It's funny, /pol/ was ahead of the internet in a lot of ways. 70% of Twitter these days is just /pol/ from 2016 thrown in the microwave. But we all just sort of laughed at this Elliot Rodger guy. The Supreme Gentleman memes were funny, but looking back, why didn't we see that incels and hypergamy and dating apps were going to be a major problem? Did we have an opportunity to have the Incel Conversation and answer the Woman Question in 2014? Why didn't we take it?
stfu retard
incel is a marketing meme for a woman's dating service in the 90's and I never thought it was organic
>>536554477nigger the guy who burned himself to death protesting jews gets made fun of like he's a lulcow around here and this is supposedly some white nationalist board, so
>>536554477holy retarded blogpost faggot
>>536554477Pre pol user here nobody glorified this incel we all laughed at how pathetic he was for not getting some box and instead got put in one
>>536554477(checked)Society just wasn't ready for Elliot's message back then. But his legacy has outlived him. ER is unironically possibly the single most consequential member of his generation.
>>536554477Because the only reason he was mad was that he thought that as a rich kid women should have been falling onto his cock no matter how unlikeable he was.He wasn't right about women.Women only like a guy with money if he is old, or has no ego.Because if he's old he's dying soon and she gets the money, or if he has no ego he might as well be dead because he won't stop her from spending his money.There was NOTHING related to him that was about women's hypergamy and why it's a major problem. There was EVERYTHING about him being mad that he couldn't profit from women's hypergamy.TL;DR analogy.He wasn't saying jews poison wells. He was mad that jews didn't poison wells in a way that benefited him.So why the FUCK should we respect the cunt?
>>536554477>Why didn't we take him seriously?Because he was hilariously wrong and so are chuds.
>>536554646If I remember correctly there was tons of "this your boy?!" spam so people owned it. Incel is just an insult for shitflinging losers with bigger problems
/pol/ did take him seriously.Even at the worst of the clowning it was always only 30% laughing at him and 70% commiserating.And the people that legitimately clowned on him 100% weren't in on the joke.
>>536554477Trump in 16 and covid in 19 were both colossal extinction level events for social media and the zeitgeist, it was impossible to predict with that amount of volatility
>>536554477In 2014 I was banging sluts. I thought one of the sluts I bang will be the one, but even if they aren't I get to bang them. It was a foolish approach to a long term commitment. Sorry, bros.
>>536554736you guys are all fucking faggots and lying retards Eliot was trolled by the Misc. board of BodyBuilding.com and they ended up trolling him so hard he left for PSL PSL was even shut down after what Elliot did he had little to nothing to do with /r9k/ even less with 4chan
>>536554477He probably loved that pic because he looks more white, but it’s just the angle and the light coming from the side. If he’d been gay I’ll bet all the rich old fags in Malibu or wherever he was from would’ve loved his petite exotic tanned thick lipped looks but he wanted to date only tall beautiful blue-eyed blonde girls and that’s where he fucked up. There’s a screenshot of a post he made on some lonely virgins forum where he’s saying “I thought 4 inches was average?!” or something like that so he was a dicklet too.
Maaan, reading his emails, it's sad to see how excited he was about the last song of ice and fire book released. It's been years and we still didn't get a new one since his death. Rest in Peace, king.
>>536554720>there was tons of "this your boy?!" spam yes>so people owned it.that's not what that spam means since retards make those dumb threads for the most retarded strawman shit all the time
>>536554477>>536554568>>536554597>>536554646>>536554656OP you can usually tell you're right about something when people get pissed off for seemingly no reason
>>536554736Why would you comiserate? You've read his manifesto? There's just so much more to life than getting it in and you're never going to get it in if you don't stop obsessing over it.
>>536555025back when Elliot was on internet retard from puahate were, for very good reasons, usually bullied out of internet now there's little faggot like OP who try to make everyone as miserable as he is
>>536555013I think it was kind of like an early influence scheme, or when social media breached containment onto 4chan, same difference. How can you tell. But it wasn't organic
>>536554477>70% of Twitter these days is just /pol/ from 2016 thrown in the microwaveTwitter is unironically better than this place these days.
He killed himself for less. He lived a more fulfilling life than most people here, especially our new users from South Asia kek which is why he gets the hate and the seethe
>>536554736Not really how I remember it. I'd probably recognize my own posts in the archive, I felt like a total outlier for thinking that the first half of his manifesto was pretty moving and well written all things considered. WoW as escapism, dyeing his hair surfer Chad blonde, being the worst skateboarder of all time. It's very millenial, I'm sure if I went back and reread it, it would take me back to that place and time.
