[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now closed. Thanks to all who applied!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1647794937775.jpg (230 KB, 898x1080)
230 KB JPG
Something I've never understood about leftists, Marxists, or whatever you want to call them is their incessant need to tear down norms, hierarchies, and structures.
For instance, for a long time now, I've heard that traditional beauty standards (like what this woman adheres to) need to be torn down.
That men shouldn't prefer women like this. They should instead prefer fat black women, apparently.
Why, though?
>>
>>536883980
interesting, i mostly hear the same stuff from rightists, Capitalists, or whatever
>>
>>536883980
It's neuroticism. Norms imply the possibility of failure and exclusion, which makes them nervous.

They like one specific type of norm: obedience to the party line. You don't need any particular ability for this, you just need to be servile.
>>
They want to make you miserable while you live in a capitalist society to make living in a coommunist one seem more palatable.
>>
>>536883980
That's because most of their leaders are agents trying to cause mayhem for other countries that pay them, aka Hasan. It's been a thing since the end of WW2.
>>
File: IMG_7865.jpg (314 KB, 1179x1738)
314 KB JPG
>>536883980
I have literally never met someone who does this. Sounds like a psyop to me.
>>
>>536883980
Don't focus on what they're tearing down, but that they're not replacing it with anything. Chaos in this form is driven from above. Ask a leftist what a great world looks like, what their neighborhood and neighbors look like, what their job is like in the perfect liberal world. They will not answer, because they don't have any idea what they want. The end result is never considered.
>>
>>536883980
Its because ugly leftist landwales are spiteful of women more attractive than them and want to tear them down. That's it, its really that simple.
>>
>>536884098
are you dumb? why wage a culture war if you don't want the culture to change? fuckin' tard
>>
>>536883980
Read Kulaks lates post on idolatry. You’ll understand exactly what you are wondering about.
>>
>>536883980
They need to drag everyone to their level
>>
>>536883980
in their eyes norms are a form of oppression by those in power. as they won't to overthrow those in power they need to fight their norms too. they don't realize that many of those norms have natural causes.
>>
File: IMG_6872.jpg (62 KB, 1283x452)
62 KB JPG
>>536884326
forgot pic
>>
File: IMG_7882.jpg (61 KB, 600x880)
61 KB JPG
communist parties contain democratic processes with every detail (like voting to allow me to just listen and not participate for example) in the party this kind of shit would get thrown out by everybody atleast where i have been
t. knower of commie party politics and people
>>
>>536883980
>their incessant need to tear down norms, hierarchies, and structures

That's the whole point.
>>
>>536883980
(((they))) just want to tear down all orders of the European people
>>
>>536884098
No you haven't
>>
>>536883980
>Why, though?
Because destroying hierarchies means equality, and when you are a spiteful mutant you want to tear down the good and beautiful to your level since you can never reach their height.
>>
>>536884255
>are you dumb?
are you?
>why wage a culture war if you don't want the culture to change?
Answer depends on the answer of who is waging the culture war?
>fuckin' tard
leafs are a type of nigger who can't think beyond leaps
>>
>>536884577
No! You haven't.
>>
File: 1699647276266939.jpg (272 KB, 995x889)
272 KB JPG
>>536883980
>Why, though?
Huh?
They want you to die.
Whatever comes out of their mouth is just whatever noises they think will make you easier to kill.

You were actually trying to "interpret" those sounds? As if they were meant to communicate?
>>
>>536884664
>nigger
Um sweetie, its workers of the WORLD unite. Not specifically and only white people you racist.
>>
>>536883980
Honestly I'm an economic leftist but I agree that progressives are retarded about age gaps and beauty standards. I don't want a fat, ugly, wrinkly, old woman. Girls should be cute, thin, and young (preferably underage).
>>
>>536883980
Wow. 10/10
>>
>>536884098
Only if your definitions of "norms" apply exclusively, selfishly, to a single lifetime, and not to history.

Sorry faggot my ancestors were right about 99% of the time.
>>
>>536884731
>They want you to die.
not follows your >picrel
since OP is not White
>>
File: Ygritte.jpg (168 KB, 1240x1594)
168 KB JPG
>>536883980
If her eyes were farther apart, she would look like a book-accurate Ygritte.
>>
>>536884167
/pol/ is a Plato's Cave of chuds learning about leftists not from ever interacting with leftists themselves but just other chuds projecting the most extreme literally whos on the wall.
>>
>>536883980
if you want the intellectual justification for it you have to go back to hegel, but for 99% it is just that they are driven by resentiment. which is not unique to leftists.
>>
>>536884800
You want government to be heavily involved in the economy? Why?
>>
>>536884783
Only group i see uniting is the parasite niggerkikejeetanglochinkchonkarabicmedeterreniancuckfaggoteuropeans who congregate at billionaire exclusive events, sport games, diddy parties, stock exchanges, hotels, restaurants, wine cellars, courthouses, parliaments and congresses
>>
>>536884481
Lmao you sound like an absolute gaylord.

>>536884167
>It never happened! Don't trust your lying eyes!!!
lol this creature just babbles an approximation of speech so you lower your weapon, it doesn't communicate.
>>
File: 1780417160361772.jpg (56 KB, 990x660)
56 KB JPG
>>536885004
much work is done when workers are united i guess, lmao
>>
>>536884956
humans in general need limits and order because otherwise they will act egoistically and like degenerates
>>
>>536883980
It’s driven by resentment, it’s score settling. ugly women want to break down beauty standards because they can’t match up to them and feel inferior, that’s too pathetic to admit straight up so they frame it as something moral and virtuous, combatting the male gaze, diversity and inclusion, dismantling the patriarchy etc. etc. when in reality an ugly bitch is triggered every time she sees a woman better looking than her, leftism is driven by raw biological resentment and feeling of inferiority, the strong, the healthy, the powerful, the beautiful, the independent will always be its target
>>
File: 1365.gif (330 KB, 387x305)
330 KB GIF
>>536885004
ohh, i almost forgot
PALACES, right
>>
It's not a hard concept, or maybe you are just asking a rhetoric question. They want to tear down whitey (previously monarchs, christians etc but I mean they were whitey too obviously) institutions, because if they cause chaos and enshitification and poor conditions, they can possibly take over. And also get back at whites and see them suffer.

Their goals might or might not included planned economy nowadays, they can be flexible about that as long as they get whitey out of the picture. Because whitey might have children who might become engineers and doctors, who might challenge the "elites", who might literally be the next hitler. Whitey also refused to do the communist revolution for most part because technology and shit already made everyone's lives better already at least until some point. So you need to punish whitey by taking in brown people who might or might not be lefties but definitely won't be a serious problem and they can be used to offset whitey. Just do everything to get even one whitey aborted or not even conceived, every whitey counts, and bring in two browns. Do this consistently.
>>
>>536883980
Heiarxhies built on anything but meritocracy deserve to be destroyed. Monarchies are the most faggot cuck shit imaginable.
>>
>>536884956
Because capitalism is obviously a terrible system that is destroying the world. The wealth of the people should go towards the good of the people. I want the wealth generated by my labour to be used to fund public education, healthcare, housing, etc, not shipped overseas into the bank account of some billionaire or mega corporation. Capitalism is the reason for the decline of the west. Socialism is obviously superior.
>>
File: IMG_7705.jpg (130 KB, 996x961)
130 KB JPG
>>536884955
Have you actually read the material? It’s quite difficult compared to mein kampf I know because I didn’t bother with it all. You know these people are unserious. Their interpretations are the way they are because they are not interested in actual change. They aren’t even real.
>>
File: 1780567262182562.jpg (58 KB, 850x972)
58 KB JPG
>>536883980
Leftist idelogy is a poison made by a jew, simple as.
>>
>>536883980

Because leftists are nothing but spoiled, immature and retarded children at heart. They can't fathom anything beyond what they can sense.
>>
>>536885070
Spoken like a true cog in a machine. You don't care what the machine does, just so long as you're part of a machine. Degeneracy only thrives when daddy government protects it from Natural Law.

