Einstein was smarter than any of them but he didn't care about stacking cash like scrooge mcduckhttps://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/billionaire-charlie-munger-asked-why-140002463.html
>>536625833
>>536625833That wasn't his point, he was saying he is rich maybe not richer than Warren Buffet but richer than Einstein. He beat Einstein
>>536625833> Einstein> SmartEinstein ruined the field of physics to a point that it has become and absolute meme.Go ahead and name a single tangible achievement made by Einstein.I will wait.You will find that all of his achievement are just mathematical nonsense that is essentially unfalsiable and has no impact on the real world.
>>536626695He explained gravity. I bet you can’t explain his theory of it either. Give it a go.
>>536626884I’m waiting,…..
>>536626695This person is an imbecile. Do not pay any attention to this person .
do not grieve about these evil demons existing our world, for their time is short and their cold God-forsakened corpses will soon meet the fucking dirt the fucking old boomer fucks
>>536626695einstine was a notorious credit thief. when he wasn't blatantly stealing his wife's ideas, he would conveniently forget the contributions of others
>>536625833precondition to getting rich, is obsessively putting in effort to get rich.
>>536626884You're retarded. He didn't explain gravity. Everyone knew gravity exists as a result of its consequence. He was also proven wrong about Quantum physics
>>536627172I’m very not retarted and you obviously don’t know what you’re talking about.
>>536626041>He beat Einsteinhe's smart enough to know his limits and never really considered his own personal wealth as a sign of his success.neither Munger or Buffet consider their own wealth to be a sign of their success. the success of their companies is just their day job.Basically these guys are lobbyists and shadow brokers. just racketeers under a different name.
>>536627172Please favor us with a breakdown of the mechanics of gravity as put forth by Einstein as pertinent to the general theory of relativity. Show us that you at least know what you’re talking about.
>>536626884>Give it a go...... ok, i'm trying.... errRrrrRR... no... no, it's no good. it won't budge.
>>536625833almost as if people are different with different interests. Some people find science boring and would kill themselves if they had to do it all day.
The wealth of a life is not measured in money but in adventure.
>>536626695>Go ahead and name a single tangible achievement made by EinsteinHe tricked millions of dorks.
>>536627318Cute but incorrect.
>>536625833His story as a WW2 vet is quite interesting.
>>536627281
>>536627388So I take it your explanation is something like “what goes up, comes down”?
>>536627281Woah dude, gravity stretches time, broooooooo. Woah, dude. It's like that line i heard from epic rap battles of history way back when. Wow, dude, epic funny man with his tongue sticking out. You scishow faggots need to kill yourself. I'll take Isaac Newton and Ticho and the guys behind thermobaric weapons over your old fart
>>536626041>He beat EinsteinEinstein was smart enough to play a game that actually mattered, instead of the game of "Who can destroy the world for profit the most?"
>>536627367
>>536626884>He explained gravity.Anybody, can do that, nobody can prove it. Anyhow, that's hardly a tangible invention. >I bet you can’t explain his theory of it either.Nobody can explain his nonsensical crap.>>536626985Still waiting for you to name a tangible achievement.
>>536627464You at least have an idea of what time dilation is. It turns out that science really doesn’t hinge on who you’d take Funny, huh?
>>536627089Special relativety is all lorentz.General relativety is nonsensical crap.
>>536626695he put a small box on a string and imagined himself inside?
>>536627522Anybody can do that. Ok. You do it. Give us all a brief explanation of how gravity works as Einstein explained it.
>>536627537>lorentz
>>536627433https://youtu.be/wsc0cwxEmSk
>>536627537Why? What are your objections to general relativity? Also, if Einstein stole from anyone it was Hermann Minkowski. The truth is he built upon Minkowski’s work but Minkowski should get more credit than he does
>>536627561Allegedy.
>>536627619Are you afraid to use your words?
>>536627536>time dilationThat's all lorentz nothing to do with the kike.It's also one of the few aspect of Memestein's nonesense that can be expermintaly proven.Still waiting on any tangible invention made by the kike, I will wait.It is not without good reason that his nobel nomination was heavily opposed.Thanks to him the field of physics have been useless since the 1940s.
>>536627667+1 his neighbor was classically trained and did well in academia, the neighbor was smart.
>>536627704And I’m still waiting on you to demonstrate you know what you’re talking about You can’t do it. You can’t explain gravity per general relativity You don’t know what you’re talking about and no one should listen to you.
>>536627661I’ll chime in. One of the entailments of his theory is that time will dilate at high velocities. This is fundamentally incoherent with his presuppositions, namely that there is no “preferred” frame of reference in physics. That means someone moving light speed away from you is equally valid to be seen as you moving away from them at the same speed.But there is the problem, time is supposed to be moving at different rates in each frame, but the difference in rate is mirrored from the alternative perspective, meaning no dilation could ever occur.They told you this dilation in time was measured. That was a lie. There have been many lies in service of this worldview.
>>536627689yup, public speaking sucks.
>>536626884yo check it. so imagine there's a trampoline. and the trampoline represents space-time, and then there's a bowling ball in the middle of the trampoline.
>>536627661Nigger the majority of special relativety can be mostly attributed to Lorentz because its core mathematical structure, the Lorentz transformations was developed by Hendrik Lorentz (and others like FitzGerald, Larmor, and Poincaré) before Einstein's 1905 paper. Einstein's radical contribution was not the equations themselves, but him throwing a spin on top of them.Einstein was shit at math, by his own admission.This is why people call him a plagirist, because he took other people's work, applied a cool story to them and took all the credit.
>>536627822>You don’t know what you’re talking about and no one should listen to you.ahahha, even idiots can change a lightbulb.
>>536625833>He has a point, why are billionaires so busy trying to have more billions than the next guy?Most of them don't. They care about controlling their companies and in order to do so they have to maintain a controlling share of stock in the company which entails having billions of dollars worth of stock in their company.The ones that want to change the world like Soros or Gates are the ones that tend to be real problems.
>>536627853>and took all the credit.How jewish of him.
>>536625833Einstein was a Smart Jew who never disclosed his real portfolio like Redshields.
>>536627834That not how gravity works. That was the topic at hand. No one here has yet to demonstrate an understanding of Einstein s explanation of gravity. It’s not about time dilation. Not directly at least. People here shouldn’t declare Einstein a fraud when they don’t even know what he did.
>>536627689https://youtu.be/pf0erXl4pwQ&t=77
>>536627281Picture a bowling ball on a trampoline. The bowling ball represents something with mass, like a planet, and the trampoline surface represents spacetime. Now, take a marble and put it on the trampoline. Notice how it is drawn toward the bowling ball? That's how gravity works according to general relativity--an object causes a distortion in spacetime which in turn causes other objects to be drawn to it in relation to the mass of the objects and their distance from one another.
>>536627840Someone is thinking.
>>536627918> What are your objections to general relativity?You literally asked this question in the post I am responding to.If you concede that general relativity is incoherent, I would be glad to discuss gravity with you.
>>536627661>What are your objections to general relativity?As for GR.It is so fucking bad that the theocratic mindless fool who insist on following it had to invent the following matters to account for its failures:- Dark matter (~27% of the universe's energy density) to explain galaxy rotation curves, gravitational lensing, and structure formation- Dark energy (~68%) to explain cosmic accelerationThis is how kike mathematical nonesence works, whenever it fails they just invent a new theoretical construct to save it, this is to say nothing about its failures on the quantum level.
