[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: tndsykurom6h1.jpg (108 KB, 640x800)
108 KB JPG
>>
>>536868039
Kill all the banana hoarding monkeys
>>
Show me a lazy, retarded asshole who wants handouts from everybody else and I'll show you someone who wouldn't give a dime to someone in a worse situation.
>>
>>536868039
The monkeys would chimp out if this happened
>>
Wealth isn't a negative sum game in a capitalistic system doe.
>>
>>536868741
zero sum game*
>>
>>536868039
If I made two dollars this bitch would ask me for one.

What the government prints musk isn't my buisness. The fact they print at all is.
>>
>>536868741
except wealth absolutly is zero sum game, you absolute retard

imagine that i am a "helpfull genie", lets say musk is worth 1 trilion$, so i gave every hunan on earth 1 trilion$ free of charge. how much is musk worth then? or more how much is 1t$ worth? nothing
in reality you can only be "rich" if "poor mases" exist, in "communism/equality" there are no rich
solution to op, is and always was the same: if you starving, eat the rich
>>
File: Tesla lulz.png (551 KB, 4096x2394)
551 KB PNG
>>536868039
Don't worry, most of that wealth doesn't actually exist. Elon's companies are just massively overvalued beyond all belief. But America is enslaved by Jew bankers, so we're forced to play along until the Jews decide its time for another crash so they can wipe out the goy's savings and consolidate even more ownership.
>>
>>536868039
Retarded comprison. He has some papers with numbers on it. The rich don‘t hoard resources, the rest conviced them the paper is worth something. The rources are still in the economy. The paper are just drawing rights.

>monkey hoards thousand banans
>he can never eat these, they go bad heavy etc
>pick hundred worthless leafes from tree
>write „worth ten bananas“ on it
>convice monkey to trade leaf for banana
>promise he can always exchange leaf for fresh banan
>other monkeys can use banana
But what happens if you say leaf not worth ten bananas, only 9, then 8, then 7…
or better: other monkeys say too many leaf, unfair! We will take half of your leaves soon!
What will happen? Monke trades leaf for as many banan as fast as he can, because if he waits, he loses. So one monkey has all banans again and the others just the worthless leafes. Congratulations.

It’s double retarded because Forbes math is not money. Its not 1.33T Dollars. It’s 1.33T mathematical coefficient. Good luck taxing it
>>
>>536868310
Chimpanzees aren’t monkeys
>>
>>536869327
> wealth absolutly is zero sum game
Bait or retarded?
Where did the first wealth come from? From whom was it stolen? Dinosaurs? Why does anything valueable even exist if win-win is impossible?

in reality you can only be "rich" if "poor mases" exist. Braindead. Absolutely braindead. Voluntary win win transactions are a thing due to efficiency assymetries.

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/8SYIksrZeu4?ra=m
>inb4 it doesnt work like this.
It works exactly like this. Becoming a forbes billionaire is the easy part, finding a bank giving you a line of credit for your stock it is the hard part, because thats how they finance themselves
>>
>>536868039
$1 trillion in intangible assets means nothing. If he tried to liquidate even just $10 billion at once it would crash the value of his assets hard
>>
>>536868039

it's not possible to hoard infinite cash
>>
>>536869883

The rich absolutely do hoard resources. Bill Gates is the biggest landlord in the US, wealth in UK is overwhelmingly tied to property ownership, wealth in Australia and Canada means control over the natural resources. Only stupid goyim think wealth is a "non zero sum game in a capitalist economy", because we're not in 1850 anymore with half of the US, the whole South America and Australia to explore and mine. Every acre of land is owned. Wealth is the ownership of resources; and any more wealth to Elon Musk means less wealth for the goyim.
>>
>>536869562
This. People think the "wealthy" have a vault of readily available cash or a gold coin pool like Scrooge McDuck just sitting there, when it's all speculative. Obviously they have enough on hand to do whatever they want, but the analogy is a poor one because bananas are readily available to eat. A "net worth" is not only whatever cash you have on hand, it's the value of everything you own combined.
If Elon Musk sold Tesla tomorrow, then he'd have that actual money, but no one on Earth is going to buy the entirety of Tesla for near a Trillion Dollars. It's all fake and bullshit.
>>
>>536868222
this is all it boils down to; people upset that THEY aren't also a billionaire
they consider success a zero-sum game and if somehow they could topple the board and start everyone over, they genuinely believe they wouldn't be on the bottom rung yet again while smarter people fill the vacuum
>>
>>536870884

No, good goyim believe that wealth is the number of shares evaluated by Mr Shekelberg without conceiving that this is just psy op for your good goyim, while Elon Musk buys a massive amount of properties, land, factories, mines... to consolidate his ownership of real resources.
>>
>>536869562
What does valuing mean, genius? All those people put their money in Tesla, validating the valuation.
Same with the spaceX IPO. People are betting spaceX will colonize the moon and Mars since it's the company closest to doing it. If the Chinese could produce a better rocket the money would run there. It's a mad race to a result, not a random bet. In the case of Tesla making electric cars mainstream was the bet and against all expectations it has delivered by driving competition and the fact the energy-scarce west wants an alternative to the gasoline it lacks
>>
>>536868039
What a retarded tweet. Try this:

> If a monkey organized a banana plantation that produced vastly more bananas than any other, leaving a surplus for himself and his workers, he would be crowned the king of monkeys.
>>
>>536868039
If a monkey has all banans then he is the most succesful monkey and he have a harem of female monkeys to procreate with.

