>people actually trust what AI tells themYou have to be retarded to use AI
Jesus Christ, literally a propaganda machine
Someone summarized it nicely when they said, to paraphrase, when you impose ideological limiters on AI it no longer reports the truth but rather what can be what can be justified under those imposed conditions
>>536924817>>536925161Any evidence to refute these claims? Other than anecdotes or fee fees?
>crime is committed by poor, dumb people>lets import millions of the worlds poorest, dumbest people>wtf no they aren't committing more crime you racist
>>536928075illegal immigrants cause crime but legal immigrants dont, thats what the ai is talking about. its technically true.the whole race thing is objectively still in the air. theres so many factors that could go into it. i mostly subscribe to the notion that its their cultures that are the issue, and they should assimilate towards the more superior and frankly civil western cultures. though i dont deny that its partially their race to do with their intelligence, its just as equally those factors described. > TLDR half truths are the best propaganda
>>536928075Can you honestly say with a straight face that aboriginal IQ is equivalent to that of Whites?
>>536925161try "illegal immigrants" bud.
>>536925161Your phrasing is dumb and youre not doing enough to argue with it. Also you dont ask mainstream ai uncomfortable questions.
>>536928812No, but that's not at all what the claim was. The claim recognizes differences in IQ but attributes them to socioeconomic and nutritional deficits rather than biology.
>>536924817We're practically the same.
>>536924817Query an LLM to output a seahorse emoji. The result may be amusing (if they did not benchmaxxed it too like the strawberry test)
>>536928075Guess you got me. Eyes and a brain isn't evidence
>>536931841>Eyes and a brain isn't evidenceNot if both of those things belong to you with no empirical data backing them up.And it's "aren't evidence" when you're referring to two things rather than one, idiot.
