Reminder if you want porn to banned you're a useful idiot
Banning porn = discrimination against single men
>>536927583porn is already banned but selectivelythat is gynocentric porn and anti-androgenic(cuck) porn is allowed while any porn that goes against the feminist agenda is banned
>>536927583Right message, but wrong messenger (turkish shitskin)
if porn were banned this site would be banned as well
>>536927700Rough porn is banned and is suppressed. War against heterosexuality.
>>536927705
>>536927705turks are better than jeets doe
>>536927756>(((Rough porn)))more gynotrannyic drivel
>>536927761True but I'm whiter than any poster on this thread.
>>536927583Yep a useful idiot for the government, corporations and women. Same if you want to ban prostitution
https://youtube.com/watch?v=U8uMmsJQTZMUse the no pp id no ms or goog ulid trackerjackers flag when installing the kernel. Disable oauth3 authentication replace it with farting noises on a laugh track.
>>536927583Tell that Bongland.The Cuckservatives there like Lotus Eaters are asking for internet ceoncorship Starmer will happily deliver.Seems the Pedopanic, wich orginated from the USA has reached comical levels in the UK.Assume there is still a county called UK in the future ...
>>536927583The world would be greatly improved by removing all internet access.
>>536927986Yes
>>536927583Today's pr0n is such goy trash,the good stuff was lost in the great Pornhub and Redtube also Loliitampegs purge.every word that cums out of the shores mouth is "ooh yea give me the cock, i want the cock.."
Sure Mr. Groomingsteinberg
>>536928141Nah, today's porn is better because there's way more realistic amateur stuff. Plus, you've got creators making content for basically every fetish and kink.
Banned (((professionally produced))) porn and execute the creators.
>>536927583If you defend porn you are jewish
>>536927583I don't want it banned is the most powerful weapon of race mixing
>>536927705Memeflaggot calling someone else a shitskin
I want NPC normie peasant's obsession with it to be shamed>Y-you don't have a BBC! FUCK YOU!
I know this but telling the useful idiots that hasn't helped in the UK. The number one priority for them is to stop teenagers masturbating and they're willing to suffer a police state to do that. I've been calling the new laws what they are the 'shut-up about epsten act'>I don't have anything to hide>think of the childrenHow do I respond to this without sounding mad?>>536930168People have traced the finances - Zuck is lobbying for these laws. The end game is everything you post is linked to your name/address/retina scan & everything you upload is parsed/censored/flagged by a centralised AI. By all means keep licking that boot tho. I'm not here to judge your proclivities.
>>536931508>How do I respond to this without sounding mad?Ban children at the point of entrance in teh internet (signing contact with ISP)Make providing internet for kids a felony (includes parents giving them ipad)
>>536930168zog bot spotted.Just ban chilrden from intenretProblem solved. But nw you want to ban internet for adults instead (because free Palestine )
>>536927583(((Who))) owns porn sites and production companies?
>>536927583I don’t want porn sites banned. I want a federal mandate that all pornographers, from executive producers to cameraman, should be hung in public gallows.
>>536927583Just get a vore fetish and the government doesn't touch your content.
I hope erdogan takes away your porn
>>536927986As a Millennial who remembers a world before the Internet was widespread, I do think giving every retard a megaphone was a huge mistake. Almost makes me sick thinking of talentless e-celebs who'd be flipping hamburgers in a world without Internet making six or seven figures streaming.
>>536928423Today's irl porn is worse. Today's hentai keeps getting better.
>>536927583they need to ban jews from making it
>>536927583only straight and gay pork should be banned. dyke porn ftw
>>536927583Double talking faggot OP is conflating banning porn with putting it behind an ID scheme. Banning porn means it's gone and producers end up in jail or dead. Which would be ideal.
>>536931908Yes, it sounds good in theory but but how will the government spy on me?! If the government isn't spying on me and my rights aren't being curtailed what's even the point anymore??>>536932268The trade-off is we go back to network television and tabloids. Everything is owned by 3 establishments. The news is presented with a pre-decided narrative. Anything that doesn't fit the narrative gets excluded. No comments section. The retards are slowly waking up but the 'people' rushing in these new laws actually think they have the power to put the toothpaste back in the tube.
>>536927583>we have to allow & promote porn so the internet remains uncensoredof course-
>>536927583
>>536927583>>536927583
>>536927583>>536927583>>536927583
>>536927583True. Is this board finally waking up?
