FYI "The South" was basically empty. Maybe an outpost here or there, possibly a Frenchman. When you hear about the US Civil War, remember, they were all people who'd only arrived in America like 2 generations ago
>>536699581Are talking about what we would call the revolutionary war? Civil war is accurate but we had an official one like 100 years later. I like calling it the GeorgeWar
What's the point of your thread? Demonstration of failure to study some other cunt's history?
>>536700190I know more about your cunt than you know about mine
>>536699581Yeah, and? This all just goes back to why the south wanted to split in the first place. North and south were entirely different. North was focused on industry, south on agriculture
>>536700331I'd guess neither quantity is worth acknowledging. Not even a good slide thread, OP, cause you posted twice.
>>536699581Um, it says AMERICAN colonies. Florida was under SPANISH control during that time
>>536699581what's funnier is that all of the rich slaveowners who started the war went North and were immediately assimilated into the Yankee bourgeoisie right afterwards, leaving the rednecks and newly freed slaves to pick up the pieces under conditions of extreme deprivation and federal hostility
>>536700331>jail>billabong>bush tucker>ned kellydone
>>536703344>rich slaveowners>went North and were immediately assimilated into the Yankee bourgeoisiesounds like typical kike behaviour, i'm not surprised.
>>536702682>Florida was under SPANISH control during that timeyes, it was still a colony in america. you're so low iq it's embarrassing for you and your nation.
>>536700190>>536699735
>>536704145Thanks I guess.
>>536699581>>536699735>>536700190>>536700331watch this about the civil warhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l72pgVD3Law
>>536705100What's it about? I'm retired and I don't feel like watching whatever that is.
>>536705312basically a secret society that caused the civil war cause they were trying to divide up states into individual banks that would go bankrupt or some shit like this
>>536705312wilkes booth was part of the Knights of the Golden Circleabraham lincoln is like hitler for half turanian mulattos because he issued interest free currency called Greenbacks and was gonna establish bimetallic currency after the war
also history is fake as shit read Anatoly Fomenkothe "Tartaria" (((Conspiracy Theory))) is just real they try to cover it up by falsifying and confusing history
>>536705500>>536705708>>536705755>Man with no subs thinks he's shadowbanned while schizoposting without sources>Can't even into lighting or focusing his camera(You) need a higher standard of evidence.
>>536705970Retart its not my channel its just one i started watching cause hes willing to explain the history of blood libel
>>536700331That's a fact
>>536699581What point are you trying to make OP?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon-eyed_peopleOne early source about the time before the Cherokee removal is an account by early Tennessee governor, John Sevier. Sevier lived at a time when North Georgia and other parts of the Appalachians were still part of the Cherokee Nation. Between 1800 and 1805, he was involved with treaties that later led to the Cherokee Removal.[citation needed]According to a 1969 newspaper article in Forsyth County News (Georgia), Sevier visited Fort Mountain in 1782. The article cites John Sevier (from a letter, date unspecified) as saying that "Chief Oconostota of the Cherokees, then 90 years old,"[7] had told Sevier that his own forefathers "told of the fort being built by white men from across the great water."[7] Chief Oconostota died in 1783, which would have been in the year following Sevier's visit.[citation needed]Benjamin Smith Barton, author of New Views of the Origin of the Tribes and Nations of America (1797), describes an ancient people who were "moon-eyed."[6] Barton, citing Colonel Leonard Marbury (an intermediary between the government and the Cherokee), writes, "the Cheerake tell us, that when they first arrived in the country which they inhabit, they found it possessed by certain 'moon-eyed-people,' who could not see in the day-time. These wretches they expelled."[6] A 1923 article in The Chattanooga News mentions a 1797 book by Barton and repeats the Cherokee legend about moon-eyed people. The article says of Barton, "He seems to consider them an albino race."[1]
>>536699581We need to go back.
>>536707457Yes, I know it's not your channel. Are you a native Spanish speaker, by chance?
Reclaim the West Florida Republic no bullshit brother
By the way, if you can’t trace your lineage back to green, yellow, pink before the civil war, you’re not really America.
