But you got a sexbot out of it? Think like a really realistic version that normally costs like $150k or more? In exchange for this bot, you get a modest salary. You'll be building a major piece of infrastructure in the remote tundra of Canada, Alaska, or Russia. The governments would do this since they can't pay people enough to live there. The only requirements to join would be:>IQ above 100>net worth in excess of $25k>minimum age of 25>male (no troons)>pass a physical exam>pass a drug test>must live in the zone for at least 10 years>if you stay for 15 years, you get to have a kid via surrogacy that is paid for>earnings are taxed at like 5%>politics are quasi-independent of the host countryWould you move there? And what would the politics of a place free of women look like?
>>536903225hell yes!
>>536903225no, I'd just the buy the Bot like that.t. not a poorfag subhuman
>>536903225No.
>>536903225>You'll be building a major piece of infrastructure>net worth in excess of $25klol
4chin fatties wouldnt survive among men. You'd have to fend for yourself. Can you imagine? You faggots NEED the nanny state.
The mere idea of having a sexbot in my house terrifies me worse than raising a pet wolf. Imagine a plastic with steel armature copy of a 20 year old Michelle Pfeiffer? And she suddenly malfunction/functioned to bit your dick off with her powerful teeth?
>>536903225Nah men are also retarded and robots are soulless homonculi. Put me alone on a desert island or something instead with a bunch of teenage native girls who can't speak english
>>536903225Absolutely all of that sounds terrible.Did you think “sexbot” was like a deal sweetener or something? You know normal people, even incels, have zero interest in owning one, right?You are in some coomer echo chamber where you think this shit is a normal thing, it isn’t.
>>536903225>Would You Move to a Place That Was Male OnlyThis is announcement to all faggots and whores
>>536903225Palantir trying to test the market for Praxis how much of /pol/ is Palantir paid spam?
>>536903225Sure
>>536903225I think the bot would get annoying. Youd just be living in a homosexual society
>>536903551Sexbots would probably be designed with fairly low physical strength. There's just no need for the robot to be that powerful and it does create a safety issue. A sexbot that's easy to physically overpower would be a far superior option for many reasons.Even the teeth wouldn't need to be hard or sharp, the robot isn't going to be eating with them.
This thread was moved to >>>/bant/24492304