Hey jackass, the last 150 years has seen an exponential INCREASE in government involvement with the economy, would you say the degeneracy and egoism have decreased or increased huh?
>>
>>536885007
You sound like a loser to me lol
>>
>>536884098
This. It's pushed by marketing and the New Left, not Marxists
>>
>>536885177
socialism in the sense of marxism obviously isn't superior, capitalism clearly won over it. but national socialism or socialist market economies could be.
>>
>>536884949
>Video and text do NOT EXIST okay?!
>>
File: essence-of-communism.jpg (87 KB, 1024x897)
87 KB JPG
>>536883980
>>
Americans belong in woodchippers.
>>
File: 1780209487982857.png (139 KB, 976x850)
139 KB PNG
>>536883980
might makes right, everything else is cope.
if im a peasant im gonna envy the king, and i will take everything he has and crown myself a new king.
everything retorical retort to this is just moralfag cope.
the bolsheviks were in their right in killing the tsar because they could do it.
nothing more than this-
discourse about hierarchies, spiteful mutants is just plain old cope of the new slave.
the powerful sets the new trend and normies just go along with it.
>>
>>536883980
>Why, though?
Because Marxism is THE modern, secular form of satinism - a death cult - whose main philosophy as well as strategy consists of reversing cause and effect for maximum destruction and corruption.
>>
>>536885186
no i haven't read hegel or marx.
>>
>>536884215
They have goals like people should all look different and speak different languages and have nothing in common but also get equal living standard everywhere regardless of input. And also, anal sex and not having offspring is sacred. That's the utopia.

I almost forgot. Capitalism is forbidden unless you sell ass (pictures) or hard drugs. Then you can do capitalism.
>>
>>536883980
The entire premise of everything they do is using fascism as a tool to tear shit apart and repurpose it into worse forms of what they already had while spreading supplies so thin nothing is functional at an effective capacity.
Their ideations are not built on progressive thought of building capacitance which is why every place you see the fuckers literally everybody is poor and in bad health.
It's extremist subsistence culture refined to a maximum and the guy who steals and kills the most gets to control what industry they destroy next.
Why would you assume that these rules don't also apply to how they approach cultural and social nomenclature? It's literally why every historian, tactician, prime minister etc throughout time who isn't retarded told us they're violently retarded motherfuckers and to kill them like parasites before the entire world is infected with civically necrotic delusions of grandeur.
>>
>>536885177
>fund public education
Holy shit of all the bad ideas in human history you're actually doubling down on one of the worst, provably, patently worst, by every metric.

>not shipped overseas into the bank account of some billionaire or mega corporation.
>If the government doesn't control trade all those government enforced monopolies and government enforced multi national policies will take all our money
Nigger.
>>
>>536885410
thats right and what makes something powerful is the peoples will
>>
>>536885275
What should I care about what you say you think, you're a walking corpse lol.
>>
>>536883980
Beauty is supremacy, ugliness is equality. It's as simple as that.
>>
>>536885410
>>536885550
>Heh the most le FUKKED UP psychos always win!!!
Spoken like faggots who always lose. You're bad at war. People who talk like you are bad at war.
>>
>>536885313
>>536885509
You're both brainwashed into tonguing billionaire assholes. The people who control the world are laughing as you two fiercely defend the right of the ultra rich to get even richer.
>>
>>536885582
I really don’t care what you think sorry im just here for the intelligent ones
>>
>>536885242
over thousands of years pretty much every form of state or empire has been authoritarian or totalitarian in some form and they all created or followed the known forms of order etc. the change came with the uprise of liberalism which is economic liberalism but also individualistic liberalism.

what you see nowadays in the west is way less government involvement as what is historically usual
>>
File: brrvrvr.png (26 KB, 900x840)
26 KB PNG
>>536885697
moralfaggot cope
>>
>>536885733
sapient ones
>>
>>536883980
Don't confuse the people who want to push idpol with people who actually have beliefs.
>>
>>536883980
You have never read a single word of Marxist literature. If you did you would realise that it is Capitalism that has promoted Blacks and constantly changes beauty standards to fit the latest marketing campaign.
>>
>>536885724
i'm for disowning billionaires. that doesn't mean i can't see that certain systems simply don't work
>>
>>536885724
>The people who control the world are laughing as you two fiercely defend the right of the ultra rich to get even richer.
LMAO the people who control the world have exclusively pushed for more control between government and business for 150 years straight.
>>
>>536883980
The left is inherently anti-hierarchical so all their policies and initiatives aim to reduce hierarchies. If this is not possible, for example in government, they aim for an approach that maximizes consensus or an even playing field. A leftist fundamentally sees a hierarchy as an artificial (unnatural) system that produces oppression of some while benefitting others which is viewed as an injustice that needs to be corrected. Leftist politics looks at a system only through the lense of its weakest and strongest elements,m. The weakest need to be lifted the strongest need to be torn down.
>>
>>536885876
See this, this makes you look retarded.
>>
>>536883980
I can sum up their beliefs in one sentence: If you don't technically HAVE to do something, you SHOULDN'T do it.
>>
>>536885004
>blah blah i'm a poorfag and society and tradition

We know.
>>
>>536885802
>Being good at war is a moralfag cope
You're bad at war lol get in the skull pyramid.
>>
>>536883980
They think they're being productive. Things "CAN" be revised so they think libertine attitudes which tear down systems count as productivity because something is technically being done, they think they're advancing not realising they've faced the wrong way and are in fact regressing.
>>
>>536885386
And this is the main reason why I refuse to view communism as a viable form of governance. Thank you for demonstraiting.
>>
>>536883980
The are authoritarian in nature. They are the most racists ones but they hide their horrible nature by pointing out "more horrible" people on a surface level. They're also retarded. You could spend hours trying to make them understand that lowering the requisites to enter university for blacks implies admitting that they are literally so retarded that they cannot succeed in something equal for everyone because they are retarded. But somehow when you complain about this single nigger that acts retarded because he tried to behead a dude in broad daylight while screaming Allahu ratbar, they will call you racist, nazi and hitler. Leftards in general are mentally challenged. You can save some, but most of them are unworthy of your sympathy.
>>
>>536885799
hahahaha retard we're living in the age of the highest centralization of power in history. Empires where the emperor was declared a God were less centralized than ANY nation on the planet today.

Do you think the past was like a video game or a jewish TV show about fantasy times and there were town guards on every street corner telling people not to steal chickens?
>>
>>536885186
>literal jews
>actually guys they were the anti-jews
Is this the christcuck cope but for communism?
>>
File: IMG_6397.png (1.03 MB, 1500x2542)
1.03 MB PNG
>>536883980
It’s for attention.
Post this copy pasta at lefties until they get it through their thick skulls

They are retarded like women, nothing they say matters
Will you Libs for ONCE in your mistaken existence SHUT THE FUCK UP. Every word that comes out of your fucking STI-crawling mouths is inane and only ever amounts to "waaaah I wasn't given the attention I thought I deserved growing up".
For 30 years you've wasted your fucking time posting your hollow meaningless babble at us real humans trying to have actual conversations, and for all your literal-shitposting you NEVER EVEN POST ANYTHING FUNNY. Nobody. Fucking. CARES.

