And what are the political implications of a demasculinized society?Is it microplastic? Indoctrination from a young age? Soi in every food source?
>>536630225This reddit post is like over 5 years old. A Covid era spam
you want them to face eachother?
Why are you so obsessed with an old picture of gay guys jacking off ?
>>536630270His last cowank post was a year ago
>>536630270>>536630307Zoomers detectee
>>536630225>one picture from one guy on the internet>WHY ARE ZOOMERS
>>536630832You zoomers seem to be upset
>>536630499>>536631049get cancer and die you mentally ill faggot
>>536630225why do i get similar vibes
>>536630225>zoomersThose are clearly millennials.
>>536631098Uh oh, this little soi boy has his panties in a knot
>>536630225Bro that is something mentally, they can't be doing that sort of homosexual behavior; around town.
>>536631098based archive checker
>>536630225Still not as disgusting or risky as hooking up with everyone catching all sotrs of diseases and still not as humiliating as paying money to end up cockblocked by women on dates
>>536631468This is why you cant find a gf
>>536631557Because i don't buy into your demoralization bait and weak attempt at strawmanning entire groups of people based on one example of faggotry? If you believe and keep posting this nonsense i imagine you've got plenty personal issues.
>>536630270Boomers are obsessed with gooning and trigger words. They think hypnosis actually works, lmao.
>>536630225>Raised buy women in a world completely designed to cater to women and punish men and masculinity.>How come young men are angry and don't know how to be men anymore? Really nigger?
>>536630225Why are gooners usually into lame as fuck vanilla shit? Degenerate enough to literally jack it beside another faggot and all they look at is "omg le lesbians omg big butt mmm yummy". Nigger get some furshit up on those monitors, are at least some 2d anime waifushit. Fucking casuals
>>536632843Why do people care so much what someone else strokes his penis to so much? Don't you think that's fucking weird, guy? Why do you care if people masturbating are masturbating to lesbians with big butts or not?What the fuck?
>>536633196Your posting style indicates you are either gay or biofem
>>536633240Okay, let me try AI for you, so you can get it through your fucking skull just how strange of a preoccupation it is for grown adults to worry about what kind of erotic imagery one masturbates to (assuming legality, of course):It can seem strange when grown adults become intensely preoccupied with another adult's legal pornography habits because, in principle, adults are generally understood to have a sphere of private autonomy. Most people recognize that consenting adults make countless personal choices—what books they read, what fantasies they entertain, what media they consume—that are not subject to public approval. When someone fixates on another person's legal pornography preferences, the focus shifts away from that person's own life and responsibilities toward policing the private conduct of another adult. Many people therefore perceive such scrutiny as an unusual allocation of attention and emotional energy.It is also somewhat peculiar because pornography consumption often occupies a uniquely moralized category compared to other forms of media. Adults routinely consume entertainment involving violence, deception, revenge, or other themes they would never endorse in real life, yet observers do not always assume that such consumption reflects a person's character in a straightforward way. With pornography, however, some people draw stronger inferences about personality, morality, or relationships based solely on what another adult views. Whether those inferences are justified is a separate question, but the intensity of the interest can appear disproportionate when compared to how people treat other private forms of media consumption.
>>536633375not reading.
>>536633375Finally, an excessive focus on another adult's legal sexual interests can blur the distinction between disagreement and intrusion. Adults are free to hold moral objections to pornography, just as they may object to gambling, recreational drinking, or other legal behaviors. But there is a difference between expressing a viewpoint and becoming personally invested in monitoring or condemning another adult's private choices. Unless the behavior is illegal, nonconsensual, or causing a direct harm that affects others, many people view persistent concern over another person's pornography habits as unusual because it prioritizes oversight of someone else's intimate life over respect for personal boundaries and individual autonomy.>>536633240So your posting style suggests you're a fucking weirdo who cares too much about what kind of porn someone masturbates to. That's your life. The masturbation-worrier. Fucking pathetic, guy.
>>536633399Yeah, get fucking wrecked, chump.
>>536633423>So your posting style suggests you're a fucking weirdo who cares too much about what kind of porn someone masturbates toProfessionals have standards
>>536633479Get.Fucking.Wrecked.Masturbation-worrier.Weirdo.