>>536554736>/pol/ did take him seriously.Yeah but why? in 2004, 4chan was filled with people getting tons of pussy left and rightHow come it magically became incels?
>>536555114>incel nerds were bullied off the internet was mostly incel nerdsThis is just blatant revisionist history.
>>536555139you're a lying homo you're probably 20 something and Elliot died in 2014 you were probably 8 - 9 years old
>>536554477>Why didn't we take it?We really are sensitive young men at heart and that would require us to do something against our nature. Start an organization for men that comes off as "politically correct" for the sole purpose of shaming and manipulating women.Like the NAACP for chuds.
>>536555146>in 2004, 4chan was filled with people getting tons of pussy left and rightLMAO haha holy shit you cannot be fucking serious nigger, you weren't fucking here then, shut the fuck up. This site was anime otaku central then.
>>536554884Bodybuilding loved him posthumously and they never really hated him in the first place when he was just some random poster. Misc is a troll board, trolling was the point and everyone gets trolled just like /b/ /tv/ and /pol/ are.People still quote>The average is 5.5? I thought it was 4. This is very unsettling.In the modern equivalent of those forums and looksmax philosophy is just an extension of Elliot Rodger's lookism viewpoint.Obviously getting mad enough to kill people was dumb, but no one's going to say anything he concluded about how the world works was wrong. Everyone knows the world is unfair and good looking people have easier lives on average.
>>536555226Anime is auraful every bitch loves anime
>>536555187shut your retarded mouth sack of shit >revisionist history fuck no little shit like you were usually bullied out of internet in fact something awful, 4chan, bodybuilding a shit tone of forum used to just bully weirdo >>536555245>is just an extension of Elliot Rodger's lookism viewpoint.nigga Eliot didn invent anything he was brainfucked by the losers from PSL after being told he was a fucking failure for several weeks straight by bodybuilding.com all the screenshot you see of elliot are from bodybuilding the moral of eliot story is don't ever let your kid alone on internet because some very badly intentioned peoples are going to fuck with him until he turn crazy a bit like what OP try to do with this thread actually
>>536555274This was 2004 faggot, anime and gaming were still very much underground hobbies. They weren't full of normalfag retards like they are now.
>>536555224I don't know if you're aware but its illegal to make an NAACP for white people
>>536554477Elliot Rodger was a fuckin autistic loser. 90% of incels are incels because they are mentally slow, and have never actually approached women. Or are too retarded to do so succesfully.
>>536555122Its like here but people have to put a slight bit more effort into their post unlike here now when any old shitpost clogs up the REAL content
>>536555305Something Awful was literally a government-run website to harass non-normalfags, you dishonest shitbag. You can't use them as a representation of the internet. The internet was nerd territory back then, simple as.
>>536555305I didn't say he invented it I said it was his viewpoint which the majority of the world's men have always known to be true, and is also now in vogue.Clav is pretty much Elliot Rodger's spiritual successor. They're spiritually the same people.
>>536555458Elliot would have hated Clav though. Clav is exactly the kind of normalfag who would have bullied Elliot.
>>536554477He was a retarded cripple and should have thrown himself from a roof since day one
>>536555401I miss it. It's fucking gay now. >>536555508>which the majority of the world's men have always known to be trueok retarda self loathing dude with a severe predisposition to mental illness was driven to suicide and attempted a massacre all that because you can't fuck stacy
>>536555552>admitting to being a goonGoons are the lowest form of life in human history and they're ultimately responsible for everything wrong with the internet today.
>>536555508Clav is not even remotely a normalfag.Everything he does exudes effort like he's trying hard to be normal.Clav is Elliot if Elliot had a billionaire backer like Thiel to put him on tren, test, jaw surgery, limb lengthening surgery, oenis enlargement, whatever.
>>536555595I mean I miss the old internet. Never been a goon. I was on IRC GLP and abovetopsecret when that happened.
niggas stop shittalking elliot rodger he was a god amongst mortals
>>536555659fuck off shartycunt
>>536555552If men weren't competing for pussy, no man would groom, own a supercar, or a big house. Every man would just be gooning in their own little box. Which is proven by what's happening today, when a few billionaires already won the game so the remaining men don't bother playing.
