>>536497401They made America the most powerful sate on Earth. Entering WW II was the best decision in America's history - they gained half of the world.
>>536497401Infinity shit eaters.
>>536497442This they inherited the British empire
>>536497401More Americans died during Exercise Tiger, a D-Day rehearsal in April 1944 on Slapton Sands in Devon, England, when German E-boats attacked an Allied convoy, killing at least 749 American servicemen.
>>536497401They did their part and lived like men afterwards.
>>536497442>being a super power means worshipping politicians, Jews and celebrities addicted to Starbucks. >watching pornography >live a materialistic lifestyle >be narcissistic
>>536497401my gaming pc
>>536497401Ooops i thought that was gallipoli. Here’s the right webm
>>536497401Trannys and half nigger children
>>536497512Are you seriously arguing the US has not been the mightiest power on Earth since 1945? Even if they do decline now, that's almost a century of being top dog.
>>536497541>>536497512>>536497504>>536497473>>536497463
>>536497401>What did they die for?I see this so much but the real question worth pondering isn't 'What did they die for?', it's 'Why did their own government betray them?' That's a pithier question and one that doesn't have simple answers.
>>536497401gay buttsex in botswana
>>536497401America became a super power afterwards and Shitler didn't destroy the entirety of Europe. The post war order was a period of immense peace and prosperity for everyone, Europe included and the US prevented more European wars for decades. Up until the 90s at least when Jews ruined everything. Inb4 muh "Hitler holocausted the Jews" because that shit never happened.
>>536497401THEY DIED FOR NOTHING. WWI AND WWII WERE THE BIGGEST WASTE OF WHITE LIVES IN HUMAN HISTORY. BASICALLY, "DYING FOR YOUR COUNTRY" IS FOR RETARDS.
>>536497442>They made America the most powerful sate on Earth. Entering WW II was the best decision in America's history - they gained half of the world.America would have been better off even without WWII. We were already the richest country in the world. We inherited the British Empire. But that empire has not been for the benefit of the American people. It's only benefited bankers and other leeches.https://youtu.be/DSZGVqC42XI
>>536497615>America became a super power afterwardsAmerica already defacto controlled the world's reserve currency and was the largest economy in the world. It was the Federal Reserve that more-or-less triggered the Great Depression. The only thing WWII did was make Europeans a bunch of cucks, and divided Europe between America and Russia(and killed tens of millions of white Europeans and traumatized the rest).>The post war order was a period of immense peace and prosperity for everyoneI wouldn't say everyone. Not Koreans for example, or Southeast Asians, or really any brown countries. Europe did see peace, but peace with mass militarization and the constant fear of nuclear war(which was often closer than people think).With that said, there were tons of material advancements made after WWII. Things like washing machines, televisions, refrigerators, and later air conditioners, etc. But these scientific and industrial advancements were already happening long before WWII or WWI for that matter. So to claim they are the product of WWII seems pretty retarded.
>>536497401jewish interests
>>536497401Gay rights and race mixing
>>536497401Jewish ritualistic murder
>>536498610>Europe did see peaceEurope was a place of unending war beforehand, always over retarded bullshit.
>>536497577>'Why did their own government betray them?' That's a pithier question and one that doesn't have simple answers.It wasn't their own government anymore, jews formally dissolved the US constitution in 1913 and replaced the American government with a jewish corporation.They just didn't tell anybody, so everyone though they still lived in their own country. FDR was a kike puppet who had communist kikes living in the whitehouse with him. if the internet had existed in the 1930/40s he and the joint chiefs would have been dragged out of the whitehouse and lynched.
>>536497401For Israel.
>>536498731>Europe was a place of unending war beforehandNo it wasn't. Prior to WWI, there hadn't been a war between European powers since the Franco-Prussian War. Which lasted six months. And other than the Napoleonic and Crimean Wars, there really weren't any European Wars in the entire 1800's. Europeans spent the 19th century expanding their empires in Africa and Asia. This is why WWI was such a shock. No one even believed a war like that was possible. Which is why people thought it wouldn't last long, and that it would be the last "Great War".The reason you believe this is because WWI and WWII happened, but WWII was really just a continuation of WWI.
>>536497473Based, fuck Zogbots
>>536497401Why'd you edit the original?
