Here me out.Economic growth always relies on a growing population. But every white nation has a shrinking population if you take away immigration. Why the focus on new jobs creation? New jobs for who? Why not focus instead on creating better jobs for our already existing population? Better jobs that actually create wealth for the nation.Growth is always fuelled by private debt anyway, which creates bubbles that transfer wealth upwards. So how do we create an economic model that doesn't require a growing population? That severs actual wealth creation from asset price inflation? Who are the best economists to read on this topic?
>>536577537*hear
>>536577537when posting an infographic, it helps if you use sufficient resolution that you can actually read the info on the graphic. just a tip for using 4chan.
>>536577627I saved it from another thread on /pol/. but point taken.
>>536577537to answer your question, depopulation is actually good and makes life better for everyone. the entire world is overpopulated likely 10x - 20x what the planet can actually comfortably support.the problem is they're filling white countries with brown people faster than the population can stabilize which is essentially just replacement.
who cares
>>536577712I agree that depopulation is a good thing and that replacement is a bad thing. But it seems like there's an economic argument to be won here against the technocrats who see growing the population as the only way to a strong economy
>>536577537>>536577939no, in modern economic theory, economic growth is driven by different things depending on the maturity of the economy.in a pre-industrial economy it is population growth.in an industrializing economy, it's industrialization.in a mature industrialized economy, it's innovation.the people pushing mass immigration in mature economies aren't economists, they're short term thinkers who just want cheap labor. actual economists know that at a certain point, investment in productivity per worker will pay more dividends than increasing the number of workers. most countries have reached this point already, even russia and china, which is why china is obsessed with copying apple and nvidia, not making more useless chinese people.a smaller, higher quality population would be good for almost every country at this point.
>>536577537comparing 2007 and 2025 wouldn't it make more sense to say the introducing of phones and dating via apps is what causes the fall in reproduction rates? I dont think moving the economy to various finance or tech scams would cause a severe reproduction crisis unless the latter would fuel one night stands via dating apps and mental illness via doom scrolling.