SILENCE.
>>
>>536884664
whose the one pushing diversity, feminism and lgbt? changing demographics, proclaiming multiculturalism? yea thats what i thought.
>>
>>536885304
Marxism = jew cultural marxism
They are the same thing retard
>>
>>536883980
Beauty is historically contingent, socially produced, and often shaped by class relations and modes of production. Also you can't lump every marxist in one bag because lots of them have different takes on beauty, like Lukács , Morrism the Frankfurt School dudes (Adorno iirc) and some post colonial Marxists.
>>
>>536886146
this is the only thing every leftist has in common. The. Only. Thing.
>>
>>536886146
That's only the belief of the lowest level white initiates, everyone with any power, and anyone nonwhite, just wants whites dead, whatever justifications come out of their mouths are post hoc.
>>
>>536883980
So-called "revolutionaries" only want to put themselves at the top, but have no path to the top within the current system, so they have to tear down the system to install their new one, which is typically nothing more than an inversion of the old one.
>war is peace
>freedom is slavery
>beauty is ugliness
etc. Since leftists are universally ugly and still angry that they didn't have sex when they were in high school, they have to tear down beautiful White women to make themselves feel better.
>>
>>536884949
>no true scotsman
This is the best argument /leftypol/ can come up these days. They even tried adopting racism to "convert" people to their religion and its still not working. LMFAO.

Ok, go ahead and name one single living communist that isn't a complete faggot.
>>
>>536885912
There is a lot of truth to that but during the woke period they used resentful leftists to push it in the media and culture under the guise of moral progress,, it also took the leftists focus off wealth inequality, capitalism is beyond left and righti anyway, they’ll use both sides depending on the circumstance, post occupy Wall Street they went with the leftists, Post October 7th they’ve swung back towards conservatives, it’s all rigged
>>
>>536886236
I’m just stating my experience. Results may vary dramatically obviously. You are not very bright.
>>
>>536885912
It’s kikes either way you push marxism to bow down to kikes

the left is allowed to criticize israel because they lump them in with whites, the left is an entirely astroturfed movement that doesn't actually stand for anything puppeteered by jews, the right is controlled opposition but there is a genuine right wing, the people on the right who the jews hate are the only genuine political actors, and in a healthy nation it would be something like libertarian vs authoritarian with the entire left removed from power or deported (the browns and jews).
>>
File: IMG_7167.jpg (109 KB, 680x463)
109 KB JPG
>>536886470
This
>>
>>536886505
CIA pushes new left garbage all over because the old left is a major threat.
>>
>>536886683
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Left
>>
>>536886364
>They are retarded like women
Literally every single political issue that can be measured with statistics falls almost perfectly on an axis of White-VS-Brown and Man-VS-Woman.

Humorously, the more formal education you receive, the more like a black woman you vote and poll on all issues, with black women being the lowest achieving group in human history across literally all metrics.
>>
>>536886505
>there is a lot of truth to that
I've never seen any. At best I get false conspiracy theories about occupy wall street(always false I was literally there) and other such copes where in essence they frame communists essentially as equivalent to nazis which is humorous considering how nazis rose to power and what they did to communists.
>>
>>536886683
Not really you can’t adopt spiritual marxism and be based
That was a bunch of drugged up narcissistic boomers that couldn’t figure out the whole circus

Some of the violent uprisings to get labor unions in the 1890s was pretty cool but that actually helped people fight kikes that were making people miserable
>>
>>536886146
Yeah that's how they sell it: if everyone is brought down the lowest common denominator, then no one is no longer ugly, poor, disabled, alienated etc. This can be seen in every aspect of life but school is one of the most important ones. Everyone needs to be brought together and when everyone will obviously (by design) not perform to the same level, we need to lower the bar.

Meanwhile the leaders, who are so pure even their shit doesn't stink, coincidentally put their children to schools with zero browns or retarded freaks, and the kids will never lack anything in their lives. Every morning these "elites" go to their political jobs and make sure that if some lower middle class people try to escape, like trying to move their kid to a different school to study better, they try to make it illegal to do so.

They really want to kill whitey and unfortunately half of whites are still having kids to some extent, so they need to enshitify neighborhoods and schools to make up for it.
>>
>>536886683
CIA pushes leftism. Old and new leftism are identical.
>>
File: 1683448654380803.png (772 KB, 961x552)
772 KB PNG
>>536886505
Lmao this retard thinks there was a "woke period" that started in his lifetime.
>>
>>536883980
Spiteful. Mutants. You dumb nigger.
>>
>>536886461
Correct, there are various flavors, but their anti-hierarchical stance unites them all.
>>536886470
>post-hoc
Absolutely correct. This metaphysical foundation is a nice abstract POV but probably only explains the behavior of a very autistic minority within the left. As social and power-seeking creatures humans often care very little about what their political group actual stands for as long as its benefits them. Niggers love the left because it gives them free reign in hating white people. White shitlib women love transgender freaks because it makes them feel good about themself etc.
>>
>>536886857
I wish it really did.
>>
>>536885177
>Socialism is obviously superior.
Just socialism or national socialism?
>>
>>536886289
They are enemy foot soldiers and they want to kill you and they will ignore all the evidence of stuff like plenty of white nations being under the boot and enslaved too (slave trade, soviet union, not white but japanese were nuked twice etc) but once the conditions got normal, it takes only 1-2 generations for them to thrive again.
>>
>>536886787
> they frame communists essentially as equivalent to nazis
Communists are infinitely worse than Nazis lmao and I don't even like the Nazis (because they didn't do a real holocaust when they should have).
>>
>>536886906
They don't actually believe that but they think by pushing this narrative they can reconcile with right wingers and larp as racists to try and achieve communism. They are ultimately parasites trying to leech off the far rights momentum. Ultimately they want to subvert a far right violent revolution into a communist one. Kike behavior, the kind of behavior they claim is evil but of course for their cause of raising their status in society there is no such thing as immorality.
>>
>>536886740
except birth rates
>>
File: 1759038024651063.jpg (169 KB, 1024x987)
169 KB JPG
>>536886979
I wish it didn't.
>>
>>536883980
>to tear down norms, hierarchies, and structures.
It is not about tear down norms, hierarchies, and structures, but to make their own
>>
>>536886455
Yeah you probably like a cheeseburger because your god le society told you so not because it is rich of basic nutrients.
>>
>>536886455
>Beauty is historically contingent, socially produced, and often shaped by class relations and modes of production.
False until you actually prove it.
>>
>>536886470
>and anyone nonwhite, just wants whites dead, whatever justifications come out of their mouths are post hoc.
Why do you think that is?
>>
>>536886683
The old left focused on class and wealth inequality, the new left focuses on race and gender and you are right it’s pushed by the CIA, they even pushed abstract art, they’ve done incredible damage to the western world, people don’t like to hear it but commies like Stalin and Fidel Castro were more socially conservative than Donald Trump or any modern conservative
>>
>>536887407
cause white is inherently right
>>
>>536886850
That’s why the left often feels sinister. At the end of the day the people in power couldn’t give less of a shit about the people they rule over, but they always hide behind this veil of righteousness. They destroy productive systems like merit-based education without having any skin in the game themselves. A hardcore rightoid will say he hates retards and then go on to kill them. A leftoid will say he loves retards but then silently removes himself and his family from the retards.
>>
>>536886455
Kill all pilpulin sophist communists right now.
Also, look at how he video of the nigger toddlers systematically choosing the white doll, and tell me they’ve been indoctrinated by white supremacy (when they can’t even be “indoctrinated” to recognize themselves in the mirror).
>>
>>536883980
They’re revolutionaries, they literally want to burn down everything that society requires to effectively function so that they can rebuild it as they think it should be.
>>
File: frankfurt school.jpg (622 KB, 1154x1556)
622 KB JPG
>>536883980
"Leftism" was designed to destroy western civilization by destroying it from within at it's most fundamental levels. Family, nation, tradition, history, faith and, arguably it's understanding of reality. The bolshevik kikes that theorized and taught it want to turn everyone's perception of reality upside down. They sell it in a pretty lie, but fundamentally it's a psychotic death cult. Hence why as Sowell explained it so well. “Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good.”
"Leftism" is at perpetual psychological and socioeconomic war with natural order, human nature and, functioning civilization. Because as long as those exist normal people aren't stupid enough to choose communism without having been completely brainwashed from birth.
>>
>>536886534
You were "just stating" that all americans should be thrown into wood chippers, and I responded that such sentiments are why Im uninterested in communism.
How does that make me unintelligent?
>>
>>536883980
The only structure I want to tear down is her sphincter
>>
>>536887522
At least where I live, a lot of common lefties suddenly grow "right-wing" values in situations such as
>they get offspring and the offspring has to go to school but they find out the school is 50% non-whites and even some whites are criminal slavs
This is where they suddenly remember they like the countryside more and move to an area with 90% white school.
>they start earning serious money with their company or they get money/fame by other means
Then they suddenly grow a sense of what's their money and what's other people's money and start living comfy millionaire lifestyle.