>>536627834No, retard. Look up the ladder paradox.
>>536627924Tah dah. Excellent, anon Space is time in general relativity Mass curves space and dilates time much like a pebble in a bathtub displaces the water all around it. This curves space (and time) and this creates gravity as a simple matter of geometry by mass curving space. This is why clocks set on earth in sync wander from each other if one is in space as they experience different temporal realities from each other in the absence of the earths gravity.
Someone argued that all of the serial killers became CEOs which is why we don't see all of the stories we used to see about them....so it's a difference in humanity.
>>536628085It doesn’t apply.Feel free to describe in what manner you think it applies.
>>536627984I do not concede that. Why would I do that? lol You can’t keep your opinion
>>536625833I would rather be poor and attractive than look like an absolute jewish ghoul freak as a billionaire
>>536628132If you don’t concede then address it. It was a direct answer to your questions and you just tried to change the subject while accusing me of doing so.
>>536628215I did address it. I said that time dilation wasn’t an explanation of Einsteins model of gravity and it isn’t .
>>536628118You don't understand how frames of reference and the principle of inertia relate to one another ("time is supposed to be moving at different rates in each frame, but the difference in rate is mirrored from the alternative perspective") and the ladder paradox relates to this by describing how they do. The rules of physics as described by relativity hold between frames of reference but experience changes based on which frame you observe as inert.
After all these posts, not a single one of the seething and fuming kikes have managed to refute.Memestein's nonsensical crap had no tangible impact on the world, no new invention was made because of it, some have cited GPS as working thanks to Memestein but that is clearly simply the application of Lorentz time dilation.Eff off, jews.Einstein impact has been entirely negative, he has given rise to other faggot kike mathematical construct that are essentially unfalsiable like string theory.Making the whole field of theorotical physics UTTERLY useless.
>>536628309
>>536628293No, you are just acting in bad faith.You asked> What are your objections to general relativity?In this post: >>536627661I answered here:>>536627834You did not address this, you continue to deflect by talking about gravity. I would be glad to talk about gravity, but that wasn’t what the discussion was about. If you concede the topic matter, I would gladly let you choose the next subject (even though you already chose the first). Otherwise, respond to the my objections. Failing to do so is itself a concession
>>536627840
>>536628391>as working thanks to Memestein but that is clearly simply the application of Lorentz time dilation.
>>536628309But it doesn’t even attempt to address my objections.Asserting> ladder paradox relates to this by describing how they doIs not an argument, it is just a repetition of your claim I asked you to elaborate on.To clarify a few reasons explicitly why this is not relative:>the ladder paradox is a thought experiment on the effects according to one observer. >it is not concerning time dilation at all>the resolution is precisely what I’m criticizing: two divergent realities being imagined when the argument itself forbids it.>Moreover, thought experiments are not evidence, my entire argument is that this
>>536628391You are retarted and gay. The truth is you’re a racist with a hard on and you’re trying to assassinate the name of a man who changed the way we view the world fundamentally but you have no idea what he actually did. Operating from an obvious bias is not scientific or even intelligent. If the answer must equal X but it really equals Y only a faulty equation can underwrite it. Your faulty equation is that that Einstein was Jewish = not valid. That’s dumb dumb knuckle dragging bullshit. In fact, Einstein actually spoke out about Israel’s politically and rejected the expansion of greater Israel
>/pol/ arguing about physicsYeah lol, lmao even.
>>536628456Gravity was the original question. I wa never not talking about gravity
>If you concede the topic matter, I would gladly let you choose the next subject (even though you already chose the first). Otherwise, respond to the my objections. Failing to do so is itself a concession
>>536628612more like rofl
>>536628635I literally linked to your post, and my post responding to it. Gravity was never mentioned.In fact, you never mentioned gravity in this entire comment chain until AFTER I answered your request for objections to general relativity.>>536625833>>536626695>>536627089>>536627537>>536627661>>536627834>>536627918From OP to your first deflection to my objections, gravity is not mentioned.I am going to accept your concession now, but I’m disappointed in you.
>>536628606>you’re trying to assassinate the name of a man who changed the way we view the world fundamentally but you have no idea what he actually did.A fucking Hollywood movie can "change the way we view the world", piss off. His cultural impact is entirely due to the jewish press shilling him as the image of the jew genius after WWII. He still had no tangible impact on the world, no new invention was made because of it.> Your faulty equation is that that Einstein was Jewish = not validNot what I said at all.
>>536628456lolYou are desperate for something to feel good about yourself, aren’t you? Are you going to pay your rent or talk a girl into bed by explaining how you got a guy on pol to concede? I don’t concede a thing and I’m not talking to you anymore.You are a loserGet a life
>>536628612Theoritical physics not real physics.This field has become a laughing stock, so your appeal to academic credintials has no impact.Now, shoo.
>>536628605>But it doesn’t even attempt to address my objectionsIt addresses them by pointing out the basis you have for holding them isn't well-founded, retard. >Is not an argumentIt is an argument. The confusion of your initial statement lay in the fact you don't understand frames of reference and inertia. The ladder paradox underscores these concepts and if you understand it, which I don't think you're able to, you'll realize your objection was based on misunderstanding and thereby nonsense. >it is not concerning time dilation at allIt does, retard.
>>536628777How strange, you gave two (you)s to to that post without ever addressing the content.In fact, you seem to be launching into schizophrenic personal attacks.You wouldn’t happen to be upset, would you?
>>536628723I don’t concede a thing other than that you are a massive faggot.
>>536628825Okay maybe we should back up a step.Do you think the ladder paradox was formulated to critique special relativity, or to argue in support of it?
>>536628723>you never mentioned gravity in this entire comment chain until AFTER I answered your request for objections to general relativity.Why the fuck are you making this solely about gravity, numb nuts?As I previously pointed out GR has WAYYY too many problems! See >>536628065This is to say nothing about its rather dubious expermintal evidence.
>>536628890You promised me you weren’t going to respond anymore here: >>536628777Is this just a pathological liar thing?
>>536628916Dear greatest ally, you are illiterate.
>>536628878>You wouldn’t happen to be upset, would you?
>>536628878No.I’m actually not. I really don’t care what you say or think. Goodbye
>>536628920>Is this just a pathological liar thing?Rhetoric!!!
>>536628799>Theoriticaljesus fucking christ
>>536628964Goodbye! I was starting to,worry you were so upset about being BTFO in a single post that you lost all self control and would respond to any post I made.Haha, that would be crazy.
>>536625833I would be building public art projects as monuments to myselfMusk Square, Musk Gardens, Musk Park, etcmake the world beautiful and myself immortal at the same time
>>536628978> I caught a spelling error caused by auto correct.You BTFO'd me!UTTERLY!I can never recover from this!
>>536625833he basically said that buffett is a retard.
