Hypothetically speaking, what would happen if not one person voted in the next election?The election would end in a draw, which would otherwise not be possible.
>>536550758I want to suck her tiddies
>>536550807
>>536550758The system would collapse by revolution long before people gave up on voting entirely. Democracy is the epitome of Western civilization no matter what well poisoning faggots try to make you believe about it.
>>536550758Make the candidates fuck each other in the ass and whoever pumps out the most cum wins, stream it live.
>>536550758If elections were real I suppose they would enter a state kind of like those government shutdowns and run a campaign begging people to get to the polls
>>536550758There would still be a million votes for the candidates with the most AIPAC money.
>>536550758>Hypothetically speaking, what would happen if not one person voted in the next election?they would just say people did and present it the exact same way they do now since they already don't count the votes, and who the fuck would be able to verify anyone outside their own personal circle did or didn't? in other states?reality is what they tell you it ismedia tells us all who won and everyone just goes "ok" and that's it and that's all they NEED to do anymore
>>536550758No one would notice. All the analysis and final tallies would be the same as if they did vote.
>>536550758Perky>>536550822Kek
>>536550958>>536551001This. Nobody currently alive has ever even seen a "real" election.
>>536551156>Perkywhat you're actually seeing there is a bra struggling to hold up fried eggs on a nail tier saggy bagssorry to tell youshe is never going to be as hot as the memes
>>536550758>hypotheticallyHey there, newfag. Welcome to /pol/.The answer is a default win for the Democrats.You're welcome. Enjoy thinking about this.
>>536550848Lets keep it at democratic-republicanism please. Artisotele warned us about democracy, wich is an anti-western and a retarded idea that wont go well very long. Why do they push the nrreative we all live in a „democracy“ even though no country does? In a democracy it’s people vs people like prison gang. The majority decides the minority is for dinner. They want to be the prison wardens. We have a repuplic with democratic characteristics, not a democracy.>>536550758Non- voting basically means you do not acxept the legitimacy of the voting procedure itself. They haven’t understood this yet. They push that non voters are the most stupid people, because they can just vote invalid or draw funny symbols on the ballot. But therewith you accept the vote, and automatically accept its legitimate. We got 60% non-voters already.>inb4 this is how the others winYes, i understand the conundrum. But once a critical mass never voted you can actually make a case any result is invalid.
like trump said, you don't have to worry about voting next time. because he isn't leaving. martial law coming soon
>>536551604>We have a repuplic with democratic characteristics, not a democracy.up until leading up to the 2020 election, there was a loophole built into the electoral system that allowed any elector to cast their electoral votes for whoever they wanted regardless of their state's election results, and there was zero repercussions, completely legalthe logic supposedly was that if some charlatan managed to fool the public, but the politicians could see what he was, and he would be terrible for the country, they could keep him outnobody ever used itputs all the democrat fearmongering about Trump in perspective that not one fucking one even mentioned this in 2016 when it still existed
>>536551604>Its not literal democracy!I mean yeah you’re right but most people in the West have a broad definition of what democracy means and how it pertains to their own governments and don’t tend to nitpick “Democracy” down to it’s literal definition.
>>536550758it wouldn't matter. even if nobody voted the end result would be 270 votes for the Democrats and 268 votes for the Republicans because it is the electorates who vote in a presidential election not the people. the people vote is just a friendly suggestion for the electorates. if nobody showed up the electorates would just go with whatever the lobbyists told them to vote, so no change.
>>536551752They tried to impeach Trump for drinking water with two hands.The dude is currently destroying the entire nation on behalf of another, but suddenly they are quiet.
>>536550758It would be decided by the electoral college or if they didn’t vote then the house of repsAnd then I assume business would continue as slightly normal
>>536550758> if not one person votedThey would count only the fake votes of the deep state then.You don't believe they would leave the outcome to chance, right?
>A total absence of voters would create a governmental vacuum, leading to the collapse of essential services such as infrastructure maintenance, public education, and law enforcement funding. The resulting political instability would trigger severe economic turmoil, including currency devaluation, loss of investor confidence, and mass unemployment, while the nation would be internationally classified as a "failed state."Sometimes you just gotta love the way AI sums things up and little bits like this fall through the cracks. Notice how it assumes voters have disappeared but investors are apparently their own class Fucking kek
>>536550758her tits have grown...
>>536550758Why do they israelis call her whore greta? I feel like, if anyone would know it's them. What do they know?
>>536550807good morning sars
I bet she can take a 9" dick.
>>536552465mossad had her get naked and took pics then put her in a cage and fed her moldy bread and warm water
>>536552512
>>536552599i'm onboard with what she's saying now
>>536551810The point is the meaning will be watered down so much, and the screens and news will push „democracy“ so hard, and tell everyone we need to „restore our democracy“ it - eventually they will be able remove all aspects of anything thats not a pure democracy, so all republican aspects. And the people will cheer for it, thinking they return to the good status quo (republic-democracy) by fighting le evil fascism, not realizing they doomed themselves. If all republican aspects are removed they have ZERO way to get out of this situation, since the majority must decide. And votes can be faked, see south korea, see 2020. You do not realize how devious and sinister the usage of „democracy“ and „democratic-republic“ as synonyms is yet. People won‘t know the difference anymore if it gets used as synonym, they think they always lived in a pure democracy, except they didn’t. This is Orwellianism, if anything is. And its happening in the whole western worlddemocracy achieved = olochcracy a second laterhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZggCipbiHwE
>>536550758Theyd get what they want. The demoralisation continues. You besg bet is to vote for people that arent in the major parties, and are running on something of substance, also no israeli lobby money. In the end the majors are just the beast fighting against itself.
>>536550822
>>536552690welcome mate
>>536550807you can have her, jeet
>>536553238fuck off Greta is Our Queen...only a kike would give her away
>>536553334>face covered completely100% a guy
>>536550758It's in the 19th Amendment. If ballots are equal, the tie breaker is a free for all fight to the death between everyone running for presidency.
>>536551604>We have a repuplic with democratic characteristics, not a democracy.I have never understood this. As far as I know in my country and the rest of Europe the political system works the same as in the USA. We have elections each 4 years, people elect their representatives, there is a Constitution with the rules of the system, there is the justice system to control the politicians, etc. Could you tell me where is the difference compared to that "Republic with democratic characteristics"?
If 51% of the population doesn't vote, then nobody won. 51% voted for neither of those two assholes, or no government at all. Any government selected by 49% of the population would be illegitimate.
>>536550758>acting as if votes mattered in the first placekek!
>>536551604>We
>>536550758>not one person voted in the next election?If no one voted all the mail in ballots would be collected, processed and the chosen candidate would win by the predetermined margin. Just ask Spencer Pratt and Rick Caruso how that works.
