Ahem, according to the ESTEEMED wikipedia, one Mr. Leo Frank was actually a VICTIM of lynching after he was FALSELY CONVICTED by a jury of his peers in a court of law. You'll never guess who the real rapist/murderer was either... some niggerboy of course. Named Conley, who was a renown degenerate.This is complete bullshit of course, incredibly, the niggerboy is innocent in this particular situation. But Wikipedia would have you and many other believe differently. If you were of the mind to correct this record, and I hope you are, please lend some support to this kikebook talk page. Yes I know its p0zzed to the extreme, nevertheless, thousands of people everyday see this article and the vast majority come away taking it as a certifiable vact that this Jew, who's righteous lynching was the impetus for the creation of the ((( anti defamation league ))) - whom btw produced a completely kike'd movie on the topic you can see right now on youtube - have fought oh so hard over 110 years now to claim Frank's innocence. Do you part...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Leo_Frank
When nogs and whitey can agree on something in the midst of the height of southern racism that the jew did it, the jew fucking did it.You can even see the narcissistic smirk in his picture thinking he's going to get away with it.
>>536696328he's a child rapist and nothing will change that
>>536696328have you checked the diffs to see if/when it was changed to "falsely convicted"?
>>536696328>Wikipedia isn't based on what "we ... know". It's based on what reliable sources say. Reliable sources describe Leo Frank as having been wrongfully convicted so that's what the article says. If you're so sure he isn't wrongfully convicted... go and write a book about it, get it published by a reputable publisher and then hope that somebody else uses your book as a source.that talk section is so brazenly kiked lmao
The worst part is nearly the entire literature or "reliable" as they deem is so..... sources that they reference, are nearly all tied to (((Dinnerstein)))... hmmmmmm, what do you know, a kike says the kike wasnt guilty and hence sets the narrative.
Off the bat>Modern researchers agree that Frank was innocent.[n 1][2][3]Only 1 applies, the other two are unrelated, and it's a doctorate thesis from 1963 by some radical kike >>536697488 who isn't even alive
Is this is one where the black guy and the KKK banded together because it was such bullshit?
>>536696763Oy fucking vey lmao
>>536697699Note that he received a pardon in 1986, long after whatever groundbreaking kikery is in it had been published, but was not absolved.
>Modern researchers agree that Frank was innocent.How the fuck can anyone know this?They didn't have surveillance cameras or DNA back then. Plus everyone who alive back then is already dead.Leo probably did it but no one can know for sure anymore.I assume he's guilty because he's a rich jew, and all rich jews are pedophiles, but it's a mystery nonetheless.
>>536696763
I mean at the day end of the day, a white girl was raped and murdered.The two main suspects: a nigger and a jew.That's it really.
He was convicted in a court of law, but the jew-funded mayor of atlanta said he was going to pardon him, so the people took matters into their own hands.
>>536696763>reputable publisherkek
>>536697488Breakfastberg was not available for comment
>>536696328>>536696397
>>536698968It is astonishing how jews are still assblasted about things like Leo Frank and Roman occupation.
>>536696328>Leo Frank Fake and gay like Ann Frank.
>>536698145White traitors make my blood boil more than Jews. I hope I see the day we can put both of them in a slowcooker to slowly disintegrate. In Minecraft.
Imagine the KKK defending a nigger. The evil kike is getting raped in hell by BBC now.
>>536700355The KKK had no involvement in this story. That's another Jew lie.