Of course there are some genuine lefties who are probably on a spectrum who would genuinely put their child to get stomped in a multicultural school and continue living in a shitty apartment even if they got millions, and they would just donate the millions to poor or something. Maybe these exist.
>>
>>536886455
Ok so you can't tell beautiful people when you see them.
>>
>>536883980
>For instance, for a long time now, I've heard that traditional beauty standards (like what this woman adheres to) need to be torn down.
>That men shouldn't prefer women like this. They should instead prefer fat black women, apparently.
That's not what "tearing down beauty standards" means, you fucking retard. Go ahead and like what you like, nobody gives a shit. It's about broadening the scope what is presented as beautiful across society and media. No cuts, only additions.
Get over your fucking victim complex holy shit dude.
>>
>>536886683

>old left
>new left

Nope, they're both the same retarded Marx worshiping dipshits.
>>
>>536883980
>why, though?
They are satanic
>>
>>536883980
The norms, traditions, and hierarchies are a threat to their own worldview.

Also GirlMath has some videos on "levels". Basically levels of consciousness. Not sure what it's derived from, but the breakdown makes a lot of sense. By those metrics, your typical wont-stfu and injects politics into everything type leftist would be the "enforcers". Pretty low level of consciousness, where they're not a total bum / criminal tier retard, but kind of a doofus who doesn't realize how little they know about the world, but thinks they have all the answers. Dangerous in large numbers, hence shit like the COVID lockdowns.
>>
>>536887921
>beautiful
i think the word you're looking for is pretty
>>
File: IMG_9250.jpg (24 KB, 320x333)
24 KB JPG
>>536887752
The Frankfurt school and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
>>
>>536887752
One of the primary factors to accomplish this for "leftism" cultural Marxism is though extreme psychological manipulation through continuous systematic demoralization. Hence their perpetual war with cultural norms and positive attributes like beauty and nature. Why do you think it's devout minions are all bioleninists?
>>
>>536888756
Exactly as they were intended to be
>>
>>536883980
what are conservatives conserving
>>
>>536883980
ask and ye shall receive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVZPYQS1dFA
>>536884215
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0ZTRa4yP-Q
>>
>>536887458
You dont need to do much "pushing" because in todays social discourse every fucking monkey can talk about arbitrary bullshit.
Some guy doesnt like you? Well that has to be the patriarchy or toxic masculinity.
Men dont like fat bitches => patriarchy.
Other bitches dont like you => internalized misogyny.
You arent opera winfrey => must be dey white mang doing evil shit in the background.

While some leftist progressive points have a kernel of truth that still doesnt justify making a mountain out of a molehill. Hence if you say bad word they will make a mountain out of a molehill.

And you can also easily engage in those group dynamic because every idiot can see where the mob with a pitchforking is waddling to.

But then again those points also do apply to the idiotic right, not just the idiotic left.
>>
>>536886381
mostly right wing capitalists and jewish billionaires pushing down labour and supply costs by inserting their golems throughout the economy, how could you tell?
>>
File: 9862987659236.png (404 KB, 698x483)
404 KB PNG
>>536888756
>>
>>536888962
>One of the primary factors to accomplish this for "leftism" cultural Marxism is though extreme psychological manipulation through continuous systematic demoralization. Hence their perpetual war with cultural norms and positive attributes like beauty and nature.
Why don't right-wingers do that in return? Wage total psychological warfare on anti-Whites.
>>
>>536889233
>You dont need to do much "pushing" because in todays social discourse every fucking monkey can talk about arbitrary bullshit.
>Some guy doesnt like you? Well that has to be the patriarchy or toxic masculinity.
>Men dont like fat bitches => patriarchy.
>Other bitches dont like you => internalized misogyny.
>You arent opera winfrey => must be dey white mang doing evil shit in the background.

reminds me of the right who explains everything with jews, niggers or women
>>
>>536883980
Eh, not to be pedantic, but these aren't really orthodox marxists. I'm assuming you think of things such as "wokism" and "woke" stuff; this is simply what normies recognize as postmarxism. Depending on your interests, i could explain the ideological foundations for their reasons and goals or i can explain what i think are the real reasons such people desire to tear down traditional hierarchies.

The real reason, i think, is that a lot of these people are what Ed Dutton calls spiteful mutants. I know it does feel like a very easy copout of just calling them ugly, but a very repeatable pattern you will find with these people is not just that they subconsciously recognize themselves as not beautiful. but also often enhances their unattractiveness by doing stuff like attaching nose rings, piercings, getting tattoos, shaving their head and so on. They want to tear down beauty simply because they are not beautiful themselves. Something Peterson (i know he's a kikelover, i'm just trying to use a good example) said many, many years ago which i still remember is that what we recognize as the modern postmarxist left doesn't really like the poor, they simply hate and despise the rich, probably because they desire their wealth and status. Could go on and probably write a whole dissertation on this if you want, but i think i made it clear and simple enough.
>>
>>536889233
All (((identity politics))) and the worst thought crime of all of them Anti semitism
>>
>>536889695
>they simply hate and despise the rich, probably because they desire their wealth and status

often you see capitalists and libertarians argue like this, they obviously can't imagine that some people just don't like to see other people suffer and want to change that.
>>
>>536884949
I was a leftist for a fair time before gradually becoming a classical liberal to then turn natsoc. I've read leftist theory, i've participated in leftist discourse and so on. I am intimately familiar with leftism as i myself was one for a fair time. You simply can not produce any actual arguments. You can only resort to insults and denial of reality when presented with evidence. 4chins is also otuside of xitter the only place with no heavy censorship, if i go on reddit and attempt to argue in favor of national socialism, i'd simply be banned.