Brown and gay pride, worldwide>White genocide
>>536499036Yeah they'd been a very long peace in Europe from the Napoleonic Wars to WW1, mainly because France had lost and been humiliated, and liberalism had tanked their birth rates so they rarely wanted to start a war anymore, they didn't have the manpower. Although you missed out on the two Italian Wars of unification, but otherwise Europe had been very peaceful for about a century. Actually some people think the long peace caused the war there were tons and tons of young men in WW1 and WW2 with few prospects, no family etc itching for a fight.
>>536497442It made the Jews i.e. Nazis the most powerful on earth. Ww2 was another economic war like ww1. Europe couldn't picture Germany being economically independent.
>>536497401They died for your freedom you ungrateful fucking asshole.While dickheads post shit like this >>536497449 and this >>536499157But none of the men who fought in those wars could have ever even concievably understood the betrayal that was to come from our political classes, and if they were alive today, unlike the pussies on this shit website, they would be incredibly unhappy, and unbelievably VIOLENT!What they fought for, and what they were told they were fighting for, was for freedom. And not just thier freedom, but the freedom of the children of the Earth. Whether they were white or black or asian. 30 million asians died fightin for freedom, and plenty of Africans too, it wasnt just the "white mans war". What little freedom you and I enjoy today, was handed to us by them. No matter what side they were on, they believed they were fighting for their people. You should never disrespect the dead, and even more so, those bravest of us all who fell in battle so thier friends and families might live. They were the best of our fathers!
>>536499036Are you insane? Prior to WW1 there was the Franco Prussian war, wars involving Prussia and Germany and the Napoleonic Wars which were continent-wide. I omit righteous wars like the wars against the Ottomans, but when you get into countries like Germany, France, the UK, they were basically all cunts who did nothing but wars of choice which were wholly unnecessary. imagine dying for Napoleon because he wanted to be le god emperor of the world.
>>536499783they weren't fighting for freedom, they were fighting because they were loyal to their nation state, that's it. Most Americans knew they were on the wrong side and not fighting for freedom at all.
>>536499811I don't think you understand how time works, from 1815-1914 there were hardly any major wars. The Franco-Prussian war was over in a few months, same with the Italian wars of Independence, Crimean War, etc. Prior to that there were lots of major wars sure, and it was mostly about France trying to conquer the continent with its large population.
>>536499783Yeah we get it, negroids like you wouldn't have it anywhere near as good without their sacrifice.
>>536499880You don't even understand the history of that time period. The reason there was a relative "peace" is because after the fall of the Napoleon, the UK had relative Hegemony at the time and laso thanks to the industrial revolution. HOWEVER during this time it was constantly pitting the European continent against itself. Saying WW2 was an extension of WW1 is somewhat accurate.. sort of, but what people do not understand is that WW1 was a direct product of the Napoleonic Wars, the Franco Prussian war, industrial competition and colonial competition. So what did Europe do to solve their differences? Kill each other again, as always. There was also the Crimean War, an unnecessary war of empire to keep Muslims occupying Europe. >mostly about France trying to conquer the continent with its large population.That's completely untrue. You're neglecting massive wars over religion, dumb shit about people controlling northern France or House X angry at House Y over something entirely beyond normal human comprehension. More wars of Empire, the list goes on.
>>536499880Also there were other wars involving Germany like the war with Denmark, War with Austria and the Austro-Hungarian wars to take over the Balkans. So the competition between powers was well underway and setting itself up to WW1, it's nothing new.
>>536500159> WW1 was a direct product of the Napoleonic Wars, the Franco Prussian war, industrial competition and colonial competition.that's nice, but there was still literally 100 years of relative peace prior to WW1, that's whole generations going by who didn't even know what a real war was like. >That's completely untrue. It's completely true, Italian Wars, The Nine Years' War, the war of the Spanish Secession, War of the Austrian Secession, Seven Years' War, almost every major war in Europe up to the French Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars (so basically from 1500-1815) were about France trying to conquer Europe and failing. >ng massive wars over religion,The French wars of religion were about the Catholics trying to keep their control over France, because part of the country was becoming protestant and would want to secede. The Thirty Years War wasn't as much about France, true, but France was still involved. >>536500347>other wars involving Germany like the war with Denmark, War with Austria and the Austro-Hungarian wars to take over the Balkansa few relatively minor wars over in a few months. Nothing major that could remotely compare to the Napoleonic Wars.
