It's begun to slowly dawn on me that the financial elite of this country (aka the only elite) is indistinguishable from the Jewish mafia, and is the source of every single problem facing the White race.
Do the Rothschilds, Kuhns, Loebs, Schiffs etc. own the Bank of England?Bank of England Ownership has always been heavily jewish.https://samisdat.in/en/books/early-jewish-holders-of-bank-of-england-stock-1694-1725-1966These were mostly Sephardic jews based in Holland and London between 1694 and 1725. The Rothschilds were Askenazi jews based in Frankfurt who only became really rich after the French revolution.William I, Elector of Hesse gave Meyer Amshel Rothschild his money to look after and keep safe from Napoleon.In todays money taking account of inflation his savings were about 120 million dollars.Rothschild invested this money for Wilhelm and made a fortune.The official company that owns the Bank of England is BANK OF ENGLAND NOMINEES LIMITED.This company is very special as it is protected by the official secrets act, it has Royal Charter status and is exempt from the normal disclosure requirements that other companies have to comply with to meet section 27 of the Companies Act 1976.The Central Bank of Ireland for serves the same function as the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve in America.We can guess that it is owned by some of the same shareholders as the Bank of England.A freedom of information request was made asking where did the Central Bank of Ireland keep its gold?The answer was the Bank of England holds the Irish gold. This is funny because Ireland is supposed to be independent of England, and the Irish government tries to persuade everyone that the central bank is a government institution.Recently the Central Bank of Ireland unveiled a modern art sculpture outside its headquarters.Who was the artist?Eva Rothschild.She has alleged she was no relationship to the famous Rothschilds but she admitted her ancestors came from the Frankfurt ghetto where the famous Rothschilds come from.CENTRAL BANKSThe magic money machine - Eustace Mullinshttps://youtu.be/Er3xPXb7aQw
>We see a state of affairs in which a people has built, through its own efforts, a great empire, whose ships trade with far-off lands, whose armies are invincible. This people is strong, self-confident, and aware of their virtues. Why should they fear a few shabby, furtive aliens who have drifted in from unknown places, and who establish themselves in the heart of the city so unobtrusively that it seems they have always been there?>These aliens are willing to do anything, they perform any sort of distasteful task which the natives feel is beneath them. The aliens traffic in the bodies of girls, set up gambling dens, clear in stolen goods, lend money, establish houses in which one can perform every imaginable type of sexual degeneracy, and provide assassins for hire.>THE INEXTRICABLE HOLD>In a short time, the aliens know every secret of the peoples’ leaders, and they have established holds over them. The colony of aliens multiplies rapidly, and soon a once healthy people finds itself helpless, because their native virtues of strength, courage and honor, which have made them great, are of no avail against the newcomers.>The host does not understand the parasite, which is like a creature from another planet, because they do not have the same goals, nor do they respond to the same stimuli, as the host people. They even seem to have different nerve patterns.>As the pernicious influence grows, the army is demoralized, the native leaders are murdered or exiled, and the wealth of the nation swiftly passes into the hands of the aliens. The people are plundered of everything, and most of all of their self-respect. No member of a host people is allowed to preserve his self-respect or his privacy, once the parasite has taken command.>One morning, the ships of a rival nation appear in the harbor. In exchange for certain guarantees, the parasites welcome them. The host people does not resist, an empire is gone.- Eustace Mullins c. 1950 "THE BIOLOGICAL JEW"
THE (((NATIONALISATION))) OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND WAS A FARCEThe "nationalization" of the Bank of England in 1946 is a half-truth fundamentally misleading. While the bank's shares were indeed transferred to the Treasury, making it ostensibly state-owned, this move didn't sever ties with private banking dynasties. Here's what actually happened: The British government bought out the bank for £11.3 million (approximately £430 million today) and issued new stock directly to HM Treasury. However, this transaction did not eliminate private influence; it merely shifted control from overtly private hands to a hybrid model where government oversight coexisted with deep-rooted elite interests. The key point missed by apologists for "public ownership" is that nationalization did not change the bank's operational structure or its role as a debt-issuer. The BoE still acts as a central bank issuing currency backed by government debt meaning every pound printed comes with an implied lien against future tax revenues and economic output. This system inherently benefits those who hold the debt (creditors) at the expense of those who don't (the general population). In practice, this means global financial institutions like Rothschild & Sons, Schroders, and other City of London Investment group players continue to exert influence through their roles in managing government bond issues, advising on monetary policy, and sitting on regulatory bodies like the Financial Stability Oversight Board. These entities profit from both sides of transactions, buying up distressed assets cheaply during crises they helped create while collecting interest on public debt they facilitated through their central banking arm."Debt implies a creditor" So when people say "it was nationalized," you should hear *reorganized*, a cosmetic shift masking continued oligarchic control over Britain's monetary policy via proxy institutions and shadow networks operating beyond parliamentary oversight.
