I live in an area that was an important english settlement with a lot of revolutionary war history and is now predominantly italian. I often wonder is the ghosts of the dead are mad about all the mary statues.
why dont the irish have nukes
>>536760510America is named for an Italian, Jefferson was friends with them, Franklin spoke Italian, Italians were a minority in America during the revolution, Italian pop in us us 5-6%, their contribution is small, the Italian mafia was basically Jewish and the worst presidents were anglos. Nice try kike.
>>536760399>"Damn Americans are pussies"
>>536760766>Jefferson was friendly with shitalians So fucking what nigger, Mussolini was friendly with Hitler so I guess Rome belongs to the Saxon now
>>536760834swarthy detected
>where the fuck are all the rebellions?
>>536760399Washington and Adam's both believed that country was doomed after each of their presidencies because the federalists had already begun breaking off into two separate parties and going at each other's throats.
>>536760766>Franklin spoke ItalianFranklin thought Italians were swarthy non-whites that should be excluded from America.He also liked fucking swarthy French grannies, since they couldn't get pregnant.
>>536760774They are coward gang stalkers
>>536760399They warned us.
>>536760399If I had money in my bank account, I would make sure it's emptied out right now so I just so I could express how much I want Palestine to be free. No sacrifice is ever ever great enough.
>>536760399I think that americans, modern anglos and germans should not exist together with jeets and other browns...
Google the Jefferson Bible and you'll understand why their project turned out the way it did.
It's not any exaggeration that every single one of them would want rebellion, all blacks and browns in America deported to Africa and then rebellion fostered throughout the west until every nation did likewise.
>>536760399Since unrepentant Freemasons and atheists are condemned to eternal damnation, their thoughts are bereft of all light and goodness.
>>536760399if they could have seen the next 250 years they would have never bothered with the 2nd amendment
>>536762595you realize only a small number of founders were freemasons right? And none were atheists.
>what do you mean, they dont own land or slaves
>>536760399AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH LUCIFER HELP ME YOU PROMISED ME SO MUUUUCH AHHHHHHHHHH
>>536760399Modern America broke pretty much every rule they specified. Thomas Jefferson wanted the constitution thrown away and rewritten every 19 years. Now the US can't even manage a successful constitutional convention due to partisan obstructionism. George Washington warned against political parties, now they control the system. The founders warned against elevating any organized religion over any other and wanted a fundamentally secular country, now christian nationalists control the country.
>>536762876No, I don't. From https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/bh-ksl.htm> Many of the United States' founders, including George Washington, Paul Revere, John Hancock, and Benjamin Franklin, participated as members of Masonic Lodges. Hardly any had fully orthodox Christian beliefs. Many subscribed to deism, which amounts to atheism in practice.
dios mio
eso que o algo no
>>536763254>manymany is not a percentage. Looking it up only 16% of the signers of the declaration were Freemasons. Many also doesn't apply to deists (which is not atheism at all) I can only think of maybe two founders who were actual deists. None were atheists. That means deists were an even smaller percentage than the freemasons, ~4%
>>536761568>He also liked fucking swarthy French granniesimagine the smell
>>536760399they threw a fit over a tax that was literally ONE SINGLE SHILLING a year to the richest magistrate class. how many silver coins do you fork over a year to be middle class. those boomers head would explode as steam shoots out their ears.
>>536763466>Looking it up only 16% of the signers of the declaration were Freemasons.And 1/3 of the Constitution's signers were Freemasons.> Many also doesn't apply to deists (which is not atheism at all) In practice, deism is atheism: it is essentially the "watchmaker" view of God.In any case, the French and American Revolutions are all but admitted by mainstream historians to be engineered by Freemasons.
>>536763713>And 1/3 of the Constitution's signers were Freemasons.That's still a minority>In practice, deism is atheism:"In practice" is meaningless, it's about belief, and deists believe in a God contradicting any claim they are athiest.
>>536763899>"In practice" is meaningless, it's about belief, and deists believe in a God contradicting any claim they are athiest.Have you an autistic inability to understand linguistic nuance? The phrase "in practice" means "in reality (used to refer to what actually happens as opposed to what is meant or believed to happen)." Thus, while in *principle* deism is not atheism, in practice, that is, the way deism is actually lived, actually carried out, it is indistinguishable from atheism, except perhaps for vague, noncommittal statements of belief in a watchmaker deity.
>>536760399>two more weeks
>>536764137That's not true though, a deist might still expect some kind of punishment in the afterlife and act accordingly, irrespective of the thoughts or beliefs of society at large, acting in accordance with the wishes of a moral God. And atheist would presumably have no such compunctions and ought to be some kind of nihilist. There's no great difference between how a Christian and deist ought to act, there's a huge gulf between an atheist and deist.
>>536760399please adolf washington we need you noe ;__;
>>536760399they would tar and feather every politician in washington
>>536764263From the Wikipedia article on Deism:> Unlike classical theism, many Deists believe in the existence of a creator God who simply does not intervene anymore after creating the universe,again solely based on rational thought without any reliance on revealed religions or religious authorities.Can you not apprehend how this "watchmaker" deity differs significantly from the Most Holy Trinity of Christianity? And that this difference in belief would lead to a difference in morality?
>>536764522>nothing about the afterlifeYou're lying if you don't say the biggest motivator in any religion is the afterlife and potential salvation/damnation. Nothing in deism precludes a future reward/punishment similar to the promises of Christianity (or any other religion). It's a big difference between that and the eternal nothingness promised by atheism.
>>536760510>>536760766Italian is black enough for them.
>>536764640>Nothing in deism precludes...Of course not. But neither does anything in deism force a "future reward/punishment similar to the promises of Christianity." And when you study the history of heresy in Christendom, you realize the principle: that which is not affirmed is assumed to be denied.
>>536761263Damn. If they only lived to see the guy on the 5 dollar bill and the other dude on the 20 dollar bill.For the room temperature IQ: one freed the niggers from the beginning the other one fought the banks or some shit probably before the debt existed at all or was at 1 trillion.of course things are much more Black and Jewish now.
>>536765094>If they only lived to see the guy on the 5 dollar bill and the other dude on the 20 dollar bill.There not a few appropriate candidates for the three-dollar bill.
>>536760399nothing. they are dead and no longer exist in any sense.
>>536761615
>>536763254eeevil atheists are laughing at you, oh you mouthbreather Deep South Babbitt?
>>536764522both are ridiculous superstitious beliefs, equally stupid.
There's no Epstein thread up right now, and I wonder why...