>>536500159Listen nigger, the point is, there was almost no war in Europe from the end of the Napoleonic Wars until WWI. So the idea that "Europe was a place of unending war" is just false.With that said, I generally agree with the "Leviathan" theory(see Thomas Hobbes), but the absence of war in Europe wasn't because Britain was too powerful. It was because Europeans didn't need to conflict with each other(at least not within Europe) because they could get what they needed from their colonies.As for the Crimean War, it was really about Britain trying to keep Russia weak. Which is really the cause of all of the major European wars. Pic-related.
>>536497442America gained half the world but lost its soul. Was it really worth it?
>>536499826its right there in your post .... "they fought to end tyranny" ... and they were unhappy that they didnt keep right on going all the way to bejing! No kidding they didnt trust thier politicians, who ever has??But after six years, 100 million dead, and a continent in ruins, who can blame them for making a deal with the devil.They left the EVIL that is communism for us to destroy. Unfortunately we havent been killin enough commies and it would seem they have infected our institutions with thier disease. But none of that matters in this thread, or my post. Its about respecting the dead. Its about showing a little bit of class. But its 4fucks, so I know the idea of having a bit of class is lost around here.It doesnt matter what they thought, or what we think. They were our fathers. They fell in battle, and regardless of thier reasons (and since they can no longer explain themselves), I CHOOSE to believe that they died for me, for my freedom, such as it is. And I dont care what side they were on. I honour them all, brave men they were.
>>536497570being the mightiest power on earth should come with its benefits no? the american people haven't experienced any benefit of this, you may say our standard of living was pretty good but the truth is the standard of living in nazi germany was better and also americans despite all the jewish myths and poverty slop they sell have always had a good standard of living because the land was basically a gold mine for a people who were naturally capable of making it work for them. america without jewish intervention was always going to be the dominant power on planet earth, that was the whole point of originally establishing civilized society there.
>>536500375>that's nice, but there was still literally 100 years of relative peace prior to WW1Except there's not. Europe has ever been peaceful? Why even try to argue this point, it's crazy. Like the 30 and Hundred years Wars? Wars of the Roses? Read into the causes of these wars, it's retarded.>a few relatively minor wars over in a few months. Nothing major that could remotely compare to the Napoleonic Wars.Those are like world war type events that recur in cycles with Europe, basically thus proving the point. All you see is the dominant power trying to maintain hegemony until a new conflict arises. Also the wars in this time are the first semi-industrial wars, Schlesswig War and Franco Prussian war were brutal. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roDlz7OEQkk
>>536500415>there was almost no war in Europe from the end of the Napoleonic Wars until WWIYou can point to several wars and conflicts that happened then. It was far from no war kek.
>>536500415>it was really about Britain trying to keep Russia weak. Which is really the cause of all of the major European wars. wat? Most wars since 1500 were about France trying to conquer Europe. It's just by the 1840s France was too weak to conquer Europe anymore, and in the 1840s-50s it was Russia that could have conceivably dominated the continent if it had say, taken over Constantinople and controlled Gallipoli thus securing sea trade with the Mediterranean. >>536500516actually read the text above that. 2/3 of American soldiers suspected the US had been dragged into the war by big business, they knew they weren't fighting for "freedom". >respecting the deadI respect the dead who actually tried fighting against jewish tyranny, not those who got forcibly marched into machinegun fire to be jewish golems. >Like the 30 and Hundred years Wars? Wars of the Roses?Neither of those took place in the 1800s>. Also the wars in this time are the first semi-industrial wars,But still very minor. More men died in a weekend of the Napoleonic wars than in the entire Schleswig War. >>536500665>several wars and conflictsall very minor
>>536497401edomites
>>536500711all wars in europe had nothing to do with "le evil man trying to take over world" and were instead banker wars for jews trying to break up the monarchies to ultimately achieve the result you see today.
>>536500711None were minor, there were major and significant wars, actually quite a few But again, this is in the post Napoleonic War era so you're in the unstable between-continental-wars phase of European history. Then WW1 starts, many of the conflicts of the 1800s are inherently related to this and it's root causes, again. No honest student of history can ever say Europe was a peaceful place, it was not.
Seemed like a good idea at the time.
>>536500850>War of the Roses>House A involved in mafia feud with House B>War for 32 years>Both Houses devastated>Massive casualties on both sides>Ended by them marrying each other>Lol troll faec xDDdSeriously imagine something more retarded.