>>536555632>abovetopsecret>admitting to being a boomer>>536555615Part of me thinks the point of propping up Clav is to essentially do a great replacement on the incel community. Muh masculinity retards did the same thing to the redpill. What's now called the incel blackpill used to be called the redpill until PUA faggots came in and started shitting the place up, and now they're trying to do the same thing to the blackpill.
>>536555701you're retarded if you genuinely believe that I've seen weirdo reproduce and find love my whole life the only constant with people who don't succeed are the people who don't try I've seen 5 foot 2 short king with 3 kids happy like a racoon in a dumpster full I have a coworker who just had his first child he's quasi paraplegique and walk like he was hit by a truck (he was hit by a truck) he still reproduced my dude if a dude, not that beautiful to begin with, who was hit by a truck and walk like a very visible infirm can reproduce you can to you can be happy you just don't want to like Elliot didn want to kid was rich assured future stacy would have fallen for him if he had waited just 5 years >>536555743fuck off man took me a while before I understood it was all bullshit I was young I remember being on Infowar shitty forum when it started I was probably what 15 - 16
>>536555743Clavicular is probably a Judeomasonic psyop to make more incels
I took him very seriously. For 12 years now I've been saying if Elliot Rodger was an incel despite being good looking, skinny, wearing designer brands, living in California, having a moviemaker rich dad, and driving a BMW, how the fuck could any of us get laid?If Elliot failed to pick up a chick, what hope is there for any of us?We are uglier, fatter, poorer, and have no BMW, so it's clearly over for all of us.We will die childless and unloved, just like Elliot.
>>536556049Elliot's dad lost a lot of money, he wasn't rich anymore by the time he did the shooting. He was also short; that was the biggest mark against him in women's eyes.
Some of the greatest men of all time were incels and died virgins. Immanuel Kant, Thomas Aquinas, Jesus Christ. What makes a man great should not be measured by the length of his penis, but how he swings it. Sometimes when you are desperate for something you do not have, when you finally have what it takes to acquire it, you no longer have the desire. A spiritual victory for the gentleman supreme
>>536555274Yea no, anime gave most millennial women the ick back then. If asian femcel-turned-stacies in the west hadn't normalized their consumption it'd still be considered more icky than it is now.
>>536556241>some of the greatest men of all time didn had children so that mean whoever I put under the label "incel" is potentially one of the greatest man of all timethat's also called a strawman argument if you use the buzzword "incel" you're braindead anyway
>>536554477call it what you want, but his vids are kino and he would have been an e-celeb in today's world and been ridiculously rich and "successful" thus would have unironically had access to the women he claimed he never got. https://archive.org/details/ElliotRodgersi was incredibly talented at video games, literally one of the best in the world in the 2003 gamefaqs era, if i would have known that shit would have made me rich 20 years later i would have just kept playing. the world is hilariously fake and gay.
>>536554477eggy had a video talking about everything thats going on right now back in 2015. everything he said came to pass, the only thing he was wrong about was people using VR to cope (instead its increasingly AI). but of course jewtube nuked the video. and of course normies back then relentlessly mocked him for what he said back then and now they all inadvertently quote him now.
>>536555862>I've seen weirdo reproduce and find love my whole lifeExceptions that are heavily publicized for the sole reason they're exceptional and therefore interesting in our attention-driven economy.>kid was richNah he wasn't. His family was financially unstable.>the only constant with people who don't succeed are the people who don't try There is a more universal truth that underlies that, which is stability.Kids from stable households will general try, can generally become normies and reproduce, regardless of physical appearance or apparent wealth.Kids from unstable households won't try, because they know how fickle life and fortunes are.It's not the kid's fault. Look up people who lived through the great depression, maybe your grandmother's generation or great-grandmother's depending on your age.They keep plastic bags, glass jars, don't waste a scrap of food or material they could potentially repurpose.It's the same principle, scarcity mindset.Of course the difference was that they also experienced the post-WWII boom which help many of them rehabilitate enough or regain just enough trust in the system to chance reproduction.But the order for our generations are flipped, we experience the good times first as kids and then an unending hellish economic wasteland for our young to mature adult lives.