>>536629026>mobilefag
>>536625833Munger's already explained this before, it's the same reason he never joined the giving pledge. He gave away most of his money to his kids or non-profits years ago. One of his wives made him promise to give the inheritance to the kids before she died, because she was afraid an anna nicole smith situation might happen. Munger was a professional lawyer and later went into architecture. He had a very broad set of skills and didn't do just one thing like buffett. He kept a billion as "play money" until his death, and was fond of reminding people that his 3 investments beat over 98% of everyone else...>>536627486Yeah but munger never did that. He was famous for promoting honest business practice and telling corporate dickheads to fuck off. Buffett was never as confrontational in public.
>>536628746People like you always criticize general relativity but never say anything about special relativity. So what do you think about it? Is it also a scam or does it work? If you think it's OK, then I need to say that there's not much difference between them and GR is a theory that was an obvious next step after SR and someone had to do it.
>>536628903That's neither here nor there, anon. The ladder paradox describes the effects of length contraction according to different frames of reference. Relativity of simultaneity is brought into play if you add doors at the ends of the building through which the ladder passes. If your frame of reference is the ladder the doors do not close simultaneously whereas if your frame of reference is standing outside the building the doors close at the same time. Both of there perspectives are valid and the laws of physics aren't broken by them.
>>536628612>>536628978based spergposter
Wait theres chuds who unironically seethe at Einstein? I understand Darwin makes their panties knot up cause it insults their deity or something utterly barbaric like that but Einstein does too? Lmao
>>536625833>Einstein was smarter than any of them but he didn't care about stacking cash like scrooge mcduckEinstein had 50 millions in his pockets. His job was not to be a professional scumbag and psycho. now compute the fucking inflation from 1950. and divide it all by inbred fucktard debility of that billionaire.
>>536629084Are you not answering because you can’t figure out the answer, or because you did find out the answer, and it makes your argument seem sorta stupid?Prove to me it is neither here nor there by answering the question:>Do you think the ladder paradox was formulated to critique special relativity, or to argue in support of it?If it is neither here nor there, then answering will not weaken your position and it will look really silly for you to deflect away.
>>536626884He did more damage to theoretical physics than anybody to date ever combined.
>>536628978>>536629077
>>536626884Gravity no be invisible rope wey dey pull things together. Einstein say dem big heavy things like Sun and Earth dey bend space and time around dem. Everything wey dey move through that area planets, moons, even dem light go follow the curved path wey the bend create. So when Earth dey go round the Sun, no be because Sun dey drag am with one hidden force. Na because Earth dey move through space-time wey the Sun don bend. The bigger and heavier the object, the more e fit bend space-time, and the stronger the gravity wey we go observe.
>>536626695I think he was just a meme/celebrity scientisthe looked the part of the quirky professorhad a functionally meaningless theory that everyone could remember and looked cool on a t-shirtclever quipsthat sort of thing
>>536629159>Are you not answering because you can’t figure out the answerMy answer is that it's neither here nor there, anon. It's irrelevant to the subject at hand. >If it is neither here nor there, then answering will not weaken your position and it will look really silly for you to deflect away.You're projecting, retard. You're deflecting away from the fact you misunderstood how frames of reference work and were filtered by the ladder paradox when it was presented to you in relation to this. Understanding physics isn't for you, bud.
>>536629273That is very cynical of you, anon.
>>536629290Hah, that was silly.Well, I may never find out whether you actually can’t figure out the answer, or just don’t want to say it; but I think we won’t have much progress from this point in either case.
>>536629376Why are you deflecting from the fact you didn't know how frames of reference work, anon? I get you're embarrassed you aren't as smart as you thought but letting everyone know you're also a narcissist who refuses to learn is just pathetic.
>>536629300exactlyChad Von Braun was the real deal, but he wasn't as marketable
>>536629459My dearest friend, you are acting in bad faith. If you weren’t, you would have simply answered the question.You claim it is neither here nor there: it is irrelevant. I disagree. I think we can resolve wether it is here nor there by getting the answer. I also think that, if you do know the answer, the reason you won’t say it is because doing so would make you look foolish.You can prove me wrong by answering the question, then I will look foolish.Wouldn’t you like the opportunity to make me look foolish? I am handing it to you on a silver platter.
>>536626695Einstein is unironically one of the best example for the midwit filter bell curve. Retards think he's smart because everyone told them so. Midwits who looked a bit into physics and watched some schizo YouTube videos think what he did was no biggie and basically he just borrowed ideas and shiet.Actually smart people fully understand his genius and the impact.
>>536629584Are you one of the smart people?
>>536625833>why are billionaires so busy trying to have more billions than the next guy?They aren't, it just happens as a side effect.They aren't thinking "Oh no Elon Musk is richer than me, that fucker!" - that's thirdie mentality. They just do their stock exchange thing and they're good at it.
>>536629584the only useful thing that has come out of theoretical physics is teaching us that the entire human race are retards and will always be retardsdark matter my hairy ass
>>536627486>Einstein was smart enough to play a game that actually mattered,lol millennial spotted
>Anon thinks he could disprove relativity and win a nobel prize in physics if he finds a free weekend do so sometime soon.
>>536629535>My dearest friend, you are acting in bad faithMore projection, anon. I told you where you were going wrong and suggested you look up the ladder paradox so as to amend such. You then failed to understand how the answer I gave you applied to the subject, while making a claim that made it obvious you were filtered, so I told you. Then you started randomly sliding about the history of the example I gave you and I stated such was irrelevant. You're now pretending that the fact I refused to engage with your slide somehow means you didn't misunderstand anything and it's pretty pathetic. >You claim it is neither here nor there: it is irrelevant. I disagree. I think we can resolve wether it is here nor there by getting the answer.That's a statement, not an argument, anon. How does the history of the ladder paradox have anything to do with you misunderstanding frames of reference and relativistic effects? Even if it were originally an argument about the absurdity of relativity this wouldn't change the fact it isn't actually a "paradox" and is completely solvable once you understand how frames of reference work. >You can prove me wrong by answering the question, then I will look foolishYou already look incredibly foolish, anon. I can forgive you for not understanding frames of reference but sliding away from the fact you had to learn something demonstrates you're not ignorant but of very poor character (i.e. you have no hope of overcoming your ignorance and you're the type of person that makes such more funny than tragic). >Wouldn’t you like the opportunity to make me look foolish?Do you want to provide yet another? Lol.
>>536625908I need rewatch Indiana Jones
>>536629810I would gladly give you another:Do you think the ladder paradox was formulated to critique special relativity, or to argue in support of it?Here is yet another chance to make me look foolish by simply answering the question.
>>536625833>answering a question with another question Quintessential jewish fucking bullshit
>>536625833he looks like that other bad guy in Hannibal. The guy with the messed up face.
>>536629864>Do you think the ladder paradox was formulated to critique special relativity, or to argue in support of it?Why is this relevant to your inability to understand frames of reference, anon?
>>536629894Relevant? You SPECIFICALLY requested I provide you with another chance to make me look foolish. And you’ve squandered it yet again.Pay attention this time, it’s coming up soon:Do you think the ladder paradox was formulated to critique special relativity, or to argue in support of it?There it is. Another chance to make me look foolish by simply answering the question.
>>536629954>Relevant?Yes, how is it relevant to the fact that you don't understand how frames of reference work? >You SPECIFICALLY requested I provide you with another chance to make me look foolishAnd you now provide the same one with every post. You're not being clever, anon. >Do you think the ladder paradox was formulated to critique special relativity, or to argue in support of it?Again, what does this have to do with your misunderstanding of how frames of reference work?