>>536500850not true, the French monarchy was relatively independent of jewish machinations, they could seize jewish wealth at any time (and did). They just wanted to take over Europe. There's a reason the jews had to eventually support the overthrow of the monarchies, because monarchies actually could tell them to fuck off. >>536500853>Denmark vs Prussia was a major significant war lmao, no way anyone could actually believe this>No honest student of history can ever say Europe was a peaceful place, it was not.You're arguing like an LLM told it can't concede an issue despite having none of the facts on its side, a few minor wars over a period of 100 years vs major wars every decade or so is no comparison. Europe was absolutely at relative peace from 1815-1914.
>>536500626>Except there's not. Europe has ever been peaceful? Why even try to argue this point, it's crazy. Like the 30 and Hundred years Wars? Wars of the Roses? Read into the causes of these wars, it's retarded.There were some bad wars in European History, but the hundred years war was 600 years ago. More people died in the Battle of the Somme than in the entire Hundred Years War. The only truly terrible war in European history(other than WWI and WWII) was the Thirty Years War. Which literally killed like half of Germany. But again, that was 400 years ago.Almost all of these wars were nothing skirmishes over some irrelevant territory. The video you linked is of a war that killed 4,300 people. More people die in the Ukraine/Russia war every week right now than died in that eight-month war.I agree that Europe is "more peaceful" with America dominating them, but I disagree that Europe was in a constant state of war beforehand. Eastern Europe didn't war with each other under the Soviet Union either. Hans-Hermann Hoppe talked about it here.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H37JIKFVp7M
>>536500924>Ended by them marrying each otheryeah, the jews come in and incite both sides against eachother, make them fight eachother, stand at the finish line, and congratulate the winner and offer to help pay to rebuild the nation (with interest) and with that, an area he came into as a complete stranger now he rules over it. do that about 300 more times and you have most if not all the war in europe, if not all the major ones going back for a very long time.
They died so boomers could be born and destroy anything that was decent.
>>536497401The bankers and their banks. Fewer goyim is bonus points.And thank Satan no one speaks german anymore.
>>536497401So that Stacy could ride Jamal's dick.
>>536501010yeah isn't he referred to as an 'evil man who tried to rule the world' he wasn't trying to take over the world, thats a historic smear the jews (bankers) use to attack anybody who was rebelling from their control, Hitler is no different hes just the most recent, it seems like our history is essentially, jews use us for war and to smash into eachother until we basically merge together and they rule us in the end its a self perpetuating cycle. basically what i'm saying is, we're literally being killed bankers, and about him trying to take europe, yeah he was trying to save the entire european people, kinda like hitler.
>>536501032>the hundred years war was 600 years ago. More people died in the Battle of the Somme than in the entire Hundred Years War.The population sizes back then were much smaller. That would be pre-industrial agriculture.>The video you linked is of a war that killed 4,300 people.That's a lot of people for small countries, just say Denmark suffered half of those. But their population then was around 1.7 million. That makes it the equivalent of about 4 Vietnam Wars for Denmark, if you scale for population and compare it to how many casualties the US suffered.
>>536501053Maybe this wasn't entirely the Jews fault though? This is feudal, monarchy Europe. Jews have no control right now and the modern banking system doesn't even exist.
>>536497401Bananas and rice
>>536501032Without Europe’s wars and the pressure they exerted to drive progress, humanity would have remained at the level of the 1500s. Look at China: when you’ve pacified everything, you simply stagnate. Or Europe after World War II.War is and always will be the greatest motivator for progress, because our own survival is the greatest motivation we have.European civilization has conquered the world; even the Chinese now pretend to be Europeans and have abandoned their own civilization. Whether Europeans played a role in this is irrelevant - their civilization has triumphed.
>>536500711>Most wars since 1500 were about France trying to conquer Europe.The fundamental cause of the Napoleonic Wars was France losing the Seven-Years War and Britain taking control of most of France's overseas territories. Britain essentially blockaded France. Forcing France to expand across the continent in search of resources and markets. Same thing that caused WWII except Germany instead of France.>>536501255>The population sizes back then were much smaller.Even if you adjust for population size it's still nothing. Most of the wars back then were based on arguments over inheritance and titles. And they involved small professional armies.
>>536497401jewish social subversion and their own cultural erasure, bankers and biracial grandchildrenthat's why they died.