>>536556534>Exceptions that are heavily publicized for the sole reason they're exceptional and therefore interesting in our attention-driven economy.No very firsthand experience. The fuck are you smoking? Normal people doing normal things. >Kids from unstable households won't tryYeah ok it's why low IQ reproduce 10 times more and everyone come from a broken house. It's because "kids from unstable housholds won't try" whatever that shit mean it's pretty obvious you try to convince yourself and nothing is ever going to be good enough for you it's alright what's wrong is you not accepting your own situation and trying to blame society for it it's you it was always you there's two kind of peoples peoples who find excuses to not do something and peoples who find excuses to do something
>>536556812>No very firsthand experience. The fuck are you smoking? Normal people doing normal things.If anything your 'weirdos are reproducing' narrative is firsthand experience. We have solid data on dating, coupling, and reproduction metrics and they're down across the board. There are warehouses full of ugly men no woman would ever touch.>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49677459_Physical_attractiveness_and_reproductive_success_in_humans_Evidence_from_the_late_20_century_United_States>https://archive.nytimes.com/tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/is-there-anything-good-about-men-and-other-tricky-questions/>For women throughout history (and prehistory), the odds of reproducing have been pretty good.>Most men who ever lived did not have descendants who are alive today.>Yeah ok it's why low IQ reproduce 10 times more and everyone come from a broken house.IQ is inversely correlated with reproduction:>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289607000244Unstable households aren't households that are poor. Unstable households can be unstable financially or emotionally. Poor houses can be emotionally and financially stable (secure and constant albeit low flow of income).In the case of Elliot Rodgers, his household was neither financially nor emotionally stable.His father bet the wealth on a failed Hollywood project and they were on their way down socioeconomically.His mother was probably narcissistic that used Elliot as an emotional surrogate for the family's financial troubles.>Emotional incest, more often described as enmeshment or "surrogate spouse syndrome", refers to a type of harmful relationship in which a parent looks to their child for the emotional support that would be normally provided by another adult.
>>536557328jesus christ I've never seen people try so hard to not succeedreally make your obssessive disordre questionable there's a reproduction crisis, but it's because of materialism, hedonism, promiscuity and social medias with a giant amount of propaganda and a totally busted economy that leave no financial mobility for the youth it can change in a decade easily like the baby boom happened we just have to outlaw usury for a start and probably clean the country from the corruption rotting the core of it >In the case of Elliot Rodgers, his household was neither financially nor emotionally stable.You sound like you developed an obsession with the Elliot story pretending you know the details of his private life reading tabloid is next level emotionally invested what's your real goal please do tell me? I see that you want revange against women but why and what will ever satisfy you
>>536557479>jesus christ I've never seen people try so hard to not succeedI'm literally just restating facts from scientific studies lol.This isn't between you and me, this is between you and the scientific establishment and normal human social dynamics.Nothing in your post even tries to refute the studies I posted which goes to show you are much more opinionated and therefore emotionally invested in his story than mine.His story is a textbook example of the scenario I described.
>>536557602>I'm literally just restating facts from scientific studies lolYou're cherry-picking studies you didn readI highly doubt you could even understand it let alone trying to establish a logical context to it. You use "studies" like it's some magic sword allowing you to swing wherever you want. It work with low IQ but someone with a brain is going to question your intentions because it's pretty obvious the "studies" in question aren saying what you pretend they're sayingI bet you didn even know that "study" was made with baby boomers listen you can pretend you're intelligent like I said it work with feeble-minded and easily manipulable idiot but we both know it's not real now please do tell me what's your real goal
>>536557847>You're cherry-pickingYou're free to cherry-pick studies that state the contrary. Didn't read the rest of your irrelevant emotionally charged ad hominem.
>>536558155>You're free to cherry-pick studies that state the contrary.You didn even read it. Nor even tried to understand it. Who are you kidding. The study is trying to prove there's a correlation between observable attractiveness and the amount of babies produced by the age of 56-58. Even the "study" conclusion is "maybe" my dude. Did you even read it? It's a study made in 2007. With Baby boomers. A totally different generation. With a different reality. Different beauty standards. You're using cognitive bias like a weapon, and I know you don't believe any of that shit. You want other people to believe it. Please do tell me how a "study" made in 2007 with baby boomers concluding the 13% ugliest part of the population by the 1670-80 standards might or might not have succeeded in reproducing because of their ugliness prove whatever asinine point you're trying to make genius
>>536558313>the study shows correlation is in you favour but you're still wrong!You can try to reject the conclusion on a study by study basis but there are dozens if not hundreds that all trend to the same conclusion:>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10164-011-0274-0>As predicted, facially more attractive and taller men were more likely to engage in marriage. In turn, married men had higher reproductive success than single men. Even when men’s marital status was considered, facially more attractive men had higher reproductive success than their less attractive counterparts. This supports the importance of physical attractiveness in sexual selection in modern humans.
