinely feasible option. in order to prove this, the state only has to convince 12 normies that chud made some kind of aggressive or otherwise provocative movement or statement--in that moment, to mr fox personally--that could justify Mr fox taking a swipe at him. a racially charged statement, a particularly aggressive stance or a straight up assault of some type would be a slam-dunk sealed deal. he pushed mr fox to fight, then shot him because he intended to kill someone so he could be famous or maybe even start a race war. for sure life in prison. ezpz, gg no re2) the state tries to prove that chud's nuisance streamer antics form the basis of a provocative pattern of action that is to be recognized by law as universally inciting niggers to violence on sight. to prove that, they would need to demonstrate mr fox's mens rea, which means making him take the stand and giving chud's defense a chance to cross examine him on his mental state, and if there aren't many black people on the jury, how well do you think honkies, hispanics and asians will understand the black mind?the second introduces thorny subjects, which the judge will have to make a ruling on to determine if chud is guilty of forcing mr fox to run up on him that will likely be scrutinized due to potentially setting precedent. it's asking a lot of the judge.they're going to try to prove he started the fistfight to pin the murder on him. his acting like a retard and calling people niggers is more likely to be examined under the reckless endangerment charge.
>>536430236
>>536431070he gets a job in the cafeteria if they trust him enough
>>536433615
>>536433645>porchettaholy shit is that just a wide ass piece of bacon??
>>536433570>that, anon, has no bearing on the interaction outside the courthouseSure it does. How can you be reasonably afraid for your life in a conflict you've actively sought out? It's logically self-negating. Does it automatically kill a self defense claim? Of course not -- not automatically, at least. But it seriously and maybe irrevocably poisons the well. Most states' self-defense statutes are written around the idea of being reasonably afraid for your life. If you have just spent the last year (or whatever) driving around and calling people niggers, it strongly suggests, maybe even beyond and to the exclusion of any reasonable doubt, that the consequences of these actions are not only not feared but actively anticipated... as he incidentally LITERALLY SAID OUTRIGHT multiple times on social media. I don't see any way in which he's not cooked short of jury nullification or procedural fuck-fuck games. I think this is already open and shut absent extraordinary procedural fuck ups to the point where he would be best served by pleading.
>>536434534>Sure it does. How can you be reasonably afraid for your life in a conflict you've actively sought out?i would ask the very same question of mr fox. what do you think his answer might be?>>536434534>It's logically self-negating.lol. lmao. chatGPT got jokes.>Does it automatically kill a self defense claim? Of course not -- not automatically, at least. But it seriously and maybe irrevocably poisons the well.again, this applies to mr fox as well. he came to the courthouse that day, quite specifically for the purpose of confronting chud. if chud didn't swing first, why does mr fox have a right to start a physical altercation? surely, you yourself have argued that seeking out a fight negates your right to fear for your life. therefore, the fight mr chud was seeking and the fight mr fox was seeking cancel each other out and we're again left with a singular question:who started the fight outside the courthouse?incidentally, it's an interesting unquestioned assumption that saying nigger to niggers negates your right to fear for your life from assaults from random niggers. do you expect twelve people to agree niggers should have the right to violently assault people who call them niggers?
>>536435086They can both be wrong. Let's say each man is responsible for his actions. Fox is responsible for assault, Eatherly for attempted murder and reckless endangerment.