>>536630083Is there a reason you don’t want to answer “Do you think the ladder paradox was formulated to critique special relativity, or to argue in support of it?”, thus making me look foolish?You have been being silly for a while now anon. Do you feel silly?Out of ten, how would you rate your performance today?
>>536630128>Is there a reason you don’t want to answerYes, it's irrelevant. However, since you've given me no other choice I'll point out your misunderstanding here just as I did with your misunderstanding regarding frames of reference. The paradox wasn't issued as a means to critique relativity, anon. The absurdity isn't the theory but the dramatic difference in the way the universe functions versus our perception of it. You didn't know this and you thought that it was meant to show the theory itself as absurd and not the magnitude of our misperception as such. However, as I stated this is neither here nor there. The fundamental basis of our interaction is the fact you did not understand how frames of reference worked. You didn't know about setting an inertial frame and you were filtered by the ladder paradox as a means to remedy your misunderstanding. What's more, you were too stupid to have a proper conversation and chose to slide about nonsense instead of recognizing your intellectual shortcomings and overcoming them. What's even more, you misunderstood the basis of your own pathetic slide and were embarrassed once again. Very poor show, retard. Very poor.
>>536628085>ladderswhy are the perspective frames rigid instead of proximal time dilation being a thing
>>536630357Prove to me it is irrelevant by answering the question. Your position will not weaken if it is as irrelevant as you claim. To my imagination, the only reason you would not answer and make me look foolish, is because answering makes you feel foolish. You can prove me wrong by answering the question.I argue the answer is relevant. You can prove me wrong only by answering.These are several very good reasons for you to answer the question, but most of all: so the discussion can actually advance past something you allege to be irrelevant.I think it is relevant, which is why I am hung up on it. I think you are hung up on it for the same reason, so you refuse to answer. Prove me wrong:Do you think the ladder paradox was formulated to critique special relativity, or to argue in support of it?
>>536630358Because the laws of physics hold between all frames of reference. In order to describe physical reality you subjectively choose a given reference frame and describe events according to such.
>>536630469>Prove to me it is irrelevant by answering the questionI did answer the question and I made fun of you for thinking it was a gotcha in the first place, retard. Reread the second paragraph of that post, lol.
Your wife can't leave you for Einstein what about him makes chuds seethe? Afraid she'll leave you for someone who understands his theories?
>>536629082>never say anything about special relativityOh, look the kike with the hohol flag is taking a break from shilling on /uhg/ to shill on here. Anyhow, I don't criticize SR because it has little to do with Memestein. See >>536629584>>536627853You unironically fall under the first midwit category. I am still waiting for you to explain what tangible world changing inventions was ever made by or because of him.All you have left is "MUH IMPACT", Memestein did have an entirely negative impact on the field of physics, as for his impact on the public, it is entirely driven by fucking Hollywood Sci Fi movies.
>>536630553>assuming these guys could attract wives in the first placeAwfully bold hypothesis, anon. Lol.
>>536630479proximal time dilation in this case is in favour of frame of reference unificationidgi
>>536626695This is the only scientist that matters
>>536629584general relativity is required for satellites to work correctly cue to time dilation. this is real science. whether or not einstein invented the concept I personally doubt it
>>536630544Yeah I haven’t really been reading past your deflections. So you say:> The paradox wasn't issued as a means to critique relativityThis is incorrect. The paradox, like all paradoxes, are critiques of models, by their very nature.. The resolution is the argument in favor.So we can pack this all the way back up to 20 posts ago: you would like to argue that the RESOLUTION to the ladder paradox is an argument against my position.Have I characterized your position correctly?
>>536630633I don't understand what you're trying to ask. Are you talking about a body's relation to a massive object versus that of another body that is further away and how time dilation applies in this scenario given frames of reference? I think the answer to your question is what I gave before--the laws of physics are constant between frames of reference but experience of them is dependant on which frame you choose to describe events based on.
>>536630828im asking why is time dilation specifically isolated on the dude running with the ladderthe paradox assumes that it is, when it shouldn't be the case, it should be affecting objects around it as well.makes no sense to me
>>536630736>Yeah I haven’t really been reading past your deflectionsYou're not the type of person who reads very much and the deflection has been you avoiding the fact you're unable to comprehend how frames of reference are used and understood in physics, anon. >The paradox, like all paradoxes, are critiques of models, by their very nature.Wrong. It's not actually a paradox, retard. >you would like to argue that the RESOLUTION to the ladder paradox is an argument against my positionYou don't have a position, anon. You lack the ability to understand physics and are experiencing something known as the Dunning-Kruger effect. With every post you just make yourself look more and more dumb.
>>536630936Is there a reason you are refusing to clarify your position?Do you understand we literally can not discuss anything if we don’t understand each other?Is your position that the resolution to the ladder paradox (which I guess is not actually a paradox, according to you) is an argument against my position?
>>536630916>im asking why is time dilation specifically isolated on the dude running with the ladderBecause he's in motion relative to the frame of reference you set as inert. From his perspective time is flowing normally for him and slower outside of his frame of reference. From an outsider's perspective it's the opposite.
>>536631015>Is there a reason you are refusing to clarify your position?I've clarified it repeatedly, anon. It's not my fault you're not bright enough to keep up and too narcissistic to do anything other than wallow in your ignorance. You don't understand how frames of reference work in physics. You were filtered by the ladder paradox. You tried to slide to divert attention away from your ignorance but it backfired. You didn't know that the paradox wasn't actually a paradox in terms of relativity not making sense. At every turn you demonstrate your lack of intelligence and the poor character that means you'll never be able to overcome it. >Is your position that the resolution to the ladder paradox (which I guess is not actually a paradox, according to you) is an argument against my position?My position is that you don't understand frames of reference and that you have demonstrated, via the textual evidence ITT, you lack the aptitude to do so. You were unable to correct your misunderstanding via reading about the ladder paradox and merely layered further examples of your ignorance even after being corrected.You're too dumb for physics, anon.
>>536631020>time dilation is perfectly localized because we said sothis paradox corners itself on retarded presuppositions.
>>536626695photoelectric effect
>>536631218Okay, cool. So is your position that the resolution to the ladder paradox is an argument against my position.
>>536626695>highschool dropout spew random bullshit about something he doesn't understandI'm not even defending Einstein lol
>>536631257>>time dilation is perfectly localized because we said soWhat do you mean by "perfectly localized", anon? It's within the frame of reference to which you speak which makes perfect sense--does turning up the AC in my living room cause the temperature outside to increase? Lol. >>536631277> So is your position that the resolution to the ladder paradox is an argument against my position.My initial position was that you don't understand how frames of reference work and that studying the ladder paradox will demonstrate where you're going wrong. My new position is that you don't understand how frames of reference work and lack the aptitude to learn because you're a narcissistic retard exemplifying the Dunning-Kruger effect.
>>536625833>Einstein was smarter than any of them but he didn't care about stacking cash like scrooge mcduck> jewish autist visionary and genius was different from usual jews Good post. Sounds like bobby fischer
>>536631481Actually, your initial position was simply “ladder paradox” with no elaboration. I tried to get elaboration, I tried to explain the irrelevance, and ultimately came the notorious question that got to the root of the matter: you don’t understand the ladder paradox or paradoxes in general.Generous as I am, I tried to formulate the argument i thought you hoped to make, namely that you propose the resolution to the ladder paradox as an argument against my position.This is a binary situation: this is either a position you hold, or one you do not.Do you hold the position that the resolution to the ladder paradox is an argument against my position, or do you not think that is the case?