>>536885186
That's not what op's really referring to. The material he'd be referring to were the works of the frankfurt school and more modern postmodern and feminist literature such as Bell hooks, Simone the Bouvoir and judith butler and so on. Marxism-leninism isn't really that relevant when it comes to this topic.
>>
>>536889557
>reminds me of the right who explains everything with jews, niggers or women
In what way are we wrong in that though? How many examples of each would you like?
>>
>>536889557
Yeah and eventually you kinda have a self fulfilling prophecy to some degree.
>>
>>536883980
because far-leftists are spiteful mutant, dysgenic circus freaks who hate everything that reminds them of this fact. Beautiful people are also a glaring symbol of genetic determinism and thus unfairness. Leftists hate being told that there are things about them set in stone that cannot be changed that will determine the trajectory of their lives. Raging against all standards, such as beauty, is their way of coping. If only their asymmetrical, subhuman selves could be seen as beautiful then maybe they won't feel so bad contrasted with someone actually beautiful. Ugly people should be regarded with suspicion until they can prove their humanity.
>>
>>536890052
1. i'm neither a capitalist nor a libertarian
2, of course i can believe that simply wanting things to be better for people, but more often than not i also see a lot of these types of people being excessive consumerists and simply want more money to spend on consumerism. Simply boiling everything down to "we are the good guys who want people to have it good and you are the bad guys who want people to have it bad" is kindergarten level thinking.
>>
>>536883980
>I'm confusing Marxism with feminism
>>
>>536883980
That bitch is not attractive to me
>>
File: liberal empathy.jpg (677 KB, 1536x1764)
677 KB JPG
>>536890052
>often you see capitalists and libertarians argue like this, they obviously can't imagine that some people just don't like to see other people suffer and want to change that.

This statement oozes so much fucking projection you should be sued by IMAX for posting it. God you argue like an insufferable cunt. You assume the reason people are "not helping" (doing what you want) is apathy and not for a reason. In context to you not liking the rich it implies that the only way to be rich is to be apathetic and exploitative. And your "want to change that" in reference to some assumed moral high ground greater good option is left completely undefined and thus immune to scrutiny. There's a fucking reason people like me want to throw people like you out of helicopters.
>>
>>536890523
Under cultural marxism they are both different spectrums of the same end objective.
>>
>>536889557
The difference is that usually leftists usually use these to write excuses for their personal lives. They're fat because the patriarchy made them fat and so on.

I know that there are both personal and non-personal reasons for me for example being a fat fuck. Is it true that corporations create foods so that consumers desire to simply eat non-stop because of the foods bad quality and chemically altered contents? Yes, but i am also personally at fault for not taking better care of my health and being more mindful of what and how much i eat.

Are for example the artificial bonuses given to women, importation of third worlders and other political and private institutional reasons for why my real wage and employment opportunities have diminished over the years? Yes, but that doesn't mean i can just flunk out of high school and college and expect to just get handouts for nothing.

This i rarely see with leftists and african-americans. Although there are of course cases, these are more rare. Like for example, has things like jim-crow, segregation, red-lining and so on made it more difficult for the african-american to attain employment and build economic security? Yes, but that doesn't mean they can constantly chimp out with no consequences.

Responsibility goes both ways, i am responsible for myself and the nation and the nation should be responsible for me. Ideally both parts should uphold their end although doing so is becoming increasingly more difficult and less rewarding.
>>
>>536889557
The identity politics are not going away and it was only a brief moment of some decades where people tried their best to pretend they didn't exists while sun was still shining and all of this could be afforded thanks to surplus of everything.
>>
>>536890802
>in reference to some assumed moral high ground greater good option is left completely undefined and thus immune to scrutiny
this is what probably annoys people the most. 90% of leftist discourse that i've seen the past 10 years have just been an extrapolation of "We're the goodies, you're the baddies, we need to kill the baddies."

They really are like children.
>>
>>536890052
how does it feel knowing that a trillionaire like elon musk, flawed as he is, has done more for humanity than anything your bloodline ever has or will?
>>
>>536883980
They manufacture grievance.
Or they manufacture crisis.
Pick a direction or color
>>
>>536891013
yes i know this phenomen too but it's usually something 1. young and inexperienced or 2. subculture people do or 3. that's generally a thing of the internet and social media. if you take a look at actual political organizations and those of the old left in particular they do serious politics independently of how you or i may think of their concrete political positions

>>536891259
define 'more'. we most likely have very different views on what's good bad for mankind, animals, nature
>>
File: Education.jpg (186 KB, 860x860)
186 KB JPG
>>536891218
>They really are like children.
Why do you think they are so hellbent on having unrestricted access to each new generations children and absolute dominion over their "education"? Liberals are the children that drank the special mouthwash in kindergarten and they never learned to think for themselves again.
>>
>>536891670
>the old left
This i actually agree on. The old left, a.k.a actual marxists and ML's are not nearly as bad as postmarxists, the problem is that there's almost no actual marxists left. Almost all modern leftists parties are postmarxist and not orthodox marxist nor ML's. I think this whole conversation is precisely about postmarxists and not ML's which is an important distinction, it would be like beginning a conversation about libertarians, but then wanting to criticize natsocs or vice-versa.

When most people, especially here, speak about "leftists" they almost always mean postmarxists, postmodernists, third-worldists and progressives and their kind; not really the old left.
>>
>>536891670
>animals, nature
making the first "cool" brand of electric cars that people actually want to drive isn't good for animals and nature?
>mankind
how about starlink?
>>
They dont want to accept some people are actually more competent/attractive/intelligent than others.
>>
>>536892239
>than others
It's not than others, but than themselves. Remember, if these people were attractive they'd constantly bully, demean and make fun of unattractive people. They also usually have an obsessive desire to appear intelligent so you will 9/10 times see them with a bookshelf bigger than the library of alexandria behind them with no books they've actually read on it.
>>
>>536892165
electric cars might or might not be less resource-intense than standard cars but they are still way more damaging than nature, wildlife and so on can handle. it's just some form of replacement and the resources people have "saved" by getting one of those electric cars they spend on building and consuming other thing simply because most people can't get enough

if elon musk or any other of those billionaires wants to do something good for mankind and maybe nature in general then they should teach people to consume less to consume differently to be happy with less to stay in the region they live or on a more political scale help to build so called 15 minutes cities and stuff like that.

he wouldn't stay billionaire for long then though and that's the problem. everyone has interests and the interest of billionaires usually is not to support measures which make them poorer
>>
File: 1781223960041.jpg (36 KB, 616x485)
36 KB JPG
>>536883980
>For instance, for a long time now, I've heard that traditional beauty standards (like what this woman adheres to) need to be torn down.
Nobody on the left believes this, not the parties that actually want to win.
Guess which of these people is a leftist and which is a rightist.
>>
File: feministfrequency.png (231 KB, 395x395)
231 KB PNG
>>536884167
I suppose you weren't around for her?
>>
>>536893112
>Nobody on the left believes this
Guess we've reached the point of just simply denying reality. Next you're gonna tell me no leftists supported the rampant censorship of the 2010s and the floyd riots?
>>
>>536893339
I provided evidence.
>>
>>536893357
>>536893325
>^
>>
>>536892942
>they should teach people to consume less
you must have missed the "minimalism" trend all the rich folks were up to a few years ago, like this guy:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32w1xnOqSPo
it was then lambasted by journalists as a "privileged" choice to make
>>
>>536883980
Throw a brick.
>>
>>536886503
>This is the best argument /leftypol/ can come up these days. They even tried adopting racism to "convert" people to their religion and its still not working
Not sure about le leftypol, but Democrat party openly takes Nick Fuentes's talking points and it is working great for them. They will win midterms
>>
>>536893357
Also it was never about who were more attractive or not. We both can provide hundreds of pics and examples of ugly left and right wingers, but it is the ideological support for the tearing down of those social hierarchies that the left has supported.

