[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 03.mp4 (3.94 MB, 528x928)
3.94 MB
3.94 MB MP4
Nerve gas is banned under the Geneva Conventions, but not nuclear weapons, napalm, thermobaric bombs... Why the inconsistency? Chemical weapons are less destructive than all of those
>>
File: file.png (834 KB, 800x876)
834 KB PNG
>>536866848
Who needs nerve gas?
There are easier ways to kill billions.
>>
If it that was government execution, dude would have been going on five minutes before you finally actually died.
>>
The whole concept is fucking stupid
>Killing is okay but not with this particular weapon
Who the fuck cares? Dead is dead
>Blinding someone is inhumane, you have to shoot him
This sort of justification of violence is the most inhumane shit of all
>>
>>536866848
Chemicals are a form of torture, they rip you up from the inside
>>
>>536866848
Ask "Isreali" and yankikes
>>
Imagine dying while visiting the fortnite shop lol.
>>
>>536866848
Is this real nerve gas? I don't see an electrical point of contact.
>>
>>536866848
Because it's an indiscriminate weapon. You can't control where it goes and what it affects.
>>
>>536866848
Because killing someone instantly is better than causing prolonged suffering. It's not about reducing destructiveness. Also, the Geneva Conventions tend to be written for the sake of winners of wars. Why would the US sign onto an agreement not to use the weapons it spent so much time and money researching?
>>
>>536866848
no one and I mean no one cares in actual combat besides (((lawmakers))) with the sole exception that mustard gas is bad because it could spread back over your own army.

proof: china said they could wipe out ALL of india in 48 hours, no one batted an eyelid
>>
>>536866848
some context to the video? What happened with the guy and why?
>>
>>536867238
Chemical weapons are just as indiscriminate as nuclear weapons. Chemical weapons spread within a small, controlled area. They don’t travel thousands of kilometers and destroy everything in their path. It makes sense that anti-personnel mines and cluster bombs are banned... Anyone could step on an unexploded ordnance. The same goes for biological weapons, obviously
>>
>>536867701
Anyone remember the spinning seizures during Covid?
>>
>>536867137
surely, abdool
>>
>>536867287
Is dying from sarin gas slower and more agonizing than dying from radiation poisoning? Or being burned alive by a flamethrower? Or being blown to pieces by a drone? Come on nigger
>>
File: 56456165654.jpg (63 KB, 1280x720)
63 KB JPG
>>536867234
reminds me more of the covid seizures that were happening to some during covid, only difference was then they would turn to look at something behind them and then start constantly turning as they collapse into a seizure.
>>
>>536866848
Where did you get the horrible opinion that chemical weapons are less destructive?

VX nerve agent can last for months and up to around a year in absolute perfect environments.
Killing basically everything in the target zone.
Only under the absolute worst conditions is it safe about 60 hours later. VX nerve agent on a targeted city would easily kill more people than any nuke we have dropped on a population in recorded history.

For even less dangerous chemical weapons, hundreds of thousands to millions of people have been killed by chemical weapons attacks.
Which is more than almost everything else you posted combined.
>>
>>536867287
Yes and no, if they are all as good at killing and killing has to happen, we can all agree at least to make it less horrific. This benefits the moral of all fighting parties. If you knew your opponent would not use cruel inhumane weapons you’d at least have some assurance about fighting. It’s easier for troops to come to terms with and less bad for survivors. Every country trying to be as horrible as possible would really make winners want to annihilate what is left of the other too. There’s real tangible benefits of a more civilized war. There was a time once when lines even stopped fighting for Christmas and exchanged rations and minor gifts. A gentleman’s war they used to call it.
>>
>>536866848
definitly the vaxx, they where probably testing the 4g / 5g frequency range that activates the graphene hydroxide, and then they vibrate and cut you from the inside, death by a million cuts type of thing.

or he got many doses of the vaxx and they finally took their toll.
or maybe he had a certain genetic trait that makes the vaxx kill you sooner,
only time will tell.

I imagine that the military tribulans will start within the next 5-10 years
the entire medical profession and other fields too, like academia etc, this will also be the moment in mankinds history where we learn that parasites are causing cancer or rather is cancer and STD's and other medical conditions like diabetes, autism, etc, and that the edomite death cult have known about the parasites for thousands of years, since ancient egypt.
also parasites is the casue of faggorty and trannyism, and also entirely possible that there are parasites that make people susceptible to suggestions rather than direct orders, and promiscuity.

these fields and professions will turn inside out and restructured and so on.
>>
I look and act like that
>>
>chemical weapons are less destructive
ding ding sing, you got the answer!

Why would the kike-masons in Geneva allow gentiles to settle their conflicts with less deadly and less destructive weapons????
>>
>>536867792
Chemical weapons aren't controlled. You can't control the wind.
>>
nerve gas is horrific
>>
>>536868048
>I CANT STOP THINKING ABOUT COVID
>>
>>536866848
Because the countries which have nuclear weapons want to keep them for only themselves to enforce a monopoly on all power. Next question.
>>
>>536866848
That's electrocution though.
>>
>>536866848
nobody wants to die like that.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.