>>536625908>muh mum was in the holly. This is what shoulda happened by jove
>>536631481>ladder doesn't fit>guy runs at lightspeed>ladder contracts>barn doesn't contract because fuck gravitomagnetism lmao>ladder now magically fits
>>536626695For me? It’s your interesting memeflag. Are you a chink, muzzie or a poo by chance?Btw: TKD Just so we know where our starting point is
>>536629273> functionally meaningless theory I really despise you browns. You never read anything
>>536628723> accept your concessionThis started in like 2018. The height of midwitism. Pathetic
>>536631849Strange you felt the need to chime in.
>>536627264only jews consider wealth a measure or success. they never got over that carthaginian way of thinking.
I hate this board and the internet. Soon we will build a whites only internet. All the poos and jews and niggers can argue <midwit nonsense amongst themselves
>536631909Eat shit newfag nigger
>>536631578>Actually, your initial position was simply “ladder paradox” with no elaborationThere's enough information there to correct yourself if you're intelligent, anon. The problem is you're not an intelligent person. >I tried to get elaborationYou were given elaboration and corrected when you claimed it had nothing to do with time dilation (in so doing you confirmed you lacked the conceptual foundation to understand the subject matter you've been foolish enough to attempt to discuss). >ultimately came the notorious question that got to the root of the matteIt was irealivant, you never provided an argument as to why it was relevant, and before you had the chance you foolishly gave me the opportunity to predict your misunderstanding (i.e. that it wasn't actually created as a critique of relativity and isn't actually a paradox). Very embarrassing on your end. >you don’t understand the ladder paradox No you, lol. You couldn't figure out how the phenomena described in it related to time dilation and dropped the subject when relativity of simultaneity was brought up. >Generous as I am, I tried to formulate the argument i thought you hoped to makeNo, retard. You avoided the fact you don't understand how frames of reference work and tried to deflect away from your ignorance by engaging in a slide. I've stated this in every post and instead of demonstrating your understanding of such you've done nothing but deflect and project. >you propose the resolution to the ladder paradox as an argument against my position.No. Once again: your "position" displays a fundamental lack of understanding when it comes to how frames of reference are defined and understood. If you were able to learn from the ladder paradox you'd see that your "position" is basically like saying "2+2 = infinity because I can divide 2 as many times as I want by smaller numbers to get a bigger number". You're retarded, anon. You're not smart enough for physics and never will be.
>>536628085hes talking about the twins paradox, and its retarded that just because the light might not travel to the observors eye for 6 years that makes the person in the rocket ship 6 years younger than the observor. what hes viewing is the image 6 years in the past, but if your twin brother comes back to early he isnt magically 6 years younger lmao
>>536631605>barn doesn't contractIs the barn moving?
>why are billionaires so busy trying to have more billions than the next guy?Do you measure your success according to what a turd worlder has?>peers
>>536632030Play, so you propose the resolution to the ladder paradox is NOT an argument against my position.So explain why you brought up the ladder paradox if the paradox itself is a critique of your model and you do not support the resolution.
>>536632051Relativity of simultaneity, retard. When you can't understand something it doesn't mean it's dumb. It means you're dumb. If you can't recognize you're dumb it means you're really dumb.
>>536632091>ladder guy whizzes past on lightspeedit now does lolAichelburg–Sexl ultraboost if im not mistaken
>>536632121>my positionYour position is being bent over a chair while the laws of physics fuck you up your ignorant ass at the speed of light, lol.
>>536627326That’s the thing, these dogs like buffet and this faggot in the OP, you know they’ve never had any fun in their life. So they made all this money and they/36, going on to be in talking about finance, but there are probably some of the most boring, at least happy people on the planet.
>>536632162its just a dumb analogy. its an interesting observation, if youre 5 maybe, but its not a paradox.no more a paradox than how youre going to move a couch using only the roof of a geo metro
>>536632214Fascinating. So anyways, back to your position:Explain why you brought up the ladder paradox if the paradox itself is a critique of your model and you do not support the resolution.
>>536632208>Aichelburg–Sexl ultraboostThat has nothing to do with what we're discussing, anon.
>>536632284>things experience contraction if an object moves past themreally...?
>>536625833The point is, there are different ways to be a genius
>>536626695This dude is right no one in this thread has dropped a single tangible thing Einstein has contributed to making
>>536632401While that may be true, they are very angry.So maybe just take the L on this one, bro.
>>536632401hes jewish. jewish people just like to get their little participation awards to pretend like theyre contributing.
>>536632263>One of the entailments of his theory is that time will dilate at high velocities. This is a misunderstanding. Time isn't an entity undergoing a fundamental change but rather the perception of time is relative to someone moving versus an inertial frame of reference. >This is fundamentally incoherent with his presuppositions, namely that there is no “preferred” frame of reference in physics. Another misunderstanding. The idea that there is no preferred frame of reference doesn't mean that distinct frames of reference do not exist. When you describe physical phenomena you must always do so from a chosen frame of reference. >That means someone moving light speed away from you is equally valid to be seen as you moving away from them at the same speed.Yet another misunderstanding. If an object is in motion it displays fundamental changes relative to that which would be if the object were inert (e.g. increased mass). You can define an object as being at rest and describe it mathematically as if it were (e.g. you're actually travelling around the sun right now but I don't need to factor that in to throwing a ball across the room) but this isn't the same thing as both objects displaying the same inertia. >But there is the problem, time is supposed to be moving at different rates in each frame, but the difference in rate is mirrored from the alternative perspectiveNo. See above. >They told you this dilation in time was measuredIt has been measured. Muons would fully decay in the atmosphere before reaching the Earth's surface if not for time dilation. There have also been experiments involving synchronized clocks traveling in different directions relative to the surface of the earth (they went out of sync). Now, would you like me to teach you how you could have learned where you went wrong from the ladder paradox again?
>>536631605I’m going to be real with you bro, unless you are chatting with him for your own entertainment, don’t expect much.
>>536625833>>536626041>>536626695Im not even going to read the rest, so many fucking retards. Including the kike billionaire. Warran Buffets father was a congressman and a stock broker. Families in the past setup kids in there own seats. He had tons of connections through family and mentors. He was without a doubt intelligent and intelligence can lead to success but it takes more than just being smart or a genius to become a multibillionare. >but le tism kike is smarter XDDYou plebbit fail to realize that high IQ does not translate into amazing finances and there is many cases where high IQ is actually detrimental to financial success. Not even bothering to type anything else.Not sure if this is jeets, bots, summerfags, or what.
>>536632793Wow that is really coolAnyways, explain why you brought up the ladder paradox if the paradox itself is a critique of your model and you do not support the resolution.
>>536632401He provided the first hard evidence for the existence of atoms in describing Brownian Motion, demonstrated that light could be described as discrete packets of energy by solving the photoelectric effect (this is the foundation for quantum mechanics), upended the Newtonian paradigm via special relativity, and proved energy and mass are interchangeable phenomena. He did this all in one year while he was still in his mid 20s.