>>536893526
>Democrat party openly takes Nick Fuentes's
i'm sorry, what? Are you actually just trolling?
>>
>>536893618
>Also it was never about who were more attractive or not. We both can provide hundreds of pics and examples of ugly left and right wingers, but it is the ideological support for the tearing down of those social hierarchies that the left has supported.
How are they tearing them down if their own party operates according to them?
>i'm sorry, what? Are you actually just trolling?
Epstein files, Epstein class, etc. Nick started talking about this before the Democrats ever cared. They took his ideas because they were losing on all fronts, but they saw Nick go scorched earth on Trump and said to themselves: "that guy has motion!"
>>
>>536883980
>For instance, for a long time now, I've heard that traditional beauty standards (like what this woman adheres to) need to be torn down.
>That men shouldn't prefer women like this. They should instead prefer fat black women, apparently.
Name 5 mainstream sources that say this
>>
>>536893475
i'm talking about constant and drastic real life changes not some trend someone half-heartly follows for a few youtube videos. and i can't think of any even only half-rich person who did something like that in the past few years.

in a way it's true that only people who have some kind of wealth are able to reduce it and live "minimalism" but that doesn't really speak against it. and on a minimal level pretty much everyone can live. most people just don't want to
>>
>>536893924
wikipedia list of media houses
>>
File: space then vs now.jpg (295 KB, 860x1483)
295 KB JPG
>>536892942
You are framing Musk wrong He's a futurism salesman front manning a mostly successful and rapidly growing multi faceted company. He is successful in selling his brand of futurism and using his company to develop near future emergent or seemingly emergent (old tech that is now reasonably market viable) for the consumer and government.
The model T wasn't the best car on the market by any stretch of the imagination. It was the best car that was most producible and attainable to the emergent market.
Even if Musk doesn't achieve a Mars colony in our lifetime he is actively moving us towards it and that to me is an admirable goal. The thing I will never understand about the people that say space is a waste. Is that we live on a planet with finite resources and gaining access to and refining them pollutes our planet. Space even the extremely limited amount of it we currently have very limited access to has near limitless resources with very little ethical concern for how we harvest them so long as we don't "pollute" space by filling it with debris. The "luxury space communism" that all these utopians are trying to sell requires the space part to even try it in earnest. Most of them are selling a bill of goods that they have no intention of delivering. Elon at least appears to be attempting to be trying to move the proverbial ball forward.
>>
>>536883980
>Why, though?
Because preference implies hierarchy. A fat black woman should be equally beautiful to that redhead because otherwise they're not equal.
>>
File: 1695002655725856.png (219 KB, 606x595)
219 KB PNG
>>536893924
>I will ignore every advertisement, beauty pageant, movie studio, and video game developer saying all of this over the past 15 years.
Do you remember the Nike ads that used to have fit models and then started having fat black women?
Do you know how many brown women have won beauty pageants in countries like Sweden?
Do you remember when Victoria's Secret stopped their shows because they made women feel bad?
>>
>>536893721
They've repeatedly tried to tear them down mainly through educational, cultural and commercial institutions. The most prominent examples have been the entertainment industry the past decade. With for example the movie industry replacing attractive people, women usually, and inserting unattractive ones more often than not of some form of minority background. In the video game industry you've seen the same, but on steroids arguably since they can simply render what they want since it's obviously not recorded reality, which have caused a series of uglifying characters, especially making them artificially uglier than their real life actress's likeness. Through architecture and art they've made things more and more minimalist, brutalist, abstract, inhuman and so on. Finally more commercially, they've progressively featured advertisement including overweight, obese, unattractive and peoples of minority backgrounds which seems to be reversing very recently, but does not disprove the obvious insertion of it into our daily lives. You can not simply deny the obvious reality that ideologues have occupied NGO's, different state and private institutions to further an ideological goal; if you do, you're simply denying reality.

Also claiming that the Democratic party began criticizing Trump because of his connection with Epstein and so on because of Fuentes is a wild and obvious fraudulent misrepresentation. Are you really claiming the democrats would've never screeched about Trump and Epstein if it wasn't for Nick? I'm excited for whatever motte and bailey you're gonna produce.
>>
>>536894240
Their work shift started and they are now pretending to never have heard about any of this.

There have literally been articles in multiple languages where they complain that whites don't date enough brown women on dating apps or whatever.
>>
>>536893924
>>536893112

>>536894027
>>536894240
We really have indeed reached the "it never happened" faze. Not even unironic holocaust deniers are this blatant about it.
>>
>>536894240
shes not ugly though. and not fat or black.
>>
>>536894641
it would be an odd ideology that says someone should rather breed with low level genetics of his own race than with high level genetics of another
>>
>>536894360
>words words words
No sources ...
>Also claiming that the Democratic party began criticizing Trump because of his connection with Epstein and so on because of Fuentes is a wild and obvious fraudulent misrepresentation. Are you really claiming the democrats would've never screeched about Trump and Epstein if it wasn't for Nick
Yes, because they just jumped on the rising tide, the tide which happened because of Nick
>>
>>536892942
>>536894047
Skimming a bit through this convo and i think you're both right. People like Elon Musk are unarguably the Fords of today. Does that mean his divine intellect and god-given autism will alone drive humanity into a new golden age? of course not, but not recognizing what he has done is also disingenuous. He's not someone i really personally like either, but simply looking at him for what he is i can't really see a reason to hate, nor despise him. Is he greedy and desire to grow his wealth and capital on the cost of others? Yes i do think so, but for a man in his position it could've been a lot worse. I'd say a lot of the banking class, Epstein jew class, is a lot worse. Does he evade taxes, underpay employees, exploit third worlders and have also probably committed other immoral and illegal actions? absolutely and he should be punished for it, but that responsibility doesn't really fall on him i'd argue, but the state.
>>
>>536894848

Nigger elon partied with jeff
>>
>>536894804
>>words words words
>No sources ...
Okay, you're either actually retarded or trolling. Should've trusted Hitler when he called the slavs subhuman, didn't even attempt to produce a counter-argument nor counter-factual. Shame your forefathers weren't left as a red spot at the bottom of a gas chamber.
>>
>>536894881
Didn't jeff reject him because he's a sperg?
>>
>>536894848
but that's the point: what has he done? you can list all the inventions and projects he is responsible for and that would be a list of facts you can barely argue against. the matter of evaluation is something different though.

>but simply looking at him for what he is i can't really see a reason to hate, nor despise him

well this...