>FACIAL SYMMETRY AND ATTRACTIVENESS>Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011) – This study found that facial symmetry is consistently rated as more attractive across cultures. Symmetry is believed to signal developmental stability, meaning fewer genetic mutations or environmental stressors impacted growth.>Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999) – Their research on facial symmetry showed that women prefer more symmetrical male faces, particularly at peak fertility in their menstrual cycle. This supports the idea that symmetrical features indicate genetic fitness and enhance reproductive success.>HIP-TO-WAIST RATIO AND FEMALE ATTRACTIVENESS>Singh, D. (1993, 2002) – Singh's studies confirmed that a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 is consistently perceived as more attractive in women across different cultures. This preference is linked to fertility and health, reflecting optimal oestrogen levels and lower risks of obesity-related diseases.>Zaadstra et al. (1993) – Found that women with a lower waist-to-hip ratio have higher fertility and a greater likelihood of conception, supporting the evolutionary basis for this preference.>HEIGHT AND MALE ATTRACTIVENESS>Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowicz, A. (2000) – Found that women overwhelmingly preferred taller men as romantic partners. The study suggested that height correlates with social status and perceived genetic fitness, making it a desirable trait in mate selection.>Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Pollet, T. V., Nettle, D., & Verhulst, S. (2013) – Examined over 10,000 couples and found that taller men had higher reproductive success, reinforcing the evolutionary importance of height in male attractiveness.
>STRONG JAWLINES, MASCULINE FEATURES, AND TESTOSTERONE>Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001) – Found that men with strong jawlines and prominent brow ridges were rated more attractive. These features are linked to higher testosterone levels, which may indicate genetic strength and immune system competence.>Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000) – showed that women prefer more masculine faces when ovulating but shift towards less masculine faces at other times, suggesting that testosterone-linked features signal short-term genetic benefits rather than long-term parental investment.>NEONATAL FEATURES IN FEMALE ATTRACTIVENESS>Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., & Yoshikawa, S. (1998) – Found that big eyes, full lips, and small noses were universally rated more attractive in women. These features signal high oestrogen levels and fertility.>MUSCULARITY AND MALE ATTRACTIVENESS>Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007) – Found that women rated muscular men as more attractive for short-term relationships, suggesting that muscle mass signals good genes and physical dominance, advantageous in ancestral environments.>PENIS SIZE AND PERCEIVED ATTRACTIVENESS>Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2013) – Found that larger penis size was associated with increased attractiveness, particularly when paired with taller height and broad shoulders, supporting the idea that secondary sexual characteristics contribute to mate selection.>UNIVERSAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF SYMMETRY AND CLEAR SKIN>Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003) – Found that clear skin, facial symmetry, and healthy hair are universally preferred traits because they indicate good health and genetic quality.
>>536558605>>536558705>>536558723newsflash it was the same for the whole history and historically it was way worse the older you go the fewer men were reproducing hence why everyone is fucking third cousin you're not actually making the point you think you're making yes the 13 uglier percentage of the population always had difficulty reproducing. it's life my dude the fuck do you want to do? try to kill everyone because you're fucking ugly and can't get over it?
>>536558806Moving goalposts now.Denial of the obvious is so fucking weird.I mean you only need to watch any episode of Survivor, Naked Attraction or even those Korean youtube shows of opposite sexes ranking each other in terms of attractiveness to know that good-looking people are more sexually successful.This is common knowledge even in the normie world let alone the scientific one.Do you miss 100% of the shot you don't take? Sure. Except it's not even relevant to Elliot's case because he tried multiple times and got shot down lol.
>>536558806>it was the same for the whole historyNot really, females being the ones making decisions about sex is a very modern concept. In all civilizations in all recorded history it was always the men who made the decisions. Maybe if you go to pre history you may have some tribes where the females made the decisions, but it is only speculation
Everyone who browsed 4chan was aware he was right. Even those of us who made it and became chads like Zyzz were still completely aware of the woman problem, because they experienced growing up as a none chad. Talk to any man who wasn't always good looking, and thus wasn't always treated as human by women, and they all behave like this.
>>536558879>I mean you only need to watch any episode of SurvivorMaybe you're just brain dead and you shouldn watch TV or go on internet. Maybe you would have reproduced and wouldn try to convince everyone to be a fucking failure like you are every day. Pretending everyone is just like you. >>536558913>Not really, females being the ones making decisions about sex is a very modern concept.so what Ugly people weren't reproducing either back then "by the beauty standards of those times." No shit someone less attractive is going to attract fewer people, hence having fewer chances to reproduce. We probably need 3 - 4 studies to prove that.
