https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8008535/In concrete terms, a 1994 pediatric study found that, among 269 cases where the alleged adult offender was identified, only 2 were identified as gay or lesbian, while 82% were heterosexual partners of someone close to the child.OMG! The heterosexual are fucking pedophile, I understand why the most famous pedophile are all heterosexualIt's so disgusting, I'm proud to be gay.
pol got destroyed/owned by this thread... Nobody wants to respond after that massacre lmaoooo
> Post-modern feminist age of consent laws:OMG PEDOPHILE STRAIGHT WHITE MEN!> Come out as disease carrying aids vermin:YASS GO SLAY KWEEN!Faggots, everyone.
>>536513779Flag checks out.>was identifiedSeems to be a bit of a bias, back then there was no Flock and Facebook panopticon.But monkey pox cases being almost exclusively adult (and one dog) was a bit disappointing, I'll give you that, butt aficionado.
>>536513779>France>gov website = USAYou are aware, that in Europe teenage sex is legal ?
>>536514534You are a heterosexual we know you have a better chance that you are a fucking pedophile. kys
>>536513779pedo or ephebo?
>>536514701I did not check out that link, as per 4chan tradition, so it's effectively a stat of looking at a 17 years 364 days old woman for more than one second?
>>536513779>1994every child molestor is openly/closeted gay. you data proves that even letting you marry and procreate is dangerous for children
>>536514857>and procreatebut how
>>536513779Men who molest little boys will call themselves heterosexual.Men who have sex with other men who are dressed in lingerie will call themselves heterosexual. Actions speak louder than words Youre so stupid
>>536514923with women, cumgaria. letting them procreate with women*
>>536514761> Muslems are what you would call a pedo (and some actual pedos)>Muslims breed a lot as the starts as teens>Muslism thrash your capital, and would attack you for your sexual orientation>go to 4chan an insult those who want to breed and stop the islamic takeover
>>536514677You are disgusting, look the famous pedophile they are ALL FUCKING heterosexual LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO>heterosexual men (M age 25.2 and 31.0 years) rated the sexual attractiveness of photographs in each category presented via computer [seeing target photographs of girls >labeled as either under- (14–15 years)https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-013-0192-zFucking digusting
>>536513779Now do per capita
>>536514857Are you retarded? 84% pedophile are heterosexual
>>536515218>faggot cant see the issue with self reporting back in the 90s where homophobia was normal
>>536515218kek this board is so dumb nowdays nobody even gets the joke after you spell it out like this
>>536515259STFUhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-013-0192-z>heterosexual men (M age 25.2 and 31.0 years) rated the sexual attractiveness of photographs in each category presented via computer [seeing target photographs of girls >labeled as either under- (14–15 years)
>>536514947You are retarded look they take into account that a man who rapes a boy is homosexual, and that heterosexual men overwhelmingly prefer underage girls
Are you all rekt/owned here so Is the debate over?
>>536515707NOPE not mentioned anywhere in the study.
>>536516351There's no debate. I would like to have gay sex with you
>>536516443Read this, learn to read a thread>>536515045
>>536516351Patients: Patients were 352 children (276 girls and 76 boys) referred to a subspecialty clinic for the evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse. Mean age was 6.1 years (range, 7 months to 17 years).why would they use more than double the girls than boys?no one thinks lesbians are the same perverts as faggots.also no where did it say they accounted for the men who molested boys being gay claiming to be straight.
>>536516474Why? We don't know each other
>>536516584yeah there no mention of calling men who found boys attractive gay even if they claimed they were straight.the fact they cite men doing this and still claim an unequal number shows its bias as it should not even be a question that man is gay...you dont need to even ask him what he says he is
>>536516694guess we are done here faggot lmfao
>>536516671>We don't know each other Maybe it's about time ;) ;)
>>536516694You’re mixing things up. The study isn’t about boys it’s about heterosexual men rating adolescent girls. And finding one male image attractive in a task doesn’t automatically make someone gay. If you want to argue bias, you need to show that their classification method actually affected the results.