>>536632855Restate your position in light of the errors I just presented in the post to which you replied.
>>536633189I would feel silly making requests for a restatement after stonewalling on actually just explaining your original position to begin with for so long.Anyways, explain why you brought up the ladder paradox if the paradox itself is a critique of your model and you do not support the resolution.
>>536633238No more disingenuousness, anon. Restate your original position with specific regard to why the errors I pointed out in >>536632793 aren't actually errors.
>>536633306My dearest friend, we should probably clear some things up and try to find common ground:>>536632793This post of yours is not actually a response to the post it links to, it is a response to this post:>>536627834From which all the quoted text comes. You may remember you already responded to this post, here:>>536628085Where you said> No, retard. Look up the ladder paradoxAnd this wonderful adventure began. Specifically, it began with me telling you that was irrelevant:>>536628118Now, after our long journey, I am still trying to get you to explain why you said this. However, I would be happy to instead respond to your second attempt at responding to my post if we could just close out your first attempt neatly.Is it fair to say, based off your second attempt, that we have come to common ground that your first attempt was, in fact, irrelevant?
>>536632284retarded it is
>>536626695His work was iterative of the work of those that came before him. His contributions are a bit exaggerated but he was extremely intelligent. If you think relativity is of little to no use in modern science and the physics that have come after built upon it haven't been useful then I can't help you.
>>536633493>refuses to restate his position in light of the errors that have been pointed out>too narcissistic to admit he's wrong and too stupid to learn I accept your concession.
>>536630590OK, you don't critisize straight minkowski space theory. Then the most obvious and natural question which immediately arises is "what if this space is bent/stretched", which is GR. Then how how can you critisize it??>Oh, look the kike with the hohol flag is taking a break from shilling on /uhg/ to shill on hereI already see from the thread that you are retarded, you didn't have to introduce yourself again
>>536633553Actually, if you read, I offered to answer your second attempt instead of your first, which we have been trying to begin for over an hour, if we could neatly close out the first.Luckily for us, all that takes is agreeing on the irrelevance of the ladder paradox, at which point further discussion of the ladder paradox becomes a moot point.So, have we reached common ground that the ladder paradox is not relevant?If not, would you explain the relevance?
>>536633615>I'm still filtered by the ladder paradoxYou're unable to restate your "position" in light of the flaws and errors that have been pointed out in it. I thereby accept your concession.
>>536632401the gps on your phone tardo
>>536631849>2018"i accept your concession" goes back at least to 1995. you must be 18 to post here.>>536628723>I am going to accept your concession now, but I’m disappointed in you.based.
>>536633683Okay so this doesn’t really clarify for me whether or not you think the ladder paradox is relevant.Do you still think the ladder paradox is relevant? Or would you like to discuss your second attempt?
>>536633731>Okay so this doesn’t really clarifyAnon, we've established that you're hopelessly filtered and don't have the mental capacity to understand physics. No need to restate it. Anyway, you're unable to restate your position in light of the direct criticism offered here >>536632793 so I thereby accept your concession.
>>536633808Neat, I never thought about it that way.Anyways, Do you still think the ladder paradox is relevant? Or would you like to discuss your second attempt?
>>536630590>Oh, look the kike with the hohol flag is taking a break from shilling on /uhg/ to shill on here.Yes, you are right. I'm actually a shill and our shilling script says "... arguing with Russian narratives is important but don't you fucking dare to skip a single post that disrespects tensor analysis! Pretend that memestein is right and GR is correct. If the poster is also from Ukraine, immediately report him to Riemannian geometry enforcement squad". Could you please reveal your actual flag? Just asking for a friend.
>>536632793>Time isn't an entity undergoing a fundamental change but rather the perception of time is relative to someone moving versus an inertial frame of reference.Your body factors into everything, physics never even considers the possibility that our very being is a variable unto itself within the equation of reality. Do you believe in prophecy anon?Do you think someone can tell you the future, even in the slightest?If you do, your entire understanding of time is inherently different than what you've been taught.Our bodies are limiters, we can only perceive so much of things because too much would be overwhelming. That place can be represented in space, the present moment. But those fortune tellers, the real ones, they see it, rather they hear it and their brains construct what they hear like whale sonar.It's a real thing backed by neuroscience, quantum theory, and more things than I could list here because of word count. to me anyone who doesn't consider the one within their equations of reality are all wrong.Niggers everything you are and see exists because you are there, but they go on about dead cats in a box, and that's where the story ends?
>>536633853>Do you still think the ladder paradox is relevant?Remember when you couldn't understand how time dilation applied to it so I pointed out the relativity of simultaneity instead of just making fun of you for not realizing it didn't matter because your misunderstanding of how frames of reference work is what was being discussed? Lol, good times. >Or would you like to discuss your second attempt?You're unable to restate your position in light of the criticism offered and never once did you try to demonstrate you had an understanding of frames of reference. I thereby accepted your concession. Say, remember when you tried to slide about the history of the paradox and I was nice enough to keep the discussion focused instead of making fun of you? Too bad you made me point out you I already knew you didn't understand why it was formulated and prebunk your attempt at semantics over the word "paradox". LolYou're retarded.
>>536626695He did do work but his reputation is enormously overinflated because he was a Jew
>>536634199Doesn’t really answer my questions though.Do you still think the ladder paradox is relevant? Or would you like to discuss your second attempt?
>>536625833>why does the guy who cares only about money have more money than the guy who likes understanding thingsTruly a mystery
>>536634236>I am unable to restate my position in light of the criticism of it that has been offered ITTI know, anon. I accepted your concession.
>>536625833EINSTEIN WAS GENIUS.He had that whole island full of smart guys and kids and created files so complex that still nobody has been able to figure it out.if you are so smart, wheres your island?
has anyone been able to name a tangible contribution chalkboard scientists have made yet?
>>536634332Okay so Do you still think the ladder paradox is relevant? Or would you like to discuss your second attempt?
>>536634409>please don't make me accept the fact I've exemplified the Dunning-Kruger effect throughout this thread...I'm too much of a narcissist to admit a stranger on the internet knows more about physics than I do and I'm dumb enough to think getting the last word means I won...let me slide one more time and just forget about everything else like I'm in control Lol
>>536634449Okay but I am still curious: Do you still think the ladder paradox is relevant? Or would you like to discuss your second attempt?
>>536625833Of course a couple of kikes who base their entire lives around money can't fathom why anyone wouldn't be so enamored by the sin of greed.
>>536634478>instead of arguing why the ladder paradox is irrelevant I'll keep asking you to reiterate it and ignore it when you do>I'll pretend this is entirely seperate from what I'm labeling your "second attempt" so I don't have to actually address either>I'm too stupid to understand physics but don't want to admit it to myself so please don't make meLol
>>536626884you can observe a pair of hanging tasticles, that's gravity
This guy was smarter than Einstein because he invented something that helped people more than writing on a chalkboard
>>536634529That’s an interesting perspective.Do you still think the ladder paradox is relevant? Or would you like to discuss your second attempt?
>>536634577I accept your concession. You now have my permission to take the last word and pretend it somehow means you aren't a retard who demonstrated he knows nothing about physics ITT.