I miss him so much, rest in peace Saint Elliot.
>>536554477>why didn't we see that incels and hypergamy and dating apps were going to be a major problem?What are you talking about newfag? we were talking about hoeflation and thot culture since 2014. The problem is now it's 12 years later and an entire generation of adults grew up with the standard that you can pick your dream partner off a menu with all the toppings you like.Elliot was an autistic faggot but he wasn't wrong about the self-serving traits of attention whoring females.
>>536559080I can tell you need to desperately believe lookism isn't real. I've presented overwhelming evidence that is not the case.Obviously there are other factors like social status and money, but neither of them equate to 'just give the ovulator a firm handshake!'.That advice will die with the boomers.
>>536559080>so whatYour claim that what we are going through is the normal is wrong. It is unprecedented>Ugly people weren't reproducing either back then "by the beauty standards of those times."No because when men controlled the means of reproduction looks were far less valuable. Men would pay more attention to things like character, utility.... Men also enforced monogamy, which allows a broader range of people to have access to sex. This is why civilizations produced higher IQ people than tribal societies.
>>536559206>I can tell you need to desperately believe lookism isn't real. lookism isn a real word anyway what you try to describe but fail to do is "superficiality" a word that already exist yes there's an increase in superficiality because of hedomism and social medias it's encouraging peoples to lie about their life and try to make it look better than it really is effectively skewing the perception of normality and creating unrealistic standards real words >>536559304>Your claim that what we are going through is the normal is wrong. It is unprecedentedI mean no not at all it happened several time in history nameling the last 100 years of Rome, the Bolshevik revolutionthe islamic revolution
>>536559422>namely* the last 100 years of Rome, the Bolshevik revolution
>>536559422>lookism isn a real word anyway>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LookismGet with the times boomer.I know it feels like whiplash from your generation that preached inner beauty or whatever, but all the younger generations can't afford to not be pragmatic anymore.
>>536559422Are you claiming that during/after the islamic revolution women were the ones making decisions regarding sex? lmao
>>536559501>y-y-you're a boomer if you don't use newspeak whatever man if I had to bet you're pushing mid 30 >>536559508before obviously
>>536554477He was mentally ill
>>536559595You are delusional, men made the decisions in pagan arabia. Maybe you will find instances of widows of powerful men making decisions, but those are exceptions to the rule.
>>536559753what nigga Iran was secular before the islamic revolution
>>536559595Even if you don't use that specific term, physical attractiveness-based discrimination was always a thing.No one ever wrote songs extolling someone's ugliness.
>>536559919>No one ever wrote songs extolling someone's ugliness.That would also not be true. Several song were made about the specific ugliness. >The Dummy Line >I married a Man Who was Ugly and Poor >The Eddystone Lightit was pretty popular even
>>536554884The internet only warms up and attempts to over embellish people once they pass away; see Terry A Davis and the fact you sick motherfuckers harassed/stalked a poor mentally ill man into losing everything including his parents, his house, his car, any women he'd try to talk to online, his website, any job interviews he had set up (people openly live streaming as they prank called and harassed multiple business owners) and ultimately any donations he received were just re-routed to you guys. With "fanbase" like /g/, /pol/ and /r9k/ who needs enemies? But hey at least you got your free entertainment and made some cash off of it
>>536559997Played as a joke doesn't count.
>>536560095I mean you make it sound worst than it was. It was mostly prank. Yeah some went too far but it was never as badly intentioned as, let's say, Outer Heaven or Entropy. 4chan was always the toilet everyone come to piss in. It doesn mean everyone on 4chan supported whatever happened on it. >>536560170yeah ok you get the point I guess
>>536559807Are you under the impression that Zoroastrianism is a feminist matriarchal religion? lmao
>>536560569that's all beside the point thoyou said it's unprecedented when there are several precedenttake the bolshevik revolution for example and what "feminism" did there
>>536554477>Why didn't we take him seriously?who said i dont? I open my compass 10 times a day towards Isla Vista and kneel and pray for the Prophet, they only true Prophet ever existed. I also buy vanila latte coffee on his birthday every year.
>>536555389This place is just full of jews, jeets and antifa now. It was always shit but now theres hardly even the rare insightful post anymore.