>>536516874Maybe ;)
>>536517015literally the orginal study says nothing about accounting for men who molested boys being classified as gay they literally brought 70 odd boys who were molested and says two of them were by men? becuase if its more than two boys molested by males its more than two gay men correct?thats also not addressing why its double girls than boys in the studyyou are bad at this faggot.
>>536515218Now do per capita. Of course heteros will be a larger percentage due to the fact that the vast majority of men are straight. Proportionately though a staggering large amount of nonces prey on boys.I can remember reading that many serial killers are either gay or display homosexual tendencies. All part of the mental illness of faggotry no doubt.
Guys how many youth, does OP and his cronies have in basement of troonry.
>>536516474flag checks out.I think the only flag on pol that's zestier than the frogs and the gayreeks is the Swedish one..
>>536515629>Mean ratings of the sexual attractiveness of the underage girls were lower than those of overage girls and women. In addition, correlations revealed significantly longer responding times when “underage” girls (and men) were rated as more highly sexually attractive. No such relationship emerged with the same girls labeled within the age of consent or women. Overall, these data suggest that men find pubescent girls identified as being under the age of consent sexually attractive, but inhibit their willingness to report this; the greater the attraction, the greater the inhibition.Interesting study
>>536517263https://cris.haifa.ac.il/en/publications/sexual-abuse-and-assault-in-a-large-national-sample-of-children-a/read thisWhereas girls are mostly abused by males (88.4%), boys are abused by both males (45.6%) and females (54.4%)
>>536517581Are you from England?
>>536513779
>>536513779>>536514514Pedophilia refers to attraction to prepubescents (children in other words), are these cases all that or does it refer to straight men being attracted to post pubescent child bearing females which is well established and proven to be biologically normal?
>>536518012I will not have sex with you.
>>536517554You do ad personam, are you projecting? Cope and seethe
OP is always a faggot, case study #536513779
>>536518253LMAO I have never wanted you, I want just to know if you are from of a good part of UK or a bad part of UK because you seem confident...
>>536518380Thanks captain obvious, I saied i'm gay in my first message you retard.I’m disappointed by the fairly low level of argumentation in this thread
>>536518536I generally avoid you "people"This will be my last communication with a faggot for the entirety of June. Shouldn't you be helicoptering your hard penis at a parade right now? Why are you here making shitty threads? Go be a faggot somewhere else.
>>536518702You are very angry because of this thread, you seems very strange, are you a pedophile or something?Go away you are disgusting
>>536519061>>536518424Why did you avoid answering this >>536518128bls respon
>>536519089Are you retarded? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8008535/They talked about children they are just pedophile that's all
>>536513779numbers per capita now> muuuuh per capita!!!only faggots doesn't get math
>>536519613I posted orther links, learn to read a thread
>>536519418Yes but look at what the study says.>Patients: Patients were 352 children (276 girls and 76 boys) referred to a subspecialty clinic for the evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse. Mean age was 6.1 years (range, 7 months to 17 years). That's a massive range. 7 months to 17 years. Having sex with a 17 year old girl isn't pedophilia nor is it illegal in most places.It's completely intellectually dishonest to include post pubescents (teenage females capable of child bearing) with 7 month year old babies.
Well that settles it thenWhatever, meaningless word anyway.Btw, kill jews
>>536519832>YesOk stfuand again I posted other links you dumb
>>536520343I'm replying to the link you posted at me, retard.That study is garbage because it includes pre pubescents, including literal babies in the same category as post pubescents up to and including 17 year old females. The word pedophilia specifically refers to attraction to pre pubsescents, words have meanings.
>>536513779Everything around this fag has muddy waters. We've got people arguing in some frequency of dissonance of the age-range of the victims, whereas it was most likely he preferred post-puberty, sexually mature teens. Detestable, but it's far from killing and eating babies, which is the other dimension to this. I don't necessarily think HE was doing such things, but he had no qualms enabling and gathering intel on those who do.
>>536515045Here's another link you posted.>14-15 years oldAgain, not pedophilia by definition of the word. Heterosexual men are attracted to teenage girls, this is a well established biological fact, it has never changed since the dawn of man. Suggesting it is a sexual abnormality is factually wrong.
>>536520699You are lying>>536518128You don't say that there a few minutes ago...Now you have to read the other link like I saied you dumb