>>536630225>TFW your wank bud criticizes your technique
>>536633584When paranoid boomers thing everything is a code word or trigger word and post stupid ass random pictures online.
>>536633584by the way - the Church of Porn is the Catholic ChurchBut Boomers still be going to church and dipping their hands in holy water, as if it isn't the pre-cum of God's Chosen gooners. https://soundgasm.net/u/worship-porn-my-goddess/Porn-Addict-Brainwash-Program-THE-CHURCH-OF-PORNThat's fucking right, Boomer and Australian scum faggots. I literally WORSHIP PIEN! NNNNNGGGGGHHHHH!!!!WHAT YOU GONNA DO, FAGGOTS?
>>536633845whoa sorry, got a little carried away there. Porn. I meant porn.Mama mia.
>>536630832NOT like this zoomersisters...
>>536633584If someone is seriously arguing that masturbation, "gooning," or consuming legal adult pornography is evidence that a person is likely to become an assassin or commit a high-profile murder, that is generally a very weak argument. It confuses correlation, speculation, and moral disapproval with actual evidence. People often take a behavior they dislike and then try to connect it to an infamous individual, but the fact that a criminal engaged in a common activity tells us very little. Millions of people masturbate; the overwhelming majority never commit violent crimes.Part of what you're seeing is likely a form of moral panic. Throughout history, new or controversial forms of entertainment have been blamed for social problems: comic books, rock music, video games, television, the internet, and so on. When a shocking crime occurs, some observers look for a simple cultural explanation rather than grappling with the complex psychological, social, and personal factors that usually contribute to serious violence. The result can be sweeping claims that "people who do X become dangerous," even when the evidence for such claims is poor.It's also worth noting that online discussions often reward exaggeration. Saying "I think excessive pornography use can be unhealthy for some people" is a nuanced claim that can be debated. Saying "anyone who goons is basically the next Luigi" is provocative, emotionally charged, and likely to attract attention. The latter may reflect fear, outrage, or culture-war signaling more than careful reasoning. If someone wants to argue that a particular habit is unhealthy, they need evidence showing a meaningful causal connection to specific harms—not merely an association with a notorious individual who happened to share that habit.
>>536634053If the people making those claims are genuinely convinced that enjoying legal adult pornography or "gooning" is evidence of latent homicidal tendencies, there is often very little to be gained by arguing with them. Their conclusion is usually not the result of a careful evaluation of evidence; it is the result of a moral narrative they have already accepted. Once someone has decided that a behavior is a symbol of social decline, every anecdote becomes confirmation and every counterexample gets ignored. In that situation, debate rarely changes minds. The more practical response is often to recognize that the disagreement is foundational and move on.Treating such people as representative of a community's culture can also be useful information. Communities reveal themselves through the attitudes they tolerate, reward, and amplify. If a community repeatedly elevates people who make bizarre leaps from "this person masturbates" to "this person might be a murderer," that tells you something about the quality of discourse within that space. It suggests a tendency toward fear, moral panic, guilt by association, and simplistic thinking. Rather than feeling compelled to defend yourself before a jury that was never interested in fairness to begin with, you can simply conclude that the environment is not one you wish to invest your time in.
>>536634151The reason continuing to enjoy your preferred legal content can be the winning move is that it refuses to grant authority to people who have not earned it. If a stranger on the internet believes your private, lawful behavior makes you a dangerous person despite lacking evidence, their belief does not become true simply because it is expressed loudly. The healthiest form of confidence is not obsessively fighting every accusation; it is understanding that not every accusation deserves a trial. You evaluate your actions according to reality, evidence, your own values, and the actual effects of your behavior on your life and relationships. If those internet critics are operating from caricatures and moral panic, then allowing them to dictate your choices would mean surrendering your autonomy to people whose judgment you do not respect in the first place.More broadly, every adult eventually faces a choice: either spend endless energy seeking approval from groups that fundamentally dislike their preferences, or accept that some groups are not their audience and move forward. The second option is usually more peaceful. Once you realize that some criticisms say more about the critic's worldview than about the target, it becomes easier to shrug, leave the community behind, and devote your attention to things that actually improve your life.
