[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3441.jpg (419 KB, 989x1321)
419 KB JPG
Did Tarrant choose Christchurch NZ because it is a namesake of Dr. Desaguliers, a foundational figure of speculative masonry (including York Rite Templars, such as Brenton Tarrant).

Trying to trace some things out here, anyone know more? Did he say why he chose Christchurch NZ specifically?
>>
>>536660126
nice trips satan
>also
do internet searching and tell us what you find
>>
>>536660414
That’s not how gets work, newfag.
But after a brief look, it seems that Tarrant wasn’t actually a part of the Freemasonic ‘Knights Templar’, rather he seems to speak of a “reborn” Knights Templar whilst attributing its foundation to Breivik.
I was off the board during the period of time in which Breivik attacked so I don’t know anything about him truthfully.
Any Anons know more about this supposed “reborn” Knights Templar group? Seems like it has nothing to do with the Masonic Knights Templar.
>>
File: kiddo.jpg (72 KB, 750x1000)
72 KB JPG
>>536660649
>That’s not how gets work, newfag
kek



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.