>>536501303you're insane to believe that, the jews were funding feudal europe the exact same way they got into power in the modern sense. they would politically incite the kingdoms into fighting eachother over ego and other insane shit, and the king needed money to prosecute the war. so he brings the jew in because the jew can charge usury, and he can't since his people are christians and he was too, and he had to be held accountable and couldn't charge them. so the jew comes in and teaches the people they're all terrible and evil, and because the people are christian they are susceptible to this, and they take the lower standard of living, and usury (taxes) and this is what funds the kings war. this is the exact same thing that is happening today, and has been happening for hundreds of years since the jews have been back. eventually they get kicked out, and its been a long time since the last happening.
>>536501330Wars aren't required for technological progress. That's insane. Was the industrial revolution caused by war? Discovery of quantum mechanics? Development of the car, aircraft, jet engine, radio or TV? The Radio might be related to military technology IIRC. It's true SOME technologies are brought about by war but it's far from necessary to progress. But even that's not necessary because most war time technologies are invented in peace time (radar and radio). Technological progress is not dependent on killing people, if you go down this road you may as well start sacrificing people to moloch or something, it's the exact same thing except worse because so many more people die.
>>536497401Niggers, Muslims, Jews, spics, faggots, trannies, feminists, obese people, whores, trannies, third world immigrants stealing wages plus jobs
>>536501389France was trying to take over Europe prior to the Seven Years' War, that had just been their most recent failure in the long line of failures since around 1500 with the first Italian War. >. Forcing France to expand across the continent in search of resources and marketsFrance had been trying to do that for centuries and although it had some success (look at the map of France change from 1500 to 1815 it expands a bit) for the most part it failed at continental domination as it was kept in check by various alliances of smaller states.
>>536497401They Died for creating the Independent Nation of India And Israel. If Hitler hasn't weakened British Empire, it would be impossible to create these two great Nations.
>>536501255>That's a lot of people for small countries, just say Denmark suffered half of those. But their population then was around 1.7 million. That makes it the equivalent of about 4 Vietnam Wars for Denmark, if you scale for population and compare it to how many casualties the US suffered.The problem in Vietnam wasn't the troop losses. It was that we shouldn't have been there in the first place. Moreover, the total dead in Southeast Asia was like three million. And god only knows how much rape and torture.We basically treated the Vietnamese like they were subhumans and wiped out whole villages. Many veterans came back not only opposed to war, but disgusted by their country. So to compare the fucking Second Schleswig War to Vietnam is dishonest at best.
>>536501651I don't really disagree with any of that but we did take losses in Vietnam and 60,000 was too much. This was over about 10 years. Denmark suffered 4 times as much damage relative to their size in a much shorter period of time.
hitler was a drug addicted manlet
>>536501445You should realize that he wasn't arguing in good faith the entire time, if you couldn't already tell
>>536497401For the least bad future.
>>536501862*the absolute worst imaginable future
>>536501833>Every single conflict ever was the Jews fault and everyone else dindu nuffin>The first monkey to club another monkey was caused by Jews
>>536497401Jews.
>>536501704It's still not really an honest comparison. Americans lost about as many soldiers at the Battle of Gettysburg as the entire Vietnam War. But the cost of the Vietnam War was infinitely greater for all kinds of political, social, moral, economic, and psychological reasons.The Vietnam War essentially bankrupted the United States. Forced us to abandon the Gold-Standard/Bretton-Woods, to send Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon to China to make an unfavorable deal with China so that we could pull out of Vietnam. And of course, reduced our moral standing in the world drastically. While empowering commies and all other agitators in the United States. Leading to a kind of revolution via the Civil-Rights movements. Moreover, even if only 60k died, almost 3 million were sent to Vietnam. Many/most of them came back with PTSD or a hatred of their country. So it was much more traumatic and destructive than simply a few people dying.
>>536497401hollywood based on true events
>>536501833its for everybody else reading who might not actually understand on a descriptive level.
>>536497401So that you can post here freely, unironically.
>>536497442Thanks but technically that was Japan's decision.
>>536501940So if the Vietnam war was a significant war for the US, then the Schlesswig war was certainly significant for Denmark though. This also resulted in Denmark losing a bunch of territory. It was a war of empire by Germany. This isn't the only war from that time period, but that time period was just a prelude to the next conflict they inevitably would have. All the competition of empire is there, armed too.
>>536501952Understood, right on then
>>536502085In Vietnam more bombs were dropped than all of WWII together and million ns of civilians died with lots of biological and chemical weapons used too.In the Danish war our armies meet on a battlefield far away from civilians, doing some war n stuff and then it was very quickly over again. All that was lost was the Danish king control over Germans.
