Has anyone ever compared the ghost lineage DNA in blacks to chimpanzees on a BLAST search?
>>536757158What are you saying?
>>536757158>.gif>no gifsadge
>>536757158A fine question.
>>536757158Don't complain. You reap what you sow.
>>536757211BLAST is a database on the NIH that you can compare genome sequences for nucleotide similarities, I am suggesting sub-Saharan are 30% chimp and they have only compared it to hominids for racia lreasons
>>536757158No, have you?But, ghost lineage DNA, by definition, is incomplete, so I don't see how that's going to work.
>>536757334havs sex with a bonobo
>>536757363You compare the fragments to similar fragments in chimp dna. there are always conserved metabolic genes you can use as place markers
>>536757415that's what I'm implying africans did
>>536757158Nope but Columbus has sephardic DNA and Carthage descendents took over Rome from the inside and hide it's presence over time using symbols of Tanit in different ways.
>>536757158Don't they provide the gene/species of the closest 50-100 matches anymore?