>>536831912>B-but the Bank of England Nominees Limited was dissolved! Conspiracy theorist!Bank of England Nominees Limited (BOENL) is the smoking gun proving the Bank of England's "nationalization" was a farce. BOENL held a Royal Charter, granting it extraordinary secrecy powers under the Official Secrets Act. This meant its activities were legally classified, preventing parliamentary scrutiny or FOIA requests. Exemption from Companies Act 1976 Section 27 requires companies to disclose beneficial ownership and financials. BOENL was explicitly exempted, ensuring private interests could hide their identities and transactions. BOENL acted as a custodian for gilt holdings on behalf of undisclosed clients effectively laundering ownership through the Bank of England's balance sheet.In 2016, BOENL was dissolved in favor of a new entity: HM Treasury Corporate Finance Unit (HMT CFU). The rebranding maintained secrecy while shifting nominal control to HM Treasury. This maintained private bankers' grip on UK monetary policy while pretending public oversight exists. By shielding true beneficiaries behind state-sanctioned secrecy, the BoE ensures that private creditors continue to profit.
>it’s begun to slowly dawn on meThis is the fucking problem. I’m tired of slow to catch up dense cunts.
>>536831725funny, as an American I could say the exact same thing
>>536832259I have a better SAT than 98% of the population my dude. This isn't about intelligence but rather hidden information, we're playing a real life game of Werewolf here.https://youtu.be/M8j1xWbyfjIJEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THECONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE BANKFebruary 15, 1791(The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. by H. E. Bergh, Vol. III, p. 145 ff.)The bill for establishing a national bank, in 1791, undertakes, among otherthings,--1. To form the subscribers into a corporation. (1700s definition of a corporation is a nationally controlled institution for a specific and narrow purpose)2. To enable them, in their corporate capacities, to receive grants of lands;and, so far, is against the laws of mortmain.3. To make alien subscribers capable of holding lands; and so far is againstthe laws of alienage.4. To transmit these lands, on the death of a proprietor, to a certain line ofsuccessors; and so far, changes the course of descents.5. To put the lands out of the reach of forfeiture, or escheat; and so far, isagainst the laws of forfeiture and escheat.6. To transmit personal chattels to successors, in a certain line; and so far, isagainst the laws of distribution.7. To give them the sole and exclusive right of banking, under the nationalauthority; and, so far, is against the laws of monopoly.8. To communicate to them a power to make laws, paramount to the laws ofthe states; for so they must be construed, to protect the institution from thecontrol of the state legislatures; and so probably they will be construed.I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground--that allpowers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, norprohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states, or to the people (12thamend.). To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawnaround the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field ofpower, no longer susceptible of any definition.
>>536832565It is absolutely about intelligence. You should be able to connect the dots and catch up very quickly if you were actually smart.