>greedy and desire to grow his wealth and capital on the cost of others
>underpay employees, exploit third worlders and have also probably committed other immoral and illegal actions

seems to be a bunch of reasons to "hate" or at least despise him. even if others were worse that wouldn't make any of those better.

he is responsible for his actions. the state is responsible for letting it happen or not. when the state is in the hands of the billionaires there's a severe problem in the system or rather the system is the problem
>>
>>536893972
While I think I understand the sentiment. There are soo many facets to why this is broken from almost every angle that I actually don't know where to begin. If the people at the top of this lived it I would be more comfortable listening to them talk about it. But they do the exact opposite. They have more everything than anyone in human history and all for the low low price of the 99.999999% of us literally having nothing but absolute soul crushing subsistence commiserate to our usefulness to them in the present moment. I don't want to be the human equivalent of a male hatchling at a McNugget factory thank you. Also we aren't even close to the most harmful to the environment. Those that are do so with impunity because current "environmentalism" as quoted by an EU official has virtually nothing to do with the environment and everything to do with manipulating the public to influence wealth redistribution. Don't get me started on how much of an absolute insult to the environment that sail boat publicity stunt Gretta pulled was. That's modern environmentalism to me and it needs to seriously, demonstratable and, fundamentally unfuck itself if it wants me to listen them again. God help me I picked this image before I started writing and can't remember what I picked
>>
Because they're ugly cunts with horrible personalities and they're jealous of prettier girls. It's not rocket science.
>>
File: race online dating.png (670 KB, 1962x1171)
670 KB PNG
>>536894505
And they backed off and buried it when there was backlash because people realized they were paying to be socially experimented on and receiving the exact opposite of what they were promised.
>>
>>536883980
How rare is cute ginger girl
They are 1% of the populating and declining. And a lot of them are old fat or masculine looking
Probably like .01% of the population.
It’s like a shiny pokemen if you’re lucky to catch it
>>
>>536895331
>he is responsible for his actions. the state is responsible for letting it happen or not
i then put more blame and responsibility on the state for their inaction rather than his actions. If a man steals my wallet i of course won't like him, but i will despise the state if they don't prosecute him.

>the state is in the hands of the billionaires
the problem is then what is to be done? Of course you could go the revolution way and just kill him and take his wealth, but that has almost never worked. I can only think of two places were a revolutionary government has actually had more power than the major capital-and landowners is that of national-socialist germany and modern china, which i'd argue is also national socialist. There weren't really any capitalists in russia at the time of their revolution, mostly just landowners, and the new soviet bureaucrats simply replaced the elites and thus became the "billionaires" of the union. Both of these systems are anti-democratic to say the least, if you go by "democracy" being the western-liberal understanding of it, and thus requires the sacrifice of democracy to attain power over this class.

Also, i don't want to put words in your mouth, but i do not care to even attmept to take seriously any ideas that this class can be abolished by orthodox marxist theory. You may call them what you want; elites, capitalists, landowners, exploiters, leaders and so on, but whatever you call it, the class itself will always persist. What should be done, and was done as stated in national-socialist germany and china, is that this class is made subservient to the nation through the party which controls the state.
>>
>>536895527
Remember when envy was seen as a bad thing?
>>
File: spiteful mutant.jpg (1.44 MB, 1869x2230)
1.44 MB JPG
>>536895527
Yes, but the reason it is encouraged and they are attempting to make it systemically doctrinal is deeper and more sinister.
>>
>>536895937
This is also a prime example of why the abolition of the church has been catastrophic. I'm not even religious, but the thing that everyone seemingly forgot is that just because you get rid of religion doesn't mean that the underlying social and psychological underpinnings it controlled and managed are suddenly gone too. Most people need religion, for if they do not have that they have no reason not to want to completely endorse individualism on the cost of everything else. Of course i'm not saying this is the only reason, it's one of a list of many, but i don't think it's as irrelevant as many people would want it to be. Arguably we have seen the rise of what i'd call neo-religions through things like environmentalism and social justice, although since neither of these are actually organized, they rarely produce anything of positive value.
>>
>>536896180
And it's true purpose is sinister
>>
>>536883980
I dont think anybody is making the argument that you arent allowed to adhere, or like traditional beauty standards, what some people argue is that you shouldnt be expected to adhere to them if you dont want to. Also, most women simply cant look like the pictured one here.
>>
>>536896426
>bioleninism
i think something like this has absolutely taken place. Not only that it has taken place, but that there's probably also been people hard at work to create these new underclasses to take advantage of. The alphabet lgbtq+ club being a prime example. It's an identity group barely 30 or 20 years old which have pledged complete and utter loyalty to their desired party simple because they uttered the words trans rights. By creating more transexuals they are securing a larger percentage of not only trans voters of course, but also their parents, friends, colleagues and so on because they're afraid of being in support of the "trans genocide"

It's honestly admirable how well this has worked if this was actually planned out.
>>
>>536895892
>If a man steals my wallet
then it is his decision and he is responsible for it. the responsibility of a state or any other higher power is another topic and doesn't dissolve individual responsibility. if there's a rapist and the state just lets him go doing it there's a responsibility of the state but the first action comes from the rapist. he could decide against it but doesn't.

about the second part: no in general i agree though i would say that national socialism in its concrete historic form was only half of a revolution because it went against the rich not hard enough and also prohibited the more socialist parts of the nsdap to gain power in the third reich basically by jailing and killing them f.e. in the night of the long knives. it was the right way though.

with china it's a bit different because there was no real open revolution towards their "national socialism" but the more or less organically evolved into that direction from the actual communist revolution decades earlier
>>
>>536883980
>>
>>536883980
The only way people will accept Marxism/Socialism is as a replacement for anarchy and a totally failed society. That's what the Red Terror was about. Based upon the French Revolution's Reign of Terror.
>>
File: LETTER TO MARX.jpg (136 KB, 577x1024)
136 KB JPG
>>536896666
>It's honestly admirable how well this has worked if this was actually planned out.
Satan you of all people should know how much easier it is to destroy than create. Especially in high trust high function societies.
>>
>>536885326
The text and video would be the shadows, the point is that the shadows are real, what they represent epistemically is the point
>>
>>536885326
That literal who is a perfect living example of the subhuman cultists conspiring and proselytizing their aspirations in our midst.

So... Yes. And sometimes they lurk in the most absurd fringes out in the open for all to see while wearing benign disguises. Often of things we might otherwise think well of while they stir their poisonous cauldron. You might be truly disgusted to find where it pops up and under the moniker of. Were it not for solitary autists showing them in the artificial light of a nazi frog posting finger box forum the world would never know until it was too late.
https://platypus1917.org/
>>
I am white female and right wing and can't understand why any brown man anywhere on earth wouldn't want me to heel check them directly in their prefrontal cortex. If you are a white man or any kind of man I hate you.
>>
>>536883980
>Something I've never understood about leftists, Marxists, or whatever you want to call them is their incessant need to tear down norms, hierarchies, and structures.
What's to understand? That's the whole point of leftism: destruction for the sake of destruction, because they love darkness rather than the light.
>>
>>536883980
>Something I've never understood about leftists, Marxists, or whatever you want to call them is their incessant need to tear down norms, hierarchies, and structures.
IT IS QUITE SIMPLE :
All of these groups, whatever you wnat to call them, boil down to one fundamental reason for their insanity....they hate anything/anyone that reminds them of Lord Jesus Christ. It's really just *that* simple.