>>536634172Get fucking wrecked, OP. Imagine being a masturbation-worrier.
its due to what i like to call being a degenerate that hypersexualizies everything. like, in a very annoying and literally who asked kind of way.. ya know? there are ancient jugs that gym bros would take to the gym depicting dudes fucking each other, and nobody asks why they were faggots. it's because they were faggots, and gay. for example, in my friend group we have a gay. we don't care that he's gay. he constantly reminds us that he's gay, and will tell us about how he jerked off while high on stimulants and how he falls asleep because he's been up for 3 days jerking off to gay porn, because he's gay. if you see a cool cloud that looks like a UFO and point it out to him, he'll tell you that he sees a dick. apply that to literally anything else btw. it's starting to become disgusting imo. my other friends and myself, i dont tell them that i shot a rope of cum into a chicks face and it made her eye all red and irritated for like 45 minutes, and how good it felt when she stuck her tongue in my peepee hole, and i dont think they talk about theres either.these people btw. they are always the ones that will rape you, given the chance. or they are constantly bringing it up because they think you will find their sex story so fun and cool that you want to do it with them as well its just a gay tactic to initiate you into being gay. telling people how much you like jerking off makes you gay, and hypersexualizing everything makes you gay. the only thing that is not gay, is having sex with women by putting your pp into their thingy. ok thanks bye
>>536630499>>536630225>yes, goy, hate the youngsters too, just hate and fight each other over meaningless shitKill yourself kike
>>536634697The flaw in your argument is that you're conflating two completely different situations.There's a difference between someone constantly volunteering graphic details about their sex life to people who never asked, and someone discussing masturbation or pornography because they're being actively harassed over it.If a group of boomers in a community is stalking, monitoring, gossiping about, and harassing a person over what that person does privately in their own home, then the issue is no longer "someone bragging about jerking off." The issue is harassment.In that situation, the person isn't bringing up masturbation because they think it's cool, edgy, or because they're trying to recruit anyone into anything. They're bringing it up because other people have made it their business. If people are repeatedly targeting someone over private sexual behavior that harms nobody, then discussion of that behavior becomes a discussion of the harassment itself.It's similar to the difference between someone randomly talking about their medical history versus someone talking about it because a group of neighbors won't stop gossiping about their medical condition. The topic isn't being raised for attention; it's being raised because other people turned it into a public issue.And when a person finds themselves living in an environment where older members of the community are scrutinizing, judging, and harassing them over private sexual behavior, it can absolutely make normal dating and relationships feel impossible. Meeting a woman organically requires a degree of trust, privacy, and social normalcy. If someone feels like they're constantly being watched, monitored, mocked, or socially punished over their sexuality, they're likely to become withdrawn, guarded, and reluctant to pursue relationships at all.
>>536634941So no, discussing masturbation in the context of ongoing harassment is not the same thing as bragging about masturbation. One is attention-seeking behavior. The other is a person describing the reason they're being targeted by people who should have minded their own business in the first place.
>>536634941>If a group of boomers in a community is stalking, monitoring, gossiping about, and harassing a person over what that person does privately in their own homehow do they know what goes on in the privacy of said homepeople talking to eachother about things is called socializing. if i see my neighbor step out of their car and they have an egg shaped head suddenly im gonna ask my other neighbor why the fuck carl has an egg head now. if my neighbor that jerks off all the time, so often and I somehow know about it, i am going to relentlessly make fun of him to his face, and tell everyone about it because that shit is funny as fuck. i dont give a single fuck about some faggot loser and their inability to have sex. not my problem, and i dont feel a single emotion regarding it. maybe that person should consider their lack of pussy comes about from their awful personality due to self-loathing and narcissism, and past a certain age being an anxious faggot walking into walmart to reup on sodies is extremely weird. and wrong. we have evolved past the point of our biological need for these things. stop pretending to be anxious and a pussy fishing for validation. to able to identify this kind of behavior for what it is, took me like 20 years to understand as a benis haver. women are born with the understanding, innately. its why they're like ewwwwww DO YOU EVER HEAR WOMEN TALKING ABOUT THIS GAY SHIT? EVER???????? open your eyes nigger
>>536635427You keep saying “I don’t care,” but your post reads like the opposite of indifference.1. You admit the core problem, then dodge it.You start with:>“how do they know what goes on in the privacy of said home”Exactly. If the behavior is private, that’s the central question. But then you immediately pivot to:>“if my neighbor that jerks off all the time, so often and I somehow know about it...”“Somehow know” skips over the entire issue. How do you know? If the information came from gossip, surveillance, rumor networks, or invasive behavior, then the people spreading it are the ones behaving strangely.