>>536634634Near, I never really thought about it that way.Do you still think the ladder paradox is relevant? Or would you like to discuss your second attempt?
>>536634655You have to go back
>>536634771What an interesting introduction to the thread!Say, you wouldn’t happen to have strong opinions about the ladder paradox that you will under no conditions share in the thread, would you?
>>536634771He's pretending to be retarded on purpose because he thinks it will cover over the fact he's actually just retarded. As with everything else, he's wrong. Lol.
>>536625833Remember how for a while every institution was pushing lab meat and eat bugs?That's because Klaus Schwab and his allies were the ones with the most money at the time.As soon as they started to take financial hits and lose influence, all of his ideas were thrown to the wayside.Among the ultra elite, whoever has the most influence at the time gets to reshape the world in his image, but doing so too willy nilly invites other ultra elite to supplant you.It is all, quite literally, a game of king of the hill to them.
>>536634828I can't understand you while you're performing ravenous autofellatio You think you can take your dick out of your mouth while talking in my general direction?
>>536635084Perhaps you could help me out then, I’m curious what it was about my post that reminded you of the time you spent on reddit.
>>536635044Sir, not only was I promised the last word, but you have spent this entire discussion refusing to answer questions about the thoughts in your head. It was pretty weird, to be honest.
>>536633053SR has little to do with him though.See >>536627853>>536630704>general relativity is required for satellites to work correctly cue to time dilationTime dilation is 100% lorentz, so nothing to do with Memestein.
>>536635084I don't get it. If he doesn't know anything about physics why be so strongly opinionated about it? If he knows he's embarassing himself via his lack of knowledge, why waste the energy posting? What a loser.
>>536635227>SR has little to do with him thoughThe Lorentz transformation is just one part of special relativity and Lorentz didn't formulate it in a way and as part of a system that overturned Newtonianism. Einstein did.
>>536633053>He provided the first hard evidence for the existence of atoms in describing Brownian MotionSo he mathematically described a well observed phenomenon, one that was already qualitatively described by many others.That's it, that's his HUGE achievement?Are you fucking kidding me?
>>536628098Displacement mixed with density causes floatation, so what floats above space-time since densities matter?
>>536635383>The Lorentz transformation is just one part of special relativity They are the mathematical core of the theory. All he ever did was add in his BS cool story to it. Einstein was always shit at math, much like most kikes.
>>536629641mao was wrong about a lot of things but killing so called 'intellectuals' is probably one of his better ones
ITT: a bunch of midwits thinking they know better than Einstein and the collective amalgamation of all physicists of the past century I rest m case: >>536629584
>Answers a question with a question.That’s very Jewish.
>>536627264If Munger was smart enough to know his own limits Munger Hall wouldn't have failed so miserably (and justly)
>>536635570I’m still wondering: are you one of the smart people?
>>536626695Einstein never even technically finished his equation.He wrote one piece of it, but it's not wholistic because it doesn't scale to other dimensions.E=mC^2 has to be taken from a reference frame of different moments of time, and different dimensions to even approach creating a full version of what it is supposed to be.E=C^3 is what technically represents this Universe, prior to the Big Bang, and after entropic death.To scale it to a dimension above ours, it must be written as something like E=xC^3Below ours and it becomes E=xCAnd so forth, it is cardinally consistent with vectors available in terms of axes of motion.Not that the knee jerk reaction of any so-called "physicist" is to granularly consider why I am correct about this. Nah, they just say this is nonsense and go about their day, because their precious bullshit is somehow infallible to them, but then again they don't actually consider that the C^2 aspect of the equation only exist because it is consistent with axes of available motion in an x,y plane and all remaining considerations between two objects are z remaining to be solved.It's an incomplete coordinate comparison that actually removes radial positioning to consider the scalar difference as an energy value.It's ultimately an abstraction of reality.
>>536628217>>536628232Someone understands frames
>>536635227The time flow is different on big distance from earth because of lower gravity, so GR is used for proper time calculation.
>>536635570> HOW DARE GOYIM NOT RECOGNIZE THE SHEER GENIUS OF MUH HECKING SPACE TIME CONTINUM FANTASY WORLD!?GR isn't even science at this point, it's just jewish theology.It is UTTERLY divorced from the real world.
Power is the whole point. Power is necessary to have the sensation of control over one's existence, life and it's purpose - the closest sense to omnipotence that grants a feeling comfort in an uncertain universe. The wealth is a means to that power. Rich people hate each other and compete because it would make them less powerful aka lack of control. They can't have that.
>>536635652>he unironically thinks the ^2 represents the number of dimensions The absolute state of this board
>>536635461>So he mathematically described a well observed phenomenon, one that was already qualitatively described by many othersIt wasn't "qualitatively described by many others", anon. Brownian motion wasn't understood so Einstein laid the foundation of statistical mechanics and proved atoms did fact exist. >They are the mathematical core of the theoryLol. Lorentz attributed Special Relativity wholly to Einstein, retard. Lorentz missed out on the conceptual underpinnings of relativity and thought it was just a special trick he had come up with to describe phenomena still under the purview of Newtonianism. Your hot takes are lame, brom.
>>536635652Because modern theoretical physics functions like a closed ideological system, where foundational assumptions are treated as beyond question. When observations don't align with the math, their response is often to add new, untestable theoretical layers rather than reconsider the framework itself—dark matter being the clearest example of this pattern.
>>536635805/pol/ is shockingly retarded.
>>536635570brother my ancestors already knew that shit before your jew boy was ever a glint in his father's eyego rest up cuck
>>536635724>so divorced from the real world you have to take it into consideration even when doing relatively simple shit like building gps The AbsoluteStateOf ThisBoard
>>536635865>It wasn't "qualitatively described by many others", anon.Yes, it was. > Brownian motion wasn't understood so Einstein laid the foundation of statistical mechanics and proved atoms did fact exist.The problem here is that Einstein's 1905 paper on Brownian motion was not about proving atoms exist, it was about explaining a phenomenon that was already well-documented but lacked a theoretical foundation.Atoms were already widely accepted by most scientists by 1905. Dalton's atomic theory (1803) had been foundational for chemistry for over a centuryBrownian motion had been observed since 1827 by Robert Brown, but its cause was debated.You are conflating "providing mathematical/statistical evidence that supports atomic theory" with "proving atoms exist."
>>536636066>>so divorced from the real world you have to take it into consideration even when doing relatively simple shit like building gpsFor the last time, you dumbass kikes.Time dilation is ALMOST entirely just lorentz.It has nothing to do with Memestein.Piss off, you fucking kike rat.
First there's a major disconnect between intelligence and wealth. Your average inbred gulf Arab will have more wealth than a top scientist. Academic professionals are salaried/grant based, they're othen fixed income regardless of their performance. Wealthy people take riskier jobs with no consistent income. However for people with already high wealth the risk is marginal so they take more and usually acquire even more wealth in a positive feedback loop.To start breaking the system smart people need to form co-ops to keep the wealth amongst the intelligent. This would increase spread out the wealth so you'd have more millionaires and less billionaires; that's a world I would like to live in.