>>536832490>as an American I could say the exact same thingThat's because it's the same people https://files.catbox.moe/p5zdv7.mp4
>>536832607>is absolutely about intelligenceIt's about hidden information. I'm literally 140 IQ anon. >You should be able to connect the dots and catch up very quickly if you were actually smart.That has nothing to do with intelligence and everything to do with exposure to hidden information. Intelligence is just a tool, it can't bootstrap itself into awareness of the parasitic banking system if it's never been exposed to genuine information outside Keynesian and Neoclassical propaganda
>>536831725what finally made the penny drop anon? If you'll pardon the pun.I'd say its been fairly apparent since Krudd was PM.
Recommended reading ECONOMY"Economics for Helen" by Hilaire Belloc which is probably the greatest economics primer ever writtenhttps://archive.org/details/economicsforhele0000bellThe Servile State by Hilaire Bellochttps://legiochristi.com/static/lit/H_Belloc_The_Servile_State.pdfManifesto for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest by Gottfried Feder https://archive.org/details/manifesto-for-abolition-enslavement-interest-on-money-gottfried-feder"Usury" by Calvin Elliott. https://archive.org/details/ElliottCalvinUsuryWhere does Money Come From by Richard Wernerhttps://professorwerner.org/pubs/where-does-money-come-from-a-guide-to-the-uk-monetary-and-banking-system/(can be found on Annas-archive)Princes of the Yen by Richard Wernerhttps://professorwerner.org/pubs/princes-of-the-yen-japans-central-bankers-and-the-transformation-of-the-economy/(can be found on Annas-archive)KILLING THE HOST: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy by Michael Hudsonhttp://digamo.free.fr/hudson15.pdfNATSOCHitler's Revolution by Richard Tedorhttps://archive.org/details/hitlers-revolution-expanded-edition-richard-tedor_20230406_2240NATIONAL SOCIALISM NOW! by William Joycehttp://www.mourningtheancient.com/joyce2.pdfJEWSThe Biological Jew by Eustace Mullinshttps://www.eustacemullins.us/wp-content/works/Articles/Eustace%20Mullins%20-%20The%20Biological%20Jew.pdfThe Riddle of the Jews' Success by Theodor Fritschhttps://www.der-stuermer.org/english/Theodor%20Fritsch%20-%20The%20riddle%20of%20the%20jew's%20success.pdfThe Jews by Eugen Duhringhttps://archive.org/details/EugenDuhringOnTheJews/page/52/mode/1up
>>536833160ECONOMY CONTINUED"The Outline of Sanity" by G. K. Chesterton https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/outlineofsanity0000ches/outlineofsanity0000ches.pdfTowards the Restoration of Property by Hilaire Belloc (Search Annas-archive.gd)Essay on Public Credit by David Hume https://archive.org/details/essaysmoralpoli00hume/page/355/mode/1up?“Barren Metal” by E. Michael Jones.“Usury in Christendom” by Michael Hoffman.Usury: The Scourge of Nations By James Harvey. https://archive.org/details/usuryscourgeofna609harvA History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind by Steven M. Goodson https://files.catbox.moe/r3y9h1.pdfThe Napoleon of Notting Hill by G. k. Chestertonhttps://archive.org/details/napoleonofnottin00chesuoftThe New Unhappy Lords by A. k. Chesterton https://ia803109.us.archive.org/13/items/TheNewUnhappyLords1965/1965%20-%20New%20Unhappy%20Lords%20-%20A.%20K.%20Chesterton.pdf
Australia is so based this morning>naming the eternal war criminals, dont forget that wanker churchil!
>>536831725These threads always get slide I've noticed. The only threads on this board that get bumped involve demoralisation slop about White man bad or bread and circuses shit that doesn't matter like the Karmelo Anthony trial
>>536832114Truth nuke
London has nothing to do with Britain and should be nuked. The British Elite are tyrannical capitalists.
Raeeeepepepepe
>>536835399sound like their ruupee