Normalcy reminds them of God. Thus they hate anything & everything that is normal. It's why a seemingly "white" person hates Whites...because God Almighty came as a Nazarene. It's why feminism....they have "daddy issues". It's why Greenpeace & PETA will team up to defend massive muslim immigration into The West....it makes zero sense otherwise....it's ALWAYS because deep down it's that they hate Jesus Christ.

It is why Leftists will even larp as "christians", and push all sorts of unScriptural garbage as though it was 'christian', and then other heathens will go on a propaganda blitz promoting such antiChristian 'christian' garbage here on /pol/.....hatred for Lord Jesus Christ.
>>
>>536898791
>I am white female and right wing
good one, very funny, this isn't a humor thread though.
>>
File: Negative_Dialectics.jpg (69 KB, 994x1497)
69 KB JPG
>>536883980
Because current marxism spin around the ideology call
>Negative Dialects
And this final form of kike marxism dictate that everything should be face against itself, family against family, friends against friends, all type of relationship and also how you see the world.
>>
>>536884566
/thread
>>
>>536883980
Because a marxists goal isn't reform for the better, it's to destroy everything you hold dear.
>>
>>536889146
>what are conservatives conserving
You have to stop retarded posts and threads like that. READ Below, retard:

>>536884215
>Don't focus on what they're tearing down, but that they're not replacing it with anything.
>Chaos in this form is driven from above They will not answer, because they don't have any idea what they want.
Agree.
Correct.
Women are used by agents of chaos right now. To create more chaos.
> Ask a leftist what a great world looks like,
>>
>>536883980
mot of them are complete failures with a small number of delusional idealists sprinkled in. They have never been good at anything, never fit in anywhere so why they should care about any of it? To them it is preferable to tear it down to turn into a tranny theme park or whatever where they fit in
>>
File: 1778694007833985.jpg (1.33 MB, 1840x2342)
1.33 MB JPG
>>536893112
>Guess which of these people is a leftist and which is a rightist.
Let's pick correct pictures.
>>
File: repressive tolerance.png (805 KB, 1004x731)
805 KB PNG
>>536899143
All based on an intentional extreme interpretation of Hegelian dialectic as expressed through the warped lenses of the Frankfurt schools founders.
>>
>>536899143
That's what Jesus wanted
>>
File: jd2.jpg (102 KB, 1080x1440)
102 KB JPG
"the child who is rejected by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth" so on and so forth
>>
>>536883980
You're talking about jews again migger. Capitalist jews control Hollywood, advertising, and the media.
>>
>>536883980
There is nothing wrong with questioning norms. You are conflating two different things.

Now that "fat black woman" norms are in place - you yourself are in favour of tearing them down. Does that make you a leftist/marxist or whatever?
>>
File: libera anti hiraeth.jpg (200 KB, 576x924)
200 KB JPG
>>536899513
>Ask a leftist what a great world looks like,
Not picrel. Their "tree of life is inverted" so their sense of hiraeth is as perverse as they are.
>>
>>536884098
>right wingers are against hierarchy
nigger
>>
>>536899683
Is this a trick question?
>>
>>536899717
shut the fuck up you retarded nigger
>>
File: 1774983100995324.jpg (110 KB, 819x1024)
110 KB JPG
>dese leftosts iz the reazin why there's niggerz on television
>>
File: tradfu.jpg (38 KB, 412x531)
38 KB JPG
>>536899891
>reeeeeeeeee
>t. rejected incel loser
>>
File: grace.jpg (139 KB, 1365x1227)
139 KB JPG
>>536899891
really hit home and struck nerve didnt it turkroach?
>>
>>536896426
>>536896666
"High-low vs middle" is another name for this.
>>
File: 1781210615227274.jpg (51 KB, 576x1024)
51 KB JPG
>>
>>536899949
>>536899980
>quoting retarded nigger quote from reddit
kys faggot
>>
>>536899717
We have already discussed angry mutant theory and it's application in context of the thread.
>>536899949
>t. childish midwit completely glossing over the discussion at hand to fling petty insults and pointless shit like a chimp.
>>
File: jd.png (1001 KB, 791x1024)
1001 KB PNG
>>536900421
it is called spiteful mutant and spiteful mutant is a theory by evolutionary psychologist Ed Dutton based on genetic mutations which is not the same thing I was referring too (which is an ancient african proverb) mouth breathing cockswaddle

>>536900130
lol you are so mad. hurts dont it?
>>
>>536900038
It's in line with their doctrine in totality.
>>
>>536900421
>childish midwit
oh the ironing board, chefs kiss
>>
File: read this please.jpg (87 KB, 666x666)
87 KB JPG
>>536900736
>spiteful mutant is a theory by evolutionary psychologist Ed Dutton based on genetic mutations which is not the same thing I was referring too (which is an ancient african proverb) mouth breathing cockswaddle
They are functionally the same thing.
The spurned outcast attacks their own village/society/angry mutant theory is functionally the same thing. They are creating the angry mutants through intentional demoralization and systematic indoctrination specifically to tear down society in the way they are programmed. You're repeating what has already pointed out and explained and acting like a smug twat about it.
>>
File: prang-crayons-1.jpg (110 KB, 860x587)
110 KB JPG
>>536901054
Further more in returning to the original point of the thread. They are attempting to systematically tear down concepts like beauty standards to make not being or wanting to be an angry mutant a type original sin. That is entirely in line with cultural Marxism and measuring their success in doing so is a metric of their progress towards driving societal collapse in general. Do I have to break out my scanner and draft you an explanation in a format you might comprehend?
>>
File: what women want.jpg (133 KB, 1024x1024)
133 KB JPG
>>536900736
Also what have you actually contributed to the discussion exactly? Supplanting a recognized sociopolitical theory with a literal reddit nigger quote? Random thot image and rage bait posting? I feel like you are pretending to be a pidgin at a chess club here.
>>
>>536883980
envy. that's all there ever was to it.
they wish they were hot, but they're not, so beauty is bad.
they wish they were rich, but they're not, so wealth is bad.
they wish they were smart, but they're not, so math is racist.
they wish they were strong, but they're not, so fitness is right-wing, apparently.
this is the entirety of the leftoid's psychology and "politics"
>>
File: 656556456554.jpg (350 KB, 1268x1241)
350 KB JPG
>>
File: consensus filter liberals.png (1.9 MB, 1536x1481)
1.9 MB PNG
>>536901799
That is who is being corralled by this campaign. Who and why is the discussion anon. The who and why all flows back to the same general stream.
>>
File: talmud on christians.jpg (87 KB, 580x413)
87 KB JPG
>>536902665
Kikes hate Christians and Christianity and subvert and debase it at any and every opportunity.
>>
File: 435646534454.png (366 KB, 1122x1834)
366 KB PNG
>>536898977
Christcucks are traitors on a spiritual level. This gives them glee. Subverting the kin selection/in-group preference of the Romans was literally what the first and most successful psyop ever (christcuckery) was created to do.
>>
>>536883980
Hirachies tend to prefer the outsider over the natives.
It's the rich who are trmpling on us.
Plus next step is teenage voting. this will hopefully lead to making teenage marriage great again (wich was normal in the past) and bettwer birthrate.
Traditional Hirarchies tell you, to turn the other cheek, to call the cops, or "i don't think so mate"
Plus leftist actually do shit:
Atomwaffendivision: Teenage Skinhead sreaming of Anarchy and getting arrested over the Hitler Salute.
Vulkangruppen: Actual Terrorost doing acttual Blackouts



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.