this would be a totally legitimate monkey strategy in evolutionary terms.
>>
>>536868039
Why don't the monkeys take the bananas back? Are they stupid? Might makes the right and there's more of them. The banana lord probably was stealing from them too.
>>
File: image-7.png (97 KB, 487x796)
97 KB PNG
>>536868039
Monkeys have territories, militaries, gangs, spies, criminals, and prostitution rings.
Apes form 'countries' and wage wars.
>>
>>536871379

The lion king isn't always defeated in a 1vs1 fair and square fight, two lions can team up to bring him down. But if 1000 angry goyim show in front of the white house to ask for explanations regarding the billions send to Ukraine and Israel, Trump and his president Kushner will deploy the army to molest them.
>>
We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.
- William J. Casey, Director of Central Intelligence, 1981-1987
>>
>>536870856
You are right, they would be stupid not to trade their worthless paper for actual resources over time. But they don’t even count to their valuation. Gates is a lot richer than musk. People not even on the forbes list are a lot richer than gates, if we take actual valuable things into account. Old banking families basically own everything. But this hurr durr Musk Trillionaire talk just makes stupid people focus on th wrong things. There are absolutely wealthy people who actually have stuff you can take from them. But they try their best to never show up. And I dont wan‘t to defend frontman Elon either, it’s just that while the anger may be justified, the rage is misdirected.

Win-win is almost dead because taxes, interest, beaurocracy, etc make most not worth conducting for the ordinary man. Efficiency potentials have almost dried up for the ordinary man so he can just sell his time. Eliminate taxes for transactions and voluntary transactions increase manyfold.
Generally more win-win = more solved problems. Why would anyone do a transaction if it wasn’t win win? Thats would be coercion (or stupidity, but people should be free to do stupid transactions, as long as they are voluntary)
>>
>>536871592
as it should be. the weak must be crushed by the strong.
>>
Is she stupid? The other monkeys would just steal the bananas or kill the hoarder monkey and then steal the bananas. What a terrible analogy.
>>
>>536871099

> People are betting spaceX will colonize the moon and Mars

No people aren't that stupid. This weird system where wealth isn't priced by the quality of what comes from the earth but the whims of Mr Shekelberg requires the line to go up (Trump confirmed it, he doesn't care about Americans standard livings as long as his portfolio goes up), so it's a whole game of frantically trying to ride on bubbles before they burst.

> You're jealous, you just have to do the same

Which I do, but 12% return when you have 10k doesn't make you closer to own estates.
>>
>>536868039
bananas rot. blam. next cope
>>
File: IMG_5957.jpg (337 KB, 981x1000)
337 KB JPG
>>536868039
Dumb bitch has never heard of a squirrel?
>>
>>536871777
What if the one monkey picked all the bananas and the others just don’t know how? Evident by them not having any. You can steal them yes, but only once. Where do the future banans comes from?
You need a way to get the banans while also making the monkey who picks it keep picking them. How?
See: >>536869883

Truth is, there are not that many actual hyperproductive people who can solve problems on a large scale (anons know elon is neither but lets pretend for sake of argument). You need to incite over-proportionally productive people with the chance for overproportional reward to make them actually use their time and effort to be productive and take the risk of doing so. If they can aswell neet easily and get fed and housed for free, they will never produce anything for anybody, why should they? If you actually demonise them and threaten to take their (already purely abstract) wealth as well the Risk/Reward calculation doesn’t work out. No innovation happens, nothing gets better, only things slowly worse. We are already there. Whites, the only people intelligent and industrious enough to actually solve problems are checking out of the economy and wont risk anything to keep the system alive. Rightly so.
>>
>>536871663

There is no more much gains to reap from optimizing the economy. In 1950, 30% of an oil barrel was dumped into the sea. In 2020, 99% is used to crack gasoline, jet fuel, naphtas, heating oil, diesel, heavy leftovers are used to build road etc...

So yeah we live now in a zero sum game and we can not "build more house", it's either seizing from Elon and the boomers worshipping him and Israel, or sleeping in the streets.
>>
>>536868039
But the monkey doesn't have 1.33 trillion bananas, he has quite a bit of bananas but most of his bananas are theoretical bananas people would pay him for if he sold off a portion of his banana farms. He doesn't have the bananas on hand.
>>
>>536872266
There is still a lot of things to be invented. Problem is many technologies get you killed or are patented to death while never used to actually improve things.
Or the entry barriers to actually produce and market them are too high. Small innovators get threatened with lawfare, biught for cheaps and their tech never sees the light of day. But this is a different problem. Add inflation to make people poorer each year while having to working harder. The human spirit of ingenuity is supressed, thats the problem.

Ask who prints the money first before you ask who has it. Because if you print enough of it, regardless where you place it in the economy, over time it will always land in the same hands.
So in a Fiat system the assymetry of possibility-potential for individuals steadily increases. Meaning people become more impotent to actually start to produce something, innovation gets harder, entry barriers increase (gatekeeping by large companies who should have failed decades ago), concentration of wealth and power increases, all gets syphoned to a few… almost if by design.
>>
>>536870923
nah, if i was that wealthy i wouldnt give a shit about my faggot shareholders or profit i would just buy cool shit and enrich my friends and family and give homeless people $10k to do funny shit like push-ups and stuff
>>
File: file.png (91 KB, 294x292)
91 KB PNG
they dont hoard bananas cause they spend it all on little monkey prostitutes
>>
>>536868039
>how did that monkey get so many bananas?
>the other monkeys just kept giving it to him for something in return.
>oh
>>
>billionaires have money piled up in some vault like Scrooge McDuck
This is the mental landscape of your average leftist.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.