>America brags about "fully autonomous AI controlled" robot and its "200hours of flawless operation">pointlessly pushes paperlight packages from container onto conveyor belt pretending to do some meaningfull work>fucks up every couple minutes on camera>turns out to be 3+ Pajeets with a headset facking the entire showhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Juc-IyTdSho
just drop the "AI" bullshit and just nakedly advertise that it's a human guiding a robotit's still a fucking robotlike just apply some machine learning to the humans and you can optimize it easily
Nah it wasn't jeets. The task is easy but keeping it running for days at a time is impressive. A lot of factory wagie tasks are actually pretty easy, just super repetitive and involving some little movement or process they haven't been able to get a machine to do before...until now.
>>536466822I rather have robots do this shit than a nigger like you OP. You're too stupid for this kind of work anyway.
>>536466950It's not a human guiding the robot though. It's pretty basic machine vision but the hand manipulators have improved a lot. The main thing is it's ability to run for long periods of time without breaking down.
>It's not a human guiding the robotYes thats the official lie
>another indian scamAs expected. There's absolutely no reason to make robots even remotely humanoid, and on legs at that, to complete such tasks.
>>536467031At this point I think it may actually be human operators on that conveyor belt. They didn't even move more quickly than a decent human would. They actually looked exactly like a human paid substandard wages would. They moved slowly and it looked to me like there was some input delay.This is tragic either way but if you were right then I would expect the robots to NOT LOOK LIKE HUMANS. I understand the need for a human-looking robot when it comes to dealing with idiot humans like Tesla's bar-serving 'robot.' But packages? If it's not a human operator then it doesn't need to look exactly like a human operator.
>>536466822Why even make it look like a robot? Why not just make a normal machine for it.
>>536466822Developed by people who have never set foot in a logistics warehouse.First of all, this kind of task does not need to run 24/7, the trailers aren't arriving 24/7, it just doesn't work like that. Each stage, from fulfilment center, sortation center and last mile has "dead" time each day where they are not active as they depend on output from the previous stage or customer orders in the first case. Having robots doesn't change that either, the root blocker is still accumulating customer orders.Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, this particular task, facing up labels, is a bullshit job that doesn't actually need to exist, it only exists as good will essentially, it could be completely autonomous with traditional automation by just putting labels all over, there is absolutely no reason to develop clankers to do it, if Amazon for example really wanted to they could eliminate the position entirely, as they have done with other positions like pick to buffer by introducing ADTA (auto divert to aisle), that change in particular decimated the last mile workforce by over a third.Also the clanker isn't even doing it properly, the whole point is that the labels are facing up so that either scanners or humans can read it and divert or pick it.
>>536469055>They didn't even move more quickly than a decent human would.This is the irony. A literal wheel could have done the same job at 100 times the speed. Robots doing flips is impressive because even most humans cant do it.Robots doing pirouettes on ice is impressive because even most humans cant do it.Robots carrying dishwashers is impressive because even most humans cant do it.A fucking pigeon can work on a conveyor belt. Its not an industrial usecase at all. Its a setup for a Pajeet with a headset pretending to do labour.
>>536470295>when you value profits so highly you want human-looking robots to pitch as the future to investors but the cheapest way to make them work is to just make them human-shaped to make it easy for human operators
>>536470483i think the use of human operators is just a convenient shortcut and necessity come from pretending to perform human like taskthe audience here is not people who run factories but people who own companies that own factories with the imagination they can replace humans higher profit margins so the sales pitch needs to look like its replacing humans even if its a completely pointless endeavor
>>536469999Because people are like children, they see flashy things and shit themselves over it.
>>536466983You can clearly see:-It is having trouble managing depth and precision with it's digits, just like with VR-It starts missing packages entirely, then reaches up to adjust it's goggles before resuming normally-It periodically freezes in a "bicycle" position, allowing just enough time for another person to put on the goggles/gloves.In the other video, the humanoid starts obeying commands before they are given, because they are scripted.It's so fucking fake and the US is pouring tax dollars into them... it's theft.
>>536467031>>536469055Watch the video OP posted
>find these people>pay them>buy their dumb robot>buy VR headset>buy the all meme direction treadmill>use gear to control the robot walking aroundimagine the possible mayhem>walk up to people>active microsoft Sam voice text to speech
I wish these fags would make working robots so I can make it work the garden. >91 degrees and need to tend to the peppers
>you will likely live to see consumer grade piloted robots for sale
>>536472773the people who started this shit realized it doesn't work. now they polishing the turd, and looking for some credulous retard investors (like a pension fund) to dump it on and bail out
>>536466822it failed, constantly. plus it acted as someone sitting down and turning something on for a head set.
>>536467031Nah, the robot raising his hand to his head is strong evidence for an operator fixing something at his own head and the robot just following the movement. What other more plausible explanation can you provide?
>>536467667> no reason to make robots even remotely humanoidYes. Unless you create sex toys of course.
>>536466822Cool and all, but what will happen once all the taxable labor is replaced?
ai is an absolute fraud.ai searches are so dumb that Noble gets calls for NOBL because of it.WAYMO has overseas drivers guiding their cars.
I watched several videos with the head of figure.It was fully automated.No jeets, no chinks, no humans.He mocked the amazing current china robots, he said they're all chink controlled and pure garbage.
>>536472773>Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions.>Although the course of schizophrenia varies among individuals, schizophrenia is typically persistent and can be both severe and disabling.>Symptoms of schizophrenia include psychotic symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, and thought disorder (unusual ways of thinking), as well as reduced expression of emotions, reduced motivation to accomplish goals, difficulty in social relationships, motor impairment, and cognitive impairment.
>>536476077>ai will never produce images>I mean ai will never produce LIFELIKE images>I mean ai will never produce video>I mean ai will never produce REALISTIC videos>I mean ai will never produce realistic videos longer than 30 seconds>okay but AI isn't useful for anything else>okay AI chatbots are a little better but it's still obvious that it's AI>Okay they've won some literary awards but it doesn't even mean anything>Look AI search isn't even that good >I know Google is shifting it's entire business to AI and businesses are spending hundreds of billions on AI but it'll NEVER get better this time FOR REAL
>>536478889And still people only use it to ask dumb questions and make images
>>536478889Everything on the internet is "fake" unless an authority doubles down on it. It's been this way since 2001 when 9/11 actors and conspirators were immediately resolved and the conclusions of the original official investigation are forever now undisputed fact, or so the official story propagators would have you believe etc. That's how I grew up.