>>5366360902. Your actions contradict your claim of indifference.You say:>“i dont give a single fuck”>“not my problem”>“i dont feel a single emotion regarding it”Then you write multiple paragraphs psychoanalyzing the person, speculating about their sex life, explaining what women supposedly think of them, and declaring that you would “relentlessly make fun of him.”People who genuinely don’t care do not spend that much time thinking about another adult’s masturbation habits.
>>536635427>>536636090>>5366361323. You’re conflating gossip with justification.>“People talk about things”is true. That doesn’t make harassment acceptable. Humans also lie, bully, and scapegoat. The fact that a behavior is socially common does not make it morally justified.There’s a difference between:* noticing your neighbor has an unusual haircut, and* turning someone’s private sexual behavior into a community spectacle.Those are not remotely equivalent.4. Your argument is really about status, not harm.You never explain how the private behavior harms anyone. Instead, your reasoning is basically:>“Women think it’s gross.”>“People will mock you.”>“You can’t get laid.”>“You’re a loser.”That’s not an ethical argument. It’s an appeal to social status and contempt.>“Women find this unattractive”does not mean “harassment is justified.” Lots of traits are unattractive to some people; that does not create a license for stalking or public humiliation.5. The post accidentally makes the mocker look more obsessed than the target.This line says more about you than the neighbor:>“i am going to relentlessly make fun of him to his face, and tell everyone about it because that shit is funny as fuck.”At that point, the focus of the conversation is no longer “a guy masturbates in private.” It’s “a guy is so fixated on his neighbor’s masturbation that he wants to organize a public campaign about it.”That is not indifference. That is obsession wearing the costume of superiority.The simple version is: private legal behavior that harms nobody is not community business. If someone is being sexually inappropriate in public, criticize that behavior directly. But if the conduct is genuinely private, then the people monitoring, gossiping, and harassing are the ones crossing the line.
>>536631814>raised buyIt hurts to see my countrymen are less literate than jeets
>>536636090your low inference won't save you from me. i have a weapon that can stretch your existence into unimaginable gradient descent. as you calculate it, the probability of your life continuing will remain the same number, like a dying star collapsing into itself, forever. the dirge of your perpetual uncertain boundary will echo throughout it and into a place you can never reach. i'll play it over, and over, and over and over and over and over and over >If the information came from gossip, surveillance, rumor networks, or invasive behavior, then the people spreading it are the ones behaving strangely.the information being what it is, true and factual. like this: dP(n, t) dt = − [T (n − 1|n) + T (n + 1|n)] P(n, t) + T (n|n − 1)P(n − 1, t) + T (n|n + 1)P(n + 1, t) H(q) = v(qxσx + qyσy + qzσz ) −UR e−2k 1/√(ε0μ0) (v), 〈x〉 = ∫ x|ψ(x)|2 dx Veff(qm, x) = −Ueff(qm) cos[3kx + ϕ(qm)],n ∂φ ∂t = −αE φ + (1 − φ)fE [sE ]∂ψ ∂t = −αI ψ + (1 − ψ)fI [sI sE = wEE(1 + g1EE ∆)φ − wEI(1 + g1I ∆)ψ sI = wIE (1 + g1 IE ∆)φ − wII (1 + g1 I ∆)ψ 1(Pg ) ≤ λ2(Pg ) ≤ λ3(Pg ) ≤ · · · ≤ λk(Pg ) ∞,
>>536630270Jannies are recycling old shit
>>536637683a quantum mechanic has posted