>>536628391Jews are experts at taking credit for everything and giving each other prizes simple as
>>536636290I asked ai and here's the answer>Special Relativity (Velocity): Because the satellites are moving fast relative to observers on Earth (about 14,000 km/h), time runs slower for them by about 7 microseconds per day.>General Relativity (Gravity): Because the satellites are high above Earth where gravity is weaker, time runs faster for them by about 45 microseconds per day.I didn't check it manually but you can do it to prove that Jewish ai is deceiving us
>>536630469I hope you don't abuse any children, psycho
Buffet is seen as this investing god but really he is a TARP babby that should have been bankrupted in 08
I will address the GPS sattelite needing SR to work one last time, as the many low IQ kikes, ITT, keep repeating the same claim.While GPS satellites do require relativistic corrections, the main issue here is that Lorentz's earlier work on length contraction and time dilation (from 1892-1904, before Einstein's 1905 paper) provides the same mathematical predictions as special relativity for the GPS use case. The GPS system neither tests nor requires Memesteim's interpretation specifically, it works equally well under Lorentz's mathematical framework.All Memestein did was take Lorentz ether theory along with its mathematical foundation and apply a seperate interpretation to it.The math of both lorentz aether theory and Memestein's Special Relativety is THE FUCKING same!
>>536636545I am not even going to respond to that, go back to coping about getting BTFO by Russia on /uhg/, kike!
>>536635190Go back, faggot.
>>536636556What an interesting response.>>536636817Say the last German ran off, what is it about my post that reminds you of the time you spent on reddit?
>>536636236>Yes, it wasNope. >The problem here is that Einstein's 1905 paper on Brownian motion was not about proving atoms existIt did and it also laid the foundation of statistical mechanics. Do you think shitting on Einstein when it comes to topics you obviously don't understand makes you seem smart because it's actually the opposite, bro.
>>536626695>they hated him because he told them the truth
>>536637006>Nope.Yes, it was.I am not sure why you are debating this, if you have not a surface level understanding of the topic.> It did and itIt didn't and the evidence for this is in the fact that the atom model was well accepted in the scientific community.You are conflating "providing mathematical/statistical evidence that supports atomic theory" with "proving atoms exist."You are engaging in typical kike semantic distortion and you have yet to illustrate a SINGLE fucking tangible impact he had.All you kikes ever do is divorce yourself from the real world and engage in verbal gymnastics.Fucking kike rats!
>>536625833Well I've tried everything legal and moral. None of that worked.
>>536637952>Yes, it wasIt wasn't, anon. No one knew what caused Brownian motion to occur and Einstein developed statistical mechanics based on theorizing the atom. You have no idea what you're talking about. >It didn't and the evidence for this is in the fact that the atom model was well accepted in the scientific community.That's not evidence, retard. The aether was widely accepted in the scientific community and it didn't exist. Yet, if someone had proven it did exist via experiment it would be one of the greatest discoveries of all time just like linking atoms to Brownian motion. >JEWS THO!!!Fuck off, retard. They've contributed more to humanity and any of your ancestors ever did.
>>536633890>reveal actual flagAint gonna happen holhol bro, its a soulless, water muddying shill, here to do the devils work. Peace to you and yours.
>>536635531>much like kikesNiggah what? I dont know much about jews, but numbers seem to fall well within their pervue of expertise. Adding, multiplying, and dividing anyway. Subtraction maybe not, but definatelyvthe bedt at imaginery numbers.
>>536627593H = -(Gm1Gm2)/(r1-r2) - (GmxGmy)/(rx-ry) ....But this was before Einstein by a century? What did Einstein say? E = mC^2? Like that's kinetic energy but he removes the factor of two? What's up? >t. Not a physicist. Idgi
>>536638343>No one knew what caused Brownian motion to occur and Einstein developed statistical mechanics based on theorizing the atomAgain, he added nothing except a straight forward mathematical description of what was already well understood.Just stop.> The aether was widely accepted in the scientific community and it didn't exist.Neither does the time space continum nonsense, nigger, all of these are mere models that are simply useful at describing the universe, you dumb kike.They DO NOT exist.> Fuck off, retard. They've contributed more to humanity and any of your ancestors ever didYes, you have contributed to everything negative about this world.That being said, you have NOT a single relevant invention to your name, you are a seething, coping mongrel.
>>536638343>They've contributed more to humanity and any of your ancestors ever did.Another bit of evidence against this kike cope is just how much everyone is eager to kick you out, Europe faught a whole bloody war just to get rid of you, those who contribute so much do not end up being so utterly despised.
>>536639212>Again, he added nothing except a straight forward mathematical description of what was already well understood.Lol! Holy shit you're retarded. It wasn't well understood and he created an entirely new branch of physics you fucking idiot. >Neither does the time space continum nonsenseNo idea what you're trying to reference, retard. Stop babbling nonsense and thinking it makes you seem educated because the fact is it demonstrates you're retarded. >Yes, you have contributed to everything negative about this world.Get a job you pathetic incel NEET faggot.
>>536639490>so triggered he multirepliedLOL!
>>536639508>Lol! Holy shit you're retarded. It wasn't well understood and he created an entirely new branch of physics you fucking idiot.LOL!You are crediting the kike for Quantum physics, NOW, LOL.Anyhow, I won't repeat myself.> Get a job you pathetic incel NEET faggotYou first, kike subhuman, you jews don't work at all.
>>536639682>You are crediting the kike for Quantum physicsThat was several posts ago and related to the photoelectric effect (you don't know what that is) and not Brownian motion, dumbfuck. >You firstYou're an unemployed schizo who has never and will never touch a woman and you think you know more about physics than Einstein. Fucking kek.
>>536639857> That was several posts ago and related to the photoelectric effect (you don't know what that is) and not Brownian motion, dumbfuck.So what's going on here, lampshade. Are you or are you not crediting him with creating the quantum field of physics, you inbred little shit. >You're an unemployed schizo who has never and will never touch a womanLots of projections from the inbred degenerate and deeply effiminate jew, simping for a woman is the jew ultimate goal in life, since jews are matriarchal.Also...> Scientists have identified a genetic variant that substantially increases the risk for developing schizophrenia in Ashkenazi Jewish and other populations. The study associates a deletion on chromosome 3 with increased incidence of schizophreniahttps://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100805172951.htm
>>536626884>>536626923>>536626985Holy seething
>>536635930>46pbtid
No pro Einstein fags have explained why that kike was actually a genius. I know very little about him but im not the one arguing for or against and you homos riding his dong hard so explain already.
>>536640095>Are you or are you not crediting him with creating the quantum field of physicsHis description of Brownian motion laid the foundation of statistical mechanics you uneducated moron. However, his explanation of the photoelectric effect, wherein he demonstrated light photons could be described as discrete quanta of energy and not just a wave, is what started the quantum revolution, retard. >Scientists have identified a genetic variant that substantially increases the risk for developing schizophrenia in AshkenaziI'm well aware of that but what's your excuse for being a schizo? Being a loser NEET with no prospects and no pussy broke the mush in your head that barely qualifies as a brain? Lol
>>536640631>laid the foundation of statistical mechanics you uneducated moron.statistical mechanics was established in the 1870-90s by Boltzmann, you dumb kike.What the FUCK are you talking about.> described as discrete quanta of energy and not just a wave, is what started the quantum revolution,LololololololLololololol!
>>536625833Because it's a game and money determines your high score.And if you need to ask the question, you lack the awareness to handle that much money anyway.
